Most Read
Image 01 Image 02 Image 03

“Elizabeth Warren / Jim Webb 2016”

“Elizabeth Warren / Jim Webb 2016”

Think the unthinkable.  Left-wing bloggers are:

“[Webb] would also be the perfect candidate for vice president in 2016 with Elizabeth  Warren, which would allow the Dems to build again, not from ’60s nostalgia, but  from original new strengths.

And so are mainstream liberal publications.

It’s one of the reasons we created and will continue to build up ElizabethWarrenWiki.org, which is beginning to get recognition as a one-stop shop for reasearch on Warren, as written up by Patrick Howley at the  The American Spectator, New Online Encyclopedia Chronicles Warren’s Past:

Cornell Law School professor and high-profile conservative blogger William Jacobson has launched a new website, ElizabethWarrenWiki.org, to definitively compile all of the information on the background of Democratic Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren.

“I decided after the election that I didn’t want this information to get lost. No single place brought it all together. So I created a resource for future people who research her,”Jacobson, the founder of the conservative blog Legal Insurrection, told me in a phone conversation last week….

Millions of Americans heard at least some of the details of Warren’s Indian scandal. But those details weren’t reported by mainstream papers or amplified by mainstream networks, as Jacobson’s wiki page clearly demonstrates.

Conservative websites were deep-diving into an issue the liberal press was determined to play off as some kind of fatuous right-wing study-hall prank. Remarkably, the story still got out….

“In four years if she runs for president, people can now go to (ElizabethWarrenWiki.org) and look deeply into her background,”Jacobson said.

Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

But wait there’s more and if you call within…

BIG SIS TO RUN FOR PRESIDENT?
via http://www.drudgereport.com/
Maybe Lizzie can team with her.

    Neo in reply to JP. | February 4, 2013 at 9:22 pm

    With “Big Sis,” the saying … “They eat their own” … has a whole new meaning.

    If Hillary runs, Hillary get the nomination (and will be a very likely winner). If Hillary does not run these pigmies may run, and one of them may win the nomination, but Elizabeth Warren, or Big Sis, or any of these others will not win the Presidency.

      Aarradin in reply to EBL. | February 5, 2013 at 2:10 pm

      Hillary’s got one foot in the grave now. If she’s still alive in 4 years I think she’ll decide she doesn’t have the energy for a campaign.

You have not focused on her original claim in the AALS directory. Why did she do it when she did? She had a tenured position. So did her husband. They were together in Texas. But then UPenn offered Yale Law-educated husband a position. How could he turn down the Ivy League? But what about his wife? Leahy at Briebart reports he argued with (pressured?) UPenn for a position for his wife, but no deal. She had no special appeal. But, then, eureka! She registered as a Native American by clicking the box on the AALS registration site (only used by those looking for faculty positions or the hunters). Wanted to meet others like her? Nonsense. No one but faculty hunters could see the entry? No, she wanted to have extra oomph to get a UPenn offer. And it worked! She trailed her husband by a few months. In fact, Leahy referred to her as a “trailing spouse,” but faculties don’t give jobs to spouses to get the primary target. She had to have special appeal of her own. In a year that diversity hysteria was sweeping through law schools, this was a prime credential. Why else choose this one career site to register her supposed Native American status if not seeking a job? She has never been asked about this or addressed it directly. She has been lying and getting away with it.

I see a different…and somewhat greater…threat.

MoooOOchelle.

You get the third-forth Obama terms, and a LOT more mean, angry, dedicated ideologue…if you can imagine that.

I watcher her at the DN convention. She is dangerous.

    She couldn’t debate — he’s just not that smart.

    That said, it’s possible the idiots now running the GOP might still be in power, and would agree to Candycow Crowley hosting the debates and again shilling for the ignorant democrat candidate.

      Bruno Lesky in reply to TheFineReport.com. | February 4, 2013 at 9:31 pm

      Not smart / can’t debate. Not disqualifiers. For example — Biden’s deranged performance vs. Ryan.

      WRONG! If I have any ability to read people who can work on their feet (and I do), she would be a killer. She is would be a good trial attorney, which is why I say she is dangerous.

      …PARTLY why I say she would be dangerous.

      Warren, on the other hand, goes into stunned raccoon mode when put to having to speak to any hard question.

      See Bare, Princess Running…

        Observer in reply to Ragspierre. | February 5, 2013 at 11:09 am

        When has Michelle Obama ever been asked a hard question?

        I agree that MO would be dangerous, but not because she’s smart or thinks well on her feet. She’d be dangerous because she’s not particularly smart, but she is a leftist idealogue, steeped in racial and gender victimhood. As a presidential candidate, she’d be dangerous because she’d be surrounded and controlled by the same corrupt, power-mad fascists that currently run Barry, Inc. (e.g., Jarrett, Axelrod, etc.).

        What is the evidence that Michelle Obama is smart, other than the assertions from the Obama myth-making machine? She was, by her own admission, unqualified (in terms of both grades and test scores) for an Ivy League college. Her Princeton senior thesis was horrible, and she has said repeatedly that she is “not a good test taker,” which suggests that her LSAT scores were probably also not high, and she was likely an Affirmative Action admit at Harvard Law as well. The timing of her Illinois bar admission (not admitted until a year after she graduated law school, even though she held an associate lawyer job) suggests that she flunked the state bar exam at least once. She lasted only a few years at the only job she ever had practicing law (at Sidley & Austin) before being told the job “was not the right fit” for her (according to an interview her aunt gave). Every job she held after Sidley was a non-lawyer, political patronage, specially-made-for-her, make-work position, obtained for her by Barry’s political fixer Valerie Jarrett.

        Since she came on the national scene, most of Michelle Obama’s public utterances have been carefully scripted. She is seen either reading speeches, or sitting for puffball interviews with friendly MSM outlets (The View, Vogue, etc). Perhaps you’ve seen her in different venues than I have, but to date I’ve seen nothing which suggests she possesses any extraordinary skills. Her main asset as a candidate (other than her gender) would be the same one Barry has — a fawning MSM/Hollywood complex, ready to provide cover for all her gaffes and mistakes.

          Ragspierre in reply to Observer. | February 5, 2013 at 11:27 am

          Oh, make no mistake! MoooOOOchelle is not a stellar intellect.

          She is smart enough? Oh, yeah! And being good on your feet is not a matter of raw intellectual power. I know scary smart people who are inarticulate. I also know some very effective trial lawyers who are a shade above dumb (and I mean a subtle shade!).

          Would she be a great debater? Is Pres. Skeeter?

          You watch her at the Deemocratic convention. She would destroy Hill-Larry in a heads-up match. IMNHO….

          JoAnne in reply to Observer. | February 5, 2013 at 12:43 pm

          All you have to do is appeal the “feeellllinnngs” bunch. Think John Edwards.

    Not going to happen. Moochelle is no belle.

General P. Malaise | February 4, 2013 at 6:50 pm

does anyone really think it wont be obama in 2016?

The Drill SGT | February 4, 2013 at 6:52 pm

I for one, eagerly await a Warren for President, 2016.

    TrooperJohnSmith in reply to The Drill SGT. | February 4, 2013 at 8:49 pm

    Not if Hitlery wants to run. Warren would get eaten alive by Hitlery and Bubba. They’d probably put duct tape on Carville’s mouth, just to make it fair.

    Jimmy C: “Why, that woman done callin’ huh-self a Cheh’kee Indian, fuh cryin’ ‘at loud. Kinya bleeve that? Shameless, uh say… shameless! Drag a PhD thu a Oklahoma traila pawk, an’ you’ah gonna git yaw-self twenny, maybe thuddy Liz’buth Wawns! Shameless, uh’m tellin’ ya!”

    The Drill SGT in reply to The Drill SGT. | February 5, 2013 at 2:31 pm

    I was joking, you two folks that gave it a thumbs down. Can’t anybody take a joke? 🙂

The professor is angling to make Warren’s “Enemies List” when she becomes president! /sarc

Seriously, the american electorate votes self-interest every time. Obama & co. give the goodies to masses. When that runs out, all hell will break loose I don’t see very many elections after 2016 unfortunately, as the situation will have deteriorated past civility, imho. I pray I am wrong though.

Elizabeth Warren Wiki is a work of art.

There should be a page for every talking head at MSNBC and every lefty journ-o-list.

    That is a very worthwhile goal. Maybe then the professional Left would think twice about posting the homes of gun-owners. Basically, the Left needs to understand “we” could/should be capable and willing(at least 99% of the time) of what they are capable.

    Force a détente, so to speak. Raise the stakes until they can’t pay the price. Conservatives, American patriots and Tea party grassroots are the people that are truly of the mindset of “pay and price, bear any burden.” Not them.

Professor, appreciate the ElizabethWarrenWiki.org. If only there’d been a BarackObamaWiki.org back in 2008:)

I wonder if she’ll run on a platform of being the first Native American president…well, maybe 1/32…well, maybe zilch.

Or try the honest approach, and run on a platform of being a hypocrite and a pathological liar…worked great in ’08 and ’12.

These next four years are going to be the longest in American history.

Things here are going to explode, a la Argentina.
http://www.myfoxny.com/story/20958959/argentina-freezes-prices-to-break-inflation-spiral
That psycho woman who is leading that nation, is leading it down a rat hole and war. (She WILL start a war with Britain over the Falklands — anything to distract from her ruinous leadership. It worked for Bill Clinton during the blowjo — er — Lewinsky scandal.

However, it’s a good investment to mock any leftist cypher who might be a potential candidate. It’d be nice to have a farm team of leaders of our own.

Is it true John Boehner had died?

TrooperJohnSmith | February 4, 2013 at 8:41 pm

With the Fifth Column News Media and Low Information Voters in the tank for the Democrats, they could probably win with any two candidates. Why stop at Warren & Webb? Let’s try Bawney Fwank and Deb Wassermann-Schlitz. Or Pelosi and Menendez. Or Reid and Schumer. Or P-Diddy and Fiddy Cent.

Sung to the tune, ‘Bless ‘Em All’:

F’em all. F’em all. F’em all.
The long and the short and the tall.
F’ all the Progs and the Democrats too.
F’ old Barry and his whole DC Crew.

Well we’re saying F’off to them all,
As off to our ‘castles’ we crawl.
But I have this fair notion,
If we cause a commotion,
They’ll just do away with us all.

It’s that kind of night. 😆

Being Branco stole our ‘Barry Fudd’ material (as long as it’s for the cause, steal away) — we deserve a plug:

BREAKING: JOHN BOEHNER IS DEAD
http://thefinereport.com/2013/02/breaking-john-boehner-is-dead/

Considering all we have come to know and all that we believe, now consider the fact of military helicopters are performing drills over every major city in the US (I’ve seen them myself on four ocasions in the skies of major city in which I live).

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/02/its-an-obama-world-miami-residents-freak-out-after-military-helicopters-fire-shots-over-i-395-video/?ModPagespeed=noscript

Then, think about the the 1.4 BILLION rounds of hand gun ammo DHS recently armed itself with — and the hysterical and ruthless push to disarm citizens.

Now, think back on every insane statement made by every insane leftist, including the Woody Allens of Hollywood (“We should make Obama a dictator for a while…”)

It’s pretty clear where we are headed. Relative to that, who will run for president in 2014 is a million years away.

To quote one of Obama’s good buddies: Lizzy will be ready to reign from day one!

Today it was revealed that an Obama Administration Justice Department confidential memo states that the killing of American citizens, including by drone attacks, is legal – if an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government has determined that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”
http://openchannel.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/02/04/16843014-exclusive-justice-department-memo-reveals-legal-case-for-drone-strikes-on-americans?lite

Combined with the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 (NDAA), which allows the Armed Forces to engage in civilian law enforcement and to selectively suspend due process and habeas corpus as well as other rights guaranteed by the 5th and 6th Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and the recent purchase of approximately 2 billion rounds of hollow point ammunition by the Department of Homeland Security, one can only agree with Alice that “it gets curiouser and curiouser”.
http://www.counterpunch.org/2012/01/18/why-the-ndaa-is-unconstitutional/

TFR’s comments do back memories of Obama’s campaign in 2008, at a campaign stop in Colorado, where Obama laid out how he wanted to establish a “civilian nation security force” with the same level of funding as that of the Pentagon. There’s not been an objective and visible sign of that happening, yet. However, TFR’s excellent catches all support that Obama’s got something planned. IMHO: the timing is a little off for now but sometime just before or after the 2014 federal elections might be his objective.

Newtown was an unfortunate incident, and almost tailor made for Obama to press his efforts to suppress civilian firearms.

However, I do believe that Obama’s enough of a politician to realize that he could wait til his orator fails to bare fruit before openly activating his CNSF; which, OBTW, already exists in his DHS, the SEIU thugs, and OFA activities. Maybe we can avoid having Obama trying to become a tyrant in fact but I doubt it. He’s planning ahead to that effect and the GOP still believes that he’s only playing hardball.

Still, Yamamota’s fears, in WWII, regarding any Japanese efforts to invade the USA, apply equally well to a domestic tyrant. Plus, we still have plenty of grass everywhere in this great country of ours!

Suggestion: Why doesn’t legal insurrection and friends create a WH petition, along the lines of “Recognize the significance of the first Massachusetts Native American Senator, and recognize her with a listing with the Senate Historical Office ( http://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/common/briefing/minority_senators.htm).”

[…] Jacobson at Legal Insurrection considers the idea floating around the left side of the blogosphere that an Elizabeth Warren / Jim […]

That’s a much more likely combo than Hillary/Biden. Well worth starting oppo research now on Warren & Webb.

Add Tim Kaine and Cuomo to that list too.

Jim “women can’t fight” Webb running second fiddle to princess sacashit? I don’t see it.

I’m biased as Webb pushed Gen. Gray for Commandant.

I wonder how many out there are taking Liz’s shining example to heart. Hey, I’ll check the box, after all I FEEL sort of (favored minority) and who knows, I could be because my (relative) always had (racist stereotype physical feature).

Font Resize
Contrast Mode
Send this to a friend