Ethiopian Foreign Minister Tweets ‘Nile is Ours,’ Drawing Ire of Egypt and the U.S.
Thousands of years of history would argue otherwise, and Egypt plans to protect its historic and essential water interests.
While the world focuses on the COVID pandemic and China’s shenanigans, a potential conflict has been brewing between Ethiopia and Egypt involving the waters of the Blue Nile.
This month, Ethiopia completed the initial filling of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD), a nearly $5 billion hydroelectricity project. The country plans to fill the rest of the dam over the next five years, a prospect that worries downstream Egypt, which depends on the Nile for freshwater.
Egypt is preparing for a fresh round of negotiations on GERD after the African Union demanded that Egypt, Sudan, and Ethiopia formulate a binding agreement on the dam that includes the issue of future development on the Blue Nile river.
During a call-in on Ahmed Moussa’s TV show “Ala Massoulity” (On My Responsibility) on the privately-owned satellite channel Sada al-Balad, Spokesperson for the Egyptian Ministry of Irrigation and Water Resources, Mohamed al-Sebaie, said that the date for the start of the new round of negotiations will be determined soon.
Sebaie indicated that the legal points regarding filling the dam are still disputed. He stressed that water is not a luxury for Egypt but rather an existential issue and a matter of life, and that Egypt will not cede its water rights.
The Nile river, which is the lifeline of Egypt, receives its waters from two main tributaries: The Blue Nile (sourced at Lake Tana in Ethiopia) and the White Nile (sourced at Lake Victoria). The two tributaries merge at Khartoum in Sudan. The Blue Nile supplies about 80% of the water in the Nile during the rainy season.
Once these facts are understood, one can understand why the Ethiopian foreign minister’s recent tweet that “the Nile is ours” would cause an international stir.
Ethiopia’s foreign minister outraged Egyptians on Wednesday with a hubristic tweet claiming “The Nile is Ours”, one week after it took a notable step in completing its controversial upsteam Great Ethiopian Renaissance Dam [GERD] project.
Gedu Andargachew tweet read: “Congratulations! It was the Nile River and the river became a lake. It will no longer flow into the river. Ethiopia will have all the development it wants from it. In fact the Nile is ours!”
It comes amid reports that the US is considering sanctions against Ethiopia over its refusal to enter into a final agreement with Sudan and Egypt about the future status of the Nile.
Tensions have increased between Ethiopia, Egypt, and Sudan after Ethiopia – which has rejected signing a binding agreement regarding the use of the Nile’s waters – unilaterally started to fill the reservoir of the GERD last week.
The unregulated filling of the GERD’s reservoir could potentially cut off essential water supplies to Sudan and Egypt, causing drought and famine.
On Sunday #Egypt reacted on #Ethiopia's Foreign Minister @GeduAndargachew's comment “the #Nile is ours”. El-Zawahiri of Egyptian negotiating Committee called the statement „strange and provocative“ & asked if ?? intentionally wants the talks to fail. #GERD https://t.co/X8oig8WNEV
— Patrick Heinisch (@PatrickHeinisc1) July 26, 2020
Wherever there is trouble in today’s world, it is wise to consider a connection to China. Looking at the funding background for GERD, reports indicate that the Ethiopians intend to fund the $5 billion for construction themselves with bonds, but have the assistance of the Chinese (who are financing the turbines and associated electrical equipment of the hydropower plants).
This financing is consistent with the fact China has been buying influence in Africa for the past several years. African countries are just waking up to the potential consequences of this fiscal arrangement.
[Zambia’s Minister of Finance Dipak] Patel is among a growing number of African activists and policymakers questioning the deluge of Chinese credit—some $150 billion in 2018, according to researchers at Johns Hopkins University—that has fueled a debt crisis aggravated by the new coronavirus. Nigerian lawmakers are reviewing Chinese loans they say were unfavorable. Activists in Kenya are demanding the government disclose the terms of Chinese credit used to build a 470-kilometer (292-mile) railway. And Tanzanian President John Magufuli calls an agreement his predecessor made with Chinese investors, to build a $10 billion port and economic zone, a deal “only a madman would sign.”
While it will be tough for cash-starved African governments to win many concessions, a wave of looming defaults poses the biggest test ever for China’s influence in the region. “This has the potential to produce the most profound change in relations since China became a major economic player on the continent,” says Chris Alden, an international affairs professor at the London School of Economics.
GERD may have started as a great idea to win favor with the Ethiopian people, the regional consequences may mean there is now a second dam that may prove troubling to the Chinese as Egypt prepares to protect its water rights robustly.
Egypt’s President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi reaffirmed the state’s rejection of any unilateral action that may compromise Egypt’s right to Nile water.
El-Sisi made the statement during a phone call with his South African counterpart Cyril Ramaphosa on Saturday as the two heads of state discussed the disputed Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD).
According to Presidency Spokesman Bassam Rady, El-Sisi said Egypt insists on the formulation of a full-fledged legal agreement between the concerned parties regarding the rules of filling and operation of the dam.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
They might want to put some anti-aircraft weapons around that dam. The Egyptians are likely to bomb it.
Don’t give them ideas the Communist government functionaries in Ethiopia aren’t smart enough to figure out for themselves. I’m sure their ChiCom benefactors will think of how to protect their investment.
That would be a very bad idea for the Egyptians.
The Ethiops could retaliate. Bursting the Aswan dam would be catastrophic for Egypt — imagine a wall of water that is still 100 feet high when it hits Cairo. Ninety percent of Egypt lives on the banks of the Nile and its delta. Egypt would cease to exist.
People in that region really, really, really shouldn’t even think about dam-busting.
General Mac was right! We should have dropped the bomb on China when we had the chance during the Korean War.
We have been paying for it ever since and one day we will be be in actual war with the dragon… it might be too late by then, and certainly more lives will be lost, many million more than if we had taken care of the problem in the 50’s…
I seem to recall someone once saying something about “never get into a land war in Asia”…
The U.S. has always treated Asia as a maritime theatre. That’s not going to change significantly.
This robustly?
PS: As I was looking for that URL, I came across this sign of the times. Not sure how I feel about it. On the one hand you don’t mess with graves; on the other hand, dogs are not people.
Oops. Missing link. Trying again.
This robustly?
PS: As I was looking for that URL, I came across this sign of the times. Not sure how I feel about it. On the one hand you don’t mess with graves; on the other hand, dogs are not people.
Yep… the dog was named in a British history film a few years back. I imagine the name has been scrubbed. It was also featured without being named in the movie “The Battle of Britain” as actor Michael Caine’s dog in the film.
They call the dam GERD really? It will give them Aqua Reflux. (acid reflux = GERD)
There is a simple solution to China, just stop buying stuff manufactured in China.
The Egyptians believe they can dam the Nile, but the Ethiopians cannot.
There is your problem, not the Chinese. The Chinese are a problem of course, but how does one country build a dam on their land and tell another country they cannot “fill” their dam on their land?
Very simply: Nobody is downstream of Egypt. Ethiopia has no right to steal Egypt’s water, and doing so is a casus belli; Egypt is not stealing anyone’s water.
Typical, your FOS.
Where is your planet earth law that says if your river empty’s into the ocean, you can dam it, but otherwise you may not?
I can provide you with many dams built on waterways they exit into another country.
Everywhere on this plant. It’s called water rights. Look them up. If your dam deprives the people downstream of their rightful water, you need their consent. You tell me where that is not the law.
Go ahead. Give us the earth law that says it.
You can’t and we both know it.
If egypt wishes to start a war, that’s their business.
They are not that stupid however. A war would result in the very death and destruction the wish to avoid.
The water is Ethiopia’s until it leave Ethiopia. That will not change unless you wish to have war.
Stating anything different is just flat out horse puckey.
http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/La-Mi/Law-International-Water.html
https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=ijgls
There is much more on the topic.
It’s not “Egypt’s water” until it makes to Egyptian territory. Egypt has no special claim on that water.
Bullshit. It’s called water rights. Whether you’re using the traditional riparian law or the prior-appropriation law that developed in the Western USA, Egypt owns that water, and stealing it is an act of war.
“Water rights”
LOL, what you really mean, but are not smart enough to say it, is the most powerful can have the water.
That’s the only international “water rights” that exist. And the country in possession of the water has a big leg up.
Pull your head out of the dirt.
There is no such thing as International Law, so … just stop it. Countries are sovereign entities. It is up to individual countries to work out problems they have with each other.
Unless you want to point out to me the International Legislature that wrote these laws, the International Executive that enforces them and the International Court that adjudicates them …
The world is organized as nation-states. If you want to impose your will on other nations and tell them what they can and can’t do that is up to you to enforce, but don’t act as if there is any moral backing to your demands. You can do whatever you can force others to accept. Fine. Other than that, it isn’t up to you, or Egypt, to tell Ethiopia what they can or can’t do with their water. If Egypt doesn’t like it then Egypt can go to war over it.
Everything is an “act of war” if one side declares war over it. The act of declaring war is, itself, something that is particular to each sovereign nation, too. A nation can declare war over anything it wants (and most have in the past). It is not a moral issue. It’s war.
Iran was ready to declare war over a Brit writing a friggin book about the silliness of islam (I guess .. I never read the Satanic Verses). So what? Now, I said, at the time, that Iran’s putting out a bounty on Rushdie – a British subject – over writing was an Act of War by Iran against the whole West, but most of the West thought otherwise, because they were short-sighted idiots.
What anyone considers an Act of War is just a matter of opinion and there’s nothing wrong with that. But don’t make pretend there is some universal truth that has etched the ownership of waters through every lake, river and ocean to certain areas … Ownership extends only to the sovereign territory of the nation because a nation’s laws don’t extend past their borders – unless they extend them by force. And if they don’t behave themselves some other nation might make it so that they are not even a nation any longer …
Did Tedros help secure China’s expertise in dam building for this project? That would work out well…
We have the same thing here in the States between Colorado and California.
China can “nudge” Egypt now by the firm control of Ethiopia. China owns and maintains them lock, stock and airline. It boils down to military might so wait for a blue water visit by China into the Med someday soon as they expand their presence.
There was a good deal of opposition to Egypt’s construction of the Aswan High dam because of the huge amount of antiquities and important archaeological areas that were going to be flooded but Egypt didn’t really care much about any of that. Preserving any antiquities was never much of a thing in Egypt – not until they found out how much they could extort the West with it. Preserving any historical artifacts has pretty much zero value in arab culture.
Ethiopia’s rivers are Ethiopia’s and they are free to do with them whatever they want. If Egypt wants to go to war over that then that is how these things go, but Egypt has no say, otherwise, as to how Ethiopia does anything on its sovereign territory.
“…but Egypt has no say, otherwise, as to how Ethiopia does anything on its sovereign territory.”
Bingo.
That is bullshit. Under every legal principle known to man, Egypt is entitled to that water and international law recognizes its right to go to war to preserve it.
And when egypt goes to war perhaps they lose.
Perhaps their dam gets destroyed (that can be done quite easily).
If your international water rights can be secured only by war, then the “rights” don’t exist.
And they don’t.
Once the reservoir is filled it’s back to the status quo.
Not sure about that, because Ethiopia will release water when they want to generate electricity, which will not reproduce the natural river flood cycle.
With a dam it’s not totally up to you as to when and how you let water out. Ethiopia can only fight the natural rise and fall of the water level so much.
But it’s a river on their territory so it’s up to them what they want to do. If Egypt doesn’t like it then Egypt can try to make a deal with Ethiopia, pay them, give them more power from the Aswan dam, go to war with them … but it’s always Ethiopia’s choice as what they feel like doing on their sovereign territory. Egypt really has nothing to say about it.
And dams affect things upstream, too. When Egypt built the Aswan High dam that had effects on all sorts of things upriver in Ethiopia. But the dam was Egypt’s prerogative.
Five years of damage to everyone downstream.
Here’s a crazy thought. Presumably the problem is that Ethiopia will generate electricity by releasing the flow at the “wrong” times, disrupting the normal flood season of the river and destroying customary agriculture. Ethiopia’s dam allows them to control this timing.
So why doesn’t Egypt build another dam at their southern border and accumulate water behind it there, and release it at the times that would replicate the natural flooding cycle. Undoing the change to the water release schedule that the Ethiopians are doing. In fact don’t they have the Aswan Dam already? Or is the issue upstream of there?
The issue is that Egypt needs the water that Ethiopia will use to fill the dam. Water is a matter of life and death, and Egypt has every right to go to war to prevent it being stolen.
LOL.
Egypt has proven that it is very happy to go to war over all manner of junk, rarely having anything to do with life and death problems.
I would not go whole hog on the argument about “Egypt’s right to go to war” … I mean, you do know the modern history of Egypt, right? Egypt … which stole the Suez Canal, basically, just as the rest of the arab countries stole the gulf oil fields in the forced nationalizations of the 50s and 60s. Egypt is certainly not one to complain about stuff like this. I mean, really.
Any country can go to war at any time. That is a country’s prerogative. Whether you consider it justified or not is immaterial.
Seriously, how does someone reach adulthood without ever having heard of riparian rights?
Seriously, how does someone reach adulthood and think “international rights” exist?
Egypt can go to war. Ethiopia can blow the Aswan dam sky high, among other things.
Brilliant.
Let’s say there is a war, what else could Egypt do to Ethiopia? Which country has the greatest military capacity?
Egypt has a far greater military than Ethiopia, really no comparison.
But the greater strength of the military does not always win the day, especially when you are going to have to take a country over.
Egypt could blow the dam in Ethiopia. The Aswan High dam is easy pickings as well.
There really is no military solution here. Just as “International rights” are of no value, the military is not the answer.
There is one answer – Egypt will have to work with the Ethiopians to fill the dam with as little disruption as possible to Egypt. The Nile in Ethiopia contributes 80% of the water to the Nile as it flows through Egypt with the other 20% coming from the tributary in the Sudan.
There will not be a war as it will not solve the problem.
That’s funny. If you really think international rights don’t exist then how can you say the water belongs to Ethiopia? According to you Ethiopia has no right to sovereignty at all, or to anything else, so how can it have any right to the water? From the start you have been pounding on a theory that Ethiopia has an absolute right to the water, but now you say it has no rights?!
Just admit that when you originally posted you were completely ignorant of the existence of riparian law.