Image 01 Image 03

Democrats in panic mode over the “unthinkable”: They might lose #CA25 House seat

Democrats in panic mode over the “unthinkable”: They might lose #CA25 House seat

Special election on Tuesday, May 12, pits Republican former Navy fighter pilot against Democrat Assemblywoman

https://youtu.be/tkWbudc3VQU

On Tuesday, May 12, a special election will be held to fill the House seat vacated by disgraced former congresswoman Katie Hill.  Hill, you may recall, resigned after being accused of “inappropriate sexual relationships” with staffers.

The House seat up for grabs is in California district 25 and had long been held by a Republican, and now Democrats are reportedly quite concerned that a Republican is about to win it back.

In a Politico article entitled, “Democrats are on verge of the unthinkable: Losing a swing district in California,” they note that Democrats are downplaying the significance of the election and are already saying they will try again in November.

California Republicans may be on the verge of something they haven’t done in more than two decades: capturing a congressional seat from Democrats in the nation’s most populous state.

Tuesday’s special election runoff in the Los Angeles suburbs, which is taking place because of former Rep. Katie Hill’s resignation last year, has Democrats bracing for defeat in a district they flipped by 9 points in the 2018 midterms. Armed with a highly touted recruit and an older, less diverse electorate than in general elections, Republicans feel they are on the verge of an upset.

Private polls show the race in the state’s 25th District is within just a few points, and Democrats are already downplaying expectations for their nominee, state Assemblywoman Christy Smith, citing depressed turnout in the midst of a pandemic and the negative impact of the scandal surrounding Hill, who resigned amid allegations that she had inappropriate sexual relationships with staffers.

Their battle plan: Hope for the best next week, then try again in six months in the rematch, when Democrats expect their voters willshow up with the presidential election on the ballot.

“We don’t underestimate how much of a Republican-leaning district this could be in May, but that will be a different electorate in November,” Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) said, noting that the winner will serve only a limited time in Congress. “We don’t get in this to lose a race, but I do think that in November, Christy will be successful.”

President Trump has thrown his support behind the Republican in the race, former Navy fighter pilot Mike Garcia.

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1259449352201830400

ABC News has more:

Less than a week before a special election in a fiercely competitive battleground district in California, which has emerged as a proxy tug-of-war testing President’s Trump electoral strength in the middle a pandemic, the Democrat seeking to keep control of the seat issued a stark plea: “I need your help to win in CA-25.”

“Republicans haven’t picked up a House seat in California in over 20 years – and I am not about to let this one be the first,” California Assemblywoman Christy Smith wrote in the email, which was sent to the national Democratic party’s supporter list – underscoring the national influence seeping into California’s 25th congressional district.

. . . . Last month, the race shifted from “lean Democratic” to a “toss up” by Cook Political Report.

Garcia, who earned the endorsement of Trump in April, is seeking to put the seat back in GOP control, after former Congresswoman Katie Hill flipped the top target in 2018, unseating former GOP Congressman Steve Knight by nine points two years after Hillary Clinton won the district in the 2016 presidential election.

. . . . Garcia has leaned into his background with the Navy, blanketing ads and digital videos with images of fighter planes and photos of him during his time in the Navy.

“After more than a year of running, the differences between my opponent and me are obvious – I am a former Navy fighter pilot and small businessman who wants to lower taxes for Californians, while my opponent is a liberal Assemblywoman who wants to raise taxes in Washington because that’s exactly what she’s done in Sacramento,” Garcia said in a statement to ABC News.

Both national parties see the import of this election and are spending money in the district.

ABC News continues:

. . . . The race has not only become nationalized but has seen its final weeks unfold in the midst of the novel coronavirus. Democrats say they are doing “everything” when it comes to organizing, with the exception “of getting within six feet of people” – even pouring $3 million into the race.

Meanwhile, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), the campaign arm for the House GOP, has waded into the race, spending weeks hammering Smith and running ads that cast her as “bad for workers” and take aim at the state lawmaker over taxes.

The Wuhan coronavirus is figuring heavily in the campaigns for both candidates.

NPR reports:

It’s hard to overstate how profoundly things have changed since California’s March primary. Garcia’s and Smith’s campaigns are suddenly playing out on Zoom instead of neighbors’ doorsteps. Instead of an in-person debate, they took part in an online candidate forum.

The candidates have had to shift policy gears as well. Issues like health care and the economy have taken on new importance.

On paper, Smith should be the odds-on favorite to keep the seat in Democratic hands.

In recent years, the district’s demographics have shifted to favor Democrats as the area’s population grows younger and more diverse. Clinton won the district by 7 percentage points in 2016, while first-time candidate Hill defeated Knight by nearly double digits.

But Republican voters tend to show up more consistently in nonpresidential elections, said California State University, Northridge political scientist Larry Becker, who added that nothing about a special election during a global pandemic is normal.

“We have no idea what turnout is going to be,” Becker said.

As a safety measure, Los Angeles and Ventura counties mailed all registered voters an absentee ballot so that they won’t have to vote in person.

This “safety measure” of mail-in ballots is another key factor in this race.

The Wall Street Journal reports:

The race is also being watched because of its heavy reliance on mail-in voting. In March, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, signed an executive order requiring county elections officials to mail a ballot to every registered voter in the California House district. Some in-person voting will also be allowed, as state law requires.

President Trump became more involved in the race with a series of tweets over the weekend alleging that it was rigged after county officials on Friday said they were adding a new in-person polling station in a part of the district with more minority voters.

“They are trying to steal another election. It’s all rigged out there. These votes must not count. SCAM!” Mr. Trump tweeted Saturday.

The Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk announced Friday it would open an in-person voting center in Lancaster at the request of the city’s Republican mayor. On Monday, the head of the Los Angeles County Democratic Party had complained that the registrar’s office had failed to provide voting centers in areas that are predominantly black or Latino and called for an additional voting center in Lancaster.

Mr. Garcia said on Twitter Friday night that Democrats had waited until the last minute to call for a new polling center.

Watch an interview with Garcia in which he discusses taxes, gun control, abortion, and other issues important to voters:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

They are just rallying the Base.

Seriously, what difference does it make if a republican takes ONE house seat out of 51?

The democrat will win after 3 recounts and a bag full of ballots are found behind the coffee machine at the local post office.

    zennyfan in reply to Anchovy. | May 10, 2020 at 8:31 pm

    They don’t need that. They have ballot harvesting.

      Frank Hammond in reply to zennyfan. | May 11, 2020 at 10:12 am

      Zero chance the Republican wins – the paid harvesters have already been trained and are ready to hit the nursing homes and homeless shelters. Another big “win” for the Dems.

    LibraryGryffon in reply to Anchovy. | May 11, 2020 at 7:36 am

    I thought the tradition was a box of ‘forgotten’ ballots in the back of an election official’s car. At least that was the method used in the WA election where Gregoire ‘won’ after the umpteenth recount.

    Concise in reply to Anchovy. | May 11, 2020 at 12:11 pm

    Yes, I foresee a big democrat win, 110% of the electorate, maybe more.

Meh. Time will tell, but if recent history is any guide Democrats will “harvest” enough ballots to be declared the winner. The People’s Democratic Republic of California has a voting fraud machine that would turn any Third World tinpot dictator green with envy.

The only question is: will Democrats spread their shenanigans over several days like they did when Hill “won” in 2018, or will they simply release the whole flood of fake ballots in one evening?

    OTOH: history has also shown that Communist governments are notoriously corrupt and inefficient, outside of the secret police and some parts of the military (see the USSR, China, North Korea). And sometimes the Communists actually blow surefire elections (see Nicaragua in 1990).

    So while voting fraud is a big factor in California it is not (yet) the only factor. If Garcia wins it means the PDRC satraps were snoozing like Daniel Ortega did when he lost his “can’t possibly lose” election to Violeta Chamorro.

      Little-known fact: When Lenin took over in the October Revolution he promised a free and fair election — and he kept his word. The election was held, and the Bolsheviks lost. But Lenin said, “I never promised to respect the result”. The elected parliament duly met for one day, with one party leader already in prison, and the gallery lined with armed sailors, and was then permanently dissolved.

    I live in California. There are a lot of Conservatives but no organization. The vestigial GOP is known as the “Please Don’t Hit Me Again Party”.

    Who was it that said: “It doesn’t matter who votes, it matters who COUNTS the votes”?

Spoke to a Dem who has never voted Republican last night.

They are voting for Trump and against Jay Inslee due to the shut down.

Politically, keeping the country closed much longer is a losing proposition.

stevewhitemd | May 10, 2020 at 8:14 pm

It’s a special election, so I wouldn’t put much stock in the results. If Mr. Garcia wins and then holds in the November election (given the ballot harvesting and massive cheating we’ll see in that one), then I’ll believe we have something.

There are a lot more conservatives in California than many people realize. Most California conservatives have given up because of the democrat cheating/illegal alien vote. gavin newsome and the democrat legislators may have alienated enough Californians, including democrats over their covid19 response that we can make a comeback.

    It’s possible. Decades of Democrat leaders stomping their jackboots in the faces of Californians with only occasional blowback may have made the totalitarians lazy and complacent (“We’ve always gotten away with this, and the stupid proles will never rise up”). It would be welcome if the greedy little Stalins who decided to flex their muscle (“Never let a crisis go to waste”) caused the Deplorables to give their self-anointed moral and intellectual betters a devastating kick in the balls.

Prayers for you Mr. Garcia.

which has emerged as a proxy tug-of-war testing President’s Trump electoral strength in the middle a pandemic
————————
More bullschiff from the lamestream retards. Sets up an easy slap at PDJT.
With mail in voter theft, ballot stealing and other crimes that should warrant the death penalty, even if the dems lose the seat then abc can say it was so close that PDJT is losing steam.
If the democrat liar wins, abc say PDJT has lost his hold on Real Americans.

BierceAmbrose | May 10, 2020 at 10:37 pm

They’re just gonna keep pushing the fraud further, to see what people will still treat as legit, aren’t they.

Remarkable.

BierceAmbrose | May 10, 2020 at 10:40 pm

Yes, the point is to win … eventually.

Taking one seat is one seat taken. Remaining to go, goes from 51 to 50. Even partial-term incumbents have advantage in their next general. So, make them work it in the next general by getting in now. Or at least, make them work for it now.

The voting corruption is so embedded in CA now that it is basically North Korea. In 2016 I had a friend text me from Riverside and she said there were no more than a hundred Americans at the polling station…and literally a thousand illegal aliens with no IDs. Not one spoke English in line. The Mayor was there and she asked what is happening?…he said they have been instructed to let everyone vote without IDs.He had no say as it was a State matter. She said he was Hispanic and was near crying.

The Navy doe not have ‘fighter pilots’, that is a term used by the Air Force. Those men and women who demonstrate the courage and skill needed to land a multi-ton aircraft on the pitching and rolling deck of an aircraft carrier, AT NIGHT, are termed Naval Aviators. They wear the fabled Wings of Gold. They are several steps above Air Force pilots in terms of sheer skill and dedication.

Please honor Naval Aviators with the correct term.

    Mphennessy in reply to SeniorD. | May 11, 2020 at 7:53 am

    You’re absolutely correct! The Navy doesn’t have any fighter pilots!

    Absolutely correct, however, Garcia refers to himself as a “Navy fighter pilot,” so I just went with it. My guess is that he (or his campaign advisor) figures the general public is more familiar with that term.

    Barry in reply to SeniorD. | May 11, 2020 at 10:19 pm

    “They are several steps above Air Force pilots in terms of sheer skill and dedication.”

    I imagine the Air Force pilots will argue that point.