Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Former Clinton Staffer Questions ‘Clinton Cash’ Author

Former Clinton Staffer Questions ‘Clinton Cash’ Author

Is George Stephanopoulos believable as an objective journalist in this case?

George Stephanopoulos worked in the Bill Clinton administration as a senior adviser. In what way is he qualified to question the author of a book which seeks to expose alleged corruption of the Clintons?

Peter Schweizer holds his own in this interview despite the aggressive and skeptical questions hurled at him throughout the discussion.

Stephanopoulos is not so much a journalist, he’s a member of the palace guard. It’s quite clear which side he’s on in this situation.

Watch the video, via Twitchy:

You may notice that Stephanopoulos keeps saying there’s no evidence for Schweizer’s claims.

Charles Krauthammer has an explanation for that.

Jeffrey Meyer of News Busters:

Krauthammer Slams Clinton Foundation: ‘The Evidence Was Shredded’

On Friday’s Special Report with Bret Baier, Fox News’ Charles Krauthammer blasted Hillary Clinton over the ongoing controversy surrounding the Clinton Foundation.

The conservative columnist argued that “[t]he Clinton defense has said there’s not a shred of evidence well that’s because the evidence was shredded.”

Funny how that fact is lost on so many in our not-at-all-biased media.

Featured image via YouTube.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“Is George Stephanopoulos believable as an objective journalist in this case?”

NO!

HELL no!

and…

CERTAINLY NOT!

Next question…

    Not A Member of Any Organized Political in reply to Ragspierre. | April 27, 2015 at 1:36 pm

    Since WHEN has George Stephanopoulos EVER been believable? Since the 12th of Never!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

NO.

He was installed after his time with the Clinton’s as a full time Democrat party operative.

One of the first most obvious. They’re were others but they were not so publicly well known. Since then there have been more and more and more.

Which is why the continued GOP allowance of Democrat operatives as “moderators” for “debates” shows that they truly aren’t serious about being conservatives or even Republicans.

Anyone who thinks that Stephy Stephanopoulos somehow became objective the day he was hired by ABC? I have a bridge to sell. Cheap. One owner and in excellent condition. Hurry!

legacyrepublican | April 26, 2015 at 5:20 pm

Personally, I call him Stephacocolius because I get a very sore throat yelling at him.

Henry Bowman | April 26, 2015 at 5:25 pm

Is George Stephanopoulos believable as an objective journalist in this case?

I really don’t think Mr. Stephanopoulos can be considered an objective journalist in any case.

As pointed out indirectly, the question is too long. “Is George Stephanopoulos believable as an objective journalist?” is the more correct question. With teh same answer- No. Or more realistically, HaHAHAHAHAHAHA! No.

The above comments all true. Plus: Stephanalloverit was a so, so flak during his WH days working for the Clinton’s.

George Stephanopoulos: not a shred of objective journalism

Pretty Boy George is running interference for the Clinton Cash Cow Fund. He will be reimbursed in due time.

Henry Hawkins | April 26, 2015 at 5:46 pm

Wasn’t it George who ambushed Romney during a debate with some birth control question?

This is a lot like having Soviets judge Nazis at Nuremberg – for things the Soviets had been doing too.

Yeah. That happened.

Good Ol’Balanced Georgie..!! Let’s see…Where to begin… Drowning “Bimbo Eruptions” for the delicate and honorable Billy the Rapist.

Don’t need to add a thing to that FACT.

Is he objective? NO! Is he a journalist? NO? Is he an objective journalist? NO. Next question.

On a side note, I remember when he first slinked into town. there was a small article in the post saying he just bought a very expensive place in Georgetown. How a then young little sh*t like him could afford that place on a government salary should have raised questions. But, it didn’t…

2nd Ammendment Mother | April 27, 2015 at 1:03 pm

Wasn’t he on Rahm Emanuel’s morning conference calls to dictate what the “talking point of the day” would be for Journolist?

When McCain refused to bring up Obama’s Muslim upbringing during the 2008 election, Obama thanked him for not making an issue of “my Muslim faith.” Stephanoplous “corrected” that to “you mean ‘your Christian faith’.” NO. Obama was NOT talking about his Christian anything. He was explicitly talking about his connection to Islam, and in a very revealing slip called it “my Muslim faith.”

That this lifetime political hack is allowed to pass himself off as a newsman is disgusting. Go to hell ABC. As bad as NBC/MSNBC (and CBS, and CNN etcetera). This country is so screwed.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend