Image 01 Image 03

Flashbacks to Kamala Harris’ wacky policies and behavior

Flashbacks to Kamala Harris’ wacky policies and behavior

Harris would be the President-in-Waiting in a Biden White House, and contrary to the NY Times, she’s no “pragmatic moderate”

With Kamala Harris’ designation as Joe Biden’s running mate, comes the narrative battle.

The NY Times immediately pegged Harris as a “pragmatic moderate,” the line Democrats will be following in describing Harris.

The narrative battle over Harris is much more important than for most other VP picks because everyone expects that Biden will not make it through a full term, and if for some reason he did, he’s definiately not running again. Harris would be the President-in-Waiting in a Biden White House.

She’s a lightweight, as I noted after one of her many primary debate debacles:

Kamala Harris proved me wrong — I’ve viewed her as someone whose intellect is a mile wide and an inch deep. I’d like to revise that assessment — her intellect is a mile wide and half-an-inch deep. There’s no there, there.

Being a lightweight isn’t the worst thing a VP could be.

I scrolled through our Kamala Harris Tag to review some of our coverage of Harris, and was surprised both how much we have written about her, but also how wacky she has been. She’s no pragmatic moderate.

So, because I’m lazy tonight, rather than writing it up again, here are my series of tweets of Flashbacks to Harris’ political craziness.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


She’s through-n-through AA. It ain’t competence.

Comanche Voter | August 11, 2020 at 9:10 pm

Like any good little Ho, she’ll assume any position you want–and ask for more.

    That’s the vulgar word for her problem and why no one trusts her. She will say anything to get to the next square. The Marxists don’t trust her either. Neither do blacks. But the Deep Staters want her.

    So now they have a Trojan Horse “moderate” set up to either step down, be removed or die in office soon making way for an utterly corrupt “moderate” for the globalists to control should it become necessary and there is your problem.

    Willie Brown advised her not to seek the veep position because there is no power there and to instead campaign for Attorney General. She is too ambitious and impatient and would quickly become a major liability for a president Biden. She is counting on the Gaffe King to quickly present an opportunity for her to stab him in the back to seize the throne. She is very likely to already be campaigning to have him removed.

    This is a very bad ticket for the Dems who can’t possibly be expecting to win with it. What’s the deadline for replacing Biden at the top? December 8? That is what I expect to happen should the ticket not self-destruct before the election and the win the election. If they lose, they can always say they gave Bernie what he wanted and nominated the first black woman to a presidential ticket so it wasn’t a total loss.

    But it’s the end of the Bernies who will have laid waste to American cities and so will end up taking the blame. That opens the way for the Obama/Soros/Masters of the Universe crowd. BLM brown shirts haave done their job and the pieces will reassemble into its something else “useful”, like… the Gestapo? A November loss will be the “night of the long knives” for those brown shirts. Just a change of uniforms.

      One circulating rumor (among teachers of all people) is that Biden will step aside or die before the election, and be replaced by

      wait for it

      Michelle Obama.

        That’s okay with me. I believe her when she says she doesn’t want it and besides she is not Barrack. Were she to lose, that would be the end of the Obama legacy too (except for all of his acolytes who will be in prison soon). They won’t risk it since Biden losing clears the landscape of the Clintons, the Bushies and all of Obama’s budding Democrat enemies. This is now about 2024 and the return of the Obama machine, or whatever is left of it.

      notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Pasadena Phil. | August 12, 2020 at 12:34 pm

      This is the end of Soros, and all Globalist families.

Kamala was the Obama pick and has been likely decided for some time (about the time Obama finally decided to show up and campaign).

Obama might as well be in the white house if she wins. And if you’re wondering about which Obama, I’m referring to Moochy.

    The only upside of Harris getting into the White House versus moochelle obama is that she won’t eat as much food and stress the buildings’ sewer system, as was from 2008 to 2012.

    It doesn’t really matter who the candidates are. It’s necessary to be a Marxist, liar and lunatic (or a good enough actor to play the role) to be in Democrat politics at the national level. If they were to win, the party establishment will staff the government and run most everything anyway.

Wait a sec … is that the Kamala Harris before or after plastic surgery?

Pragmatism is a situation specific behavior. We could examine her record as a legal professional, say as an attorney general, or as a member of the senate judiciary committee, or we could check with Ed Brown. As for the moderate part? No.

Monumental disaster for joe biden and the dnc. This is so bad I have to wonder what kind of democrat stratergery is at work here. I’m guessing it’s plain old TDS. Californians saw kamala’s failures and corruption up close and personal. Normally a VP candidate should bring something useful to the ticket, such as guaranteeing their home state. I believe this pick hurts the dem ticket in California. Sure they’re likely to get CA’s 55 electoral votes anyway, but JFC, what a blunder. These politicians are totally exposed. Naked emporers who never had a clue about how to run government on any level, but sure got rich pretending to do so.

    My2centshere in reply to CKYoung. | August 11, 2020 at 11:23 pm

    She only got 7% in her home state. She’s a fraudster any everybody knows.

    bhwms in reply to CKYoung. | August 12, 2020 at 11:35 am

    Maybe they’ve already decided to throw 2020, using other tactics like challenging the election, calling it illegitimate, house investigations, etc to undermine Trump for another 4 years? Which means they think they will keep the House.

      notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to bhwms. | August 12, 2020 at 12:37 pm

      They’re going to get a House dropped on their heads…..

      markymark in reply to bhwms. | August 12, 2020 at 1:21 pm

      I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s the case. The only chance the Dems have is massive fraud but punting this off to 2024 makes perfect sense to me. They get to bitch about illegitimacy and racism for the next four years, especially if the Dems keep the House.

Kamala Harris is low-rent.

She is where she is because she sexually serviced Willie Brown.

That’s why she’s so angry – she’s just like another low-rent hack who made it to where she is because of someone else: Hillary Clinton. (At least Bill married the witch.) Her rage covers her insecurity of herself knowing she’s undeserving of being where she is and her insecurities of performing in her various — er — positions.

All we’ll see of her is anger and hate.

It would be fun to start a fundraiser to pay a prize to the first journalist, if any is left, that asks her:
“Do you still believe Biden’s accusers?”

Hadda larf at her Wiki page … they are calling her an Asian American and African American.

Isn’t that cultural appropriation?

Damn, I thought I had stored up all the popcorn I could possibly need, and then comes dopey Joe picking the only other democrat to accuse him of racism on the big stage and add sexual predator to that.

Brilliant. A winning strategy. Apparently the damnocrats are letting Trump choose their ticket.

notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | August 11, 2020 at 11:12 pm

Remember Kamala wants to go back to Obama’s Iran Nuclear Deal.

DNC’s MSM already issued their dictates for sucking up to Kamla.

HT to spoogels

“What the media can and can’t say about Biden’s running mate

A group called “We Have Her Back” has sent a remarkable memo to “News Division Heads, Editors in Chiefs, Bureau Chiefs, Political Directors, Editors, Producers, Reporters, and Anchors.” In the memo, the authors tell the media leaders how to cover the female whom Joe Biden will select as his running mate. They even graciously offer to provide the mainstream media with guidance as the campaign progresses. And they warn that they “will be watching you.”

To:News Division Heads, Editors in Chiefs, Bureau Chiefs, Political Directors, Editors, Producers, Reporters, and Anchors

From: Fatima Goss Graves(National Women’s Law Center),
Ilyse Hogue(NARAL)
Valerie Jarrett,
Alexis McGill Johnsonand
Melanie Newman(Planned Parenthood), Debra Ness(National Partnership for Women and Families),
Cecile Richards(Supermajority),
Jess Morales Rocketto,
Hilary Rosen,
Stephanie Shriock and
Christina Reynolds (Emily’s List), Tina Tchen(TimesUp

After the obligatory pablum about George Floyd and “inequality,” the authors provide a partial list of things they are forbidding:

• Reporting on a woman’s ambition as though the very nature of seeking political office, or any higher job for that matter is not a mission of ambition
• Relationships with partners, staff, colleagues and donors are characterized differently if the woman is not seen as subservient or supportive
• Reporting on whether a woman is liked (a subjective metric at best) as though it is news when the “likeability” of men is never considered a legitimate news story.
• Reporting, even as asides in a story, on a woman’s looks, weight, tone of voice, attractiveness and hair is sexist news coverage unless the same analysis is applied to every candidate
• Reporting on questions of electability of women is, in itself, a perpetuation of a stereotype about the ability of women to lead
• Reporting on doubts women may not be qualified leaders even when they have experience equal to or exceeding male leaders
• Reporting on the heritage of Black women or women of color perpetuates a misunderstanding about who is legitimately American
• Reporting on and using pictures of a woman’s, particularly black women, show of anger at injustice or any other kind of passion in communication perpetuates racist tropes that suggest unfairly that women are too emotional or irrational in their leadership or worse “hate America”

Her “moderation” is a style thing, part of her performance art, part of why she is seen as phony. So easy to see through.

Her lack of core, besides opportunism, and poor decision making is another matter.

notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | August 11, 2020 at 11:19 pm

For what it’s worth.

Wikileaks Releases Treasure Trove O Documents On Kamala Harris…

I will laugh like crazy if she causes Trump to win California.

Live by the kneepad, perish by the kneepad.

In other news, Popcorn futures up.

Anacleto Mitraglia | August 12, 2020 at 4:23 am

So, a question: what happens if Sleepy Joe doesn’t make it to November, say after a disastrous televised match with Trump? Will KH be the automatic candidate for POTUS, or will DNC have another take? Or will it it be the second-best candidate per number of delegates, IE Bernie Sanders? And in the latter case, will a new nominee choose another person for VP, or will he/she be legally bound to stick with KH?

buckeyeminuteman | August 12, 2020 at 6:34 am

Peepads and Kneepads 2020!

Another thought, the real loser for the Dems is Tulsi Gabbard. She won every debate and was clearly the strongest candidate. If I were Trump, although she leans hard left, I would be working on her to switch parties. Being a viable threat to the Obama legacy, she will be going nowhere as a Democrat. She may even morph to the right as a Republican. Nothing to lose trying.

I am surprised these flashbacks contained no mention of her role in the prosecution of the reporter who broke the story of Planned Parenthood selling baby parts!

BierceAmbrose | August 13, 2020 at 10:50 pm

She’s a self-righteous authoritarian, an administrative state fasist of opportunity – their only, yet consistent, position