Andrew Branca and William Jacobson will analyze the good, the bad, and the ugly of the case, and what went right and wrong, in the context of threats of violence if there was a ‘not guilty’ verdict.
Now that the trial of Derek Chauvin for the in-custody death of George Floyd is over with conviction on all three counts, including Second Degree Murder, the Legal Insurrection Foundation is holding an online event to analyze the good, the bad, and the ugly of the case, and what went right and wrong.
As he did with the George Zimmerman trial, Attorney Andrew Branca of The Law of Self-Defense covered the Chauvin trial for Legal Insurrection from jury selection through verdict, providing the most in-depth and perceptive analysis anywhere. I’d like to think I also contributed something of value.
Legal Insurrection will hold an online event on Wednesday night, April 21, 2021, at 8 p.m. Eastern, at which Andrew and I will be able to give you our assessments of the facts and the law presented in court, within the broader context of activists demanding a conviction under threat of burning cities.
There will be an opportunity for Q&A.
You can register HERE.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.