Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Germany to Renege on NATO Spending Pledge

Germany to Renege on NATO Spending Pledge

US Ambassador Grenell: Germany’s defense cuts a “worrisome signal to Germany’s 28 NATO allies.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eWP0XgPG5tE&t=672s

Germany won’t be meeting its NATO spending target this year, the country’s finance ministry disclosed. “Defense spending is projected to fall well short of NATO’s 2 percent target,” German state broadcaster DW News reported Wednesday.

Furthermore, the defense cuts in coming years appear to be even more drastic, dropping the country’s defense spending to 1.25% by 2023. The planned cuts fly in the face Germany’s budgetary pledges made to the North Atlantic alliance.

In recent years, Washington has repeatedly urged Berlin to honor its defense commitments. “The United States is spending far more on NATO than any other country. This is not fair, nor is it acceptable,” President Trump said at the 2018 NATO summit.

Germany’s low defense expenditure sent a “worrisome signal to Germany’s 28 NATO allies,” US ambassador to Germany Richard Grenell said. The country’s top defense official also objected to the finance ministry’s disclosure. The armed forces commissioner Hans-Peter Bartels urged Chancellor Angela Merkel’s government to “reliably” allocate funding in keeping with country’s previous commitments made to the alliance.

Following Grenell’s response, Chancellor Merkel reiterated Germany’s commitment to the NATO. Berlin, however, did not plan to meet the mandated two-percent spending target, the German Chancellor’s statement indicated. “The 1.5 percent target by 2024 is an obligation to NATO,” she told the parliament Thursday. “I guarantee and the German government guarantees that we will meet that obligation.”

In contrast, the U.S. contributes 4.2 percent of its GDP to Western military alliance. In 2017, the U.S. “accounted for 51.1 percent of the allies’ combined GDP and 71.7 percent of combined defense expenditure,” the Defense News noted.

Germany’s DW News reported the details of the country’s planned defense budget:

The Finance Ministry said Monday that an extra €2 billion ($2.27 billion) was planned for the military in 2020, but Germany’s military spending would drop in 2023 to 1.25 percent of its gross domestic product — well short of NATO’s 2 percent target set for 2025 and Germany’s promise to meet 1.5 percent by that year.

Next year’s intended outlay of €45 billion — compared to €43 billion this year — would not suffice for a “fully equipped” Bundeswehr, said Bartels, who has often highlighted defects in aircraft, tanks and submarines and the “monstrous” military bureaucracy.

“The troops expect that it [the NATO pledge] be predictably and reliably implemented,” he said, referring to Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen’s drive to retool Germany’s military 25 years after the Cold War.

The lowering of defense spending is a further blow to Germany’s deteriorating military capabilities. According to a German parliamentary report reviewed by the Legal Insurrection earlier this year, the country’s armed forces were running low on both equipment and manpower. The soldiers were being dispatched on combat missions without proper gear and body armor, and the recruitment levels were critically low.  The official report disclosed that “often less than 50 percent of the Bundeswehr’s tanks, ships and aircraft were available at any one time, either for training or operational purposes.”

The ill-equipped German army with its 183,000 active duty personnel now ranks third largest in terms of size in Europe, falling behind France. The Muslim-majority Turkey, also a NATO member, can muster an army twice that size.

Berlin’s growing energy dependence on Moscow makes its vulnerable to foreign intimidation. Encouraged by the EU’s approval for a Baltic Sea gas pipeline to Germany, Russia has began construction on a Black Sea pipeline aimed at German market. President Donald Trump’s repeated warnings have largely gone unheeded in Berlin and Brussels. “Germany, as far as I’m concerned, is captive to Russia because it’s getting so much of its energy from Russia,” he said at the NATO summit last July.

If Chancellor Merkel fails to honor her defense spending pledge, the U.S. may be forced to shoulder even larger burden within the security alliance. However, with President Trump at the helm, Washington has little appetite for stretching it defense capabilities to cover up Germany’s depleting military preparedness.

Video: Germany lags behind in NATO defense funding increases

[Cover image via YouTube]

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Bucky Barkingham | March 22, 2019 at 7:27 am

How does Mutti Merkel square this with her desire, shared by M. Macron, to create an EU Army?

The money is going to the EU. Germany is trying to BE the EU. This is a bad idea, for those who do not want to see a Fourth Reich.

    For a Fourth Reich, it will be remarkably unarmed.

    I think you mean Merkel and her party wants Germany to *control* the economy of the EU, with the mistaken understanding that a united Europe (without that pesky England) will be economically powerful enough that Russia would not dare to carve out a few choice pieces.

    The Ukraine would like to differ.

      Mac45 in reply to georgfelis. | March 22, 2019 at 12:23 pm

      First of all, Germany has never given up its goal of controlling all of Europe. It merely changed tactics. Instead of controlling it through military force, it is now dominating Europe through expanding central economic control. Politically, it dominates the Western European nations through the EU. Economically, Germany is able to set European standards through the EU.

      Second, Germany does not really fear Russia. Except for that misunderstanding when Hitler invaded Russia in 1940, Russia and Germany have always enjoyed a very cordial and cooperative relationship. They even invaded Poland together, in 1939. And, Russia really has no desire to occupy any European territory. What it wants, and has always wanted, is a neutral buffer along its border with the rest of Europe. Russia suffers from cultural paranoia, probably due too the fact that it was invaded almost steadily for over 800 years. Russia is currently seeking to increase its influence with and have leverage over Western Europe by becoming the major energy supplier ti the EU.

      So, what Germany is doing, by reducing its defense spending, is two fold. It is designed to assuage Russian

        alaskabob in reply to Mac45. | March 22, 2019 at 1:28 pm

        You got the paranoia right…. everything revolves around invasion and the threat “from outside border”…”из-за границы”.

        There is no buffer per se now with Eastern Europe in USA sphere of influence… but as you point out a German hungry to influence. Their imperialism was thwarted in WW1 and WW2.

      Mac45 in reply to georgfelis. | March 22, 2019 at 12:33 pm

      Sorry for the double post, but my fat fingers accidentally submitted the preceding post prematurely. This is the completed post. Thank you for your indulgence.

      First of all, Germany has never given up its goal of controlling all of Europe. It merely changed tactics. Instead of controlling it through military force, it is now dominating Europe through expanding central economic control. Politically, it dominates the Western European nations through the EU. Economically, Germany is able to set European standards through the EU. And, Germany is controlled by rich, Progressive Globalists.

      Second, Germany does not really fear Russia. Except for that misunderstanding when Hitler invaded Russia in 1940, Russia and Germany have always enjoyed a very cordial and cooperative relationship. They even invaded Poland together, in 1939. And, Russia really has no desire to occupy any European territory. What it wants, and has always wanted, is a neutral buffer along its border with the rest of Europe. Russia suffers from cultural paranoia, probably due too the fact that it was invaded almost steadily for over 800 years. Russia is currently seeking to increase its influence with and have leverage over Western Europe by becoming the major energy supplier to the EU.

      So, what Germany is doing, by reducing its defense spending, is two fold. It is designed to assuage Russian concerns about a European military build-up which the US might be able to control, by attempting to force the dissolution of NATO if the US leaves. And, this will allow for the build-up of an EU [read German] controlled regional military/paramilitary force which would most likely deal more with internal, rather than external, threats. And, as Germany, and much of the EU, is directly controlled by rich, Globalist Progressive interests, having a regional military force, independent from the US, cements their control of the region.

NATO is past its Sell By date.

I’m waiting for “Muti and Puti” to sign a non-aggression pact, then it’ll be just like Yogi Berra observed…..”deja vu all over again”!

NATO is dead. To the Germans I say AMF-YOYO.

Adios (My Friends). You’re On Your Own

Germany will happily, even eagerly, increase defense spending just as soon as the perceive the French as spending more.

History. It always wins.

Since the fall of Communism NATO serves no purpose. It is time to reduce our commitment. Europe is quite capable of defending itself from any threat the Russians could possibly mount.

    MattMusson in reply to cwillia1. | March 22, 2019 at 10:49 am

    Western Europe has 4 times the population and 10 times the economic power as Russia.

    healthguyfsu in reply to cwillia1. | March 22, 2019 at 12:19 pm

    The problem is that most of our modern day shared interests are coming from Eastern Europe. Western Europe will let Eastern Europe rot, again, if left to their own devices.

Just kick them out of NATO since it’s obvious they have no intention of meeting their obligations, and only raising it to 3/4 of where they need to be (in 5 years, hold your breath) is insulting.

I don’t trust Merkel anyway.

“The ill-equipped German army with its 183,000 active duty personnel now ranks third largest in terms of size in Europe, falling behind France. The Muslim-majority Turkey, also a NATO member, can muster an army twice that size.”

There’s a Gilbert & Sullivan opera in there somewhere, but would it be tragedy or farce? Discuss.

I totally understand the lack of funding for their so-called military. Windmills and the rest of the green new deal crap ain’t cheap.

This can’t be true.

I thought I just read that the EU was contemplating organizing its own defense force as an alternative to NATO.

What a bunch of impotent clowns.

And dhimmitude.

Glad they’re next to the Bear to the East and not us.

In one word…. Poland. During Cold War with Russia parked on West German border, there was no buffer. Poland, with US support is that buffer. Secondly , how about a Secret Protocol V2.0 between Russia and Germany over Poland?

First option is obvious as choice to further German politics. The opiate of living under US defense shield and not paying their “fair share” oozes Leftist thought.

Second option is a rainy day deal, but familiar feel for portions of German gov from Eastern times.

Let them be invaded

    bobtuba in reply to healthguyfsu. | March 22, 2019 at 1:15 pm

    Not necessary. They are already being invaded. As a matter of fact, they are importing the invading army, paying them, housing them, and feeding them. They are already Dhimmis for all intents and purposes, and feminism and pacifism have produced successive generations of Men Without Chests. It won’t be long until they’re part of the Caliphate.

It is time for the US to allow Europe and Canada to forge their own paths in this world. The EU was started as a means to try to destroy the influence of the US in the world. Let them go. I heard the other day that Canada has a navy. It must really be small since they depend on the US for 99% of their safety.

You just know if Germany is willing to lie point-blank to the president’s face they’re lying about a whole host of things.

Shortchanging NATO is just one leg of the stool. The other two are the Nord Stream 2 pipeline (Russia) and opening Germany to Huwawei 5G (China). Thus, we have a) a weak German military, b) Russian energy dependence, c) Chinese military-connected corporate dominance of German wireless networks, in the making.

Surely no one thinks this is some kind of accident, an unintended result that simply happened on its own?

Its time to close our bases in Germany and move them to Poland where I’m sure they’ll be welcomed!

https://legalinsurrection.com/2019/02/merkels-government-deliberately-helped-terrorist-escape-justice-u-s-attorney-general-says/

The government that helped a wanted terrorist escape U.S. justice is reneging on defense spending pledge? I’m stunned, STUNNED, I tell you. Really, who could have seen this coming?

Well, the sailor chick with the pony tail looks, from this (ahem) angle, like she’s very cute. I suspect my hunch is correct because the soldier across from her (I’m not up on current Euro army uniforms; the army types are the ones wearing green berets, correct) is totally checking her out. So maybe some of the troops are good for something.

So maybe some of the troops are good for something. But they’re not going to be good for taking a front line role in any conflict.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/02/20/german-armed-forces-not-equipped-do-job-rules-watchdog/

According to the photo caption, which differs from the text, less then half of their 244 main battle tanks at the time of the article. In the previous year at times none of the Luftwaffe’s A400M transports were operational and Germany had to lease aircraft to bring their troops abroad home. The situation wasn’t quite as bad with tactical aircraft and other utility aircraft but it was still dismal. None of the Navy’s six submarines were operational, and only nine of a planned fifteen frigates were operational. Twenty one thousand NCO and junior officer billets were unfilled.

Naturally when readiness is that low an armed force can’t even train for the fight let alone fight the fight.

But at least some of them make good eye candy.

Meanwhile, I have nothing to add to Mac45’s analysis. You don’t have to be psychic to know which way the wind is blowing. Not meeting her defense spending commitments serves the old Stasi informant Merkel serves her so much better on all levels then ponying up and meeting her commitments.

    Arminius in reply to Arminius. | March 22, 2019 at 7:17 pm

    I went with the text in photo caption because the text in the article said ninety five percent of their armor was operational. And that would not be a problem. Since the article singled out the Leopard main battle tanks as a problem I figured the text in the article couldn’t be right so I went with the less than fifty percent figure as logically that is more accurate if were singling out weapons systems as not mission capable.

Shut our German bases down, bring our soldiers home or reposition them where they will be appreciated.

The germans will lie and never pay their agreed upon fair share. Let Europe sink. Hold them economically accountable. Same tax on their products they put on ours.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend