Image 01 Image 03
Sign In or RegisterLogout

50th Anniversary of Six-Day War: The Eve of War

50th Anniversary of Six-Day War: The Eve of War

Israel Stood Alone: Reliving Israel’s Victory with a 6-Part Series of the Day-by-Day Action
Posted by Sunday, June 4, 2017 at 08:30pm
https://youtu.be/pnSNJL_MirY
More Sharing Options

Note: This post is a prelude to our daily re-created coverage of the Six Day War. Starting Monday, June 5, we will cover each night the war as the events happened in 1967.

The Six-Day War, the fiftieth anniversary of which takes places tomorrow on June 5, 2017, is “one of history’s most brilliant—and controversial campaigns.” In a mere six days, from June 5 through June 10, 1967, the state of Israel routed a numerically and materially superior Arab war coalition, decisively defeating the surrounding Arab armies in a pre-emptive act of self-defense.

As the editors of a special Summer 2017 issue of Middle East Quarterly put it:

On June 4, 1967, the ecstatic Arab leaders were prophesying Israel’s imminent destruction and promising their subjects the spoils of victory; a week later, they were reconciling themselves to a staggering military defeat, the loss of vast territories, and sharp international humiliation.”

To commemorate this significant moment in Jewish history and Israel’s “monumental victory” a half-century ago, in the upcoming week we’ll be running a series of posts covering Israel’s stunning 1967 feat of arms.

[Credit: You Tube Screenshot]

The posts will provide a day-by-day review of the action on the battlefields, the decision-making in the war room, and the ways in which Israelis coped on the home front. We’ll be referencing and hyperlinking to seminal studies, newly published analyses and opinion editorials, and recently unsealed secret transcripts of the highly classified Israeli government committee that managed the country’s military affairs and basically “ran the Six-Day War.”

In our upcoming daily posts from June 5 through June 10 we’ll also include footage from the hard-fought battles along three fronts.

[Israel’s Preemptive Strike | June 5, 1967]

Iconic images will also be featured in each post, as dread and fear turned into celebration and euphoria for Israel and the Jewish people (especially when on June 7, 1967—after a short battle for the Old City which was conducted without tanks, artillery or aircraft for fear of doing damage to the holy sites—the Israeli commander Mordechai “Motta” Gur announced from Jerusalem’s Old City that “The Temple Mount is in our hands”).

New never-before-seen photographs that have been released in recent weeks in advance of the semi-centennial of the Six-Day War and Jerusalem’s reunification will also be included in the posts, along with videos from a special 12-part 50-Year Anniversary Series on the Six-Day War produced by Jerusalem U in partnership with The Jerusalem Post and other agencies in Israel and the U.S. (for the initial three videos released thus far, see embeds below).

We’ll also add some social media from a special Israel Ministry of Foreign Affairs initiative (@Tweeting67) which offers a unique perspective on the Arab build-up for an all-out war, and how IDF reservists, conscripts and their loved ones at home coped—both during the run-up to war and during the six transformative days fifty years ago:

What follows in the remainder of this introductory post is a brief overview of the regional atmosphere in the months and days leading up to the start of the war on June 5, 1967.

The Countdown to War

The 1967 Six-Day War transformed Israel, the Jewish people, and the modern Middle East. But it’s impossible to really understand its repercussions and ramifications without knowing about the events of May that led up to the war.

This includes an escalatory Arab state belligerence which made war inevitable; Israel’s persistent backchannel diplomatic efforts to get Arab rulers not to engage in war; and its many entreaties to the US and the international community for help.

As historian and former Israel Ambassador to the US Michael Oren has noted:

Israel wanted to prevent a war with all its might…up to the eve of the battles it tried to stop the war in every possible way—even at a heavy strategic and economic cost for the state.”

Basically, Israel was forced into a war against its enemies.

In this regard, it’s important to note that in May of 1967 a vulnerable Israel was only 19 years old and a nation of a mere 2.7 million, many of them Holocaust survivors and refugees from Arab lands.

At its narrowest, Israel was just 9 miles wide with Arab armies surrounding it on all its borders and with “its back to the sea.”

From the Golan Heights, Syria shelled farms and villages below in northern Israel on a routine basis.

In the South and from the East, Arab terrorists from the Egyptian-controlled Gaza and the Jordanian-controlled West Bank (both illegal occupations) infiltrated Israel, perpetrating constant attacks on Israeli civilians (some 400 innocent men, women, and children were murdered from 1949-1967).

The Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO), created by the Arab League in 1964, conducted non-stop terrorist raids: in 1965, the PLO carried out 35 raids; in 1966 the number increased to 41 and in the first few months of 1967 another 37 terror attacks were launched against innocent Israeli civilians.

Israel also stood alone:

China, India, Soviet Russia and its 12 satellite nations were all hostile. The United States, though friendly, was not allied militarily with Israel. Most of its arms came from France which, just days before the war, switched sides.”

So Israel was already in a precarious situation when Arab hostility toward Israel took a turn for the worse:

  • May 14: Soviet-backed and lavishly-armed Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser begins moving troops and military equipment into the demilitarized zone in the Sinai Peninsula between Israel and Egypt;
  • May 18: Nasser expels 3,500 United Nations peacekeepers stationed in the Sinai, leaving the buffer zone under total Egyptian control;
  • May 22: Nasser blockades Eilat—Israel’s lone port on the Red Sea—by closing the Straits of Tiran to all Israel ships, thus cutting off the Jewish state’s route to Asia.

By the end of the month, approximately 250,000 Arab troops; 2,800 tanks; and 800 aircraft were ringed around Israel (Egypt alone had amassed 80,000 troops, 550 tanks, and 1,000 artillery pieces on the Israeli border). Nasser had also managed to unify the Egyptian, Jordanian, and Syrian militaries under the United Arab Command; many other Arab countries also ended up pledging support for the war effort.

[credit: Middle East Quarterly/Middle East Forum]

Mobs gathered in Arab capitals shouting “Death to the Jews!” and cartoons with antisemitic tropes inundated the Arab press.

[Credit: Elder of Ziyon]

The entire Arab world was prepared to go to war with the basic objective of liquidating and “wiping Israel off the map”.

Because they categorically rejected Israel’s right to exist, they were prepared to resume the war that had been halted 19 years earlier. That is, for Israel’s Arab neighbors the ultimate goal was to rectify the “unfinished business” of 1948:

Here’s several short video clips that offer a good overview of the military provocations and threats in the run-up to the war in May of 1967:

The Arab States Really Did Plan on Destroying the Jewish State and Israel Took Them at Their Word

It’s hard to believe that with all this evidence of Arab aggression there are still those who insist that Israel “overreacted” to what was merely Egyptian “grandstanding” and that the Arab military coalition never really posed a serious threat to Israel’s security—at least not one that was severe enough to provoke Israel’s territorial expansion.

Yet this argument is standard fare in the historiography of the war.

Much of it exaggerates the role that “Soviet disinformation tactics” played in instigating the war.

It’s true that in early May the Soviets fed its Syrian and Egyptian clients bogus warnings about Israeli troop build-ups on the Syrian border and its supposed intention to attack. The problem though is that Nasser was totally aware that the Soviet reports were false—Egypt continued its reckless escalation even though Nasser knew full well that there wasn’t going to be any imminent Israeli attack against Syria.

The reality, as Bar-Ilan University Professor Efraim Karsh persuasively writes in a new journal article, is that Nasser wasn’t a hapless victim of Soviet manipulations. Rather, he was convinced that Egypt would win the war:

Nasser believed the Egyptian air force might only incur a small loss before dealing a devastating blow to Israel…the Egyptian president did not stumble into war but orchestrated it with open eyes.”

Basically, the Egyptian president was gunning for war—and for Israel to attack first—because he firmly believed that Egypt could absorb an Israeli first strike and still win. His escalatory behavior during the May crisis is evidence of that (but for those who still have trouble accepting it, there are also military documents captured during the war which reveal elaborate plans for an invasion of Israel).

The notion that Israel was trying to “lure the Arab states into war” in order to expand its territory is also ludicrous—even though this claim too is commonly found in the literature.

If anything, Israel’s multiple appeals to Jordan to stay out of the war is solid proof that had King Hussein not made the mistake of joining Nasser’s bandwagon, the West Bank and Jerusalem’s Old City would have remained under Jordanian control.

So Israel’s leaders and people expected the worst, and for good reason.

Yitzhak Rabin, who served as IDF chief of staff (and suffered a brief nervous breakdown in the run-up to the war) estimated that some 50,000 Jews would be killed. At the IDF’s direction, municipal Rabbis designated fields and parks to be repurposed as Jewish cemeteries and over 10,000 graves were dug in preparation for the mass slaughter. Children dug trenches, filled sandbags and taped their windows.

It’s possible—based on an interview published today in the New York Times which Israel has so far declined to comment on—that Israeli leaders were so “deeply fearful ahead of the war” that they even allegedly prepped a “doomsday plan” to detonate an atomic bomb in the Sinai so as to get Egypt to stand down (due to Israel’s rapid success in defeating the Egyptian army, the alleged operation reportedly became redundant and was aborted):

[Credit: The Times of Israel]

There’s no reason to think that this operation ever existed. But if it did, it would go a long way toward discrediting the prevailing wisdom that Israel wanted a war.

The fact is that Israelis were thinking in terms of worst case scenarios. And they weren’t the only ones. In the U.S. and around the world, Jews also anticipated the possibility of a second Holocaust.

They donated money to the embattled Jewish state—and they prayed.

Conclusion

In a powerful op-ed published last week in the Israeli news site Ynet, scholar Ben-Dror Yemini notes that, in documents seized by Israel, both the Egyptian and Jordanian armies had operational orders to exterminate the civilian populations in the areas occupied during their victorious June 1967 war against the Jewish state.

It’s a sobering reminder of what Israel was up against at the time.

But it’s Yemini’s personal reflections and righteous indignation that really hit home:

I was a child, an elementary school student. I remember fear, a lot of fear. There were no shelters in the house I lived in. It was clear that there would be bombings, so we dug pits in the yard.

Occasionally, we are reminded of the sound of thunder from Cairo to remind us of the annihilation threats. But in fact, they were much more serious. Both the Arab League and the leaders of all neighboring states announced in an unequivocal manner that the plan was annihilation. I repeat: Annihilation. Arrogant talk? Considering the fact that the Arab and Muslim world was engaged in endless self and mutual massacres, it was pretty clear that what they were doing to themselves—and it’s still going on—they would also do to Israel.

We must remember one thing, therefore: The alternative to victory was annihilation. So excuse us for winning.”

Bottom line: In the spring of 1967, Egypt’s Gamal Abdel Nasser and his Arab allies did “everything in their power to deteriorate the situation.” Isolated and surrounded, Israel believed that it faced an existential threat. So after hesitating and agonizingly waiting for help from overseas which never came, Israel finally decided to preemptively strike. Even then its war goals were initially limited—to neutralize Egypt’s air force and its tank divisions in the Sinai (Jerusalem’s Old City “was on no one’s agenda”). But Israel ultimately was compelled to expand its war aims on account of Jordanian and Syrian aggressive moves during the war. It’s something we’ll be highlighting in the next posts for this series.

[Featured Image source: Jerusalem U Video]

Miriam F. Elman is an Associate Professor of Political Science and the Robert D. McClure Professor of Teaching Excellence at the Maxwell School of Citizenship & Public Affairs, Syracuse University. She is the editor of five books and the author of over 60 journal articles, book chapters, and government reports on topics related to international and national security, religion and politics, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. She also frequently speaks and writes on the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) anti-Israel movement. Follow her on Twitter @MiriamElman    

More Sharing Options
DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Tags:
, , , ,

Comments

iconotastic | June 4, 2017 at 9:47 pm

I disagree that the strike against Egyptian (and other Arab) forces was preemptive. A blockade is an act of war and has been for hundreds of years, afaik. Attacking the massed forces was more than justified by that blockade alone, let alone the myriad of provocations the Arabs committed in the months leading up to the 6-Day war.

puhiawa | June 4, 2017 at 10:27 pm

That was a scary one. I was in college and had to find a TV. Found one in the commons of another dorm. The Arab students cheering turned to curses when Damascus was bombed.

    Tom Servo in reply to puhiawa. | June 4, 2017 at 11:53 pm

    I have an oddly personal connection to this week, which will betray my age. I remember sitting at our old 50’s style red & chrome breakfast table with my younger brother and father on a bright morning – I was 7 years old, and he read us the account of this war which had just been fought and won in 6 days – he was quite excited about it, which let me know it was something big. (he always read the paper in the morning, but rarely discussed it with us young’uns) It’s the first time I remember realizing that there was something important out there in the world, separate from me or anyone I knew, happening right then, and that even if I didn’t understand it completely, it was a Big Deal.

    And 50 years later, we’re all still talking about it. It was one of those weeks that indelibly changed the world to come.

      Vascaino in reply to Tom Servo. | June 6, 2017 at 1:42 pm

      ” It was one of those weeks that indelibly changed the world to come. ”

      Never a truer sentence. Imagine if Israel had been wiped out; certainly we, today, would lack quite a bit of the technology that is now part of our daily lives.
      For starters we might never have seen the Intel Pentium, the start of cell phones, agricultural and medical advances that were researched and developed.

Milhouse | June 5, 2017 at 1:43 am

I don’t understand the point of those who say the war could have been avoided, that Nasser was only bluffing, or that he was mislead by Soviet misinformation. Let it be so. Suppose it were so. So f***ing what? The fact remains that the Arabs committed multiple acts of war, and therefore Israel had every right to respond even if it were to know all this, and were entirely confident of victory. Nobody disputes that Assad had been shelling Israel for a long time. Nobody disputes that Nasser expelled the UN observers and closed the straits. Nobody disputes that they made the threats. Under what moral or legal code, exactly, was Israel supposed to sit still? Further, nobody at all disputes that Hussein chose to join the war, attacking Israel with absolutely no provocation or justification, so how can any of this speculation provide grounds for condemning Israel for taking back its heartland?

Yitzhak Rabin, who served as IDF chief of staff (and suffered a brief nervous breakdown in the run-up to the war)

A euphemism for “drunk under a table”.

Romey | June 5, 2017 at 4:56 am

I was a young Airman, stationed with a C130 wing in the UK. As such didn’t have any direct involvement. Everyone was happy, estatic, it turned out as it did.

Bitterlyclinging | June 5, 2017 at 7:13 am

Its the United States on the brink, this time.
Eight years of Buraq Hussein Obama will do that to a country.

94Corvette | June 5, 2017 at 7:43 am

If you have not seen the documentary, “In Our Hands” which is showing for the third and supposed last time tomorrow (6/6) in theaters, find it and watch it. My wife and I saw it last week and it is powerful, truthful and really helps one gain a perspective on today’s situation.

Announcement
ATTORNEY - EQUAL PROTECTION PROJECT - Legal Insurrection Foundation is seeking an Attorney for the Equal Protection Project (EqualProtect.org). For information on the job opening contact Talent Market.
DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

CONTRIBUTORS

  • William A. Jacobson

    Founder

  • Kemberlee Kaye

    Sr. Contrib Editor

  • Mary Chastain

    Contrib Editor

  • Mike LaChance

    Higher Ed

  • Leslie Eastman

    Author

  • Vijeta Uniyal

    Author

  • Stacey Matthews

    Author

  • Jane Coleman

    Author

  • James Nault

    Author

  • Elizabeth Stauffer

    Author

  • Mandy Nagy

    Editor Emerita

  • Learn more about the Contributors
Log in or register to comment.Logout

SUBSCRIBE:

APPLE PODCASTS | SPOTIFY | IHEART RADIO
Accessibility by WAH