Image 01 Image 03

Cory Booker Will Not Stop Meeting With Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan

Cory Booker Will Not Stop Meeting With Anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan

But it’s bad that Biden had past relationships with segregationalists.

Democratic presidential candidate Sen. Cory Booker (D-NJ) has made it known that he will not stop meeting or communicating with well-known anti-Semite Louis Farrakhan.

Booker made the surprising declaration after an audience member at a faith breakfast asked if he would avoid Farrakhan due to his anti-Semitism.

From The Washington Examiner:

“I live in Newark, so we have famous Mosque 25, we have Nation of Islam there,” the New Jersey Democrat said Saturday at a “Conversation with Cory” campaign event in Nevada. “As mayor I met with lots of folks talking to him. I have heard Minister Farrakhan’s speeches for a lot of my life, so I don’t feel like I need to do that, but I’m not one of these people that says I wouldn’t sit down with anybody to hear what they have to say. But, I live in a neighborhood where I’m getting guys on the streets offering and selling his works. I am very familiar with Minister Louis Farrakhan and his beliefs and his values.”

Senator, if you are that familiar with Farrakhan then you know the man hates Jews and has no problem spouting out hatred towards them.

If Booker needs a reminder he can read through pieces on our site with the Louis Farrakhan tag. He has called Jews “satanic” and “termites.” He praised Hitler and accused Jews of controlling the government in an effort to keep down the black man.

Emily Zanotti at The Daily Wire pointed out Booker’s hypocrisy when it comes to Farrakhan. He recently blasted frontrunner former Vice President Joe Biden for “meeting with ‘Dixiecrats’ who supported segregation and other racist policies back when he first began his tenure in Congress.”

Booker said on Sunday that these relationships Biden had “with proud segregationists are not the model for how we make America a safer and more inclusive place for black people, and for everyone.”

How about your CURRENT relationship with Farrakhan, Senator? Farrakhan not only hates Jews, but he also hates white people. Is the model to make America safer by keeping a relationship with a man that does nothing but spew hate?

Why can’t Democrats condemn and distance themselves from Farrakhan? He has already proven himself as a poison since his close relationships with the women who hijacked the Women’s March, which led to the destruction of the movement.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Why should he? It is not like he is a Republican meeting with David Duke. It is not like he is a President trying to restore calm to Chancellorsville.

The Democrats seems to have decided to attempt to break the record of “the longest suicide note in history”, now held by the British Labour Party since 1983.

The Friendly Grizzly | June 24, 2019 at 12:28 pm

Continuing to associate with Farrakhan buys him votes in the burgeoning muslim demographic, gets him more black votes , and if he becomes the nominee, he will lose maybe 2% of the Jewish vote.

    Indeed. A disturbing number of Jews, who claim to see antisemites crawling under every Republican bed, are strangely blind to the direct, unambiguous threats coming from their Democrat pals.

      The Friendly Grizzly in reply to Recovering Lutheran. | June 25, 2019 at 8:38 am

      My cynical view: Jews are still angry because they were denied membership at the Jonathan Club (Los Angeles reference).

      I’m of Jewish upbringing, although I walked away from the whole thing decades ago. A “recovering Jew”, so to speak. I never understood the raving paranoia about Christians, and about the GOP.

      A dear friend of mine was burned out in the Malibu fire. He and his wife are Jewish. She sings in the choir of a church, and, yes: the church knows they are Jews. After the fire, the congregation came together and provided a lot of help getting settled in an apartment, getting basics like some furniture and cooking utensils. They provided moral support. Their own synagogue? (crickets). I pointed this out to my friend. SOME of his doubts have slipped away.

    notamemberofanyorganizedpolicital in reply to The Friendly Grizzly. | June 24, 2019 at 4:16 pm

    But Cory’s blown it.

2smartforlibs | June 24, 2019 at 12:29 pm

Guess the projectionist doesn’t get irony.

What will T-Bone say?

Then we on the right owe it to these guys to document the hell out of this meeting (and the fact it took place) through lots of pics, unsanctioned videos and unauthorized sound bites taken before and after the meeting. Hammer this clown with bad optics.

ahad haamoratsim | June 24, 2019 at 1:19 pm

It started when Mondale decided to condemn Sharpton while courting Jesse “Hymietown” Jackson. Then they started cozying up to Sharpton, too. Now Farrakahn. I shudder to think who’s next on the Democratic Party’s approved list.

The moral cowardice and bankruptcy of the utterly despicable Dhimmi-crats, perfectly exemplified by vile Booker’s equivocating and posturing.

The Dhimmis simply cannot bring themselves to osctracize, criticize or otherwise unabashedly, unequivocally and unhesitatingly condemn Muslim bigot Jew-haters, for fear of alienating the Jew-haters amongst their black and Muslim bases.

Booker’s posture is as outrageous and contemptible as a white politician’s refusal to disavow David Duke.


Meet with anybody you want, is the best policy. It’s misguided to discourage it.

Once it’s weaponized, you lose your ability to change minds where it’s needed.

    Fair enough. But in the Booker-Farrakhan case, who is trying to influence whom?

    (HINT: there is little evidence Calypso Louie has moderated his views.)

    guyjones in reply to rhhardin. | June 24, 2019 at 4:41 pm

    Ideally, I don’t disagree.

    The problem here is that when Dhimmi-crat pols meet Farrakhan, they grant him utterly undeserved legitimacy as a political figure, whether intended, or not. They’re That’s the undeniable effect — an audience gives this vile bigot the imprimatur of being a legitimate leader, instead of him being treated, deservedly, as persona non grata. And, of course, the Dhimmis are coming to kiss Farrakhan’s ring, as an alleged kingmaker, and, to curry favor with the black Muslims, just as Obama did, prior to running for the Dhimmmi-crat nomination for President.

Obama met with Farrakhan, so why not? If you criticize Farrakhan then you must be racist, regardless of the hate spewing from him. Race baiting 24/7.

This guy is such a pathetic clown.

Everyone thinks they can become the next Maddoff or obama. But that scam has been blown to smithereens for decades.