Image 01 Image 03

Disturbing trend: local governments engage in lawfare, suing public records requesters

Disturbing trend: local governments engage in lawfare, suing public records requesters

“These lawsuits are an absurd practice and noxious to open government”

The right of the private citizenry to make a public record request has, at least until recently, required local and federal governments to maintain a certain level of transparency. But a disturbing new trend has private citizens and even journalists flummoxed.

In Louisiana, Michigan, Kentucky, and Oregon, individuals requesting public records have been sued by the agencies whose documents they requested. This new lawfare front has successfully kept public records out of the hands of requestors and made others think twice before making FOIA (Freedom of Information Act) requests.

The Associated Press reports:

Government bodies are increasingly turning the tables on citizens who seek public records that might be embarrassing or legally sensitive. Instead of granting or denying their requests, a growing number of school districts, municipalities and state agencies have filed lawsuits against people making the requests — taxpayers, government watchdogs and journalists who must then pursue the records in court at their own expense.

The lawsuits generally ask judges to rule that the records being sought do not have to be divulged. They name the requesters as defendants but do not seek damage awards. Still, the recent trend has alarmed freedom-of-information advocates, who say it’s becoming a new way for governments to hide information, delay disclosure and intimidate critics.

“This practice essentially says to a records requester, ‘File a request at your peril,’” said University of Kansas journalism professor Jonathan Peters, who wrote about the issue for the Columbia Journalism Review in 2015, before several more cases were filed. “These lawsuits are an absurd practice and noxious to open government.”

Government officials who have employed the tactic insist they are acting in good faith. They say it’s best to have courts determine whether records should be released when legal obligations are unclear — for instance, when the documents may be shielded by an exemption or privacy laws.

At least two recent cases have succeeded in blocking information while many others have only delayed the release.

The legal remedy in most of these cases allows for the requestor to file a complaint if they believe their request was wrongfully denied. But even that’s a gamble. There’s no guarantee that a judgment, even one that requires release of the requested records, will also require the stubborn government agency to pick up the legal fee tab.

Mike Deshotels, a Louisiana-based retired educator, learned the lawfare lesson the hard way. The AP continued:

“You can lose even when you win,” said Mike Deshotels, an education watchdog who was sued by the Louisiana Department of Education after filing requests for school district enrollment data last year. “I’m stuck with my legal fees just for defending my right to try to get these records.”

The lawsuit argued that the data could not be released under state and federal privacy laws and initially asked the court to order Deshotels and another citizen requester to pay the department’s legal fees and court costs. The department released the data months later after a judge ruled it should be made public.

Deshotels, a 72-year-old retired teachers’ union official who authors the Louisiana Educator blog, had spent $3,000 fighting the lawsuit by then. He said the data ultimately helped show a widening achievement gap among the state’s poorest students, undercutting claims of progress by education reformers.

In response, the this new wave of lawfare, some states are intervening.

The Michigan House passed a bill that prohibits agencies from filing suit against records requesters. That bill has stalled in committee.

The Portland school that sued records requesters is being audited. From The Register-Guard:

Oregon’s secretary of state said his office will audit spending by Portland Public Schools, in part because of the district’s decision to sue people who requested public records.

…Secretary of State Dennis Richardson told the Oregonian/OregonLive on Monday that Portland residents have complained to him about the district’s problems and that the public records lawsuit is one reason it deserves an audit.

The district filed a lawsuit in April against parent activist Kim Sordyl and journalist Beth Slovic, both of whom requested information about employees on paid leave. Sordyl said she believes the information, which has been released in the past, might expose lengthy and costly leaves for some employees accused of misconduct.

The district attorney has ruled that the records are public and should be released. The district said it filed its lawsuit as a way to appeal that decision, arguing the law is unclear and that releasing the information could jeopardize employees’ due process rights.

…In Oregon, Sordyl called the lawsuit an attempt to intimidate and retaliate against her, an allegation the district has denied.

Dave Northfield, a spokesman for the Portland school district, said Tuesday it would cooperate with the audit. He noted that an outside firm already conducts annual reviews of its finances.

Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


There are very few things that “like” providing information to citizens LESS than bureaucracies.

“Knowledge is power”.

    MattMusson in reply to Ragspierre. | September 21, 2017 at 9:01 am

    They can change that plaque down at the Statehouse that says, “Ye shall know the Truth. And, the Truth shall set you free.” to “Screw You.”

No problem. The ACLU will step up to the plate.

The Portland school that sued records requesters is not being audited

“Not” doesn’t make much sense here. Is it “now”?

This story should be provided with a barf-bag. Seriously, how disgusting is this behavior? At what point do these “civil servants” get fired, have their pensions stripped, and spend a few years in jail? At what point do the “governed” just get sick of it and revolt?

Government agencies are directed by law to provide responses to public records requests. When an agency goes to court to avoid producing records, they are essentially asking to be relieved of duties imposed upon them by legislative bodies (Congress and the various State legislatures). Because the agencies are asking the courts to excuse them from obligations imposed by law (i.e., asking the court to violate the separation of powers), and because they are not making claims of damage (requiring a government agency to abide by the law doesn’t “damage” the agency), aren’t these situations in which the complainants have failed to state claims upon which the courts may grant relief?

As in many things, there is no downside to filing lawsuits to deny transparency. No jobs, elected or appointed are lost. The dinosaur media usually ignores them or vastly under reports.

Also, they are filed by government officials, at absolutely no cost to them, tax money has no value to them. It’s not theirs and by providing work is negative incentive to be economical.

The Swamp wants its secrets kept from the rest of us.

This is the most institutionally corrupt the United States has ever been, from the left all the way to the GOPe.

We have one chance left at a future: support Trump, and work to destroy the GOPe with our votes.

“Ve vill teach zese upstart “citizens” to demand our records!”

Oh, sorry. I didn’t intend to turn this into a Hillary comment. It just came out that way.

The cases of course are being heard by extreme leftist judges who totally side against the defendants.

I experienced similar in Thurston County Wa in going after county judges who were engaging in activism and using their positions as judges to push anti-father legislation. They deemed that anything they touched was exempt from FOIA laws.

Our response to this was to quadruple down and FOIA the living shit out of them. You visit a website? We want your browser history and the freaking IP address history from the router.

If they feel they need to sue to stop FOIA requests, I would suspect they may have something to hide.