Georgetown Students Think Criticizing Sharia Law is Hate Speech
Let them try living under it…
Perhaps we need a national student exchange program with countries with Sharia Law so these students could experience it firsthand.
The Daily Caller reports:
Georgetown U Students Reject Criticism Of Sharia Law As ‘Hate Speech’
Nonie Darwish grew up as a Muslim girl in Egypt and wants to tell American university students what Sharia law is really like.
A lot of them don’t care to hear about it and don’t even think Darwish should have the freedom of speech to tell her side of the story — including some of the Georgetown University College Republicans (GUCR) who invited her to speak at their academy Tuesday night.
According to Campus Reform, her presentation at Georgetown University this week prompted a torrent of angry student voices who called Darwish’s condemnation of Sharia law “hate speech.”
The lecture was co-sponsored by the GUCR and the Clare Booth Luce Policy Institute. Just days before Darwish was scheduled to appear, The Georgetown Voice published an article by undergrad student Aly Panjwani warning that the university would become a vehicle for the “hateful and violent views” that Darwish allegedly espouses.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Albert Einstein: ‘Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I’m not sure about the universe.’
I’m sure these students simply don’t want the truth about sharia to get out.
Wasn’t Georgetown a serious college way back when?
In related news, psychiatrists have determined taking away a child’s candy is ‘abuse’ and parents should be punished.
Georgetown should spend some time recruiting smart students. The dumbasses they have are a bunch of losers.
There is truth in this:
Currently colleges are recruiting – and students applying know this – on activism, and not critical thinking.
So – surprise surprise – you get activist minded snowflakes and not folks who think critically.
Core free speech is the right to criticize government and the people running it, particularly tyrannical government and tyrants. Proponents of Islamic/Sharia Law are agitating for a complete substitute government, one where no Kafir will rule over any Muslim anywhere. It is quintessentially a protected First Amendment right, in spirit even if Sharia law already rules, to oppose Islamic tyranny.