Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Elizabeth Warren: My historically underrepresented group treated differently in Senate

Elizabeth Warren: My historically underrepresented group treated differently in Senate

Must be Senate Dems doing it, or she’d name names.

Oh, thaaaaaatttttt historically underrepresented group. Not the one you were thinking of.

Via CNN:

Sen. Elizabeth Warren told CNN she has been treated differently as a woman in the clubby upper chamber — echoing the general sentiments of her colleague Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, who wrote about sexism in the Senate in a recent book.

During a wide-ranging interview on the Colorado campaign trail—where she was stumping for endangered incumbent Sen. Mark Udall—CNN asked Warren whether she had experienced any different treatment as a woman. “Yes,” she said. Would she elaborate? “Nope.” But was it surprising? “Not really, I wish it were,” she told CNN. “But it’s hard to change these big, male dominated institutions. What I am very happy about is that there are now enough women in the United States Senate to bring change to that place and I think that’s just powerfully important.” There are now 20 women in the senate.

Warren added: “You know, others have said it before me. If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re probably on the menu.” Warren’s comments did make one clear case: women will be treated as equals when there continue to be more women in the Senate.

Warren didn’t want to talk specifics, or how the different treatment manifested itself. “I’ve said all I am going to say,” ending that part of the conversation. In the book, Gillibrand recounted specific details of unnamed male senators remarking about her appearance—even squeezing her waist.

So who are the bullies? Bryan Preston points out the obvious — if they were Republicans, she’d be naming names:

Well, we can all infer what’s going on here. If the culprit or culprits were Republicans, Warren, false Indian and darling of the far left, would not hesitate to name them and call them out. No doubt about it. Her accusation would resurrect the phony “war on women” with less than two weeks to go before the election.

So the culprits must be Warren’s fellow Democrats. That’s why she has said all she’ll say about it.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.


Warren’s a woman?

Let me guess – someone held a door for her one time. Bunch of sexists…

She isn’t naming names because she has to work with these louts.

    Ragspierre in reply to mwsomerset. | October 22, 2014 at 7:40 pm

    …and the nice, gentlemanly Conservatives.

    A lot like Gillibrand.

    JOHN B in reply to mwsomerset. | October 22, 2014 at 8:59 pm

    Let’s see, the louts are probably Democrats like Teddy Kennedy, Bill Clinton and others who mistreat women.

    Oh, I forgot, NOW said it was okay for those guys to assault women.

    TrooperJohnSmith in reply to mwsomerset. | October 23, 2014 at 11:00 am

    She was elected from Massachusetts, which has a recent history of electing Senators who love, honor, respect and care for women.

    See also, Mary Joe Kopechne, Chappaquiddick; Heinz-Kerry Fortune;

“If you don’t have a seat at the table, you’re probably on the menu.”

Or you have Warren-level halitosis.

tightspotkilo | October 22, 2014 at 7:54 pm

Maybe they’re discriminating against her on account of her being Native American.

Henry Hawkins | October 22, 2014 at 8:41 pm

I hate men.

Democrat Senator Elizabeth “Redskin” Warren Goes On the #WarOnWomen Path

Are you treated differently as a woman? Yup.
Will you elaborate? Nope.

These protestations eerily parallel an interview I saw with her on Boston’s FOX station.
Are you really part Cherokee? Yup.
Will you elaborate? I have family pictures – but they are not for you.

‘Po wittle ‘How’ Warren. In this PC-Thought Police on Steroids Age, I’m trying to imagine Senator Margaret Chase Smith(Republican)boo-hoooing about those durned sexist boys.

But, ooohhhhhhhhhh booooo-hooooooooo in the 5th decade of Women’s Lib+Modern Victimhood, we hear this tiresome shit from a lying liar of the left. Are we not blessed?

The race is on between Hillary Weiner Clinton and Elizabeth Fauxchahontas — for the slot of America’s scummiest public figure.

It sounds like Warren has become tired of being a simple rubber stamp and being treated as such.

As an aunt was known to say: “Well bless her little heart.”

Little squaw take heap big gulp fire water, think she now chief.

TrooperJohnSmith | October 23, 2014 at 10:49 am

Oh, great. Oklahoma’s Number 2 national embarrassment (sadly, now #2 after the Sooners’ Saturday suck) opens her mouth again and, you guessed it, nothing but gibberish spewed.

It’s funny how you nice, educated, genteel folks back east look at us rubes out here in fly-over land as the ignorant, unwashed masses. However, if there was ever incontrovertible proof that the opposite is true, it’s the hiring of “Cherokee” Lizzy Warren as a Harvard professor, followed by her election to the Senate by the people of Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Down here, she couldn’t get elected dog catcher. “White Indians” never do well in politics west of the Allegheny mountains or east of the Colorado River.

Cherokee Barbie never fails to bring out the laughs!