Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

IRS Employee Charged With Leaking Michael Cohen’s Bank Records to Michael Avenatti

IRS Employee Charged With Leaking Michael Cohen’s Bank Records to Michael Avenatti

The employee faces up to 5 years in prison.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=156Zo3pirU0

Back in May 2018, attorney Michael Avenatti published what looked like bank records related to President Donald Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, who in turn demanded the court force Avenatti to reveal his source.

Avenatti claimed that Cohen lacked evidence that he received or distributed any bank records. At the time, Cohen represented Stormy Daniels in her case against Trump.

Well, now an IRS employee has been charged with providing Cohen’s information to Avenatti.

Here is some background on the case:

You can read the affidavit here.

IRS employee John C. Fry, based in San Francisco, received charges of “illegally disclosing suspicious activity reports – investigative records the service kept detailing potentially illegal transactions” that involved Cohen.

From Fox News:

According to an affidavit by Linda Cieslak, a special agent with the U.S. Department of Treasury, Fry repeatedly searched law enforcement databases for information relating to Cohen. Fry, an investigative analyst for the IRS’ law enforcement arm who has worked for the agency since 2008, is accused of gaining access to five SARs, which are filed by banks when transactions are spotted that raise questions about possible financial misconduct.

One of the reports Fry allegedly accessed showed Cohen’s Essential Consultants had received a total of $500,000 from Columbus Nova, a company associated with Viktor Vekselberg, a Russian oligarch who donated money to Trump’s inauguration fund. Other payments to Essential Consultants came from AT&T ($200,000) and pharmaceutical company Novartis (approximately $399,920).

Cieslak said Fry called Avenatti from his cellphone three separate times and relayed the information from the SARs to the attorney verbally. The agent added that Fry admitted to doing so when investigators confronted him in November.

The affidavit says Avenatti made the information he obtained from Fry public on Twitter May 8, writing: “Mr. Trump and Mr. Cohen have a lot of explaining to do.” Avenatti declined to say how he obtained the records, telling Fox News at the time: “That’s my work product and will not be disclosed.”

According to the affidavit, Fry also talked with reporter Ronan Farrow, who wrote about the leak in the New Yorker magazine. Farrow wrote “that the law enforcement official who released the report had grown concerned after he was unable to find two other reports on Cohen’s financial activity that he believed should have been in a government database.”

Fry claimed “that Farrow had contacted him to confirm information supplied to Farrow by Avenatti.”

If found guilty, Fry faces five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

These deep-state creeps need to go to jail, lose their jobs and lose their pensions when they abuse their power like this.

“Avenatti declined to say how he obtained the records, telling Fox News at the time: “That’s my work product and will not be disclosed.””

That sounds like Avenatti confessed to knowingly receiving this stolen IRS information during a criminal investigation into Cohen’s activities.

Isn’t that a crime?

“Avenatti claimed that Cohen lacked evidence that he received or distributed any bank records. At the time, Cohen represented Stormy Daniels in her case against Trump.”

I think, Mary, that you have that inverted.

So did Avenatti make the statement that he did not receive the tax info in court? Wasn’t that part of the questioning for allowing him to take the stormy Daniels case even though he did not have the license in NY? Seems to be that he has been allowed to get away with too much shady BS for too long.

2019 has been one helluva year so far…

go long on popcorn futures! 😎

If the evidence against Cohen was obtained illegally is it acceptable in court? It was an agent of the government who revealed his tax stuff.

If the evidence against Cohen was obtained illegally is it acceptable in court? It was an agent of the government who revealed his tax stuff.

Main Page showing portion of post needs a small correction:

At the time, Cohen represented Stormy Daniels in her case against Trump.

Yeah. Should be changed to “Avenatti“.

I’m sure there are puh-lenty of Obama holdovers still in the IRS whom are all too happy to *much more carefully* leak yet more info whenever and to whomever they are utterly compelled to at some point in the future, so our activist judges laden Judicial Branch darn well better put them all on notice with a prosecution and sentencing to the fullest extent of the law on these spying subversive fools.

JusticeDelivered | February 22, 2019 at 4:46 pm

Avenatti comes across as the kind of attorney who should be destroyed. This looks very promising.

Meanwhile, rumor has it that The Onion is in trouble, all because of clowns like Avenatti

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/atklw4/cant_compete_with_fake_news_anymore/

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend