WikiLeaks Emails Suggest Hillary Campaign Engaged in Illegal Coordination with Soros
Hey, let’s put the nation’s police under federal oversight!
The leaked Podesta emails are providing a lot of insight into Hillary and her team, including tidbits that support suspicions long-held on the right and now seemingly confirmed.
The latest example may implicate the Hillary campaign in illegal activity (yet again). The emails in question appear to show the Hillary campaign engaged in illegal coordination with George Soros.
Leaked emails from Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta’s personal email account published by WikiLeaks reveal the Clinton campaign’s coordination with George Soros’s Open Society Foundations on the subject of police reform.
Soros, who has given almost $10 million to Clinton super PAC Priorities USA, is a major funder of Black Lives Matter. The Washington Times reported in August that Soros has given at least $33 million to the group through the Open Society Foundations (OSF), which he funds and controls.
. . . . A December 2015 email exchange between Podesta and OSF president Chris Stone was included in the batch of Podesta’s emails released by WikiLeaks on Friday.
“Hi, John. Your policy team was asking me for ideas on police reform a couple of months ago. Here’s a concrete idea I’ve written up, and a good hook for it in Chicago,” Stone wrote.
Stone attached to the email an article he wrote that advocated putting federally-funded bureaucrats in charge of police oversight.
“Thanks Chris. Will circulate. Hope all is well,” Podesta replied.
“As well as can be. We are now officially and formally undesirable in Russia. Hope you are thriving!” Stone shot back. “From where I sit, things look good for your team.”
Setting aside the possible lawlessness—we can be certain no charges will be filed against Hillary: Soros and Team Hillary coordinating on federalizing the police forces of America? Not good.
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Fuzzy, just to be the contrarian that I am, how is this different than an email with a position paper from the Cato Institute to a conservative’s campaign?
Maybe I missed a stitch…
Our foreign policy can’t be seen supporting the practice or those who abide/participate-in: honey-trapping and castrating bacha-bazi rape slaves, or bacha-bazi connected heroin production/distribution.
hillary is not a viable candidate.
https://toysoldier.wordpress.com/2015/08/27/in-plain-sight-the-rape-of-afghans-boys/
hillary must lose and her bacha-bazi failures must be why.
—-
I’d sooner vote for trump because he’s competent enough not to appoint a Secretary of State who cant even fathom how to use a desktop computer. Where as hillary…..
Why vote for an incompetent who either ‘is’ or routinely ‘plays’ stupid? Because of the soft bigotry of low expectations for her because she’s a woman? hillary supporters are bigots.
Who would deprive their own daughters of the chance to be the first woman president by voting for a honey trap hillbillary?
She can’t even manage to use a desktop computer and she thinks she’s qualified to be president. This is the definition of Dunning-Kruger effect.
Team hillbillary keeps trying to take our civil rights as hostages. Politicians like that need to have their careers removed and burned.
Put our Police under the FBI. Right?
It doesn’t matter. Trump has committed the doubleplus ungood crime of USING BAD WORDS.
At this point I am convinced that there is literally no proof of corruption that will dissuade the Democrats from voting for her.
12 percent of DEMOCRATS think she’s honest and trustworthy.
These people simply do not care that she’s a dishonest, corrupt piece of shit.
I don’t think you get it. Nobody is voting ‘for’ anyone. They are voting against the other guy and Trump is covered in tar. Most of it he applied himself.
Now you give sh** a bad name; I use it (cow, horse) as compost on my garden and it’s very useful. I can’t think of a single good use for Hillary OR Bill.
Are you sure you don’t mean Goldstein?
Guarantee you that none of this will come up in tonight’s debate because, you know, Trump said things the left finds outrageous (whereas if he had only done those things instead talking about them the left would not only protect him but destroy anyone who dares says anything about their forced encounters with him).