We’ve become accustomed to leftist agenda-ists using campaigns of intimidation and bullying to push their way into the public school system, museums, our churches and synagogues, and of course into the old guard media. Are consumer packaged goods the final frontier?

By now you’ve probably seen the Kraft Foods “gay pride” oreo the company placed on the cookie’s facebook page. The ad was the latest in a campaign orchestrated in conjunction with advertising agency Draft FCB as part of the “History Print” Oreo campaign.

Kraft Foods is just the latest company to choose to embrace contentious issues through its consumer brands. From General Mills’s Betty Crocker, Gap, and Target’s upfront support of Gay Pride to Unilever’s Ben and Jerry’s support of Occupy Wall Street, large corporations and their brands are choosing sides in the culture war.

Of course it is their choice–and ultimately, the stockholders’–to do so. But are there externalities that impact how brands approach their marketing that, in this age, go beyond the traditional “fill a consumer need?”

Companies do appear, at least publicly, to be content with the opportunity to add the political dimension to their brands’ personas. ABC News reports:

Basil Maglaris, a spokeswoman for Oreo’s parent company Kraft Foods, said in a statement that the image was part of a “series of daily ads reflecting current events in a fun way using images of OREO cookies and milk.” Kraft is not planning to sell the rainbow-stuffed Oreo in stores, Maglaris said, as it was created solely for the advertising campaign in honor of Pride month.

“We are excited to illustrate what is making history today in a fun and playful way,” she said in an email to ABC News. “As a company, Kraft Foods has a proud history of celebrating diversity and inclusiveness.  We feel the OREO ad is a fun reflection of our values.”

But they are falling in line with a certain narrative the left has been working on over the past years. Note in particular the word “inclusive,” which comes up again and again (see the prior Betty Crocker link) as companies go through their their by-now pat defense of extreme brand politicization. Is it inclusive to introduce a highly politicized debate into a cookie’s branding, thereby opening up the opportunity to alienate a huge–if not majority–portion of your consumers? No, it is selective inclusion, a negation in terms, or as I call it, “Bully Marketing.”

As in the case of the McDonald’s happy meal toy in San Francisco, a small, relentless group of leftist activists intimidate large companies into embracing the carefully calculated leftist narrative of inclusiveness and tolerance, which really just means, promote their politics.

The most probable target market for Oreo, the leading brand in the cookie category, is children. The campaign, then has little to nothing to do with reaching the eventual target consumer, nor even the gatekeepers to Oreo purchases (parents). This is no push/pull consultant’s directive gone awry.

Rather, what Kraft and others are doing is making the “facilitating payment” that allows them to continue to operate their storefronts. It’s the money in the envelope that allows them to be left them alone–for now.

And Kraft’s betting that Oreo’s consumers will shrug their shoulders and keep their mouths shut, just as Americans have in all other areas of our lives as we cave in to a small group’s extreme views being pushed on us and our children. After all, none of us like being bullied. That’s why there’s a government website dedicated to stopping the practice.


Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.