Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Hillary Earned Less For College Speech Than “Snooki” From Jersey Shore

Hillary Earned Less For College Speech Than “Snooki” From Jersey Shore

And no, it’s not just pop culture. She also earned less than Condoleezza Rice.

Rutgers University paid twice-failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton $25,000 for her recent speech, and the relatively low speaking fee is causing quite the buzz.

After all, Rutgers paid Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi, of the reality show Jersey Shore more than that in 2011.

Fox News reports:

Clinton was paid $25,000 to speak at Rutgers University about being targeted as a woman in politics, the upcoming elections and the Trump administration, among other topics, NJ.com reported.

But the money she made seemed to be considerably less than some other high-profile guests who’ve spoken at the New Jersey school.

For example, Nicole “Snooki” Polizzi, of “Jersey Shore” fame, was paid $32,000 for her Rutgers appearance in 2011. Students paid for her appearance using money from the student activity fees undergraduates pay at the school, according to NJ.com.

If you’re wondering who Snooki is, here’s a compilation clip from Jersey Shore (NSFW):

Hillary’s Wall Street speaking fees have garnered a lot of attention, but her university speaking fees were a source of much interest only four years ago.

In 2014, after Hillary left State, the Washington Post reported that her university speaking fees were creating backlash at universities.  Students were outraged that universities were raising tuition while paying Hillary $200k-300k for a single speech.

At least eight universities, including four public institutions, have paid hundreds of thousands of dollars for Hillary Rodham Clinton to speak on their campuses over the past year, sparking a backlash from some student groups and teachers at a time of austerity in higher education.

In one previously undisclosed transaction, the University of Connecticut — which just raised tuition by 6.5 percent — paid $251,250 from a donor fund for Clinton to speak on campus in April. Other examples include $300,000 to speak at the University of California at Los Angeles in March and $225,000 for a speech scheduled for October at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas.

The potential 2016 Democratic presidential candidate also has been paid for speeches at the University at Buffalo, Colgate University and Hamilton College in New York, as well as Simmons College in Boston and the University of Miami in Florida.

Officials at those five schools refused to say what they paid Clinton. But if she earned her standard fee of $200,000 or more, that would mean she took in at least $1.8 million in speaking income from universities in the past nine months.

So intense was the backlash, that Hillary felt the need to explain that all of her university speaking fees “went to charity.” The charity? You guessed it, the Clinton Foundation.

CBS News reported at the time:

Facing criticism from some quarters about her expensive speeches, Hillary Clinton said Friday that every dollar she’s earned speaking at universities since stepping down as secretary of state last year has gone into the philanthropic work of her family’s foundation.

“All of the fees have been donated to the Clinton Foundation for it to continue its life-changing and life-saving work,” she told ABC News. “So it goes from a foundation at a university to another foundation.”

The issue was thrown into the spotlight when students at the University of Nevada at Las Vegas (UNLV) demanded last week that Clinton return the $225,000 the university paid her for a speech scheduled for October, citing planned tuition hikes.

“The students are outraged about this,” Elias Benjelloun, UNLV’s student body president, told the Washington Post. “When you see reckless spending, it just belittles the sacrifices students are consistently asked to make. I’m not an accountant or economist, so I can’t put a price tag on how much we should be paying her, but I think she should come for free.”

So what happened?  Why are her speaking fees so low now?  From a quarter of a million dollars a pop to $25k is quite a drop.

It’s not because she’s “just” a former Secretary of State.  The University of Minnesota paid Condoleezza Rice $150,000 for a 2014 speech.  She had left State in 2009.

Rutgers may be on a budget, though, since they invited Rice for their 2014 commencement and offered her an honorary doctorate and $35,000.  A horrible backlash ensued, however, because Rutgers faculty and students didn’t want to hear from Rice, and she ultimately decided not to give the speech.

As a conservative former Secretary of State, Rice was offered by Rutgers $10k (and an honorary doctoral degree) more than Hillary.  As a former “reality star,” the unpolished Snooki was paid by Rutgers $7k more than Hillary.

They’re both women, so Hillary can’t keep shrieking “sexist misogynists who hate me because I’m a woman.”  I’m sure she’ll come up with something, though.  Maybe Rutgers is in league with the Russians, Comey, Obama, the DNC, and the “deplorables” who are plotting against her as a part of the “vast right-wing conspiracy”?

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Henry Hawkins | March 31, 2018 at 6:10 pm

The female members of leadership at Rutgers succumbed to the misogynistic bullying of the white male leadership and ought to be blamed for Hillary’s fee nosedive. These are the same weak-ass women who failed to vote for Hillary in 2016. They are positively deplorable.

Now that political favors coming from bribing her with outlandish fees, are not going to happen, she is now a “bargain”, if you could stomach hearing her whining and blaming everyone else for her loss.

Earned? Was paid.

Which applies for all three women mentioned.

Gotta love this wannabe woman: the bozo single-handled destroyed the leftist plot that would have succeeded in stealing our nation – and our freedom – after the obama eight-year setup.

In gratitude: let’s lock her up for the rest of her rotten life.

AG Sessions: you suck. You are as corrupt as klinton or mcconnell.

Levin: Mitch McConnell should be removed after ‘shocking’ and ‘disgusting’ corruption allegations:
https://www.conservativereview.com/articles/levin-mitch-mcconnell-removed-shocking-disgusting-corruption-allegations/

McConnell And Chao: As Corrupt As The Clintons:
https://www.redstate.com/joesquire/2018/03/19/mcconnell-chao-corrupt-clintons/

Well. The obvious first assumption is that there’s little point in throwing donations at the Clinton Slush Fund if neither principal is likely to be in a position to grant any favors anytime soon. That might account for a 90% drop in her rates.

On the other hand, Condoleezza Rice isn’t going to be in any such position either. So her fee is inexplicable. Maybe even outrageous.

So there’s evidently more to this market than just bribing the Clinton crime family. What it might be I can’t imagine. Speaking personally, I can certainly think of more economical ways to pay for a speech I’d just sleep through anyway.

Being able to say, “I don’t remember” 27 different ways, while a talent, is not one worth as much as a well rounded, firm rack.

    You can be sure she didn’t come up with the 27 ways by herself: she had some paid hack do it.

      ARKANSAS ALZHEIMER’S

      Number of times that Clinton figures who testified in court or before Congress said that they didn’t remember, didn’t know, or something similar.

      Bill Kennedy 116
      Harold Ickes 148
      Ricki Seidman 160
      Bruce Lindsey 161
      Bill Burton 191
      Mark Gearan 221
      Mack McLarty 233
      Neil Egglseston 250
      Hillary Clinton 250
      John Podesta 264
      Jennifer O’Connor 343
      Dwight Holton 348
      Patsy Thomasson 420
      Jeff Eller 697

      FROM THE WASHINGTON TIMES: In the portions of President Clinton’s Jan. 17 deposition that have been made public in the Paula Jones case, his memory failed him 267 times. This is a list of his answers and how many times he gave each one.

      I don’t remember – 71
      I don’t know – 62
      I’m not sure – 17
      I have no idea – 10
      I don’t believe so – 9
      I don’t recall – 8
      I don’t think so – 8
      I don’t have any specific recollection – 6
      I have no recollection – 4
      Not to my knowledge – 4
      I just don’t remember – 4
      I don’t believe – 4
      I have no specific recollection – 3
      I might have – 3
      I don’t have any recollection of that – 2 I don’t have a specific memory – 2
      I don’t have any memory of that – 2
      I just can’t say – 2
      I have no direct knowledge of that – 2
      I don’t have any idea – 2
      Not that I recall – 2
      I don’t believe I did – 2
      I can’t remember – 2
      I can’t say – 2
      I do not remember doing so – 2
      Not that I remember – 2
      I’m not aware – 1
      I honestly don’t know – 1
      I don’t believe that I did – 1
      I’m fairly sure – 1
      I have no other recollection – 1
      I’m not positive – 1
      I certainly don’t think so – 1
      I don’t really remember – 1
      I would have no way of remembering that – 1
      That’s what I believe happened – 1
      To my knowledge, no – 1
      To the best of my knowledge – 1
      To the best of my memory – 1
      I honestly don’t recall – 1
      I honestly don’t remember – 1
      That’s all I know – 1
      I don’t have an independent recollection of that – 1
      I don’t actually have an independent memory of that – 1
      As far as I know – 1
      I don’t believe I ever did that – 1
      That’s all I know about that – 1
      I’m just not sure – 1
      Nothing that I remember – 1
      I simply don’t know – 1
      I would have no idea – 1
      I don’t know anything about that – 1
      I don’t have any direct knowledge of that – 1
      I just don’t know – 1
      I really don’t know – 1
      I can’t deny that, I just — I have no memory of that at all – 1

      prorev.com/legacy.htm

So, is the point that Snooki was paid too much or that Hillary snookered ?

Hillary Clinton is yesterday’s news.

I remember Hillary Clinton having much more self-awareness than this. I wonder if the decay had more to do with cocooning herself inside the establishment, or is a result of some mental health issue.

Or is this the consequence of corruption? I’m not a very religious person but I remember from my studies of CS Lewis this concept that’s the reason we avoid sin it’s because it hurts us the most.

I’m remembering the corrupted Narnians from The Last Battle, squatting in the corner of a hot unable to taste the feast laid out before them and insisting they were surrounded by total darkness. They found so far off the path that their sins were eating them alive like a cancer.

Watching Hillary over the past year, I’m beginning to think she is going to get exactly what she deserves

VaGentleman | April 1, 2018 at 4:06 pm

I guess that after the beating she took trying to sell herself at Trump Tower, old Bill decided her best days were over and he is going to pimp her out to frat houses as a freak show.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend