Image 01 Image 03

Tucker Carlson: NYT Doing Story On My House Location ‘to Injure my Wife and Kids’

Tucker Carlson: NYT Doing Story On My House Location ‘to Injure my Wife and Kids’

“Their story about where we live is slated to run the paper this week. Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run. I called them today and I told them. But they didn’t care. They hate my politics.”

Tucker Carlson told his audience on Fox News that The New York Times plans to publish the location of his house.

He claims the publication wants to do this to injure his wife and kids to make him “shut up and stop disagree[ing] with them.”

Carlson moved his family in 2018 after an ANTIFA mob attacked his house while he was on the air. His wife locked herself in the pantry and called 911. Luckily their four kids were not at home.

Now Carlson might have to move again.

The Daily Wire has the transcript:

One more thing before we go tonight. Since this show began almost four years ago, I’ve really tried not to talk about myself on the air or even use the first-person pronoun. The last thing this country needs is more narcissism. It’s not very interesting anyway.

People who use the word “I” a lot tender for everyone but themselves but tonight were going to make an exception to that rule. We don’t have much choice. Last week The New York Times began working on a story about where my family and I live. As a matter of journalism there is no conceivable justification for a story like that. The paper is not alleging we’ve done anything wrong and we haven’t. We pay our taxes. We like our neighbors. We’ve never had a dispute with anyone.

So why is The New York Times doing a story on the location of my family’s house? Well, you know why. To hurt us, to injure my wife and kids so that I will shut up and stop disagree with them. They believe in force. We’ve learn that. Two years ago, a left-wing journalism was publicized our home address in Washington. A group of screaming antifa lunatics showed up while I was at work. They vandalized our home. They threatened my wife. She called 911 while hiding in a closet. A few weeks later they showed up again at our house. For the next year, they sent letters to our home threatening to kill us. We tried to ignore it and felt cowardly to sell our home and leave. We raised our kids there the neighborhood and we loved it. But in the end that’s what we did. We have four children. It just wasn’t worth it.

But The New York Times followed us. The paper has assigned a political activist called Murray Carpenter to write a story about where we are now. They’ve hired a photographer called Tristan Spinski to take pictures. Their story about where we live is slated to run the paper this week. Editors there know exactly what will happen to my family when it does run. I called them today and I told them. But they didn’t care. They hate my politics. They want they show off the air. If one of my children gets hurt because of a story they wrote, they won’t considered it collateral damage, they know it’s the whole point of the exercise: To inflict pain on our family, to terrorize us, to control we say. That’s the kind of people they are.

They’ll deny this of course, they’ll it’s just journalism, just the facts. Really? So, how would Murray Carpenter and his photographer Tristan Spinski feel if we told you where they live, if we put pictures of their homes on the air? What if we publicized the home address of everyone of the soulless robot editors at The New York Times who assigned and manage this incitement to violence against my family? What about the media editor, Jim Windolf? We could do that. We know who they are. Would that qualify as journalism? We doubt they’d consider it journalism. They’d call it criminal behavior if we did it and that tells you everything.

The NYT responded:

“While we do not confirm what may or may publish in future editions, The Times has not and does not plan to expose any residence of Tucker Carlson’s, which Carlson was aware of before tonight’s broadcast.”


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Expect many, many more pre-election stink bombs like this from the left. There is nothing too outrageous for them to try.

    mailman in reply to Rab. | July 21, 2020 at 9:42 am

    Given the left is all in on keeping the country locked down so that people HAVE to vote by mail then this isnt a stretch that they would do this kind of thing to someone they dont like.

    JusticeDelivered in reply to Rab. | July 21, 2020 at 3:32 pm

    A NYT stooge will leak the address, and then NYT will gleefully report all the details, including the address.

    To make sleaze bags understand, they need personal experience.

      CorkyAgain in reply to JusticeDelivered. | July 21, 2020 at 7:26 pm

      It doesn’t need to be anyone from the NYT who leaks his address. Now that they’ve put the idea out there, the left’s SJW army of doxers is probably already on the case.

      When the address is leaked, as I’m afraid it inevitably will, I hope some stout patriots show up at Tucker’s house to help him defend it and his family. He shouldn’t have to move again and he shouldn’t have to stand up to this kind of harassment alone.

        henrybowman in reply to CorkyAgain. | July 22, 2020 at 6:37 pm

        To the contrary, I hope some stout patriots show up at the homes of Carpenter and Spinski. It’s time these people reap what they’ve been sowing.

This is truly frightening…to openly INVITE terrorism and encourage harmful actions against someone who has differing views…Is the Revolution here???

    RWGinger in reply to PaulB. | July 21, 2020 at 9:28 am

    I think WE will and have to be the Revolution

    TrickyRicky in reply to PaulB. | July 21, 2020 at 9:31 am

    I can’t really imagine who down-voted your comment. The scenario is pretty damn straight forward. I guess Rags must still be lurking about in the shrubbery.

    RWGinger in reply to PaulB. | July 21, 2020 at 10:41 am

    I accidently hit the dislike key. I meant to hit like
    but I do think We will have to be the ones who step up

      JusticeDelivered in reply to RWGinger. | July 21, 2020 at 3:44 pm

      Aiming for reply, oops, it happens to all of us. Many web sites all both up and down votes to be toggled on and off. That might be a simple setting in the software.

        henrybowman in reply to JusticeDelivered. | July 22, 2020 at 6:41 pm

        After experimentation (sorry for the downtick!) I’ve determined that any attempt to re-tick just gets “Already voted.” I realize the financial/technical limitations here, but this is truly the Duplo of comment software. 🙁

    antisocialjustice in reply to PaulB. | July 22, 2020 at 3:37 pm

    Yes the revolution is here. Well, one revolution is here. Is it a revolution or a criminal conspiracy? I think the latter.

    Regardless, the revolution that some people want is here and the left and its institutions are actively prosecuting it.

    Soon, the people they are claiming are the oppressors, are mostly unaware there is a war on. They think it is simply another tantrum by children who constantly throw them.

Dusty Pitts | July 21, 2020 at 9:31 am

I believe the New Yourk Times…
…is lying.

    JusticeDelivered in reply to Dusty Pitts. | July 21, 2020 at 3:56 pm

    I have a vague memory of a time when NYT was a reputable publication, but it has been so long, the memory is nearly gone.

The only way to stop a bully is to fight back.

    MarkS in reply to Exiliado. | July 21, 2020 at 2:14 pm

    Which Tucker refuses to do. Last time he got scared, he moved, but guess what Tucker, they found you and will continue until you put a stop to it….not someone else,…you!

      Milhouse in reply to MarkS. | July 21, 2020 at 5:24 pm

      Excuse me? What exactly could he have done differently, last time? And if the address had been published this time he would have had no choice but to move again. But now it won’t be published, because he told the NYT what would happen if it were.

        henrybowman in reply to Milhouse. | July 22, 2020 at 6:45 pm

        He could publish the home addresses of Carpenter and Spinski, for one. Then wave an envelope on the air and say, “Joe Kahn, tune in next week if you don’t clean up your mess.”

buckeyeminuteman | July 21, 2020 at 9:55 am

“By Any Means Necessary” means exactly that. The regressive, rabid Left will destroy the economy, kill children, dissolve public trust and anything else they think gets in the way of removing Trump from office. There will be blood leading up to November. And there will be a lot more of it in the weeks and months after the Election. If they’ll come after Carlson, they’ll come after you too.

texansamurai | July 21, 2020 at 9:57 am

Where are the 4chan folks, et al? Why not dox the entire staff(including the owners) of the NYT? If they’re not going to honor/respect you then why honor/respect them? time for a few expedient flash mobs to visit the NYT folks in person/at their homes

thad_the_man | July 21, 2020 at 10:03 am

Huh the latest news, often guest on his show Cathy Areu claims he sexually harassed her.

    johnny dollar in reply to thad_the_man. | July 21, 2020 at 10:27 am

    I always thought she looked crazy. She was one of the standard left wing punching bags Fox would have on to give “balance” to a segment. I never heard her make a single remark that wasn’t stupid.

    MAJack in reply to thad_the_man. | July 21, 2020 at 11:14 am

    The psycho loon? Now that’s funny.

    Milhouse in reply to thad_the_man. | July 21, 2020 at 11:23 am

    She actually claims “sexual misconduct”, but nothing she alleges, even if true, would amount to that.

    Meanwhile, co-plaintiff Cathy Areu accuses fellow Fox News stars Tucker Carlson, Sean Hannity and Howard Kurtz of sexual misconduct alongside Henry. Areu, a former Fox journalist and frequent guest on Fox News programs, claims she was rarely asked back onto Carlson’s show after turning down an invitation to join him in his hotel room. Areu also claims she turned down a similar invitation from Kurtz, who is alleged to have told her “in sum and in substance, ‘You’re the only woman here who won’t come to my hotel room.’” The complaint also accuses Henry of sending Areu sexually explicit messages, and states that Hannity encouraged his male crew members to take Areu on a date, calling her a “beautiful woman.”

      SDN in reply to Milhouse. | July 21, 2020 at 12:00 pm

      What’s in their wallets? Forensic audits of them and their families should be step one.

IMO, the public square, place of business whether physical or virtual are all ok for protests. As long as they are peaceful protests, peaceful defined as not making threats, not using illegal sound amplifiers or blocking ingress or egress.

Following people’s families to harass them in a restaurant or at their kids school is out of bounds. Showing up at people’s homes is beyond the pale.

That said, the d, SJW, anarchist movement thinks this is an acceptable tactic. If the adults, presuming that any exist, on the d side refuse to condemn and denounce this behavior then they have moved the mark on what is considered acceptable.

The consequences are potentially very dangerous. First, the immediate victims are likely to defend their families and homes as the folks in St Louis did. Provoking an armed confrontation at a home is totally irresponsible, the consequences will be dire.

Secondly, do the folks pursuing this course of action not realize that rent a mobs can be turned loose on them? Do they really think that the r party and voices on the right are all a bunch of soft handed county club republicans who wouldn’t dare to retaliate in kind?

The d are allowing their party to be represented in public by anarchist mobs. Burning, looting, assaulting and killing. The deep blue government officials are allowing this. They are encouraging and endorsing this by their refusal to pursue criminal charges.

The d own this mess. They will reap the bitter harvest of their planting. One way or another. Hopefully they intervene to end this before we move past a point of no return to a place of tragedy.

The New York Times is part of a subscription bundle for national news to be reported in the local and regional newspapers.

These papers carry essentially 2 sources: The NYT and the Washington Post. I’ve pointed this out to my local paper, which indignantly replied that they use lots of sources, including the AP, never mind that the AP is derivative.

It’s time to write to the local papers, and demand they expand the scope of news. There are other, well-known, longterm news sources, both print and online, covering the national news. Further, the real national news is instantaneously available via published signed documents, press releases and video, to all comers. All the subscriptions do is re-package their choice of information, with their spin.

It’s time to end the tunnel vision.

    stevewhitemd in reply to Valerie. | July 21, 2020 at 11:32 am

    Another point Valerie: if all the local news does is to regurgitate the NYT, WaPo, and the AP, then why bother with them? Why not go straight to the source?

    If local news wants to survive they have to give me something I can’t get from NYT/WaPo/AP. Otherwise I’m just paying twice for the same thing.

    Make that point to your local news vendor, and let’s hear what they say.

    coyote in reply to Valerie. | July 22, 2020 at 9:07 am

    What we need is our own media. Period. Our own newspaperS, tv channelS, etc. relying on the good will of others hasn’t been a successful strategy. Fox is good, as far as it goes, but it plainly doesn’t go far enough, nor does it carry enough purely entertainment programming. The Wall Street Journal reports actual, unslanted news, and it’s diversified it’s content enormously and creatively over the years. But like the image of a nerdy kid dressed up in a business suit (IBM) standing next to the casually dressed cool kid (Apple), we have a ways to go to get the same coolness cachet [read: General appeal] of NYT and WaPo.

    Not sure why the GOP hasn’t figured that out yet, but it hasn’t.

How totally despicable and totally NOT unexpected. I’m shocked, I tell you. Shocked!
These are the same people who post that they hope that those who disagree with them die, and that it’s okay to kill their children because otherwise they would grow up to be as monstrous as their parents.
And they control the “news.”

freespeechfanatic | July 21, 2020 at 10:37 am

What more does anybody need to know about the Left? How much evidence do we need of their malice, intolerance, totalitarian mania? The disgrace of the Times in this case is obvious, of course. But the less obvious and more tragic disgrace is the abject failure of our side to convert what we know, the effluent evidence of their evil in which we are drowning, to produce and push and sustain ruthless, devastating narratives.

Trump here is failing, and the republicans are failing. We could disable and destroy the Left in a matter of months if we were as determined as they are to destroy us. We choose not to.

Tucker’s first mistake was bowing to the New Woke Times by firing his head writer. Never give the mob an offering, they just want more. Second, he doesn’t seem to grasp the concept of making the woke left abide by their own rules. These people won’t stop until they feel some kind of pain from their actions. Tucker doesn’t seem willing to inflict that pain. If he wants this to stop, go on offense. Giving an inspired, well written monologue every night may get you a larger audience, but doesn’t seem to have saved many advertisers for his show. Until he stops playing defense, the NWT will continue.

    freespeechfanatic in reply to technerd. | July 21, 2020 at 11:01 am

    I have to disagree that Tucker doesn’t go on offense. He may be one of the few who do. It’s why they want to kill him (yes, kill him). The problem isn’t Tucker not going on offense, its Republicans not doing so. We’re awash in opportunities to eviscerate the Left. We’re failing to do so.

      What “offense” is Tucker going in? Last time demonstrators came to his house, he whimped out and moved, now they’re at it again and Tucker has given them no disincentive not to.

        Milhouse in reply to MarkS. | July 21, 2020 at 5:21 pm

        What are you talking about? He told them exactly what he would do if they published. And wonder of wonders, they’ve decided not to publish.

    Milhouse in reply to technerd. | July 21, 2020 at 11:25 am

    This was not bowing. This was a threat. He told them exactly what he would do if they published the piece, and lo and behold they backed down and said they wouldn’t publish it. Mission accomplished.

      CorkyAgain in reply to Milhouse. | July 21, 2020 at 1:44 pm

      Now watch them spin it to paint him as the offender, in the same way they’ve charged that St.Louis couple for daring to use firearms to defend their home and their lives.

      The NYT has already started the spin with their claim to be innocent of any plan to publish his home address. Any suggestion to the contrary is just a typical right-wing paranoid fantasy!

        Valerie in reply to CorkyAgain. | July 21, 2020 at 6:13 pm

        The San Diego Union-Tribune is already doing this. According to their editorial board, the NYT shouldn’t have to deny baseless claims, but they have.

        So, the regional newspaper chooses to whole heartedly accept any ol’ damn thing the NYT says, not merely report the denial.

        I think their faith is touching.

I stand with Tucker, he needs our support.

The NYT responded:

“While we do not confirm what may or may publish in future editions, The Times has not and does not plan to expose any residence of Tucker Carlson’s, which Carlson was aware of before tonight’s broadcast.”

I believe them, except for the last bit. I believe they have no plans to expose his residence now, but the reason is that he told them what he would do if they did. I don’t believe they told him this before his show went to air.

As much as it is hated that this had to happen to TC, some transparency in the media, maybe not at this level, would create a situation where media personnel could be held accountable for the comments they make.

When the boss says ‘say this’, there would be grounds for the personality to say ‘no, as it jeopardizes my safety’.

We might actually see some level and honest reporting across the board.

The Friendly Grizzly | July 21, 2020 at 12:23 pm

If push comes to shove, I will loan Tucker Carlson my backhoe.

one in belfast is about 30 miles (as crow flies) from me. to see how bad it is up here read the comments. funny how SOME commentators NEVER have stuff removed while myself and others often do.

The Real Truth | July 22, 2020 at 10:03 am

In my opinion, I see nothing but EVIL on the left, every day. You never hear about conservatives attacking people, looting stores, tearing down monuments, and statues or burning businesses to the ground ! These are ALL carried out by LIBERALS. Michael Savage was RIGHT, when he said that “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder”, because it IS ! These people are SO evil, that they want to hurt a good man, and his family simply because they don’t agree with his politics. These people are despicable, obnoxious people for even threatening to expose his home location !

The only saving grace here is that, since it is the NYT, the address with likely be incorrect.