Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Congress targets Obama’s “Green Climate” funding

Congress targets Obama’s “Green Climate” funding

Political courage infects both House and Senate.

After Congressman Paul Ryan became Speaker of the House, we remarked that he “may surprise us.”

I must admit, the surprises have exceeded my skepticism, especially after the House defied a veto threat by the President and overwhelmingly passed legislation to suspend Obama’s program to admit 10,000 Syrian refugees in the next year.

And Ryan shed not one tear doing so, either.

It appears that this newly found political courage is infectious. The Senate is now making a move to defund some climate change inanity, to the tune of $3 billion dollars.

Republicans are taking aim at a new “Green Climate Fund,” as they look to weaken President Obama’s hand in global climate talks later this month.

The pot of money, a $3 billion climate change pledge the president’s administration made last year, is something officials hope to bring to the negotiating table at United Nations summit in Paris.

But Republicans — hostile to the climate talks and bent on doing whatever they can to derail a deal in Paris next month — say they’re going to deny Obama the first tranche of money he hopes to inject into the fund.

“We pledge that Congress will not allow U.S. taxpayer dollars to go to the Green Climate Fund until the forthcoming international climate agreement is submitted to the Senate for its constitutional advice and consent,” 37 Republican senators wrote in a letter to Obama on Thursday.

The fund, a pool of public and private money, is meant to help poorer nations prepare for climate change.

A Senate appropriations bill cleared the way for the first portion of American funding earlier this year, but Republicans committed this week to blocking it in a final budget deal.

By way of background, the Green Climate Fund (GCF) was established at United Nations talks 5 years ago. The monies raised would supposedly be used to help developing nations deal with a warming world.

Given the recent weather developments and the history of UN corruption, I would assert that the fund is more of a wealth transfer with a side of UN bureaucratic fraud.

The fund has received a slew of criticism, including a lack of transparency:

…There are also concerns about how the GCF is run, says [Washington, D.C. policy analyst Brandon] Wu, who attended the Zambia meeting as a permitted ‘civil society observer’. Wu is worried that indigenous communities were not adequately consulted before the approval of $6.2 million for the Peruvian wetlands programme, for example. GCF documents say that a consultation was carried out, but for this and for other projects, the fund has no independent verification of its claims, says Andrea Rodríguez Osuna, who works in Mexico City for the non-profit environmental law organization AIDA and was also present in Zambia.

Nor is the GCF transparent about its processes, Rodríguez Osuna adds. “The fund has no information disclosure policy and no accountability mechanism, yet the board is approving project proposals,” she says.

For the eight projects approved at the board meeting, for example, only proposal documents were publicly available (and in the case of two private-sector projects, only a summary). “These are hardly the unbiased sources of information needed to evaluate a project’s merits or any potential negative impacts,” Wu says. Project reviews made by the fund’s board and by an independent technical advisory panel are not publicly released, and GCF officials repeatedly failed to answer questions asked by Nature for this article.

As we enter Thanksgiving week, the willingness to fight toxic policies and defund worthless programs from both houses of Congress is something to be grateful for.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

It is way past time to take away Obama’s “green” card.

Excuse my skepticism but nothing this Republican congress does passes the smell test. I can’t say about this particular issue but with this GOP congress you can be sure that somehow they’ve slipped a turd into the punchbowl.

    rabidfox in reply to secondwind. | November 21, 2015 at 6:56 pm

    I agree. Last week the House passed a “Veto proof” bill holding up Syrian ‘refugees’. Problem is that it isn’t the House that overrides Presidential Vetoes it’s the Senate. And McConnell won’t do anything to try to convince his Democrat colleagues to support limiting the number of incoming ‘refugees’. McConnell seems to be marching in lock step with the president.

      Incorrect.

      According to Article 1, Section 7, of the Constitution, when the President chooses not to
      sign a bill1 and instead returns it to the chamber that originated it, the chamber shall enter
      the message of the President detailing the reasons for the veto in its Journal and then
      “proceed to reconsider” the bill.2 A vetoed bill can become law if two-thirds of the Members
      voting in each chamber agree, by recorded vote, a quorum being present, to repass the bill and thereby override the veto of the President.
      The chamber that originated the bill sent to the President acts first on the question of its
      reconsideration; in other words, the House acts first on vetoed bills that carry an “H.R.” or “H.J.
      Res.” designation, and the Senate acts first on vetoed bills that carry an “S.” or “S.J. Res.”
      designation.
      If the chamber of origin votes to repass the bill, then the bill with the veto message is transmitted to the second chamber, which then also reconsiders it.

No one is impressed by show-votes. The bill won’t even get through the Senate, much less become law.

Stop wasting our time.

Wake me up when they do something real.

If Rubio gets elected, he and Paul Ryan will pass the Democrat’s Amnesty agenda and flush this country forever. If you think you can trust him, you are out of your mind.

GOP bums in panic mode.

But we won’t forget who they are.

They might ask, “So nothing we do will be right?” The answer is, “Retire. Make way for real men and women, who are honest, and have their nation’s interest in mind, not their own, like scum like you do. Oh – and if you don’t vote ‘correctly’ before you retire, you’ll likely be indicted for the corruption the next GOP administration’s FBI uncovers about your current activities.”

Sounds fascistic, but given a choice between a completely corrupt GOP bought-off or blackmailed by a leftist lunatic president and his handlers and terrorizing US citizens by means of the IRS and Justice Department, the former might sounds better.

Ryan reminds me of a military officer captured by Caesar after Caesar won his final battle against Pompeii. Caesar agreed to absorb Pompeii’s soldiers into his own army, but warned them they’ll be watched. And at the first sign of any treachery, well…at the very least be unceremoniously booted from their position as Speaker of the House.

After Boehner – and to paraphrase Justice Holmes — two generations of imbecile Squeakers are enough.

“Courage”? Give me a break. Simply not conceivable from these people.

Three billion dollars is a nice sized slush fund for Dems to spoon out to their favorite kickback-giving donors. Chopping it off will make the Leftists scream bloody murder.

Good. Keep chopping.

When will we find out that the $3 billion is in a lockbox unaffected by the new legislation.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend