Clinton Attack Dog David Brock is in Major Denial
“These are nothing-burgers.”
![](https://c2.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/David-Brock-on-MSNBC.jpg)
David Brock, the founder of the far left Media Matters for America, has taken on the unenviable role of Hillary Clinton defender in this election cycle.
Yesterday, he appeared on MSNBC’s Morning Joe program and proved that he’s in deep denial over Hillary Clinton’s scandals and the way they’re being perceived by the American people.
David Rutz of the Washington Free Beacon:
Brock Gets Hammered by Morning Joe Trying to Spin Clinton’s Email Conduct
Media Matters founder and Hillary Clinton flack David Brock struggled to defend the conduct of his boss under aggressive questioning from MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough Monday.
Brock, the former self-described “right-wing hitman” who underwent a massive political transformation in the late 1990s and became one of the Clintons’ most rabid defenders, appeared on Morning Joe to promote his new book blasting the New York Times and other “perceived enemies” he insists are out to destroy the Clintons. The hot topic, of course, was Clinton’s private email server, another “phony scandal” as Brock put it, that has sunk Clinton’s numbers on honesty and trustworthiness.
“Are all the scandals involving the Clintons, quote, ‘fake scandals’”? Scarborough asked.
“Yeah sure,” Brock said. “I take you through each one in this book, and I’ve dealt with the ones from the ’90s in prior books, as you know. Look, nothing’s been found. These are nothing-burgers.”
Watch the video below and note the utter disbelief from Joe Scarborough and Mika as Brock continually insists there’s nothing to any of these issues.
The depths of Brock’s denial were revealed last week when he accused the New York Times of being conservative propaganda. Politico reported:
David Brock: The New York Times has ‘a special place in hell’
David Brock’s war against the New York Times just went nuclear — and the paper is responding with equal fury.
Brock, the former right-wing journalist-turned-pro-Clinton crusader, takes aim at a top New York Times editor in a soon-to-be released book obtained by POLITICO. In the book, titled “Killing the Messenger: The Right-Wing Plot to Derail Hillary Clinton and Hijack Your Government,” Brock accuses senior politics editor and former Washington bureau chief Carolyn Ryan of helping to turn the paper into a “megaphone for conservative propaganda” by unfairly targeting former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.
Finally, could someone tell David he needs to do something about the hair? I mean, really.
Featured image via YouTube.
![](https://c1.legalinsurrection.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/subscribe-ad.jpg)
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
“Look, nothing’s been found.”
___________________
LOL. Yes, and that didn’t happen by accident. To take just one example, the S&L fraud that Hillary was involved in in Arkansas, Hillary and Web Hubbell destroyed/hid all the records of the Rose Law Firm that documented Hillary’s intense involvement in those deals. It wasn’t that Hillary was not involved, or that she did nothing wrong, it was that Hillary made sure after the fact that nothing would be found that would implicate her.
Just a few weeks ago, somebody was asking Bill Clinton about a different scandal. He said “I don’t think any evidence of wrong doing will be found.” Not “I didn’t do anything wrong” just “you won’t find the evidence of it.”
There are not many possibilities:
1. Hillary did not use email in connection with her position as Secretary of State; she has said differently.
2. Hillary was not in the loop for decisions by the Secretary of State; in that case, she only sent and received trivial matters.
3. Every country and agency with even a mild interest and mediocre technical ability, already has every bit of confidential information she sent or received.
“Look, nothing’s been found.”
Wipe, wipe, wipe….WhiteLieWater….wipe, wipe, wipe, Benghazi…wipe, wipe, wipe…U.S. Ambassador Stevens, three others…wipe, wipe, wipe…server…wipe, wipe, wipe…Brock…wipe, wipe, wipe…James Carville…wipe, wipe, wipe…
All in each day’s cleaning for HRC.
Dating myself here, but does he use the same barber as Mr. Tudball (Tim Conway’s shuffling oddball character on The Carol Burnett Show)?
“Dating myself here”
Couldn’t help but think that would be a great title for Caitly Jenner’s autobiography.
What???
“My Journey from Mr. Tudball to Mrs. Wiggins”
by Catty Jenner
…blasting the New York Times and other “perceived enemies” he insists are out to destroy the Clintons.…
The Clintons have done a very good job of doing that themselves. They keep on thinking that they are above the law. Well that does not sit very well with a large majority of the American people. Richard Nixon and others were forced out of office by doing way far less.
This insanity from the man who brought us Paula Jones.
Ah, the irony.
This guy is pure loon. More importantly, there IS someone out there with worse hair than Trump. LOL!
You forgot Ernest Moniz.
How dare he wear a BLUE shirt…..
I said shirt, not skirt……
The story here is that Clinton and all of her defenders keep talking about whether it was appropriate/legal for her to have a private email account as Secretary of State. That is NOT the question and don’t let them change the subject. The issue is about her using an unsecured server and using private email to disseminate secret information putting national security in jeopardy.
Vote:
1. David Brock is a true and sincere Clinton supporter.
2. David Brock is a well-paid shill pretending to be a true and sincere Clinton supporter.
3. The Clintons have something deep and ugly on David Brock.
Since Brock started out to write a hit piece on Hillary back in the 90s and ended up writing almost a paean, I suspect they have something on him.
4. David Brock is insane from cocaine abuse?
David Brock is insane because he’s a rainbow boy pretending to be normal. Too much of a bad thing = danger.
David Brock’s powdered wig is awesome!
Remember Dracula’s “hat” in “Dracula: Dead and Loving It”?
That.
https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=dracula%3a+dead+and+loving+it&FORM=VIRE3#view=detail&mid=8A7811129E14417A1A2A8A7811129E14417A1A2A
It seems to me that to be a successful attack dog, you have to be able to have some small sense of credibility, some small amount of fact to hang your had on and build a narrative. This guy’s just nuts.
“Finally, could someone tell David he needs to do something about the hair? I mean, really.”
Thank you!
I was going to say, “Hey, David. Kathleen Sebelius called, she wants her hairstyle back.” 😉
“Nothing burger”? More like dead meat burger, well done.
and there’s rats’ bodies buried in that meat…..just sayin’….
They don’t even mention the crimes of mishandling classified information on Hillary’s unsecured server. There is no defense for this.
Not only did Hillary deny the Ambassador’s pleas for security improvements in lawless Libya but it’s likely she provided the information that Al Qaeda used to kill him.