Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

The Revolution Turns On Itself: Portland ‘Wall of Moms’ Accused of ‘Anti-Blackness’

The Revolution Turns On Itself: Portland ‘Wall of Moms’ Accused of ‘Anti-Blackness’

They always eat each other.

https://youtu.be/At3hYLlGkyo

Last week, a “wall of moms” made a barrier around the rioters in Portland, OR, to protect them from law enforcement.

But now the rioters turned against the Wall of Moms because of allegations of “anti-Blackness.”

Nothin can satisfy these people.

The white leaders of Wall of Moms decided to step down from their roles and hand over the reins to “women of color.”

The new leaders “include Teressa Raiford, executive director of Don’t Shoot Portland, Demetria Hester and Danialle James.”

But now Don’t Shoot Portland wants people to stop supporting Wall of Moms.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

EDIT FOR EVERYONE UPSET ABOUT THIS POST: WE ARE NOT AGAINST MOMS! EVERYONE HAS A PLACE IN ORGANIZING. WE ARE NO LONGER IN SUPPORT OF WOM LEADERSHIP. ANTI-BLACKNESS. DO NOT SUPPORT @wallofmoms #WALLOFMOMS. . After leaving vulnerable Black women downtown after marching, failing to support those on the ground that put trust in them, @wallofmoms leadership also found time to make THREE registrations through Oregon’s Secretary of State. This was all done in privacy and without the knowledge of the Black leadership WOM was claiming to implement. The lies are finally clear and we are sad but ultimately not surprised that anti-Blackness showed it’s ugly face with Wall of Moms. This all came to light over the last 24 hours – We began having safety concerns within the group because Black women started saying they were not protected by WOM leadership. Too frequently would be in communication for safety, transport etc and when the time came, there would be zero response and no leadership to rely on. It’s put many on the ground in direct danger. Once these registration filings with Secretary of State came out, it became more clear – WOM was not started for BLM, but to get the feds out of PDX. None of the Black leadership WOM claimed to implement knew about this. Combined with a lack of care for and disregard of Black women, we were used to further an agenda unrelated to BLM. Please do not support this organization anymore. We need everyone to show up against racism, but it’s even more crucial to prioritize transparency and accountability. . The Wall of Moms . http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.show_detl?p_be_rsn=2147737&p_srce=BR_INQ&p_print=FALSE The Wall of Moms PAC http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.show_detl?p_be_rsn=2148001&p_srce=BR_INQ&p_print=FALSE AND Wall of Moms as an entity name: http://egov.sos.state.or.us/br/pkg_web_name_srch_inq.show_detl?p_be_rsn=2147267&p_srce=BR_INQ&p_print=FALSE

A post shared by Don’t Shoot PDX (@dontshootpdx) on

From Oregon Live:

The Wednesday post alleges that Wall of Moms founder Bev Barnum filed for business registrations without consulting the newly instated Black leaders and that the safety of Black members at the nightly protests in downtown Portland was overlooked.

The post said that issues of Black mothers’ safety have only come to light in the past 24 hours.

Barnum appeared to file three business registrations on Tuesday including one that makes The Wall of Moms a 501c3 nonprofit. Don’t Shoot Portland interpreted the filings to mean that Wall of Moms goal was to get federal officers out of Portland — not to support Black Lives Matter, according to the Instagram post. The newly instated Black leaders were not told about the registrations, according to the post.

“None of the Black leadership WOM claimed to implement knew about this,” the Wednesday post reads. “Combined with the lack of care for Black women, we were used to further the agenda unrelated to BLM.”

I don’t get how wanting to make your group a nonprofit meant that Barnum only supports forcing out the feds and not the BLM movement. She should have told the new leaders, but see that as the only problem.

The official Wall of Moms Twitter account claimed Barnum “went rogue” and a lot “of us do not agree with her decisions.”

Barnum explained in a private Wall of Moms Facebook group:

“The announcement of the 501c3 really hurt some of you,” she wrote. “That was never my intention. In fact, it was just the opposite. WOM will be led by a BIPOC board and BIPOC advisor committee. WOM is a group that supports BLM, not a BLM group. If that is not good enough for you, please feel free to leave this group. And if you currently volunteer your time, please feel free to leave your positions.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

As always happens in totalitarian uprisings, especially those from the left which view ideological purity as a must.

How can the inherently racist practice of judging people based on race ever result in anything but accusations of racism?

    TX-rifraph in reply to TX-rifraph. | July 30, 2020 at 12:14 pm

    Marxists are about power. Power does not comprehend cooperation. Any appearance of cooperation is an act that will later turn into a fight for exclusive control.

They always eat each other.
Apparently that ain’t all they ate

A wall of morons. All in terrible physical shape, as well.

They must be showing up for the free donuts.

The “useful fools” have already over-stayed their welcome. News video featuring obese lesbian “moms” waving BLM signs is too much even for the nutty left. I many of these “women” look like men. It’s already been reported that lesbians are a very large component of this white “shame”.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to Pasadena Phil. | July 30, 2020 at 1:16 pm

    BLM means Black Lesbian Mothersuckers???????

    A Punk Named Yunk in reply to Pasadena Phil. | July 31, 2020 at 3:51 pm

    No longer useful but still idiots.

    Hi Pasedena Phil,

    I was preparing my own “Useful idiots” remark but you said it first; the above line just came to me as I was writing this.

    For those unfamiliar with this term, it is attributes to Vladimir Lenin (of accursed memory) but, according to Wikipedia, this is unsubstantiated.

    Be that as it may, Russia’s useful idiots were were the first folks that were shot (and later just deported to Siberia) when the Communists took over Russia; they had served their purpose and now would only be disillusioned malcontents.

    These so-called Moms just got a taste of expired usefulness. Probably will not learn the lesson, though.

In order to placate the woke mob, they must now submit to getting gang banged by a bunch of black trans dudes.

why is safety an issue when the protests are totally peaceful, each and every night?
Even Nadler says it’s a myth.

How ironic that the “Wall of Moms” is not viable. Some, Select Black Lives Matter is a Pro-Choice sect of the Progressive Church.

Somebody, a little help here? I was rolling on the floor laughing and my arse fell clean off.

Interesting that an affiliate of BLM, which is not a non-profit organization subject to regulation, would become a 501(c)(3). My guess is that BLM Global Network is angry as hell about this.

501(c)(3) organizations are highly regulated entities. Strict rules apply to both the activities and the governance of these organizations. No part of the activities or the net earnings can unfairly benefit any director, officer, or any private individual.

In addition, all assets are permanently dedicated to a charitable purpose. In the event that a 501(c)(3) organization must cease operations, all assets remaining after debts are paid must be distributed for a charitable purpose.

Further, lobbying, propaganda or other legislative activity must be kept relatively insubstantial. Intervention in political campaigns or the endorsement/anti-endorsement of candidates for public office is strictly prohibited.

    Neo in reply to Neo. | July 30, 2020 at 1:46 pm

    1) you can’t keep the money
    2) you can’t lobby to “defund the police” or anything else.

    It’s impossible to become a Hugo Chávez as a 501(c)(3)

Wait, they own clothing that isn’t loose flannel? FWIW, I am seeing more of the permanent BLM signs being altered to their oLive form. I guess it is just one of those mutation thingies that they keep talking about.

Overall, they started too early and have now pretty much peaked even before August. Come September when kids aren’t in school the rage that everyone is feeling is going to spill onto those who are making the local decisions that affect local people, and this being Oregon, it won’t be a Republican issue. I just hope that the schools open up in Red States. It will be an issue that makes the people in Blue States start to wonder what advantages they are seeing by voting blue, which to me, have been none, none, and none for a long time.

Wait a minute? The Left actually recognizes the difference between supporting a concept yet rejecting the leadership?
Wonders never cease.

    It’s only about the money and the power.

    With the restrictions of a 501(c)(3), the money will all be reportable to the feds, and it must go to charitable work.
    Most importantly, they can’t lobby for “defund the police”.

I wonder how many of these White moms became Trump voters overnight.

    Paul in reply to alohahola. | July 30, 2020 at 3:54 pm

    Precisely zero.

    You’d have to be crazy as a shit-house rat in order to supplicate yourself like that in the first place.

    Getting attacked by the woker contingent of the crazy crowd won’t make them conservative. It will just make them grovel ever closer to the ground, and lick more boot.

      Exactly. I used to be astonished at refugees from Southeast Asia after the Vietnam War who came to the US or Canada and began exposing virtually identical political positions they had escaped with their lives from.

      But think about it. In Vietnam or Kampuchea they were fully immersed in a media and education system that preached genocidal hatred of “capitalists” (read: anyone who opposed Communism). When they got to the West they encountered a media and education system that preached a genocidal hatred of “racists” (read: anyone who opposed Communism). The righteousness of absolute subjugation of the individual to the Communist State is something they have heard their entire lives and take for granted.

      I think these “moms” – I doubt they actually have human children, but no matter – have literally never considered Communism as anything but pure good, and everything else as evil. Why wouldn’t they do what the Communists tell them to do?

        That might have something to do with certain aspects of Asian culture.

        Many Eastern Europeans love and breathe capitalism and still hate the Communists for essentially kicking them out of their homes in their homeland.

        I’m thinking that some of these “moms”–I agree and bet they are all childless–might realize that they’re being treated like sh*t. But I also see how they can hate themselves, as they already do, enough to keep ticking while they’re taking lickings.

          I think it depends on when refugees from Communist countries arrived in the West (particularly the USA). Refugees who arrived in America in the 40s, 50s, 60s and even early 70s could expect at least some pro-freedom media and education with an emphasis on tolerance, freedom and respect for their new country. But just before the USA lost in Vietnam the Communists seems to gain control of the education establishment and the media*. Refugees from Southeast Asia (mid 1970s onward) were the first major refugee group that walked into a media and education climate eerily similar to the one they left, so in my opinion it is no surprise that many (not all) ended up sounding just like the political leaders they were fleeing.

          * – it is true that Communists have infested the media and academia since before the Russian Revolution. But the balance of power seemed to tip in the Communists’ favor in the mid 1970s. Today the Communist Party controls practically every media corporation and major school in America, and the few non-Communists left are being purged and blacklisted.

What if farmers did to the EPA what BLM has done to the federal courthouse in PDX?

    henrybowman in reply to Andy. | July 31, 2020 at 8:31 am

    If you change that question slightly, and ask what if ranchers did to the (other) BLM what BLM did to the PDX courthouse, you’ve already had your answer a couple years ago.

They should battle to the death to see who leads the group. There can be only one.

    murkyv in reply to UJ. | July 30, 2020 at 5:55 pm

    Judging from the size of them…

    “We’re going to need a bigger Thunderdome”

“No man survives
When freedom fails;
The best men rot in filthy jails.
And those who cried: “APPEASE, APPEASE!”
Are hanged by those they tried to please.”

~ Tuskegee Airman, LTC Hiram Mann (5/23/1921 – 5/17/2014)

I am about to launch a new 501(c)(3) organization called “Wall of Uncle Toms” (WOT) its purpose is to please the white power structure of Portland Oregon by going out each night and putting our black bodies on the line in confronting the federal officers protecting the Federal Courthouse. We pledge to do the white mayor’s bidding as pawns in this over-thought-out confrontation.

Bon apetit as those two sides “eat” each other.

So, the Gov. of Oregon ants to throw out the Feds? Take a leaf from the events of 1861. Let Oregon secede. Welcome a new state of East Oregon into the Union. Treat the burning of the federal courthouse in Portland the way Lincoln treated the shelling of Ft. Sumter…

It is real simple! The WOM was not giving ‘blm’ enough entitlements!

Judging by that pic of them, I’d say that is quiet a ‘wall’ of women there. They certainly have not missed out on any snacks. Some of them are at least two or three soy boys combined that pass for ‘men’ in that movement.

Bezos ex-wife just gave 1.7 BILLION dollars to these freaks!

If any of them are moms, it was via artificial insemination.

LeftWingLock | July 31, 2020 at 9:13 am

Keep in mind that in today’s social climate, there is no neutral. If you are not sufficiently pro-black, then by definition, you are anti-black. Same for pro-trans, pro-gay, etc. etc. etc.

Here’s a quote which is true over a large scope:

“… impatience with the messiness of ordinary human life, the mark of the true totalitarian.”

Wall of Misguided Old Mother Strumpets, who acquiesce to the will of the 13%.

Wall of overfed, unhappy, angry frustrated women with no lives and lousy husbands. Even their kids hate them. Look, girls, go volunteer for the Red Cross of do something PRODUCTIVE!

The Russian Revolution killed Trotsky, the French Revolution killed Robespierre, The ChiCom Cultural Revolution killed “revisionists”, “The Revolution” always eats its own. These “Mom’s” were throwing fireworks and frozen bottles of water at the police an hour before, so they’re phonies.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend