Image 01 Image 03

Internet Works Feverishly to Identify Sketch of Stormy Daniel’s Alleged Threatener After Her Attorney Posts Reward Offer

Internet Works Feverishly to Identify Sketch of Stormy Daniel’s Alleged Threatener After Her Attorney Posts Reward Offer

The race to identify the perp is on

Stormy Daniels the (former?) porn star who claims Trump paid her $130,000 to keep quiet about their affair now claims she was threatened in 2011.

Daniels claims the “well dressed” man approached her in a parking lot and told her to “Leave Mr. Trump alone.”

Know who this guy is? Daniels is offering a $100,000 award.

The internet is hot on the perp’s trail.

Raise your hand if you knew it

Generic man, because obvs

Also likely

You know you laughed

If the hair fits…

Could it be The Mooch?

Nope. Too short. WAY too short.

I mean…

We’re halfway there

Let’s be real here, Dexter’s done MUCH worse

Like his accent wouldn’t have given him away

Well now…

For posterity

A most uncanny resemblence


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


OleDirtyBarrister | April 17, 2018 at 7:12 pm

Is that Karl Hungus? Did he try to gain entry to her house by pretending that he was there to fix the cable?

Or is it the younger version of Val Kilmer when he was in the movie “Heat”?

This entire ‘he threatened me’ story is just utterly ludicrous at even a cursory examination.

So Trump banged her.

Then, as SHE has previously claimed, she never attempted to tell anybody about it.

So then, randomly, YEARS later, somebody just turns up to threaten her? That makes zero logical sense. You threaten somebody immediately after it happened, or if you find out they’re going to try to go to the press about it.

By her own admission she hadn’t considered telling anybody. So why would she need to be threatened?

This whole thing is just an aging prostitute trying to capitalize on her 15 minutes and peddling lies to a captive media audience.

    Ragspierre in reply to Olinser. | April 17, 2018 at 7:42 pm

    Either intentionally ignorantly or just lying, you have presented the time line and facts all wrong.

    You might want to start with “T-rump banged her”…and lied about it.

      MarkS in reply to Ragspierre. | April 17, 2018 at 8:35 pm

      OK, Trumped banged her, so what?

        Ragspierre in reply to MarkS. | April 18, 2018 at 1:45 am

        Well, you are about to learn all the “so whats”, following T-rump banged her and then he lied about it.

          JusticeDelivered in reply to Ragspierre. | April 18, 2018 at 3:13 pm

          Her mug is ugly enough that many men would lie about being involved with her.

          I don’t get this, Rags. Trump lied about banging (a decade ago, long long before he was elected president) a porn star. What’s the big here? Who *wouldn’t* lie about banging a porn star (except maybe another porn star, a twelve-year-old boy, or Charlie Sheen)?

          Your prissy pants are far too tight, Rags. Try some big-boy pants for a change.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 21, 2018 at 12:06 am

          In prior years, Duh DOnald would BRAG about banging a porn star.

          As well you know, you dishonest witch.

          Now, with his campaign conversion, it isn’t so shiny.

          I certainly can’t speak for your morals, but mine have kept me from ever cheating on a spouse. You and your “pants” seem to be cool with all that. What are you panting about…???

      Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 18, 2018 at 1:39 am

      Did she date Roy more as a teenager?
      Did Roy Moore sign her yearbook, in December?
      Did she work in a BBQ restaurant where no one remembers her?

      Inquiring minds wish to know.

        Ragspierre in reply to Barry. | April 18, 2018 at 1:48 am

        How are all those defamation lawsuits by Moore going, poor lying nutter?

          Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 18, 2018 at 7:56 pm

          As I’ve already pointed out to you progs, the election was it. There is nothing to be gained from penniless political whores through civil lawsuits.

          You and Stormy. Good match.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 5:41 am

          So you’re admitting that Moore and his lawyers were just lying.

          Odd though. The WaPo has money. So does Allred. And people sue to redeem their good name where no damages are really in play.

          You and “Jail Bait” Moore. A great couple.

          Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 2:36 pm

          The only “admitting” being done is you on every page of LI standing with every political whore.

          Moore’s net worth is reportedly around 2mil. Lawyers for lawsuits of this type are not going to work for free and 2mil ain’t going to cut it.

          He can’t get “his good name back” as there is no way to prove a negative, I.E., that he didn’t do the things he was accused of.

          Of course, the truth is, you know all this.
          You lie in service to the progs.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 6:37 pm

          Poor old lying nutter…!!!

          A defamation lawsuit would cost MAYBE $30,000, if that.

          Roy “Jail-bait” Moore could easily raise that from his idiot acolytes. Like you.

          Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 9:43 pm

          More of your lies. 30K wouldn’t be a drop in the bucket for these cases.

          And I was never a Moore supporter, I don’t even like him. One more of your infinite number of lies.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 20, 2018 at 12:06 am

          But, Butt-hurt Barri, I have both brought and defended defamation lawsuits, and I know what they cost, you stinking, lying piece of shit.

          Roy “Jail-bait” Moore lied. The only lawsuit in existence is one by one of his victims. He even lied about suing. Even you can see that, liar.

    JusticeDelivered in reply to Olinser. | April 17, 2018 at 9:52 pm

    maybe when Trump was banging Stormey she was attractive, but not anything exceptional today. That might explain why she has resorted to what looks like extortion-blackmail. Why hasn’t she been charged?

      Where’s the extortion or the blackmail? It would only be blackmail if she demanded the $130K for her silence. If Cohen offered it and she accepted there’s no crime. And now that she’s talking there’s definitely no crime.

        dystopia in reply to Milhouse. | April 18, 2018 at 6:16 am

        Accepting money in return for a non-disclosure agreement and then blatantly and repeatedly violating that agreement is despicable to me. Whether a crime has been committed is up to prosecutors to charge. The validity of the NDA is also something that can be challenged in court. But blatantly violating a bargain when you understand the terms and have accepted money is despicable.

        JusticeDelivered in reply to Milhouse. | April 18, 2018 at 3:07 pm

        Milhouse, you are really finely splitting hairs on this. She is going public, but goes to Trump’s attorney near the election, holding out her hand. I think it is pretty clear it was extortion. This woman is really low class, and probably a major schemer. I still think she should be charged and have her day in court.

        scaulen in reply to Milhouse. | April 18, 2018 at 4:02 pm

        So if she accepted $130K to not talk then she must have reported the cash windfall on her taxes correct? If she didn’t then maybe the IRS might want to investigate why she didn’t claim such a significant amount of cash. After all it would have to be cash as there is no way anyone would cut a check for that. Never mind trying to cash it and depositing it would raise some flags. So she would be in a bind either way, tax evasion or a false statement. I’m sure someone could get the same warrant but to be used to visit her accountant, get her IRS records and all her banking accounts?? #justwondering

    stl in reply to Olinser. | April 17, 2018 at 10:07 pm

    Yep, if they can get rid of Trump, perfect, if they can limit his effectiveness-awesome, if they can destroy his marriage, Perfecto… cant’ stand the illegal, uncouth, unethical, morally decrepid leftist and their associated media

Well Tom Brady is a Trump supporter, Did he deflate her tires????

Well that narrows down the list to several million people sharing the same sentiment.

That’s definitely Willem Dafoe.
How do I claim the reward?

    Tom Servo in reply to Exiliado. | April 17, 2018 at 11:30 pm

    When I saw that sketch, I thought “whoa, that looks like Barbie’s Mystery Date!”

    Wait, I know his name – it’s Haven Monahan!!!

It’s… it’s me!

I’m so sick of this BS. She’s had way too much attention already. Far beyond boring now.

Paging OJ Simpson, perhaps we’ve identified the perp who murdered Nicole and Ron.

Oh boy, a Clue!

It was Kato Kaelin with the nothingburger in the parking lot!

Everybody can get in on the fun. America’s all about life, liberty, and the pursuit of entertainment.

The sketch looks a lot like her ex. A LOT.

It could be a figment of her imagination, it isn’t hard to describe some fictional character and have an artist do a rendition. She is doing this BS to make it out as if Trump hired a hit man of sorts to threaten her.

She’s a porn star, I don’t care if Trump did anything with her or not. It isn’t pertinent to anything other than his family and his wife. She is pretty disgusting and I don’t believe she is being totally honest. Why should we care what a slut has to say?

The prostitutes attorney dreams up a headline every day.

No joke – the sketch is her ex-husband, Glendon Crain. https://

What the crap was her description to the sketch artist; “He was about yay tall and non-descript!”

No problem with her filing a police report now, is there? Except the prospect of jail time, of course.

Oh dear. Camera Hogg is having one helluva tough time getting back into the limelight. First it was James Comey and his work of fiction and now it is Stormy Daniels again. Come on libs give the kid a break.

Is Trump running this entire thing as a diversion to take the spotlight off of other stuff or is the media really this stupid?

    Daiwa in reply to Andy. | April 17, 2018 at 11:33 pm

    The media really are this stupid. Latest example: the trite, overly melodramatic claptrap speculation about the Southwest Airlines engine explosion. May the victim rest in peace.

Somehow “leave Mr. Trump alone” just doesn’t really sound all that threatening to me. Unless it’s in a Terminator voice, then it might be threatening, if I could stop laughing at it.

It seems to me that the Councilwoman was far more threatening than this supposed man who came up like George McFly telling Stormy to leave Mr. Trump alone. I wonder if he wagged his finger at her too. Of course no punch after, as Stormy never said it was physical…

“Leave Mr Trump alone” WOW! That’s quite the threat. No wonder she’s so scared. [/sarc]

OleDirtyBarrister; If it was Karl, the resemblance is striking, you can damn sure bet Jackie Treehorn sent him!

CaliforniaJimbo | April 18, 2018 at 8:51 am

Maybe Hogg is the Trump / Stormy love child.
Seriously, the composite looks a lot like her ex BF.

On so many levels, I could make the analogy that the pretty face of Stormy Daniels is the perfect poster child of what the Democrats have become. Attention seeking, vulgar, shrill, and using pimps to shake-down and threaten. I could go on, but Dems, like Stormy are also slightly past their shelf-life and destined to soon be denied the stage.

    elle in reply to elle. | April 18, 2018 at 11:54 am

    Democrat Poster Children through the ages:

    1. young and idealistic peace protesters – Jane Fonda;
    2. busy soccer moms; –
    3. insufferable nannies Cheryl “1 Square” Crow,
    4. wanting to feel young again peace protesters – Code Pink
    5. self-righteous warriors unmasking the heretics; – Ladies of The View
    6. aging women in pink hats – Lena Dunham
    7. Prostitute used to raise cash – Stormy Daniels

    What comes next?

So, in 2001, 4 years before Trump even begins to run for office, someone allegedly threatens Daniels to leave Trump alone. This according to Daniels. And, this elicits NO suspicion, on the part of the media, that perhaps Daniels was attempting to shake down Der Donald, way back then. Then, in 2016, she takes action, threatening to go public, which results in her receiving a payment of $130,000 dollars, which she accepts AND signs a NDA for. And, now she feels IMPELLED, by some kind of civic minded OBLIGATION (?) [which she apparently did not have in 2011 or 2016], to tell the world about her one-time, consensual affair with Trump, which she agreed to withhold comment on AFTER she accepted $130,000 and signed a NDA.

If did not involve Trump, it wouldn’t even see the light of day, outside the pages of a supermarket tabloid. This whole thing is beyond stupid.

    Ragspierre in reply to Mac45. | April 18, 2018 at 12:20 pm

    For decades, T-rump’s lawyer was Roy Cohn, mob lawyer deluxe. So, that treat could NEVER happen…!!!

      Mac45 in reply to Ragspierre. | April 18, 2018 at 2:26 pm

      Oh, the threat may certainly have occurred. And, of course, this would make Trump the ONLY politician in US history who has ever paid a woman to remain silent about a consensual sexual liaison, or even threatened one, or possibly worse [sarcasm alert].

      But, that does not diminish the potential that, in 2011, Ms. Daniels was going to expose a consensual liaison with Trump, in exchange for money. She did the same thing in 2016 and received money, in return for a promise not to disclose this incident. After taking the money AND signing a NDA, she is again attempting to cash in on the fact that she had a consensual sexual liaison with Trump.

      Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 18, 2018 at 8:01 pm

      Ragspusy, supporter of porn stars and hookers.

      Mr. “conservative” with a side “character”.

      A proud prog he is.

        Ragspierre in reply to Barry. | April 19, 2018 at 8:49 am

        What’s funny is that I am MUCH less a “supporter” of porn stars and hookers than is your Great Goad Cheeto.

        I’ve never cheated on a spouse. T-rump has cheated on all of his…and bragged about it usually.

        I’ve never had any dealings with a porn star. Duh Donald has exchanged bodily fluids with at least one.

        I’ve never paid anyone a dime to suppress information. Duh Donald has (at least by proxy) paid a small fortune to his paramour. Now THAT is “support”…!!!

        Plus, as we know, he’s lied. Because he’s a liar. Like you. And you support his lying.

          Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 2:41 pm

          Anyone that reads LI knows you support every political whore.

          It’s that simple. You do. You never question what they say. It’s always “true”.

          Its Trump derangement syndrome writ large.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 6:39 pm

          I credit people who have corroboration. I DEPLORE people like Moore who lie. Simple as that.

          Barry in reply to Ragspierre. | April 19, 2018 at 9:47 pm

          “I credit people who have corroboration.”

          There is not a single bit of “corroboration” in any of these cases, and you know it.

          They are nothing more than unprovable allegations.

          And you always stand with the political whores of the left.

          Ragspierre in reply to Ragspierre. | April 20, 2018 at 12:11 am

          Each of Moore’s accusers is corroborated, You’re just a lying a lying sack of shit who defends the likes of Moore and the serial adulterer who is your Great Goad Cheeto.

Can’t Stormy use or like everybody else ?

I’m late to the party, I know, but yeah – the subconscious plays tricks on you sometimes, especially when you’re lying through your teeth and gotta come up with something. . .

And, just for fun. . .


    When I first saw the drawing of Ms. S’s bogeyman, I thought it looked like a generic representation of an attractive young guy.

    But after seeing the pic…It’s obvious the man who approached Stormy in the parking lot was her own ex-hubby!!!!!
    (wonder why she didn’t recognize him?)

No, Butt-hurt Barri, I stand with people who have stories that hand together, and against you and the people who victimize them.

    Woah, oh he speaks with SJW forked tongue. Stormy is a victim here? REALLY? Even she says the affair was consensual. She’s offering a $100k reward for the identification of the guy she claims told her to shut up. She’s a porn star, who has a clear concept about sex for money. She agreed to the settlement (most of which she is apparently putting up to identify some ravishingly beautiful hunk who uttered the dread words: “Leave Mr. Trump alone”), and she’s preening around like the porn version of Hogg. Yeah, some victim.

    Where was this poor victim from 2006 to October 2016 when she was reportedly paid $130k for her silence (which she’d been keeping for ten years already)? Why didn’t she spill her affair story earlier in the year, before the confidentiality agreement? Why didn’t she spill when Trump won the GOP nomination? Why didn’t she spill a decade ago?

    Oh, right, she was accosted by a hunk in a parking lot who beat her to pulp, kicked her puppy, and threatened her family. Oh, wait, he just said “Leave Mr. Trump alone.” Yeah, that would have me totally skeered.

    If I were that skeered, I’d contact the police immediately, but hey, that’s just me. I’m not a victim.

    Your adept use of the left’s language is a bit alarming. Stormy is no victim, even she says she wasn’t an unwilling participant. She wasn’t paid off until October 2016, and you’re whining about her victim status? Grope around in your noggin for those last two brain cells–they have to be in there somewhere–and try really really hard to rub them together into a coherent thought. You can do it!

      Rags, when you post a reply to an OP (original post), you are posting a reply to . . . the OP. If you mean to reply to a particular person or thread, then the means of doing so is hitting “reply” and replying to that thread or person. Since you posted this as a separate thread, it’s not unreasonable to take it as . . . oh, I don’t know, a separate thread.

      Sure, you preface your bizarre statement with something directed at Barry, but who knows what you mean based on your comment? How many comments does Barry have in response to this post? Which one are we to assume you are responding?

      Here’s an idea, instead of spouting off in reply to the OP and expecting everyone to know what you mean because we hang on your every word, think about how comment threading works. If you respond to the OP, the OP is the context. If you don’t like that, then think about you might respond in a less useless manner.