Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Will DOJ Inspector General Report be the excuse Hillary needs to run in 2020?

Will DOJ Inspector General Report be the excuse Hillary needs to run in 2020?

“But my emails” could be the rallying cry for Hillary 2020

The Inspector General report not only explosed James Comey’s breach of protocol, there was a tidbit about Comey using his gmail account for FBI business.

That was like rubbing salt in Hillary Clinton’s wound.

She tweeted “But my emails” in response, a tweet that had been retweeted and liked hundreds of thousands of times.

https://twitter.com/HillaryClinton/status/1007376361101582336

Remember all the Hillary supporters crying on Election Night? “But my emails” could be their rallying cry.

[No grinning and smiling when you watch the video above, please. We’re better than that. Right? Right? Bueller?)

Of course, Hillary running a de facto shadow electronic government through her private server and Comey (and other officials) occasionally using personal email accounts are hardly comparable.

But no matter. Hillary is bitter, and refuses to accept responsibility for her own misconduct. She and her supporters are wallowing in self-pity over a year and one-half later. The election was stolen from them by (a) Comey, (b) Russia, (c) [fill in blank].

Add the highly-questionable conclusion of the Inspector General report that there was no proof of political bias in the decisions taken with regard to exonerating Hillary, and what we have here is a rage within Hillary that must be the ragiest rage since she threw plates at Bill.

My quick take on Hillary’s tweet is that she wants to run again, and the Comey revelation combined with the IG conclusions may be the hook she needs. She views herself as life’s ultimate victim, someone deprived unfairly of her destiny by Obama and then again by Trump.

Will Hillary run? I’m thinking the chances are better than 50/50.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Run? She can’t even walk without falling down.

    MrE in reply to Paul. | June 16, 2018 at 9:17 pm

    Oh just lash her to a Segway already. She can go anywhere. ;^)

      murkyv in reply to MrE. | June 16, 2018 at 9:43 pm

      Stephen Hawkings isn’t using his ride any more.

      She could breathe into the tube and make it bark

      Chuckin Houston in reply to MrE. | June 17, 2018 at 12:25 am

      How about strapping her on the front of a vehicle like the Humungus Truck from the Road Warrior.

    Sanddog in reply to Paul. | June 16, 2018 at 10:05 pm

    That was my first thought as well. It’s going to be like Weekend at Bernies where they just move her corpse from campaign event, to campaign event and her supporters never notice a thing.

      Tom Servo in reply to Sanddog. | June 17, 2018 at 8:48 am

      I’d like to see someone take Hillary water skiing. Oops! Here comes a marker buoy! BONGGGG!!!!

    iconotastic in reply to Paul. | June 17, 2018 at 1:52 am

    Hillary’s team is experienced at throwing her around like a side of beef. No need for her to walk. All she needs to do is shriek out some hate every few days

    JohnSmith100 in reply to Paul. | June 17, 2018 at 8:34 am

    I would love to see Hillary run and lose again. It would be priceless.

Well, her call. If she wants to run on the strength of classified information being handled so badly under her at State that “we’d have had to prosecute 150 people”, and therefore prosecuted none, America can have the choice of putting her in charge of the entire executive branch… …not that I think that is a good idea, but hey…

I would put the chances of Hillary running at less than you do. Of course she wants to run. That’s a given. But her health seems to be deteriorating. I doubt she will be up to running when the times comes (though I wouldn’t be surprised if her organization ran a CGI version of her).

    oldgoat36 in reply to irv. | June 17, 2018 at 7:35 am

    I have no doubt that she would want to run, but I don’t think the donors nor the large number of DNC puppets want her to. They are wishing she would just go away. I agree that I would put her chances of running again at less than 50 percent.

    Bucky Barkingham in reply to irv. | June 17, 2018 at 7:37 am

    Maybe Chelsea could run as a surrogate?

    stevewhitemd in reply to irv. | June 17, 2018 at 11:07 am

    A CGI version would be interesting, it could easily be more life-like…

It was nice of her to remind us of them. Considering how badly they were mishandled, there is an excellent case to reopen the investigation, this time with competent personnel. Not that I want her in prison, but it would be nice to see her forced to plead guilty to a single misdemeanor.

    Disco Stu_ in reply to Tregonsee. | June 17, 2018 at 8:05 am

    I’d propose 5 years of supervised probation, including an electronic-monitoring cankle bracelet.

    Plus monetary fine of, oh, say $500,000.

    Mostly I want no doubt about the deporable character of this witch when she’s portrayed in history books 50 years from now.

      ConradCA in reply to Disco Stu_. | June 17, 2018 at 1:17 pm

      $500,000 for each of the 22 top secret and above classified documents found on her server, closing down her charity/slush fund and penalties for the $87 million in campaign violations.

Oh…PLEASE…!!!

It’ll be fun to watch…again…

On the Comey comparison, there isn’t any.
https://hotair.com/archives/2018/06/14/hillary-mocks-comey-ig-revelation-used-private-email/

    rabid wombat in reply to Ragspierre. | June 16, 2018 at 10:00 pm

    This!

    Imagine looking at the last campaign through what we know now….

    And Rags will vote for her, again. Because TRUUUUMMMPPPPP!

      Ragspierre in reply to SDN. | June 16, 2018 at 11:43 pm

      I’ve never voted for a Clinton, you lying sos.

      kenoshamarge in reply to SDN. | June 17, 2018 at 9:44 am

      That’s a scurrilous lie rabid Trump supporters tell. If someone, and I was one, didn’t like Trump or want Trump then we were Hillary voters. What a bunch of crap!

      Some of us are finding that he isn’t as bad as we thought. And we are glad of that.

      And so many of you mindlessly, up voted this nonsense. I thought the people here were smarter, and better, than that!

        Barry in reply to kenoshamarge. | June 17, 2018 at 1:39 pm

        “That’s a scurrilous lie rabid Trump supporters tell.”

        No one gives a rip who you voted for. It is a provable assertion that rags did every thing in his power to see Trump defeated and Clinton elected.

        “Rabid” is not required. The only “rabid” are the deranged nevertrumpers, which equate to “I’m with her”.

Please run, you vile, blood-sucking, walking corpse.

    Sanddog in reply to Immolate. | June 16, 2018 at 10:08 pm

    That’s harsh. I’m sure there are plenty of bloodsucking corpses out there that aren’t nearly as vile as Hillary.

regulus arcturus | June 16, 2018 at 9:23 pm

No. We are awaiting yet another IG report which will spell out clear criminality in the FISA process, and will dovetail with the criminality stated within the most recent report.

Additionally, John Huber is still at work. Indictments to follow.

Sorry, Professor, but you’re misinterpreting the “conclusion of the Inspector General report that there was no proof of political bias in the decisions taken with regard to exonerating Hillary”. Horowitz is only the investigator. He can only report facts. This statement means that no one explicitly admitted that they acted out of bias. The report imcludes ample circumstantial evidence for a prosecutor to bring charges.

In the Freddy Gray case we saw firsthand the problems caused when the prosecutor becomes the investigator. The two functions must be separate, so the investigator can testify during trial.

It’s all up to Huber now. And I don’t think it’s a coincidence that a Senate staffer was recently charged with leaking.

The same way the Dems conspired against Bernie in 2016, they’ll conspire against 2-time loser Hillary in 2020. I’d expect a speech from her at the convention to rally the women around whatever old white male (Biden) candidate they (fix to) nominate with Kamala or Liz as his running mate.

“No grinning and smiling when you watch the video above, please. We’re better than that. Right? Right?”

Wrong. I giggled and snorted. Again. Still. Those videos just never. get. old.

Humphrey's Executor | June 16, 2018 at 10:02 pm

To satisfy the base, she’ll have to divorce Bill and marry Huma.

I hope Hillary runs again. I love rewatching the 2016 election returns and watching the Left go from smug gloating to bat poo crazy to it’s the apocalypse melt down.

If she does run we need to push the polls for months and months on end showing her with a 98% chance to win and how everyone believes the “email story”. While telling the truth and saying like it is sour grapes that surely the polls cant be right. I would even hold a Hillary sign saying something like “Hillary her time has finally come! Vote2020” as long as we are all wink wink and realize what is going on. Then everyone votes Trump like their lives, their families lives, and the country depends on it because they do – walking on glass and even in a hurricane to vote against Hillary.

Good grief, even Al Gore gave up eventually.

DouglasJBender | June 16, 2018 at 10:15 pm

“Elect me!! I was only ‘extremely careless’, not ‘grossly negligent, in my handling of classified information when I was Secretary of State!!”

The more aging democrats in the ring, the better.

If she is alive in 2020 (and not in jail), she’ll probably drop dead in the course of trying to run – which would be quite a spectacle to cap a long, criminal career.

Maybe she’ll take that rat Sessions with her.

nordic_prince | June 16, 2018 at 10:35 pm

I don’t know. If Hillary is so incompetent that she couldn’t even win an election rigged in her favor, who on earth is going to bankroll her candidacy? Maybe I’m naive, but I don’t think even the liberals/leftists are *that* dumb to flush money down the toilet.

Clinton/Comey 2K20!!!

Almost guaranteed NO. Too many Democrats have swallowed buckets of crap for the Clintons, and what they got for their efforts was president Trump. On top of that, it’s a fact that she and the DNC rigged their own primary.

Dem voters aren’t going to forget that.

    n.n in reply to Matt_SE. | June 16, 2018 at 11:20 pm

    And Obama before her… and he was elected twice. It’s not about democracy or voting rights. It’s about winning.

      Matt_SE in reply to n.n. | June 17, 2018 at 10:01 am

      Yes, winning is a big part of it and she’s a two-time proven LOSER. Thank you for agreeing with me.

        Barry in reply to Matt_SE. | June 17, 2018 at 1:42 pm

        You’d be surprised. The Clintons spent lots of years putting corrupt people in the right positions and collecting the dirt required.

Yes! Now that Comey has somehow vindicated her for committing similar wrongdoing (?!?!) which somehow in her mind means she was right all along (?!?!) she’s in the clear.

Well, except for Russian interference. And White women voting like their husbands tell them to instead of thinking with their ovaries. And low information voters. And the Republican party. And the Democratic party. And Bernie Sanders and Barack Obama sabotaging her. And bad polling numbers. And idiots in Wisconsin and Michigan who think she should actually campaign there. And not being able to campaign for weeks at a time because of “pneumonia.” And getting tossed into the “Scooby van” like a side of beef. And Netflix. And a hostile press. And people making the wrong documentaries. And misogyny. And FaceBook, Twitter, and Wikileaks. And Macedonian content farms. And, and…

You get the point. Now that Comey is disgraced along similar lines she disgraced herself, as long as she can keep all the above factors under control she’s got a clear path to the presidency.

And giving the vote to illegal aliens while taking the vote away from the deplorables. Let’s not forget that.

Comanche Voter | June 17, 2018 at 12:00 am

You run girl. If you do that in 2020, Trump will kick your butt from Chappaqua almost all the way to Carlsbad California. But you will win in California. Unfortunately there are all those electoral votes out there in deplorable land.

Subotai Bahadur | June 17, 2018 at 1:57 am

There is a more than passingly compelling case that Hillary has Parkinson’s disease. During the campaign, [4 years before a 2020 campaign] it could be cogently argued that she was at Stage 3. Her “sack of potatoes” toss is consistent of having reached the stage where Levadopa loses effectiveness as a treatment.

Stage 4 is indicated when artificial means for walking and movement are necessary. In the last few weeks, she has been photographed wearing unseasonably bulky and warm clothing in hot weather. And even through those what appears to be a back or body brace is evident. From Stage 4, mental problems and hallucinations manifest themselves and become more frequent. By Stage 5 dementia is the norm.

While she certainly may WANT to run again, even leaving out the possibility of other parties having an interest in removing her from the political scene, by 2020 she may not be physically or mentally capable of running.

    oldgoat36 in reply to Subotai Bahadur. | June 17, 2018 at 7:44 am

    Would the Dem voters even be able to tell if she has dementia or hallucinations? Given the stellar members of the party, like Maxine and Nancy, just to name two, who certainly seem to suffer along those lines, it might be an enhancement to run. Like a badge of honor.

      Tom Servo in reply to oldgoat36. | June 17, 2018 at 8:50 am

      Not simply a badge of honor – I would argue that Dementia is a *requirement* for someone to reach the highest levels of today’s Dem Party.

    Remember the wikileaks dump of the campaign emails? I saw copies of the ones that HRC was supposed to use during her “speeches”. They had to utilize a font so large that about 4 sentences could fit on a printed page. The reason is that HRC cannot see typical print. The other item that was readily apparent is that she would not do a speech without a podium for support that was longer than 5 minutes.
    HRC couldn’t run, she couldn’t stand and she couldn’t see. Her physical condition has not improved….

inspectorudy | June 17, 2018 at 2:32 am

A couple of things. One, Sundance at the Conservative house says that the IG did NOT write the conclusions. He says that they were written by the lawyers in the two departments, the FBI and the DoJ.
Second, if hillary is going to claim that Comey’s actions caused her to lose then she will have to explain why the FBI (Comey) did not make the fact that her server was hacked by a foreign agent public before the election. They also hid Strozk’s statement that he would stop Trump if elected. The bottom line is that she will not run again and America does not want her to run.

    JohnSmith100 in reply to inspectorudy. | June 17, 2018 at 8:48 am

    I would love to see run against Trump and lose again, maybe she would go into convulsions and expire. Hillary is disgusting.

      One, don’t wish for her to pass away. That’s not cool.

      Two, if she did pass away in the middle of a campaign, her running mate would get an overwhelming sympathy vote. Think about it. If she had won in 2016 and passed away in 2019, we’d have eight years of President Kaine (in effect) or even 12.

      I wish her a long and healthy retirement from politics, filled with loving relatives and playful puppies. Far from D.C.

Hell for Hillary will have two parts:
1) Endlessly losing elections rigged in her favor.
2) Having Bill as her roommate. (That’s a twofer)

Can you imagine life in 2018 if HRC were POTUS? It would be Hell-on-earth for everyone else as the USA is destroyed.

I have a question: Why was Huma so loyal to HRC?

There seems to be a slight difference between using an account outside the government one as Comey the snake did, and what Hillary did. It seems confidential materials were not sent on Comey’s, at least that is the inferred. We know Hillary used the private server to be able to do exactly as she did, destroy the evidence and control what could be found to a high degree.

Of course those 30K + emails were only about the wedding plans and would have nothing to do with illegal activities she was engaged with while SOS. The criminal crime family Clintons know how to hide their crimes well enough, even though they are neck deep in crap, they have enough cover, and enough dead people around them, that they get away with it.

The woman is bold. She is convinced she should have been crowned queen, despite knowing her own corruption, she thinks it is owed her. She believes the crimes committed are justified because the ends justify the means. They were in deep debt and broke, of course they deserve to become wealthy from their crimes because the evil Republicans dared to give them a tough time through that vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Never mind the crimes done, they deserve every last dollar they could steal.

The OIG report is being misinterpreted by many in that it lays out case after case of apparent wrong doing and then examines each on in a vacuum. In evaluating each situation, the OIG concluded that each did not represent a case of something terribly wrong. This is akin to flipping a coin 1,000 times and analyzing each coin flip to say that there was a 50:50 chance of seeing heads as the result. What the report does not do and leaves up to the reader is to look at the 1,000 coin flips and realize that coming up heads each of the 1,000 times is essentially statistically impossible. Likewise, all that was done for Hillary was each a slight variation from normal behavior by the FBI, but taken as a whole it represents an enormous deviation.
>
Also, there is a statement where the FBI did not see the presence of classified material on Clinton’s home grown server a problem since there have been many cases before of DOJ personnel having thousands of classified materials in their homes and nothing was done. This is in itself horrifying to so many that have been prosecuted for relatively minor offenses in using/storing classified material in that it essentially seeks to justify a two tier justice system. Why do we even have certain laws if there are those for whom they do not apply?

    oldgoat36 in reply to Cleetus. | June 17, 2018 at 9:13 am

    Hence the reason why Drain the Swamp was able to resonate with so many people.

    Laws are supposed to apply to all, not exempt the select few untouchables.

    More and more it seems they WANT an armed resurrection to happen.

Hillary will be the Pontiac Aztec of 2020!!

This is not the first time the DOJ was weaponized for politics.

Look, we understood we couldn’t make it illegal to be young or poor or black in the United States, but we could criminalize their common pleasure. We understood that drugs were not the health problem we were making them out to be, but it was such a perfect issue…that we couldn’t resist it.” – John Ehrlichman, White House counsel to President Nixon on the rationale of the War on Drugs.

I don’t recall “conservatives” complaining about that.

The government is corrupt because the people are corrupt. It rarely goes the other way around.

Occasional Thinker | June 17, 2018 at 10:13 am

I agree with her, but not the way she means it. Hilary improperly communicated and should have been prosecuted. Comey improperly communicated and should be prosecuted. Let the difference be in the sentencing, based on the information that was mishandled. Government employees should be held to a stricter standard than the general population, not a lesser as they now are. If they don’t like the stricter standard, they can go to work in the private sector with us other uneducated lazy POS’s.

If you want to make some heads explode, try:

Trump2016! Trump2020! Trump2024!

Works every time . . .

Obama spied on American citizens, including the Republican presidential nominee.
Clinton colluded with foreign agents in Kiev and Britain in order to influence the election.
The DNC aborted democracy by denying the vote to the Sanders (perhaps Jew privilege). In their defense, they did the same when they favored Obama over Clinton (perhaps White privilege).

The issue is if these “deep state” actors enabled Obama’s spying and influenced the election, but, thankfully, not sufficiently to disenfranchise the People.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend