Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

8th Planned Parenthood Video: Buyer Wants “Another 50 Livers per Week”

8th Planned Parenthood Video: Buyer Wants “Another 50 Livers per Week”

Previously banned from release…

Last week, the Center for Medical Progress released a “teaser” of their 8th video implicating Planned Parenthood and StemExpress officials in the trafficking of fetal body parts. Until last week, the video’s publication had been banned under a temporary restraining order sought by StemExpress; CMP, however, overcame that TRO on free speech grounds, and seized the opportunity to release more footage before StemExpress’ attorneys could launch an appeal.

Today, CMP released the full video, throwing into full relief the legal situation groups like Planned Parenthood and StemExpress could find themselves in if activists keep digging. In the video, StemExpress CEO Cate Dyer talks with “buyers” about how abortion providers’ actions affect how much money the products of abortion—or, as decent human beings like to say, the baby’s body—can raise for procurement firms.

Watch:

HotAir breaks it down:

Dyer also discusses how StemExpress had to intervene in the “procurement” process in order to get usable specimens, suggesting that abortionists have to change their methods to get them — which would violate federal law:

“So many physicians are like, ‘Oh I can totally procure tissue,’ and they can’t,” expresses Dyer, seeming to indicate that abortion doctors must do the procedure in a special way to obtain useable fetal parts. Federal law requires that no alteration in the timing or method of abortion be done for the purposes of fetal tissue collection (42 U.S.C. 289g-1).

“What about intact specimens?” asks one of the actors. “Oh yeah, I mean if you have intact cases, which we’ve done a lot, we sometimes ship those back to our lab in its entirety,” replies Dyer. “Case” is the clinical term for an abortion procedure. An “intact case” refers to an intact abortion with a whole fetus. “The entire case?” asks an actor. “Yeah, yeah,” says Dyer. “The procurement for us, I mean it can go really sideways, depending on the facility, and then our samples are destroyed,” she explains past botched fetal dissections, “so we started bringing them back even to manage it from a procurement expert standpoint.”

At one point, Dyer makes a point to note how viciously protective Planned Parenthood is of their clinics and their business. If you’re not on board with the butchery, consider yourself on blast:

If you’re not in the cause, they don’t need you around. If you’re not a champion, you should go.

Although this video is less dramatic than those previously released, its contents provide valuable hints about how the continuing battle to defund Planned Parenthood is likely to proceed. If these clinics have indeed changed their practices in order to produce more valuable specimens, that could spell big legal trouble for Planned Parenthood.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

I read the other day that Pennsylvania had cleared Planned Abortionhood of something or other.

That would be the same Pennsylvania that looked the other way for years during Gosnell’s reign of terror, and whose AG is under her own criminal conduct cloud.

    Not A Member of Any Organized Political in reply to Ragspierre. | August 25, 2015 at 12:28 pm

    Soylent Green = It’s Planned Parenthood’s Murdered Babies!!!!!

    Would you like some Chianti wine to go along with your murdered babies’ livers Mr. Hannibal?

    jayjerome66 in reply to Ragspierre. | August 25, 2015 at 5:33 pm

    State officials in Georgia, Indiana, and South Dakota (all with Republican Governors) had alsoiinvestigated local affiliates of Planned Parenthood to ensure that the health care group was operating within the law. The organization passed every test.

    Again – there’s NO EVIDENCE Planned Parenthood is doing anything illegal. And no evidence they’re profiting from the sale of fetal tissue. None! Nada! Zip! Bupkis!

      healthguyfsu in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 6:27 pm

      It’s clear you know little about how a non-profit works. The NFL is a non-profit…does that mean they can’t make anyone any money? I forgot that Roger Goodell works out of the charity of his heart.

      There are countless ways to hide profit into expenses, including but not limited to compensation expenses. You really think PP is going to be as open with those investigators as they were when they were caught red-handed on tape?

      While the evidence is inadmissible, it’s damning and “clever editing” is a sorry excuse considering many of the conversations go long for minutes without a break in tape…of course, I don’t expect you to watch but you will have a hard time covering your eyes with fingers in your ears.

      Ragspierre in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 6:38 pm

      “Again – there’s NO EVIDENCE Planned Parenthood is doing anything illegal.”

      Except for the EVIDENCE they are manipulating abortions to produce “products” for resale, which is a Federal crime.

      Except for the EVIDENCE showing they are SELLING “products” for PROFIT, which is a Federal crime.

      You lying sack of shit.

        jayjerome66 in reply to Ragspierre. | August 26, 2015 at 12:42 pm

        The Bald-Headed Chicken-Shit Blog Bozo is at it again:

        “Except for the EVIDENCE they are manipulating abortions to produce “products” for resale, which is a Federal crime.”

        Where’s the ‘evidence’ you moron. You claim to be a lawyer (that’s a laff) and don’t know the difference between evidence and accusation.

        Show me the evidence, dumbo. Where’s a link to any ‘evidence’ except the edited gotcha tape

        “Except for the EVIDENCE showing they are SELLING “products” for PROFIT, which is a Federal crime.”

        More of the same bullshit evidence accusations from a smuck as dumb and bald as a hard-boiled egg. Here’s what EXPERTS have to say about the bogus profit claims:

        From FactCheck:
        http://www.factcheck.org/2015/07/unspinning-the-planned-parenthood-video/

        Profit From Fetal Tissus: “Four experts in the field of human tissue procurement told us the price range discussed in the video — $30 to $100 per patient — represents a reasonable fee. “There’s no way there’s a profit at that price,” said Sherilyn J. Sawyer, the director of Harvard University and Brigham and Women’s Hospital’s “biorepository.”

        She continued in an email:
        Sawyer, July 20: In reality, $30-100 probably constitutes a loss for [Planned Parenthood]. The costs associated with collection, processing, storage, and inventory and records management for specimens are very high. Most hospitals will provide tissue blocks from surgical procedures (ones no longer needed for clinical purposes, and without identity) for research, and cost recover for their time and effort in the range of $100-500 per case/block. In the realm of tissues for research $30-100 is completely reasonable and normal fee.

        Jim Vaught, president of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories and formerly the deputy director of the National Cancer Institute’s Office of Biorepositories and Biospecimen Research, told us in an email that “$30 to $100 per sample is a reasonable charge for clinical operations to recover their costs for providing tissue.” In fact, he said, the costs to a clinic are often much higher, but most operations that provide this kind of tissue have “no intention of fully recovering [their] costs, much less making a profit.”

      CloseTheFed in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 8:49 pm

      You are certifiably mentally retarded.

Established law. A human life (e.g. Jane or John Doe) from conception to some time around birth is subject to the jurisdiction of its mother. Indiscriminate killing is a civil right.

    For now.

    But the real questions currently on the table are these:
    1) Should it be a “civil right” to indiscriminately kill an unborn human?
    2) Irrespective of the answer to question #1, should the American people be required to subsidize the practice via tax dollars?

    If you answer “yes” to both questions, then I demand tax-payer money to fully-fund projects to build a church, launch a conservative family-friendly newspaper and matching website, and stock up my gun safe. Y’know, since we’re now requiring funding for everyone’s Constitutionally-protected civil rights. 😉

      n.n in reply to Archer. | August 25, 2015 at 2:00 pm

      Not even everyone. The pro-choice doctrine, including: selective-child, “equal”, illegal/unmeasured immigration, etc. is notoriously selective. A choice that has been promoted or normalized that does not favor American human and civil rights.

      I would support establishing a nation under a religion/moral philosophy with a distinctly pro-life/human rights prejudice and balances the ancient scale of individual dignity, intrinsic value, and natural imperatives.

        I’d support such a nation, too. In fact, it’s been done.

        “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. –That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, –That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” — Declaration of Independence, 1776

        America was that nation. Whether it can or will be again, is largely up to us.

        jayjerome66 in reply to n.n. | August 25, 2015 at 5:43 pm

        “I would support establishing a nation under a religion/moral philosophy with a distinctly pro-life/human rights prejudice and balances the ancient scale of individual dignity, intrinsic value, and natural imperatives.”

        I guess you don’t consider Israel a nation under a true religious and moral philosophy, as it has free and easily available abortions to almost all women of childbearing age.

        But I guess you’re more in accord morally with the Palistinians in the occupied territories, who entirely prohibit abortion. As do many other Arab and Muslim countries.

          healthguyfsu in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 6:22 pm

          False equivalencies, galore…get a grip.

          Israel has abortion and it has its opponents of abortion…same as the US.

          Should we talk about all of the other human rights atrocities in Sharia law that libtards like yourself choose to ignore when choosing to side with ISIS err I mean Islam?

          The problem is not in the Jewish religion, but rather the widely adopted pro-choice doctrine in secular societies.

          jayjerome66 in reply to jayjerome66. | August 26, 2015 at 1:18 pm

          healthguyfsu:

          Yeah, I’m a Libtard on abortion. Am I also a Conserva-dope on immigration (go Donald, go!) and for being strongly pro-police in the Zimmerman and Ferguson imbroglios? And for suggesting the only way to prevent Iran from becoming a nuclear threat is to invade and destroy their infrastructure as totally as we did to the Japanese in WWII?

          Do those contradictory views make me a Conserva-Libtard?

          Milhouse in reply to jayjerome66. | August 26, 2015 at 3:24 pm

          I guess you don’t consider Israel a nation under a true religious and moral philosophy

          Of course we don’t. Why would anyone consider it that? Israel was founded by militant secular socialists, who refused to even mention God in the declaration of independence.

          jayjerome66 in reply to jayjerome66. | August 26, 2015 at 6:09 pm

          Milhouse, you nudnik, here’s the first paragraph of theDeclaration of the Establishment of the State of Israel:

          “The Land of Israel was the birthplace of the Jewish people. Here their spiritual, religious and political identity was shaped. Here they first attained to statehood, created cultural values of national and universal significance and gave to the world the eternal Book of Books.”

          What ‘spiritual and religious identity’ do you think they were referring to?
          What ‘Book of Books’ do they mean,the Comunisti Manifesto?

          And by the way, nudnik, the word “God” does not appear in the Preamble to the U.S. Constitution, or anywhere else in it. Was that a socialist conspiracy ?

          from iPad email

    CloseTheFed in reply to n.n. | August 25, 2015 at 8:51 pm

    As I recollect, in either Roe v. Wade or its companion case (I don’t recall its name), the opinion stated if an unborn child were granted “personhood,” then abortion would be prohibited.

    Been a long time, so my memory may be incorrect on this.

Buyer Wants “Another 50 Livers per Week”

Bill Clinton (1992) – abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare”.

Planned Parenthood (2015) – abortion should be safe, legal, and profitable.

    I’ve always been annoyed by that “safe, legal and rare” remark.

    Why rare? If something is safe and legal, why should it be rare? Are they admitting that there’s something wrong with it?

    It’s like they think they’re throwing us a bone: “We’ll try not to do a lot of them. There. You happy now?”

It is not necessary to outlaw Planned Parenthood or abortions. All that is necessary is to build an artificial womb made out of rubber/plastic that is large enough to accommodate an adult. Then everyone who claims to believe in abortion should be put in it and aborted. It would not take very many of those procedures before there would no longer be anyone left who still believes in abortion.

So they believe that “a woman has a right to control her body”?

If a baby is in another room, is intact, has a beating heart… how can it possibly still be called a part of the woman’s body?

    jayjerome66 in reply to RKae. | August 25, 2015 at 5:49 pm

    Ha ha ha ha,

    A child in another room isn’t in a mother’s body. Mother here. Child other room.
    Get it?

    You do know that Harpo was a Liberal, right?

      If only all other liberals could be as silent as Harpo.

      Ragspierre in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 6:52 pm

      You need to provide links, you lying sack of shit.

      Harpo was, in fact, an active anti-Soviet, who smuggled material out of the Soviet Union.

      He also adopted several children, with his ONE wife.

        jayjerome66 in reply to Ragspierre. | August 26, 2015 at 1:33 pm

        Links to what, Bozo?

        You couldn’t be dumb enough to be suggesting that because Harpo smuggled letters out taped to his leg under his trousers (during the presidency of the liberal Democrat FDR) he wasn’t a liberal Democrat?

        You must be drunk and stupid.

Not only are they curing ZERO disease with this organ harvesting, but even if they were, there’s no disease that infects humanity that is more destructive than the absolute lack of morals that these murderers are exhibiting.

The ability to chuckle while a tiny heart beats in front of your eyes; snickering while you throw them in a trash bag… is there ANY disease that’s worse than that mental state?

I think not.

It makes me think of what Gary Ridgeway (the Green River Killer) said when he was asked what was wrong with him. Dave Reichert asked him, “What’s missing in you?” and Ridgeway answered, “That caring thing. I just don’t care.”

Want Onions with that “liver”, GHOUL BASTIDS!?

I’m all for ‘Women’s health’ issues AND everyone’s health issues BUT these vile, evil people ARE way beyond ANY female health issues.

    jayjerome66 in reply to JP. | August 25, 2015 at 6:01 pm

    By ghoul bastards you mean the doctors and researchers and hospitals and pharmaceutical labs who are DEMANDING them, right?

    If there wasn’t a need/demand for fetal liver tissue, middlemen like StemExpress (who ARE PROFITING) wouldn’t be pushing to get more..

    And those liver samples they’re talking about in the propagandistic anti abortion gotcha video apparently are from tiny fetuses in the first trimester ( confusing a blood clot for a liver indicates a fetus the size of a thumb). If you think it’s morally wrong to harvest fetal material for medical research, picket the major hospitals and universities who are conducting those experiments.

      Ragspierre in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 7:02 pm

      “And those liver samples they’re talking about in the propagandistic anti abortion gotcha video apparently are from tiny fetuses in the first trimester…”

      You are funny, for a lying, hyperventilating sack of shit. Put up your links.

        jayjerome66 in reply to Ragspierre. | August 26, 2015 at 2:20 pm

        If I have a 90% chance of being correct about the fetus size, and you have less then a slim 10% chance I’m wrong, YOU need to provide a link that I’m inaccurate.

        You do know what percentages I’m referring to, right dummy? Or is your shiny head up your butt on the statistical facts of abortion in the U.S?

      JerryB in reply to jayjerome66. | August 25, 2015 at 8:27 pm

      JJ wrote: “If you think it’s morally wrong to harvest fetal material for medical research, picket the major hospitals and universities who are conducting those experiments.”

      Finally, I can agree with you on something. This practice has been going on for nearly 70 years in major medical universities, e.g., Harvard. It’s not much different than pagan human sacrifice, just now the god is called science, and the offering is for improvement of the human race — for those that aren’t offered in sacrifice, that is.

It’s funny. The abortionists think this is only about illegal harvesting and trafficking of “planned” human babies. Where in fact these videos that depict not only callous treatment and endangerment of pregnant women, but also torture, killing, harvesting, and trafficking of their aborted babies’ bodies, parts, and tissue is directed to the so-called “moderates”.

People who recognize human rights stopped watching at indiscriminate killing by Planned Parenthood and other corporations in the abortion industry. The target is, in fact, the State-established pro-choice policies that rationalize/legalize selective-child, selective exclusion, etc. and the left-wing Party, amoral religion, and liberal ideology that promoted/normalized it.

“Intact Specimens” – This is just devastating for them.

How do they get an “intact specimen” given the abortion procedures currently practiced? Simple. The baby is born alive and then they let it die. That’s murder. Its also a violation of the “born alive” legislation that the federal government and all 50 states have adopted.

    jayjerome66 in reply to Aarradin. | August 26, 2015 at 2:02 pm

    No, Intact means they were not dismembered inside the womb.

    In California, where the tapes were recorded, all abortion clinics are under the legal stipulations of the Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003.

    The fetus is put to death before expulsion, “usually from a solution of potassium chloride or digoxin injected directly into the fetal heart using ultrasound to guide the needle.”

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial-Birth_Abortion_Ban_Act#Clinical_response

      JerryB in reply to jayjerome66. | August 26, 2015 at 7:36 pm

      If you’ll hold PP to Wiki’s “put to death usually from a solution of potassium chloride or digoxin,” then they won’t be able to sell the parts. One step ahead. Next step: no more murdering children in the first place.

        jayjerome66 in reply to JerryB. | August 26, 2015 at 10:45 pm

        JerryB, here is the California law for live birth abortions:
        http://californiaabortionlaw.com/wp/?page_id=64

        Look at Part B. If PP is delivering live fetuses per the legal description, they’re in violation of the law.
        And if they’re doing it regularly, without fetal termination pre birth, let’s round them up and put them on trial.

        Surely with all the publicity from the tapes, dozens of witnesses have already contacted the authorities to corroborate their wholesale illegal actions! We should soon be seeing swarms of them on media exposes! That will help put an end to fetal tissue experimentation. To hell with Michael J. Fox and his Foundation! And all those other thousands of in-process fetal medical tests. Pitchforks and bonfires for them!

          Correct me if I’m reading you the wrong way, but it sounds like you’re in favor of fetal tissue research. It sounds like I’m the bogeyman with “pitchforks and bonfires” because I’m opposed to putting these murdered children to “use” for the betterment of society. Maybe I should be glad the kids get to “contribute”?

          Joe Mengele furthered science using an unwanted class of humans in his day. Most everyone finds his experimentation appalling. As a former fetus, I’m appalled at what passes for science today. Yes, I’d like to see the murder and experimentation ended, the labs razed as a testament to the Naziism that continues to thrive in our society today. And you are one of them, as are many on this board.

          jayjerome66 in reply to jayjerome66. | August 27, 2015 at 9:36 am

          Yes JerryB, I’m strongly in favor of allowing abortions to be performed, according to the laws now in place following Roe V Wade and those subsequently based on it.

          Before responding to your other assertions above I’d like to know where you stand on the abortion laws, and what changes you would make to them….

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend