Image 01 Image 03

European Powers Trigger “Dispute Mechanism” Over Iran’s Nuclear Deal Breach

European Powers Trigger “Dispute Mechanism” Over Iran’s Nuclear Deal Breach

European move could pave the way for global sanctions against Iran.

Germany, France and the United Kingdom have launched a formal dispute mechanism against Iran which could end up putting international sanctions on the regime. The measure was announced on Tuesday following recent Iranian violations of the 2015 nuclear deal. The dispute will now be brought before a Joint Commission made up of Iran, Russia, China, the three European signatories, and the European Union. If the panel fails to resolve the dispute, the matter will then come before the United Nations Security Council.

Even if the process gets stalled at the UN, Iran could end up facing comprehensive international sanctions — in addition to the current U.S. sanctions, media reports suggest. “If the Security Council does not vote within 30 days to continue sanctions relief, sanctions in place under previous UN resolutions would be reimposed – known as a “snapback”,” British newspaper The Telegraph reported.

Tehran formally abandon the nuclear deal last Sunday by announcing its plans to scrap the limits on enriching uranium put in place by the international agreement, Iranian state TV confirmed. The move brings Tehran within striking distance of procuring sufficient weapons-grade uranium needed for a nuclear arsenal. The regime already possesses advanced missile delivery systems capable of carrying nuclear warheads.

Tehran dismissed the European decision to take it before an international panel as a “passive” move. “The Islamic Republic of Iran, as in the past, has complete readiness to support any (act of) goodwill and constructive effort to save this important international agreement,” an Iranian foreign ministry spokesman said in a statement.

Reuters reported the measure taken by the UK, France and Germany, also collectively known as the E3 signatories of the 2015 nuclear deal:

France, Britain and Germany confirmed on Tuesday that they had triggered the dispute mechanism in the Iran nuclear deal given Tehran’s ongoing violations, but said they were not joining the United States campaign to exert maximum pressure on Tehran.

“We do not accept the argument that Iran is entitled to reduce compliance with the JCPoA [Iran Nuclear Deal],” the three countries said in a joint statement, saying they had no choice but to trigger the process that could eventually lead to U.N. sanctions.

“Instead of reversing course, Iran has chosen to further reduce compliance.”

Iran took a further step back from its commitments to the 2015 pact, with six world powers, by announcing on Jan. 6 that it would scrap limits on enriching uranium, though it said it would continue cooperating with the U.N. nuclear watchdog.

“We do this in good faith with the overarching objective of preserving the JCPoA and in the sincere hope of finding a way forward to resolve the impasse through constructive diplomatic dialogue, while preserving the agreement and remaining within its framework,” they said.

The announcement comes days after the three European powers expressed their support for the nuclear deal. “[W]e remain committed to the JCPoA and to preserving it,” the leaders of Germany, France, and the United Kingdom said in a joint statement on January 12.

The announcement comes almost a week after U.S. President Donald Trump urged the European allies to “break away from the remnants” of the agreement. “The very defective JCPOA  [Iran nuclear deal] expires shortly anyway, and gives Iran a clear and quick path to nuclear [weapon] breakout. The time has come for the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Russia and China to recognize this reality,” the U.S. President said last Wednesday in his speech in response to the Iranian missile attacks on U.S. forces in Iraq.

[Cover image via YouTube]

[Author’s note: Portions of this post, including the title, were reworked in light of new development of European governemnts triggering the dispute mechanism]


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital | January 14, 2020 at 9:16 am

President Trump will make the E.U. break away from that Evil Deal or he’ll make the E.U. wish they did!

God Bless Israel!!!!!!

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital. | January 15, 2020 at 12:11 am

    Ace of Spades:. Lloyd Billingsley reports, there’s more to the story. It turns out that several passengers on board, Canadian citizens of Iranian descent, were anti-regime activists/dissidents. The other angle to the story is the media and Canadian government officials’ attempts to cover it all up. Talk about your collusion.

The producers of the Twentieth Century Apocalypse now bring you Iran.

At the moment, I’m concerned about all the protestors who have put their lives on the line.

But, in passing, I note what the press would have said about someone who killed Hitler in 1938.

The Mullahs have threatened to name everyone they bribed to make this deal happen. When you understand they’re facing prison time if they back away from the deal, it suddenly makes sense why these douchebags are clinging so bitterly to their sham.

Looks like Neville Chamberlain was ahead of his time.

Germany and France need to act fast because as soon as the US and UK enter trade negotiations the UK will no longer be part of any deal with Iran.

That will be the price of access to the US market.

“The 2015 agreement with Iran is “the single biggest foreign policy achievement in the EU’s history,” the news network [CNN] added.”

That sounds about right, but I’m surprised they want to call attention to what a loser the EU is.

“Germany, France, and UK: “Today, our message is clear: we remain committed to the JCPoA and to preserving it.”

Translation – Germany France the UK and the Obuma progresssives remain committed to ensuring remains unmolested in their pursuit of nuclear weapons, including providing funding to accomplish the goal.

(1) Time to tell the EU: you trade with Iran or the US, not both. Time to choose. (2) Trump should issue an executive order
prohibiting US insurance companies from covering any losses in a war (to the extent not already excluded under “act of war” clauses). Let the EU collect from EU, Chinese or Russians insurers. See how fast the EU companies run the other way.

“Despite increasingly difficult circumstances, we have worked hard to preserve the agreement.”

The Correct Process must be followed, even if the result is genocide. The EU – and, I am sorry to say, many in the UK – would like nothing better than for Iran to turn Israeli Jews into radioactive dust.

This is such Kabuki theater. Iran’s corrupt leadership has been circumventing the deal since day 1, so deal or no deal, nothing changes. It’s fun to watch the EU squirm, though.

I also laughed when I heard about all of the potential cyber threats from Iran reported by the msm. Really? with what tech?

Finally, some positive progress. People are skeptical of the quid pro Bo. It was a great deal for the Iranian regime, not limited to ignoring counter claims, and palettes full of cash. Probably many quid pro Joes, from DC to Tehran, too.

JusticeDelivered | January 14, 2020 at 2:10 pm

I think we should offer Iran a nuclear deal, they stop all their nefarious activity, or we let them study a few nukes as they reach critical reaction.

“If the Security Council does not vote within 30 days to continue sanctions relief, sanctions in place under previous UN resolutions would be reimposed – known as a “snapback”,” British newspaper The Telegraph reported.

This doesn’t depend on the Europeans. Trump could have invoked the snapback clause on Jan 20, 2017, and on Feb 19 all the mandatory UN sanctions would have automatically come back, and there would have been nothing the EU could have done to stop it. Trump fans should at least try to answer why he didn’t do this.

    mailman in reply to Milhouse. | January 14, 2020 at 4:12 pm

    Maybe because the fucking Europeans should be getting off their fat fucking arses and introduce themselves to reality and do something instead of leaving everything to Trump to do.

      Milhouse in reply to mailman. | January 15, 2020 at 2:04 pm

      That doesn’t answer the question. All the mandatory sanctions from before JCPOA could have been back in place by Feb 20, 2017. They weren’t for one reason only: Trump chose not to invoke the snapback clause.