Word Association 2016: Hillary = Foreign Donations and Benghazi
Even Chris Matthews Knows Benghazi and Foreign Donors Spell Trouble for Hillary
Ever since the Benghazi attack that killed an American ambassador and three other Americans, Hillary supporting liberals have been calling the incident a non-issue but facts are stubborn things.
They’ll undoubtedly give the same white wash to the fact that the Clinton Foundation has accepted donations from foreign governments.
Yet even MSNBC’s Chris Matthews has acknowledged that these issues are serious.
Video via the Washington Free Beacon:
Jim Treacher of the Daily Caller has more:
By The Way, Now There’s Even More Proof That Hillary Clinton Lied About Benghazi
You know it. I know it. Most particularly, the America-loving patriots who sarcastically shriek “BENGHAZI!!!!11!” know it. The murder of Ambassador Christopher Stevens had nothing to do with any “awful Internet video,” and nobody involved ever really thought it did.
Judicial Watch announced today that on February 11, 2015, it uncovered documents from the U.S. Department of State revealing that top aides for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, including her then-chief of staff Cheryl Mills, knew from the outset that the Benghazi mission compound was under attack by armed assailants tied to a terrorist group. The documents were produced as a result of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the State Department (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State ((No. 1:14-cv-01511). The documents make no reference to a spontaneous demonstration or Internet video, except in an official statement issued by Hillary Clinton…
Hey everybody! Have you heard that Scott Walker didn’t finish college?
Featured image via YouTube.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X4cC6xtltYU
Chuck Da K makes an excellent point. If you want to help X or Y, you’d give money directly to X or Y. You would NOT give it to the Clinton slush fund.
UNLESS, of course, you are REALLY buying influence.
That would be unethical and I can’t see a Clinton doing anything unethical.
BWAAAAAAAAA hahahahaha hahahaha… (cough, cough) … hahahahahahahaha
Breath….Breath…..slowly. 🙂
Soooooooo…Let’s just jump over the regular foreign policy crap, lies, grift, shall we Missus Clinton. Okaaaaay, how about staying married to your Compulsive-Obsessive Sex Addict Serial Philanderer, Babycakes??? That’s example Number One of how pathologically SICK you are.
Now, go away.
Yep. Like I say, “Her only claim is being the submissive enabler of really bad men for several decades. Well, aside from her own corruption, treason, and anti-Americanism”.
The very LAST person I would recommend to my daughters for an example.
PLUS, as we know from her own words, the FCC move against a free internet is something she’s been militating for since the “vast right-wing conspiracy” days.
Slowly but surely, the Hildabeast’s coronation is looking like it will never happen. Too bad she can’t be sitting in a Federal prison right now. Then again, stranger things have happened. Like the election of the current pretender that currently resides in the White House.
The only thing worse than a Hillary Clinton Presidency is……………well crap. Can I get back to ya on that?