Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

Most brutally accurate tweet ever?

Most brutally accurate tweet ever?

I know you hate it when I mention Meghan McCain.

I hate it too, it brings back memories of her bizarre and false claim that I made fun of her breast size. I didn’t even write the post at issue, Kathleen did, and the post did not make fun of McCain’s breasts. The whole thing was false, numerous people called her out on it, but she never retracted it. The incident was really strange, and served as a caution to me that someone with a big megaphone can do a lot of damage just because.

Which brings me to last night.

McCain tweeted out the Republicans were hypocrites for supporting Mark Sanford:

Twitter - @meghanmccain - Sanford hypocrite

To which Iowahawk responded:

Twitter - @iowahawkblog - Meghan McCain

I think this response to McCain also is noteworthy:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

“…the post did not make fun of McCain’s breasts. The whole thing was false…”

Which of the two…???

Who cares how small and misshapen her breasts are.
Why do sex scandals only matter when they are done by Republicans?

    “Why do sex scandals only matter when they are done by Republicans?”

    Because Republicans actually run on adherence to standards and values, not freedom from them as do Democrats. It is easy as an individual to violate the former, but impossible to violate the latter. That’s why dems can’t be accused of hypocrisy. A Republican individual’s misstep is ultimately used to condemn the standard, when in fact the misstep is only evidence of human imperfection. There’s nothing wrong with the standard.

    3/4 Dome in reply to Towson Lawyer. | May 8, 2013 at 3:48 pm

    See Alinsky rule, hold your opponents to their own standards.

    Democrats have no standards, so they can get away with anything.

rabid wombat | May 8, 2013 at 12:51 pm

“…someone with a big megaphone…”

are megaphones a euphemism?

Homosexual behavior and heterosexual adultery are two different problems. One is a betrayal of evolutionary fitness. While the other is a betrayal of trust. Neither behavior has any redeeming value to society or humanity.

For me, it’s not just the affair, it’s the way he handled it that make me question Mark Sanford’s sanity. This guy has treated his wife and children abominably, IN ADDITION to cheating.

    Estragon in reply to Valerie. | May 9, 2013 at 1:56 am

    Sanford’s “trespassing” charge, which Jenny agreed to settle now that she can’t sabotage his election, came when she didn’t respond to his calls. He went to her house anyway so their youngest son wouldn’t have to watch the Super Bowl by himself.

LukeHandCool | May 8, 2013 at 1:17 pm

Professor Jacobson:

“I know you hate it when I mention Meghan McCain. I hate it too, it brings back memories of her bizarre and false claim that I made fun of her breast size.”

Yes, I remember the Professor’s unfortunate typo leading to that whole boobhaha … excuse me, brouhaha.

Professor Jacobson:

“She’s just a big boobs.”

LukeHandCool (who marvels at the power a little “s” can wield when mistakenly tagged onto the end of a word. And who also marvels at Freudian slips)

The apple never falls far from the tree.

Meghan McCain is a mega-RINO and vapid airhead. Just like that decrepit turncoat Father of hers. I can hardly believe that there was actually a time when I admired John McCain.

Heck — I can hardly believe that there was actually a time when I admired the GOP and the RNC. Period.

GOP/RNC RINOs — just like the entire reprobate Clan McCain — are what compelled my to flush the Republican Party like the turds they have become and re-register ‘Unaffiliated’ [NPP – No Party Preference].

Iowahawk for the win!

In Megan’s pea brain conflating heterosexual infidelity with homosexual marriage is a natural extension of the hereditary McCain family mental midget syndrome.

It’s true, then, that asshats come in female form too.

PS: What Ragspierre said (about the two) made me LOL. 🙂

[…] me that’s a feature of his win, not a bug. Another feature – it gave people a reason to have fun at the expense of Meghan McCain. […]

So… I’m lost here. I should forgive Mark Sanford?

In other words: I should alter my behavior because it’s causing some sort of problem. Did I get that right?

If human beings can alter their problematic behavior, then how ’bout the creeps that cheat on their spouses alter THEIRS?!

Meghan doesn’t have to be consistent. She’s the Left’s Favorite Republican. It’s the same as not having to be able to write a coherent paragraph to be paid as a writer. What she lacks in skills and knowledge she more than makes up by having the correct ideology.

If Senator McCain’s daughter has a problem with people making fun of her breasts, all she has to do is lose weight.

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend