Mark Zuckerberg Answers Questions About Role of Fake News Stories on Facebook in 2016 Election
“Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes.”
Love it or hate it, Facebook is an inescapable part of modern social engagement. As the public grapples for any variable that would explain the Trump presidency, Facebook is the recipient of at least some of the blame, justly or not.
The complaints are rather silly — users are blaming the social media platform for content others post, in particular, fake news stories. Of all the factors that determined last week’s electoral outcomes, I doubt fake news stories even moved the needle, alas…
Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg, responded to the criticism saying, “Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.”
Dealing with “fake” content is challenging. Who determines what’s fake and what’s a stretch of truth? Do we want social media platforms functioning as arbiters of truth?
This is an area where I believe we must proceed very carefully though. Identifying the “truth” is complicated. While some hoaxes can be completely debunked, a greater amount of content, including from mainstream sources, often gets the basic idea right but some details wrong or omitted. An even greater volume of stories express an opinion that many will disagree with and flag as incorrect even when factual. I am confident we can find ways for our community to tell us what content is most meaningful, but I believe we must be extremely cautious about becoming arbiters of truth ourselves.
His full statement is here:
I want to share some thoughts on Facebook and the election.
Our goal is to give every person a voice. We believe deeply in people. Assuming that people understand what is important in their lives and that they can express those views has driven not only our community, but democracy overall. Sometimes when people use their voice though, they say things that seem wrong and they support people you disagree with.
After the election, many people are asking whether fake news contributed to the result, and what our responsibility is to prevent fake news from spreading. These are very important questions and I care deeply about getting them right. I want to do my best to explain what we know here.
Of all the content on Facebook, more than 99% of what people see is authentic. Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes. The hoaxes that do exist are not limited to one partisan view, or even to politics. Overall, this makes it extremely unlikely hoaxes changed the outcome of this election in one direction or the other.
That said, we don’t want any hoaxes on Facebook. Our goal is to show people the content they will find most meaningful, and people want accurate news. We have already launched work enabling our community to flag hoaxes and fake news, and there is more we can do here. We have made progress, and we will continue to work on this to improve further.
This is an area where I believe we must proceed very carefully though. Identifying the “truth” is complicated. While some hoaxes can be completely debunked, a greater amount of content, including from mainstream sources, often gets the basic idea right but some details wrong or omitted. An even greater volume of stories express an opinion that many will disagree with and flag as incorrect even when factual. I am confident we can find ways for our community to tell us what content is most meaningful, but I believe we must be extremely cautious about becoming arbiters of truth ourselves.
As we continue our research, we are committed to always updating you on how News Feed evolves. We hope to have more to share soon, although this work often takes longer than we’d like in order to confirm changes we make won’t introduce unintended side effects or bias into the system. If you’re interested in following our updates, I encourage you to follow our News Feed FYI here: http://bit.ly/2frNWo2.
Overall, I am proud of our role giving people a voice in this election. We helped more than 2 million people register to vote, and based on our estimates we got a similar number of people to vote who might have stayed home otherwise. We helped millions of people connect with candidates so they could hear from them directly and be better informed. Most importantly, we gave tens of millions of people tools to share billions of posts and reactions about this election. A lot of that dialog may not have happened without Facebook.
This has been a historic election and it has been very painful for many people. Still, I think it’s important to try to understand the perspective of people on the other side. In my experience, people are good, and even if you may not feel that way today, believing in people leads to better results over the long term.
This summer, Facebook met with conservative leaders after the platform faced criticism for censoring right-leaning news stories from their trending stories section.
Follow Kemberlee on Twitter @kemberleekaye
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
“Share” “commitment” “dialog”
Way to much liberalbabble to read the whole thing. I am going to go see if I can feel a connection with a glass of Jack Daniels.
Normally I’d say the appropriate response to a Facebook story is a single finger. But in your case I recommend three to five, depending on what kind of day it’s been for you.
I used the last of my JD from the JackRabbit bottle shop to mix with Sweet baby rays and a touch of Slap ya momma to make BBQ sauce. Before you start yelling BLASPHEMY!! They were the best BBQ ribs and chicken I’ve ever had and I’m fat so my opinion on food quality and taste should carry some weight.
As long as I don’t have to carry yours.
Excellent! And I like chubby engineers. They can stress test their product before I do.
It’s not fake that Facebook bought whole into the antisemitic/Islamophile dogma and banned those who pointed it out!
Scumbags!
Facebook? What in the world is that? Likely just another way to simultaneously waste time while proving to yourself how important you are. Personally, I have more important things to do like powerwash my sidewalk.
99% authentic firstly sounds like a mide-up statistic, and secondly would put them far, far ahead of the NYT or WaPo or LA Times or any of the major media outlets. I call BS on it.
“Identifying the truth” is far less complicated when you don’t have to wade through a fetid swamp of partisan bias to see it. I have no more reason to trust Zuckerberg than I do to trust Ochs-Sulzberger.
Zuckerberg is full of it. I deleted my FB account a week before the election (which is why I came back here) because the liberal FB moderators were censoring and suspending Trump advocates with reckless abandon.
Get slimed as a “racist sexist homophobe” by Team Hillay? Crickets. Respond back that they are “just as corrupt as Hillary”, and get a 7 day suspension.
Screw Facebook. They are welcome to their echo chambers. It’s one of the things that blinded them. And since Zuckerberg has taken sides in the culture wars, it will go the way of CNN and Twitter.
“Only a very small amount is fake news and hoaxes.”
What a joke.
I haven’t seen a single Leftist meme on facebook that couldn’t be conclusively disproven in under a minute.