Cherokee problem hurts Elizabeth Warren’s core political narrative
Attempting to rig the system.
I had an Op-Ed in The Boston Herald earlier this week, Will Elizabeth Warren sell ‘outside the bubble’?.
The overall point was that Elizabeth Warren could win the Democratic Party nomination if she were willing to run a tough fight against Hillary, but that Warren didn’t seem to have what it takes to win a national general election.
I discussed that Op-Ed today on Boston Herald Radio, guest hosted by our friend Rob Eno of Red Mass Group blog.
Money quote:
“She’s someone who runs against people who rig the system. And there’s plenty of evidence that she tried to use a false claim of ethnicity, of Native American status, to rig her career.”
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Ironically, her Cherokee hype is a bit of a catch 22 for her.
If the media circle their wagons around her, it just highlights her problem instead of covering it up.
” … circle the wagons … .” Heh!
Can’t she just hatchet ax her way out?
She is gonna get ax-ed many questions about her forked tongue – even though Hollywood is already making “excuses” for her.
As such, just witness such as a recent “The Middle” tv episode where the daughter said she checked “Native American” on her college application. Because she was American and she was a native of America…..
What is Truth in a Post-Modern Media?
“Progressives don’t only live in a post-American world; they live in a post-Truth world.”
… I’ve seen this some where before …
Morpheus: This is your last chance. After this, there is no turning back. You take the blue pill – the story ends, you wake up in your bed and believe whatever you want to believe. You take the red pill – you stay in Wonderland and I show you how deep the rabbit-hole goes.
So, the blue pill allows you to believe whatever you want to believe.
I don’t know. It has worked for the hildabeast for years although she has not claimed to be an indian. She has claimed to have been shot at while in the air, claimed to have been named for Sir Edmund Hillary even though she was born before he became known to the world, claimed to have been “Dead broke” after leaving the WH, claimed there was a vast right wing conspiracy against her and her husband, claimed that Chelsea was at ground zero when 9/11 took place. I think old William Safire was right when he called hillary a congenital liar.
Didn’t she also say that, during her husband’s presidency, the West Wing sometimes sent her on diplomatic missions that were too dangerous for State or the military?
How did that conversation go in the Oval Office? “Folks, there’s a real hellhole out there… maybe we can finally get rid of my wife so I can have some real fun.”
What Hitlery has that Warren does not, is Bill’s army of sycophant’s, bag men and agents provocateurs , willing to literally do anything to advance The Clinton Machine. Hell, Sandy Berger stuffed damaging, annotated papers from the National Archives down his pants to keep the 9/11 Commission off his boss. Jimmy Carville is ready to do anything to find dirt and smear anyone who crosses the Clintons. Warren may be merely immoral, whereas The Clintons are the very definition of amoral.
Or Warren is merely a hot-house academic and not cut out for the biting, kicking, scratching, eye-gouging, scorched-earth, down-and-dirty, cage match that running against Hitlery will be.
How is it that that criminal didn’t get thrown in Leavenworth for espionage for the rest of his life?
Sandy Berger
Berger falls under the Constitution’s Connected People Clause.
All true, but they were the same gang, younger and more in practice, in 2008, yet they lost to a totally inexperienced candidate from her left.
Any myth of inevitability or idea of intimidation fell to the reality then. Hillary just isn’t a very good candidate.
Hillary Clinton is talentless, pathetic and ah unfunny joke to most people. She’ll be humiliated by anyone who runs against her – even Fauxcahontas.
“What difference, at this point, does it make?”
Democrats are allowed to be hypocrites.
allowed? it’s required…
They’re required to be Hyper-Hypocrites.
This pow-wow wouldn’t be complete without mentioning her practicing law out of her Mass. office without a Mass law license/bar membership. Conveniently overlooked by the corrupt Dems in Mass. Liberal=no morals, no ethics, no principles.
“You didn’t renew that! ” Princess Fauxahontas was just too cheap to spend $600 out of the $350K she got for teaching 1 class at Haarvaarhd. The rules for thee but not for me – of course she’d be a perfect candidate for the elitist Donks