Image 01 Image 03

California: 700 Parents Show up at School Board Meeting In Show of Force Against Sex Ed Policies

California: 700 Parents Show up at School Board Meeting In Show of Force Against Sex Ed Policies

Parents alone have a right to decide the proper course of sex education for their children, regardless of the state’s perverted determinations.

California Christians and their beliefs have been targeted by legislative efforts by the Golden State.

But it’s not just Christians under fire. What used to be common sense traditionalism is squaring off against extreme progressivism.

If the parent protest at last week’s Chino Valley School Board meeting is any indicator, these parents aren’t going down without a fight.

By some estimates, 700 people showed up to the meeting to protest the push for sexually explicit education programs.

Life News reports:

Yesterday, about 700 parents showed up at the Chino Valley Board of Education meeting to demand the school district allow parents to opt out of K-12 sex education curricula. Concerned parents from varied ethnicities and backgrounds held signs reading “Let Parents Decide” and “Support Parents’ RIGHT TO DECIDE”. Pastor Jack Hibbs with Calvary Chapel Chino Hills and about 40 other concerned citizens spoke in favor of a proposal to require the school district to notify parents when “comprehensive sexual education”, HIV prevention education, family life education, and even instances which may imperil their child’s physical/bodily privacy on school premises.

The proposal complies with state law by granting parents the right to exclude their children from classes that teach them inappropriate sexual activity and impose an LGBT agenda on children. Parents are right to be concerned about sexual “health” curriculum in their schools that encourage children to explore certain graphic sexual acts with one another as young as 7th grade. The proposed policy would give parents ample time to shield their child from “comprehensive sexual education”. Let’s hope the Board of Education listens to the hundreds of parents who showed up and enact this sensible policy.

Parents alone have a right to decide the proper course of sex education for their children, regardless of the state’s perverted determinations.

Parents across the country need to be cognizant of how sexual and gender ideologues are co-opting school boards and sexual health curricula to change sexual and gender norms of future generations. Changes in sexual health curriculums should steer children away from risky sexual behavior, by encouraging them to abstain from sexual activity all together until they’re married, not encourage them to explore sexual acts and identities. Sexual education programs, like California’s, will only serve to perpetuate sexually-transmitted infections (which, according to the CDC, are already at record highs) and a “hook-up” culture that tells young men and women their self-worth comes from the number of sexual partners they have.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.



A great group that has the handle on all these issues is Mass Resistance. They have several chapters across the country, and in some foreign countries.

    I like what you did there. By passing on the existence of a group that can help these CA parents, by means of the LR website, you’re doing an end-around of the social media giants and their attempts to deny us the ability to communicate. Obviously this is what we have to do. And we’re gonna find other ways too. The left is not going to stop us.

Many decades ago, my sixth grade class was the first in our district to attend a Health Class and be taught ‘human reproductive biology’ (none dared call it sex ed in that relatively staid & quaint age).

Permission slips were sent home with all 6th graders. Parents were granted the courtesy to decide the ‘opt in’ option – since opt out was the default setting.

It was pretty sterile stuff. The boys were hoping for nudie stuff, like peeks from National Geographic, but it was little more than text book talk about menstration, eggs, sperm, and zygotes. The girls were simply embarrassed.

My how far we’ve fallen in this ‘progressive age’ to allow the debauched to expose such perversion to our children that ‘opt out’ is now a dare – or not even offered!

Is it time to ban government schools?

Maybe this is why there were so few people at Obama’s campaign stop in California. Only 750, just a few more than here and 1/10 of the stadium capacity. Subtract the press and Obama probably only had 500 people.

“Sexual ‘health’ curriculum in their schools … encourage children to explore certain graphic sexual acts with one another as young as 7th grade”

Really??? In California it’s a crime for any minor to have any kind of sexual relations with another minor, even if mutually agreed. Therefore, assuming the above quote is an accurate description of the Chino Valley schools curriculum, how can that possibly not amount to criminal solicitation, criminal aiding and abetting, and even criminal conspiracy to commit underage sex crimes???

Hello??? California Attorney Generals? Where are you??? Oh that’s right, professional courtesy prevents you from investigating — never mind prosecuting — unionized teachers for sex crimes.

History repeats itself: In 1968, San Mateo, CA child psychiatrist Dr. William Ayres had the first ever sex ed series for kids on television on PBS. It was also shown nationally in all California Schools. Conservative parents fought hard against the school showings, and some were even thrown in jail for keeping their kids home on the day it was shown. They felt vindicated when Ayres was arrested for molesting young boys in 2007. I saw some of his episodes. They were creepy. He talked about sex in a dead voice, as child predators do to desensitize their prey.

Ayres was convicted and died in prison in 2016. Police believe he had at least 1000 victims:

Replace sex education with biology, and a suitable religious/moral philosophy that normalizes self-moderation and personal responsibility.

Can’t teach reading……. check.
Can’t teach arithmetic…. check.

Does anyone else actually think that forcing children to attend ‘public’, government-run schools is anything less than child abuse?

This article might have been more compelling if it were accompanied by copies of the materials in question.

The Gateway Pundit did a series on sex ed materials, and they were inappropriate with respect to both tone and subject matter.

Nobody needs to be taught about “fisting.”

I was raised in a rural area, not on a farm, but between family members and friends who were, we all had a pretty good idea of what having sex was about and how babies were made and the role of the mother at birth and how the father fit in to all of it. By the time we got to 7th/8th grade and health/hygiene class, we had it all pretty clear what sex was about and were ready to know about how it related to respecting ourselves through hygiene, taking care of our own self-respect and each others. Did it change outcomes for everyone? No, but it put in perspective a life lesson for those who didn’t achieve then what they had to overcome and work harder for to go forward later. I believe the only thing missing are several visits to animal farm and a class on hygiene and self-respect.

    Back in the 70’s the farm girls were WAY ahead of the city girls, but now I wonder if it is the other way around.

    I frequently remind people that it was Bill Clinton who made oral sex a topic for dinnertime conversation. That, of course, is why he is the hero of teenage boys everywhere.

Maybe a few legislators needed to be hissed at the next time they speak.

How exhilarating to see so many non-white faces in the crowd in the accompanying photo. If only some of them would break the knee-jerk habit of voting D, there might be some hope left for CA.

JackRussellTerrierist | September 10, 2018 at 11:59 pm

When I was in high school if a girl got pregnant, woe was she. NOT socially acceptable.

As long as people send their children to government monopoly bureaucratic schools, they will be indoctrinated in leftism. A system like that will inevitably be a tool of whoever is in control. It is not capable of reform.

Pastor Jack Hibbs would do better to spend his efforts starting or funding a Christian school.