Image 01 Image 03

Senate Debates, Votes on NDAA (Updates)

Senate Debates, Votes on NDAA (Updates)

Let the airing of grievances commence!

Update: The Senate has managed to muster the majority vote needed to pass the NDAA. Votes are still flowing in.
(Bill eventually passed 89-11.)

You can watch the debate and final vote here, via C-SPAN.

The Senate has been in session since 10 this morning, debating a $585 billion defense authorization. The National Defense Authorization Act, when passed, will authorize spending by the Pentagon into 2015, and includes a controversial lands use portion that would create new national parks and expedite the permit process for oil and gas drilling.

Interestingly enough, most of the chatter about the NDAA has revolved not around defense spending itself, but around the unrelated, deficit-neutral land use provisions. From The Hill:

“The NDAA for fiscal year 2015 is a legislative hodgepodge that includes those straightforward, noncontroversial items that almost all of us support, but also numerous other provisions that are unrelated to national defense,” Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said. “Most egregiously, the drafters secretly added 68 unrelated bills pertaining to the use of federal lands.”

As the House prepares to leave town Thursday night, the bill’s authors made it clear it that this bill was the only chance to pass an NDAA authorization by the end of the year.

“We have to pass this bill,” Sen. James Inhofe (R-Okla.) said ahead of the vote. “The House is going to go home and there are no ways to make any changes.”

Senators on both sides of the aisle defended the lands use portion, saying the Congressional Budget Office reported it would be deficit neutral. It designates new national parks and wilderness areas and expedites the permit process for oil and gas drilling, among other things.

“That is why the package of lands bills in the National Defense Authorization Act is vitally important to America.” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said. “This compromise is the chance for the Senate to get something done.”

The hilarity of Harry Reid suggesting that now is the time for the Senate “to get something done” aside, I think Senator Lee makes a fair point here about the hodgepodge going a little too far this time. Fortunately for proponents of the land use portions, debate over the NDAA drafting was overshadowed by the #CRomnibus controversy. (To be fair, the land bills attached to the NDAA cleared their various committees, mostly with bipartisan support.)

We expect a vote on the NDAA at our around 3:00 pm Eastern Time, and will update this post with the results.

You can watch the debate and final vote here, via C-SPAN.


Here we go with the final passage vote! Lingering controversies over land use provisions and indefinite detention have made for an interesting time.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.



Let the airing of grievances commence!

No Festivus pole?!

It was a compromise. Republicans allowed some new parks & wilderness designation in exchange for forcing the new mineral leases. Obama has still not approved a single new lease on federal lands, only those begun under Bush and some renewals.

ALL of our increasing production is from private land and existing federal leases. Once we get back to sanity, it will be even more.

– –

I agree that it is ridiculous to lump all these unrelated things into a single bill, but there are so few Reid has allowed to come to a vote, we have to deal with the situation we have.

DINORightMarie | December 12, 2014 at 7:23 pm

Can you post a roll call of the vote? 89-11 = who were the RINOs and sell-outs? Mike Lee and Ted Cruz are the two I trust most in the US Senate. If they say it’s a bad deal, I believe them.

I’d like to know the names of those who are selling us out, so we can get ready to primary them in upcoming elections.

And here I though NDAA hearings could revisit the President’s new found right to kill Americans with drones.