Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

City of Bloomington to sue Mall of America protesters (#BlackLivesMatter #ShutItDown)

City of Bloomington to sue Mall of America protesters (#BlackLivesMatter #ShutItDown)

“This was a powder keg just waiting for a match”

Bloomington City Attorney Sandra Johnson is making moves to hold accountable the organizers of this past Saturday’s “Black Lives Matter” protest at the Mall of America.

Officers were present on-site, and once the chanting started, moved to close almost 100 stores and several entrances to the mall. I say “moved to” as opposed to “were forced to” because the shutdown occurred as soon as the protests began, and there were no reports of some sort of violent instigating event; but perhaps it’s a good thing the officers moved so quickly, based on how mall employees describe what happened next:

From CBS Minnesota:

Nate Bash works at one store near the rotunda, which he didn’t want us to name.

“You had people yelling and screaming inside the mall that wanted out and you had people yelling and screaming outside the mall that wanted in,” he said. “I would say the mall was less than half as busy as it should have been considering what day it was.”

“This was a powder keg just waiting for a match,” said Johnson.

Police officers are busy using social media in an attempt to single out the organizers (arresting every single protester would be chaos, and not worth the trouble;) their goal is to target the organizers and participants who encouraged others to come to the mall even after officials made moves to emphasize that the Mall of America is privately owned, and those disrutping business would be asked to leave. Officials don’t yet know how much money was lost during the shutdown, but they’re throwing around words like “staggering,” so I’m willing to assume that losses were well worth the effort to track these people down and file a lawsuit.

As someone who has worked in retail management, I can testify to the importance of not missing a single sale, much less two hour’s worth in the middle of the holiday shopping season. Corporate offices put enormous pressure on their retail slaves to make sales goals, no matter what’s happening outside the store’s entrance.

In this case, I imagine that there are an awful lot of retail managers sitting in tiny offices crunching the numbers and wondering how in the hell they’re going to make up two hours worth of sales in an already crunched and competitive market. Organizers of the protests claim that their goal wasn’t to intimidate or disrupt, but to “sing carols and raise awareness,” and I suppose they achieved their end as far as visibility is concerned. But if Nate’s story (above) is true, it sounds like they didn’t work nearly as hard to let other protesters know the true goals of their protest.

That being said, if you believe that the goal of this protest was meant to be anything other than another high-profile screechfest for the cameras and pundits, I have a sun-drenched beach in Minnesota to sell you.

h/t Stephen Kruiser

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

On another site there was video of some of the demonstrations. One store had many clerks, women in black dresses, come out with their hands up to join the protests. I hope the store accepted their abandoning their jobs as a resignation thus ending their employment and chances for unemployment compensation. The truth is being abused and useful idiots are furthering the chaos.

Here’s an observation: free speech is a right. It isn’t a right that grants a license.

What that means is that you have a right to mount a protest. It does NOT mean you are granted a license to trespass. It does not mean you have a right to protest anywhere at any time. It does not grant a license to disrupt other people in the exercise of their rights.

I was listening to Mayor Rudy the other night, and he related that he went to court, and gained a court order that protesters were free to protest at a certain location from 3 am to 6 am. After that, they were cleared out if they had not moved themselves.

That is consonant with everyone’s rights, seems to me. Shutting down a bridge or highway is NOT. That is not “free speech”. It is planned, organized disruption, aimed at harming the rights of others, and imposing costs on others that no one has a right to impose.

If a “protester” attempts to prevent the lawful movement of citizens, they need to be dealt with harshly. You can either move out of my way or I’ll go right through you.

Suing Democrats is how we destroyed the power base of the KKK.

No reason we can’t sue the communists/Democrats organizing these race riots.

Once we started taking houses, land and businesses from the KKK the Democrat’s terrorist wing collapsed amazingly quickly.

    Ragspierre in reply to Aarradin. | December 24, 2014 at 8:06 am

    Something InstaPundit pointed out…

    social media leaves an excellent trial for RICO.

    There’s a down-side to flash-mobs.

Why not arrest them all?

Find a muddy field with a rent a fence. Zip tie hands and feet. Let them sit there and peacefully stew for about 10 hours while they wait to be processed and released. The peaceful revolutionaries sing songs and enjoy the walk back to town afterwards.

JackRussellTerrierist | December 24, 2014 at 7:32 pm

Amy, “retail slaves”?

Nobody is holding a gun to their heads.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend