Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Media can’t get enough of Chelsea, Chelsea, Chelsea

Media can’t get enough of Chelsea, Chelsea, Chelsea

Chelsea Clinton is being groomed. The only question is, for what?

http://wwlp.com/2017/02/16/chelsea-clinton-doesnt-hold-back-on-twitter/

The political career of Chelsea Clinton is being carefully nurtured, and she now is the topic of favorable media coverage almost daily, frequently after she has tweeted in opposition to Trump.

Because she is a female Clinton, nothing is spontaneous (Bill is another story).

We posted just after her mother lost the presidential election how Chelsea Clinton Being “Groomed” For House Run. Since then, Clinton World has been sure to put Chelsea at the center of opposition to Trump.

We’re increasingly seeing headlines like Chelsea Clinton doesn’t hold back on Twitter:

Former first daughter, Chelsea Clinton, is taking to twitter to bash policies under the Trump administration. Twice in two days, Donald Trump was given the opportunity to outright condemn anti-Semitism, and did not.

President Donald Trump said, “I think a lot of good things are happening. And you’re going to see a lot of love. You’re going to see a lot of love.”

And twice in two days, Chelsea Clinton hammered him for it on twitter, tweeting, “One would think he would have thought of an answer since yesterday. Here’s one: ‘there’s no place for bigotry, ever, in America.’”

The former first daughter criticized Trump on the campaign trail saying, “So to me, this election is both about repudiating Donald Trump’s divisive, demeaning, degrading, rhetoric that should offend all of us.”

I’ve particularly notice The Hill promoting Chelsea:

https://twitter.com/LegInsurrection/status/838893260500320256

https://twitter.com/LegInsurrection/status/839115788602736640

The Hill seems to write up just about every Chelsea tweet.

https://twitter.com/thehill/status/833460437257691137

But it goes far beyond The Hill. Jim Geraghty at National Review summarizes some of the fawning coverage:

Chelsea Clinton is not fascinating. But the repeated insistence that Chelsea Clinton is fascinating . . . is actually rather fascinating. It’s like a giant social experiment, in which everyone who has spent decades building connections to the Clinton political dynasty attempts to make the world see the president’s daughter as someone she isn’t.

Witness the recent insistence that we’re seeing a new side of Chelsea Clinton . . . because she’s tweeting a lot of critical things about President Trump. This is not particularly unusual behavior for a Democrat with a Twitter account. Yet Politico declares that she “lets loose on Twitter” with “a spicy, sarcastic online personality.” CNN concurs that “Chelsea Clinton embraces her Twitter sass.” …

The uptick in Chelsea coverage since November has a transparent purpose, of course: to pave the way for her entry into politics.

Twitter sass? Just like Hillary’s *spontaneous* encounter with Iowa voters and videotaped visit to Chipotle during her *spontaneous* road trip? Hillary staged Iowa coffee shop talk, what about Chipotle?

Here is some other glowing coverage of Chelsea as leader of The Resistance, from Mercury News, Is Chelsea Clinton Donald Trump’s most formidable Twitter foe?

Of all the public figures and Hollywood stars who’ve been using social media to protest Donald Trump and the policies of his month-old presidency, Chelsea Clinton has emerged as one of his most relentless — and possibly formidable — critics.

With a mix of mild sarcasm, exasperation and humanitarian concern, the former first daughter daily delivers sharp commentary on Trump to her 1.5 million Twitter followers. On Tuesday, for example, Chelsea issued a series of tweets decrying the Trump administration’s possible plans to rescind an Obama White House policy that protected the rights of transgender students in public schools.

None of this is by chance. Clinton World is deeply steeped in media operatives and public relations handlers. And those media operative and handlers have made sure that Chelsea is not seen as unhinged as Elizabeth Warren, so Chelsea has pulled very savvy moves like supporting Barron Trump against attacks from the left. Which of course generated favorable publicity:

She also struck up a Twitter moment of harmony with Kellyanne Conway after some sexual innuendo by a Democratic congressman was directed at Kellyanne after the (incredibly stupid) feet on the couch Fauxrage.

That generated positive coverage even at Breitbart News:

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/03/04/chelsea-clinton-defends-kellyanne-conway-calls-rep-richmonds-joke-despicable/
Chelsea is being groomed. Take that to the bank.

The only question is, for what?

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Why the long face Chelsea? Must be that diet of oats and carrots.

    audax in reply to snapper451. | March 12, 2017 at 3:21 pm

    Then she’s getting really fat on it…..look at that picture in the red dress…..she’s huge!

    …..and looking more like Webb Hubbell everyday….

I wish they would stop trying to make her into something.
We get it MSM. S
he’s on Twitter.
She’s so darn interesting!
Big deal!

    Old0311 in reply to HamiltonNJ. | March 11, 2017 at 9:08 am

    In her defense, she has managed to gross this old grunt out with her spinach pancake tweets. I’d rather have c-ration ham and eggs every meal for a week rather than think of those awful pancakes.

    Other tan her cooking abilities, she is every bit as loveable as her mother.

Please, oh please, Lord! Do NOT inflict this woman on our country!

The only question is, for what?

To finish the job of killing the Dimocrat party, that her mother started.

Hillary Clinton is the gift that keeps on giving.

Chelsea is, too. (Hey, didn’t she pay for her wedding by embezzling money from a charity?)

Next, come the indictments.

Are you seriously wondering what she’s being groomed for?

FOR MONEY. For to have a bankable politician whose influence can be sold to the highest bidder. It’s the family business and revenues are way down since Hillary lost. She’s being groomed as a new revenue stream.

You must have been being sarcastic because this is about as obvious as could be!

Webb would be pleased

casualobserver | March 10, 2017 at 10:16 pm

If you were to create a new measurement and call it the Clinton Charisma Scale, the peak of top would be Bill. Hillary would be somewhere in the lower quartile. And you would use Chelsea to as closely as possible to calibrate your zero point.

As long as she never appears in public she may have a small chance in politics. Even the media cannot perform those kinds of miracles.

The Friendly Grizzly | March 10, 2017 at 10:48 pm

About all I can say in her favor: she’s not as big an airhead as Caroline, like, Kenn, you know, ady.

cheif bighorn | March 10, 2017 at 10:56 pm

This hideous mug is irrelevant in every way. Whoever follows her must be just as ugly and boring. The MSM I guess.

She’s a lot like Caroline Kennedy in that they both benefited from a family name. Caroline is much more attractive than clinton but they both lack the stuff that makes great politicians. Both came from pampered lives with excellent educations but without the charisma or personality, they both are as interesting as a stone balloon. She will be just like her mom and have to always have everything setup for her before she spontaneously shows up. She will always know the questions before hand and will always call on the selected beforehand questioners. Just like her mom she will never go into an unknown arena and wing it.

You know we’re winning, if Chelsea is the best they’ve got.

I don’t see a lot of “star” power there. And being a Twitter nag won’t help.

Trump uses twitter to sell ideas (simple ideas, but ones the press would prefer to ignore) and to goad his opponents. And response has always been gratifying; they go ballistic right on cue.

But that won’t work for Chelsea, as she’s not offering any ideas, and she’s trying to goad Trump … which I don’t think will work too well.

    murkyv in reply to tom swift. | March 11, 2017 at 7:33 pm

    If and when Trump decides to, he can Tweet-slap her into silence like he did Hillary when she tried to bash him on being abusive to women.

    Just mention Bill’s history.

Pelosi Schmelosi | March 10, 2017 at 11:43 pm

“Grooming” to be another useless, no-talent carpetbagger…just like Mommy.
The apple didn’t fall far from the tree.
The Left sure is desperate these days, huh?

Too bad Hillary!’s daughter didn’t marry JEB!’s son; they could’ve captured the throne.

1.5 million followers?
Sure.
The woman who interviewed a cartoon character.

Please keep promoting this woman.

Flogging this charisma-less greedy grasping scheming calculating out-of-touch emotionless robot daughter of a pair of grifters who was up to her elbows in Clinton Charity corruption is a dead end for the Democrats.

Please please please pour lots of wasted effort down this hole.

Please split the Democratic Party further and keep the Sanders – Clinton schism alive for longer.

Her candidacy for anything fills me with big hope if they run this over-privileged 0.1%-er dope.

    Old0311 in reply to PrincetonAl. | March 11, 2017 at 9:23 am

    Your happiness at someone else’s troubles is troubling. That’s not who we are! Now, knock it off. LOL!

    I tried to think of a way to work in the part about red lines. I hope you will forgive me. This is the best Barry scolding I could write this early. It’s a pity that liquor stores aren’t 24/7 like 7 Elevens.

She’s bei9ng groomed, but we are being violated.

New Yorkers are truly afraid.
Will the surgically enhanced ex-first daughter try and sneak in to congress as the hand-picked successor to Nita Lowey, even though Ms. Lowey shows no sign of retiring? Will she let Schumer push out his pet Gillibrand to allow Chelsea to become a Senator?

You don’t see her wandering the streets of Chappaqua, so she’s not being groomed for State office, though once Preet is through with Andrew Cuomo there’ll be a governorship open. Maybe she should join the army, it was good enough for Elvis!

Meanwhile, my search for a new home in a red state continues!

James Carville would say, “It just shows that if you drag fifteen million dollars (Chelsea’s net worth, thanks to the Clinton Foundation corruption) through a trailer park, you never know what you might find.”

    ooddballz in reply to nisquire. | March 13, 2017 at 5:16 pm

    James Carville would say, “It just shows that if you drag fifteen million dollars (Chelsea’s net worth, thanks to the Clinton Foundation corruption) through a trailer park, you never know what you might find.”

    My best guess is something modern medicine has no cure for…..like a bad case of the Clinton’s.

inspectorudy | March 14, 2017 at 6:34 pm

Chelsea’s problem is that she didn’t marry a medicine man like slick willie. She married an incompetent money launderer who just lost his business. That means she will have to earn her way up the political ladder which for her is an impossibility. She has the looks of her father and the charisma of her mother. There isn’t a spontaneous bone in her body nor any humor. Her career as a pol will be bought and paid for but not successful.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend