Image 01 Image 03

Mob Kills Pakistani Student Accused of Blasphemy for Social Media Posts

Mob Kills Pakistani Student Accused of Blasphemy for Social Media Posts

The mob screamed “Allahu Akbar” as they beat the student to death.

A mob of ten students beat Pakistani student Mashal Khan to death on the Abdul Wali Kahn University campus and injured another identified as Abdullah. They accused him of “sharing blasphemous content on social media.” Reuters reported:

A group of about 10 students shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack on fellow student Mashal Khan, who was stripped naked and beaten with planks until his skull caved in as other students looked on, video obtained by Reuters showed.

Blasphemy is a highly sensitive topic in Muslim-majority Pakistan, where insulting the Prophet Mohammed is a capital crime that has dozens languishing on death row and where even an accusation can lead to violence.

Dawn reported that authorities have arrested 45 people “in connection with the incident by Thursday morning.” No one filed any complaints against the students, but instead reacted to rumors “circulating among the university’s student body.”

Witness Testimony

*WARNING* Graphic images in below video.

Dawn also spoke to those students who witnessed the murder:

The eyewitness said a mob of university students first surrounded Abdullah and forced him to recite verses from the Holy Quran. Although he repeatedly denied the accusation that he was an Ahmadi, the students beat him nonetheless.

The police, when alerted, reached the site of the attack and rescued Abdullah, after which the mob set its sights on Mashal, who was in the hostel at the time, the eyewitness said.

Mashal was beaten and shot by the mob and succumbed to the injuries he received.

Another witness claimed that “several leaders of the university’s student bodies were part of the attacking mob.”

Blasphemy in Pakistan

Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif has spoken about removing “blasphemous content online” and insisting that those who post the content should have “strict punishment under the law.”

The State Department even issued a travel warning not to travel to Pakistan due to the enforcement of blasphemy laws. From The Times of India:

“Sectarian violence remains a serious threat throughout Pakistan, and the Government of Pakistan continues to enforce blasphemy laws. Religious minority communities have been victims of targeted killings and accusations of blasphemy,” said the advisory published on the state department website.

In fact, US aviation authorities too have issued an advisory to its airmen.

“The Federal Aviation Administration has issued a NOTAM (Notice to Airmen) concerning the risks to civil aviation operating in Pakistan, particularly at low altitude, during the arrival and departure phases of flight, and when on the ground, due to extremist/militant activity,” The advisory said.

[Featured image via Twitter]


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.



The real blasphemy is the Islamist notion that God wants them to kill people for transgressing the made-up nonsense of their unschooled preachers.

    Arminius in reply to Valerie. | April 14, 2017 at 2:14 pm

    The fact is the preachers aren’t making this up, and they aren’t unschooled in their scripture. They’re unschooled in every other subject but they know what their prophet and Allah had to say on these subjects from their canonical texts.

    Neo in reply to Valerie. | April 14, 2017 at 4:23 pm

    An omnipotent God really needs these folks ?

      Arminius in reply to Neo. | April 14, 2017 at 6:10 pm

      An omnipotent God? No. But Allah needs these people very much as he’s incapable of punishing people in this life. If you read the Muslim sources you’ll find Allah spends a lot of time thinking about two things; punishing the unbelievers and making sure Muhammad’s sexual urges are satisfied. Actually if you read the Muslim sources Allah isn’t capable of doing a lot of things the God of the Bible is capable of doing.

      Surah 3:151

      “We will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve for what they have associated with Allah of which He had not sent down [any] authority. And their refuge will be the Fire, and wretched is the residence of the wrongdoers.”

      See, Allah needs the help of Muslims. Allah isn’t capable of casting terror into the hearts of disbelievers unless it’s a team effort.

      Surah 9:14

      “Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them and satisfy the breasts of a believing people”

      Surah 9:74

      “They swear by Allah that they did not say [anything against the Prophet] while they had said the word of disbelief and disbelieved after their [pretense of] Islam and planned that which they were not to attain. And they were not resentful except [for the fact] that Allah and His Messenger had enriched them of His bounty. So if they repent, it is better for them; but if they turn away, Allah will punish them with A PAINFUL PUNISHMENT IN THIS WORLD and the Hereafter. And there will not be for them on earth any protector or helper.”

      That painful punishment in this world is to be delivered at the hands of the Muslims. Allah can’t do it on his own. Sometimes I almost feel sorry for Allah, because he just can’t take care of his own business without lots of help.

        Allah can’t do it on his own.

        That is to say, Allah is impotent? 😉 No wonder Muslim men seem so obsessed with sexual dominance and subjugation.

        Y’know, they make a little blue pill for that. 😉

        rokiloki in reply to Arminius. | April 14, 2017 at 7:20 pm

        You omitted surah 33:21, which says mohammed’s conduct is exemplary and muslims should follow his example. Mohammed routinely had critics killed, so when these braindead mohammedans kill blasphemers, they are following mohammed’s example and the command in the koran.

          Arminius in reply to rokiloki. | April 15, 2017 at 12:31 am

          And the example of Muhammad is to be found in the ahadith collections. Based upon the father’s statement it sounds like the specific charge of blasphemy concerned that led the mob to murder this young man concerned insulting their prophet. “Whenever the subject of religion was discussed, [my son] was [respectful] of the Prophet Muhammad.”

          Muhammad had definite opinions on that subject; as has already been noted he would order his followers to kill critics.

          Sunan Abu Dawud – Book of Prescribed Punishments (Kitab Al-Hudud) – (2) – Chapter: The ruling regarding one who reviles the prophet (pbuh)

          ” Narrated Abdullah Ibn Abbas:

          A blind man had a slave-mother who used to abuse the Prophet and disparage him. He forbade her but she did not stop. He rebuked her but she did not give up her habit. One night she began to slander the Prophet and abuse him. So he took a dagger, placed it on her belly, pressed it, and killed her. A child who came between her legs was smeared with the blood that was there. When the morning came, the Prophet was informed about it.

          He assembled the people and said: I adjure by Allah the man who has done this action and I adjure him by my right to him that he should stand up. Jumping over the necks of the people and trembling the man stood up.

          He sat before the Prophet and said: Messenger of Allah! I am her master; she used to abuse you and disparage you. I forbade her, but she did not stop, and I rebuked her, but she did not abandon her habit. I have two sons like pearls from her, and she was my companion. Last night she began to abuse and disparage you. So I took a dagger, put it on her belly and pressed it till I killed her.

          Thereupon the Prophet said: Oh be witness, no retaliation is payable for her blood.

          Grade : Sahih (Al-Albani)
          Reference : Sunan Abi Dawud 4361
          In-book reference : Book 40, Hadith 11
          English translation : Book 39, Hadith 4348″

          Sunan Abu Dawud is probably the third in rank in authentic ahadith collections after the two Sahihs, al Bukhari and Muslim. And this hadith is Sahih, “genuine” or “authentic,” which means all Sunni Muslims must accept it as authoritative.

          If a man can kill the slave-mother of his own children and along with his own unborn child and not suffer any punishment (meaning he acted correctly; the Muslims have a quite literal understanding of Lex Talionis as their justice system) why couldn’t these other students beat this guy to death?

          Surah 4:65

          “But no, by your Lord, they will not [truly] believe until they make you, [O Muhammad], judge concerning that over which they dispute among themselves and then find within themselves no discomfort from what you have judged and submit in [full, willing] submission.”

          Surah 33:36

          “It is not for a believing man or a believing woman, when Allah and His Messenger have decided a matter, that they should [thereafter] have any choice about their affair. And whoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger has certainly strayed into clear error.”

          Muslims can have no choice once Allah and his prophet have ruled on a matter. Failing to submit completely and without any reservations is a form of rebellion. In other words, apostasy.

    rokiloki in reply to Valerie. | April 14, 2017 at 7:13 pm

    God doesn’t want that, but Allah does.

Religion of peace, my ass!

The latest news from the Religion of Peace.

due to extremist/militant activity

Can’t blame blasphemy laws on extremists or militants.

“A group of about 10 students shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the attack on fellow student Mashal Khan, who was stripped naked and beaten with planks until his skull caved in as other students looked on”


“Why, yes, Islam is quite normative. Its practices easily fit within any society, including Western ones.

“Why do you ask?”

inspectorudy | April 14, 2017 at 1:38 pm

I see a strong parallel between these savages and the leftists students in this country. If not for the thin blue line, we all know that the leftists would have already crossed this line and killed someone. What is so amazing is that none of the horrors of “Isms” are being taught any longer in our schools. The horrors of Communism or Facisism. As in islam, totalitarianism is their ism. They have total authority over all the fools who believe in it and who have no say in the rules or beliefs.

The Left has chosen to ally with Islam to defeat conservatism. They foolishly think that they can co-exist with Islam should they succeed. Progressive secular humanism doesn’t stand a chance against Islam. Progs will mistakenly give up everything to prove their “virtue” and Islam will gladly subjugate and eliminate whats left.


Why is it when ever a Muslim mob beats men they strip the men naked first? The things the mob did to Ambassador Stevens before killing him, what they do to captured fighters and pilots. There seems to be a lot of latent homosexuality with these savages.

    Arminius in reply to scaulen. | April 14, 2017 at 6:25 pm

    That’s because unrelated women are off limits. Women and men are segregated everywhere in Muslim society, except in a private family setting and then men and boys only ever associate with close relatives who they aren’t permitted to marry. And wealthy men can have four wives. Although in places like Saudi Arabia the four wife limit isn’t strictly observed and very rich men will marry more than four wives.

    This skews the ration of men to available women. So, yeah, there’s a lot of pent up sexual tension.

      This skews the ration of men to available women. So, yeah, there’s a lot of pent up sexual tension.

      And for practical purposes, it’s one reason why wealthy and powerful men are always indoctrinating and radicalizing younger men to be suicide bombers and front-line fighters. As the young men die or are killed it raises the female-to-male ratio — to the sole benefit of men who aren’t suicide bombers or front-line fighters.

      Don’t think that the opportunity to subjugate and have sexual ownership over as many women and girls as possible doesn’t factor into the leaders’ calculus. It most certainly does.

        rokiloki in reply to Archer. | April 14, 2017 at 7:24 pm

        Along that same point, you have to wonder why the wealthy and powerful men are not so keen on sacrificing for paradise and 72 virgins as they preach to the young and poor.

        Islam is a cult of brainwashed individuals who have no ability to rationalize or think critically.

          randian in reply to rokiloki. | April 15, 2017 at 12:07 am

          No need for them to be so keen, when the Quran specifically states that funding jihad has equal merit with doing it.

Just so everyone knows, the men who beat him to death are the radicalized muslims. The ones who stood and watched were the moderates.

    GraySkies in reply to rokiloki. | April 17, 2017 at 1:55 am

    Who stood and watched, and also didn’t think that anything of consequence, worth reporting to the authorities, had taken place there that day…

    This is a good example of the reaction we can expect from the “normal” or “non-radicalized” muslims, in response to this sort of activity by the “radicalized” ones… NOTHING.

And, Obama and the rest of the Islamic apologist Left who are perpetually engaged in a morally bankrupt and intellectually dishonest trifecta of Islamo-victimology, Islamo-flattery and Islamo-Revisionism/Rehabilitation contend — with a straight face — that the ideology of “Submission” is totally compatible with the secular and pluralist values of the Enlightenment, when any cursory glance at the harsh reality of daily life in any Islamic country or Islamic-majority country (to say nothing of Islamic scripture and 1,400 years of history) — to wit, misery, oppression, strife, stifling of creativity, expression and individual freedoms and a general totalitarian tenor of life for non-Muslims, women, gays and atheists — reveal that this is a morally bankrupt and utterly fascistic ideology.