As I’ve noted previously, “If the gun grabbers can’t repeal the Second Amendment or get laws passed to infringe on our right to bear arms, they’ll simply tax guns and ammo until we can no longer afford to buy guns or use the ones we have.  At least that is their hope.”

And it’s full steam ahead in Seattle, where they are moving forward with their “gun violence” tax.  David Workman explains:

The committee voted unanimously [Wednesday] to send the proposal to the full city council for consideration next Monday, according to the Seattle Monday’s vote could set the stage for a legal confrontation, and there were hints that existing gun shops could move out of the city, and that gun owners living in Seattle will simply shop outside the city, thus thwarting any dreams that this tax will generate $300,000 to $500,000 annually for the city’s gun control efforts.

. . . . Another part of the Burgess gun control effort is a second proposed ordinance requiring the reporting of lost or stolen firearms to police within 24 hours that the theft or loss is discovered. This requirement also appears to go beyond state statute, and thus violate the preemption statute, passed in 1982, strengthened in 1985 and reinforced with the defeat of Seattle’s attempted parks ban three years ago when the state Supreme Court refused to hear Seattle’s appeal after the city lost at trial and at the appeals court.

The NRA argues that this is bad policy.  From the NRA-ILA website:

The burden of regressive taxes like the Seattle proposal falls squarely on those that are least able to afford them. Persons of means will simply drive outside the city to purchase firearms and ammunition, while those without such options will be forced to go forego their rights or pay the tax. This is especially egregious considering how those at the lower end of the economic scale also tend to reside in areas where violent crime is the highest.   One wonders whether this type of social engineering on the downtrodden is an intended feature of the legislation rather than an unfortunate consequence.

And there is little doubt that this is indeed social engineering designed to limit Seattle’s citizens’ access to firearms.  As Hot Air explains, this is not a “tax intended to raise revenue for vital services”:

Supporters are claiming that this tax could bring in a half million dollars in revenue, but under the best of circumstances that sounds vastly inflated. It also doesn’t take into account how much it could affect the local market. As one local gun dealer pointed out, it’s a competitive sales space and they already sell pretty much on the margins. If he has to jack up the price of a ten or fifteen dollar box of ammunition by five dollars, shooters will simply go outside the city limits and buy their rounds where the tax is not applied. The same goes for new gun purchases. If sales plummet, the tax revenue goes down by default and if the shops close, the revenue disappears entirely.

Of course, that’s been the idea all along. This isn’t a tax intended to raise revenue for vital services. It’s a political statement. That’s why the supporters of the proposal even call it the gun violence tax. They’re not expecting to raise cash or reduce violence. They’re simply looking to show their base constituents how “serious” they are about restricting gun rights. The irony behind all of this is that the city will doubtless face a series of expensive lawsuits if the tax is put in place and they’ll probably lose. In the end they will wind up getting no revenue and the taxpayers will be stuck with the bill for the court costs and associated expenses.

Watch a gun store owning Microsoft engineer from Seattle address the Seattle city council committee:

With the Seattle city council vote coming today, Workman notes that the Seattle decision will have larger implications for Second Amendment rights across the country.  He continues:

Many Second Amendment activists, which include open carry proponents, “constitutional carry” (no license required) advocates, target shooters, hunters and collectors, see what is happening in Seattle as a symptom of a larger problem. Anti-gun liberals, they contend, are pushing in every direction to erode Second Amendment rights and discourage people from exercising the right to keep and bear arms under both federal and dozens of state constitutions.

This is quickly shaping up as a battle in which there can be no sitting on the sidelines. Gun control politics is not a spectator sport.