Image 01 Image 03

Military K9 Handler Describes Hillary’s Profanity-Infused Tirade about His Dog

Military K9 Handler Describes Hillary’s Profanity-Infused Tirade about His Dog

“Happens every day, Brother”

A few days ago my colleague, Mark Finkelstein, asked about the veracity of the following graphic I posted on Facebook:

LI #80 eric-bonner-hillary

It turns out that the author, Eric Bonner, is real and the graphic is based on a recollection the K9 serviceman offered on Facebook.

He writes:

Being a K9 handler in the Military I got to do a few details involving Distinguished Visitors. Mostly Generals, DOD Officials, and Secretaries of Defense. I was lucky enough to pull two awesome details. George W Bush, and Obama.

GW looked at me, said “Man, who’d you piss off” high fived me, and continued on. I was climbing down from a catwalk I stood on for 4 hours with nothing but Dust and a radio to keep me company. The radio died early on. It was pretty sweet.

Obama, as he was walking out to his plane in Turkey, said “What the hell kind of dog is that?!” In reference to Suli.

One of my Last details was for Hillary when she was Secretary of State. She was in Turkey for whatever reason. I helped with sweeps of her DV Quarters and staff vehicles. Her words to me? “Get that Fucking dog away from me.” Then she turns to her Security Detail and berates them up and down about why that animal was in her quarters. For the next 20 minutes while I sit there waiting to be released she lays into her detail, slamming the door in their faces when she’s done. The Detail lead walks over apologizes and releases me. I apologize to him for getting him in trouble. His words “Happens every day, Brother”

The post was shared over 200,000 times on Facebook, and it turns out that Staff Sgt. Eric Bonner was a 39th Security Forces Squadron military working dog handler and was on duty at the time of a Hillary Clinton visit to Foreign Minister Babacan.

LI #80b bonner with dog

So what did our hero get for his vivid account? Some time in Facebook jail!  While it should be noted that Facebook apparently told Bonner that his name needed to be verified, the timing is, as he notes, interesting.

The key passage:

Facebook suspended my account until my name could be Verified. The timing of it was interesting. They wanted me to provide government ID. Which ultimately I did not end up providing. End Result? As you can see my profile is back up and running. However, I feel like this won’t be the end of this type of “Contact.”

Why would Hillary Clinton berate a security detail assigned to protect her and her staff in an unstable region of the world? I would suggest that perhaps her brain short-circuited after her corkscrew landing.

I certainly thank Bonner and Suli for their service, and I hope Bonner gets a break from being a social media target soon!

I can only hope that all Americans don’t have to face a regular dose of Hillary Clinton’s version of the “charm offensive” after November’s election.

(Featured image via Twitter).


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


I am so sick and tired of hearing stories about Facebook and Twitter censoring conservative voices. Do something about it! Quit using them, for good! Both of those platforms derive their value from the ‘network effect’, the more people that use them the more valuable they are. Conversely, if enough people stop using them they will collapse in a heap of their own progressive crap.

    amwick in reply to Paul. | August 7, 2016 at 9:52 am

    Censoring voices??
    Good thing that would never happen in an open-minded, fair and unbiased place like Legal Insurrection.

      Paul in reply to amwick. | August 7, 2016 at 10:49 am

      Private companies certainly have the right to censor. And people do too, ultimately by choosing not to listen to idiots.

      But my point is that by electing to participate in social media networks that censor conservative speech you contribute to their financial success.

      If a company is giving you something for “free” it usually means they’re making money from your presence. If you don’t like what they do or say, don’t go there.

        sequester in reply to Paul. | August 7, 2016 at 11:42 am

        Sure they can censor until they refuse to bake a cake for a gay couple.

          Paul in reply to sequester. | August 7, 2016 at 6:51 pm

          Oh there you go again, letting what the Constitution actually SAYS cloud your judgement again. Freedom of association? Hah! It’s a “living document”, don’t you know? Der Kommisar will diktat to you what it means today, Komrade. All in the name of “fairness”, of course.

      amwick in reply to amwick. | August 7, 2016 at 2:50 pm

      Censorship drives other people away, and they are not all idiots. They may be the ones with more common sense.

      4fun in reply to amwick. | August 7, 2016 at 7:15 pm

      I see your post is still up amwick. Maybe the prof should take it down and require government I.D. from you to able to post.

      You do know that the dnc hq in Washington D.C. has a sign saying 100% ID check at their front desk don’t you?
      Wonder what would happen if someone stopped by without an ID, would they be allowed to swear that they are who they say and then allowed entrance as dems want to have done at the polls?
      Maybe the same rationale should apply to gun buyers without ID also.

      mzk in reply to amwick. | August 8, 2016 at 2:14 pm

      There is a difference between having standards (which the Trump acolytes have no concept of) and censoring viewpoints. At any rate, this is not a general purpose, semi-commercial setup like Facebook.

    legacyrepublican in reply to Paul. | August 7, 2016 at 6:01 pm

    We should start by calling Facebook what it is first …

    Socialist Media

    mzk in reply to Paul. | August 8, 2016 at 2:12 pm

    These rthings nly work if you tell them why, otherwise they will rationalize. Dinesh D’Souza’s supporters once brought a large retail chain to its knees – but they made it clear as to the reason. It worked.

Hillary doesn’t care about anyone but Hillary.

I’m shocked! Shocked, I tell you!

Common Sense | August 7, 2016 at 8:53 am

My take on this is there are a lot of Azz holes out there.
Crooked Hillary is one of them. OK!

The real concern is she can not and will not tell the TRUTH!
The women has some mental issue where she continues to lie when the evidence is so over whelming to point out that fact.

Crooked Hillary put our national security at risk for years from her extremely poor judgement. And for the last year lies time after time to try to cover it up.

She can not be trusted and has disqualified her self to be president.

A compulsive liar!

thalesofmiletus | August 7, 2016 at 9:23 am

Temperamentally unfit for the office.

    Unknown3rdParty in reply to thalesofmiletus. | August 7, 2016 at 10:51 am

    Actually, adverbs are NOT required to define her lack of fitness to hold any office, higher, lower or otherwise.

    On that note, there ARE other adverbs (besides temperamentally) that can be applied, many with far more devastating connotations, each having condemning evidence: socially, constitutionally, physically, emotionally, financially/economically, etc.


    Sufficient proof of why Hillary should NEVER be in a position of authority over anyone.

We should not only be afraid of POTUS Hillary, but also of the subhuman totalitarians who support her and expect to get their owns hands on power. Lois Lerner will look like a kitten next to Hillary supporters.

“Hillary doesn’t care about anyone but Hillary.”

There’s more to it than that. Someone who only cares about themselves can still treat others with respect when they’re needed, such as a security detail keeping them safe. Hillary views people as disposable tools, as slaves. She’s nobility and they’re peasants stinking up her air with their presence.

inspectorudy | August 7, 2016 at 9:45 am

I have read many books detailing the angry and vile personality of hillary and one thing that rises to the surface about her is that she hates anyone who is beneath her status and has any form of power that could involve her. Many of her SS detail have stated that she curses them and orders them around, in demeaning ways, and the same with military personnel. At State she refused to have an Inspector General appointed though the law requires one. We know that she routinely employs intimidation and threats to get her way. Can any of you imagine this monster as our president? We must support cheeto man or we will perish!

Not surprised that Bammy was a little spooked by the dog. Common. AS if any more data was needed to conclude that Hillary is scum, hating dogs is a bellwether. Muslims hate dogs too so she’s in good company. She probably has a visceral hatred of fishing too, a tell for a sociopath.

I hate to defend Hillary, but one must anticipate the excuses/reasons she will give for her behavior

Perhaps she is allergic to dogs, and the SS has orders not to bring them around?

Probably just still upset about the sniper fire. LOL!!

This story has been bubbling for a long time.

I lived in a DC suburb during the Clinton administration, along with a lot of White House employees, including Linda Tripp and members of the White House security staff. Word was that Bill, like Kennedy brothers, was a “hard dog to keep under the porch,” and that Hillary was rude and ill-tempered toward all sorts of staff. This was very different from the word about both Bush administrations.

And people worry about Trump getting pissed and nuking a foreign nation, I worry about Hillary getting pissed and nuking middle America.

I’ve seen a few things recently which make me wonder if the SS is very subtly telling America something.

Like walking up to one of the world’s most experienced public speakers and telling them to keep talking, while putting a reassuring arm around the shoulder. Or holding an injection pen in clear view of cameras.

No one is saying anything at all publicly, or even doing anything that deserves a rebuke. But they’re getting close.