Modern Language Assn split verdict: Adopts watered-down Israel visa resolution, rejects pro-ASA boycott resolution
Non-binding resolution “urges the US Dept of State to contest Israel’s denials of entry to the West Bank by US academics”
The Modern Language Association House Delegates voted on two anti-Israel Resolutions today. (The Resolutions are at the bottom of this post.)
The main resolution, asking for the State Department to contest Israeli denials of entry visas to traveling academics: “Be it resolved that the MLA urges the US Dept of State to contest Israel’s denials of entry to the West Bank by US academics….” The language was amended at the last minute to take out the word “arbitrarily” and to delete reference to Gaza.
A House of Delegates vote is NOT a binding resolution that commits the organization to action. A resolution, if it passes the House of Delegates, then goes to the Executive Committee, which can reject the resolution for a variety of reasons, including that the resolution would jeopardize tax-exempt status). I would be surprised if the Executive Committee rejected it, since the operative language is so weak.
We will have a post later from someone who was in the room. For now, I will post some of the Tweets from those in the room. Notice that there was significant pushback, and that the supporters of the resolution basically said take our word for it, when challenged as to the proof. That apparently was enough.
The actual operative language of the resolution is not particularly damaging, and was watered down. But the “wherefore” clauses were highly anti-Israel and pretty-much propaganda. Those “wherefore” clauses will be the main victory for the anti-Israel group.
The second resolution was an “Emergency” Resolution asking the MLA to denounce supposed attacks on the supporters of the American Studies Association boycott resolution. That Emergency Motion, which actually was explicitly pro-boycott, was rejected.
(Added) It needed 75% to be considered, and it fell short so it never went to a vote on the merits. This is big blow to the boycotters, as they have been playing victim with regard to criticism, and surely would have liked the MLA to come to their aid. However, Inside Higher Ed reports that the second resolution still will be “referred” to the Executive Committee, so it will be interesting to see if the Executive Committee approves a resolution never even considered by the House of Delegates.
Note also that barely half of the total delegates were present for the vote. There was barely a quorum.
The net-net of this day was that a barely critical resolution passed narrowly, a highly critical resolution was rejected.
Considering how many months (years) the BDS academics spent preparing, and how little time the opposition had, this is something of a victory.
(Tweets mostly in reverse Chron.)
So anti-Israel crowd barely wins on a minor issue vote, then loses big 59-41 to even consider an emergency anti-Israel pro-BDS resolution.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
60 voted yes 53 voted no / ayes have it / resolution 2014-1 will be passed to executive council #mla14
— long-legged socialist (@mini_mia) January 11, 2014
2008 res. blaming "occupation" + critical of "anti-Palestinian groups" passed 77-9. @mwecker @LegInsurrection @Glutens @erikadreifus
— Jonathan Marks (@marksjo1) January 11, 2014
"Be it resolved that the MLA urges the US Dept of State to contest Israel's denials of entry to the West Bank by US academics…"
— Menachem Wecker (@mwecker) January 11, 2014
chair: substitute resolution too similar to resolution 2002-1 http://t.co/c55RptcvMb #mla14
— long-legged socialist (@mini_mia) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 @MLA exec council says substitute resolution "too close" to prior resolution on academic freedom of movement. Denied a vote.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
Parliamentary confusion at #mla14. This debate over time for discussion is a total mess. pic.twitter.com/YoaXYXYGgU
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
If you are missing Delegate Assembly it's like the worst faculty mtg you ever attended, times 1 trillion, to the Israel power. #s544 #MLA14
— Roopika Risam (@roopikarisam) January 11, 2014
This #MLA14 anti Is resolution debate is a mess. Poor management of parliamentary rules/process.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
Leave it to Israel and Palestine to create #MLA14 Delegate Assembly chaos! Two vote solution? #s544
— Roopika Risam (@roopikarisam) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 Nathan Brown UC Davis argues against the rhetoric of needing more details is in fact a rhetoric of oppression.
— Ruth Starkman (@ruthstarkman) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 anti-Is resolution supporter calls Israel an apartheid system, a racist state.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
"We criticize Israel bc of that special relationship [w US] … There are responsibilities that come w that privilege," Samer Ali #MLA14
— Menachem Wecker (@mwecker) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 Samer Ali's speech was a case study of the Walt/Mearsheimer view of history, with an unforced error that GOPers kowtow to Egypt. Huh?
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 delegates argue that resolution is not good for MLA nor helpful to Palestians, too complex insufficient proof
— Ruth Starkman (@ruthstarkman) January 11, 2014
DAOC rep for #MLA14 says case studies presented by anti-Is advocates were not useful in substantiating the resolution language.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
Ohmann goes first says #MLA14 anti-Israel resolution is not a #BDS effort. "This is false, this is insulting… and I wld like an apology."
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 Cary Nelson responds "An apology?" Not in this life."
— Ruth Starkman (@ruthstarkman) January 11, 2014
128 voters in the room now at #MLA14 delegate assembly.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
#MLA14 Cary Nelson: "you have to act like scholars.This is a biased resolution & part of a long term effort to discredit Israel. No apology
— Ruth Starkman (@ruthstarkman) January 11, 2014
Cary Nelson, opposed to #MLA anti-Israel resolution, told his time for comment cut from 3 mins to 1 min.
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
G. Furr, lead name on emergency #MLA14 res in his own words. Mission seems to be showing Stalin better than thought.http://t.co/zaCeFrpMdb
— Jonathan Marks (@marksjo1) January 11, 2014
#Mla14 #bds panel moderator Samer Ali checks in for the delegate assembly. pic.twitter.com/4KxYuep91k
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
We are at #MLA14 delegate assembly … Let's see how this vote goes. pic.twitter.com/YcEbQNGePL
— Noam Neusner (@NoamNeusner) January 11, 2014
Modern Language Association Proposed Anti-Israel Resolutions
NOTE: The title of this post was changed shortly after publication.
(Featured Image credit – Noam Neusner)(with permission)
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
So the MLA narrowly passed a non-binding resolution stating they want the State Dept. to investigate when the Israeli State Dept. (or whatever it is called) denies visas.
I wish the scrotum-less idiots good luck with that.
Sounds like the MLA only did something to appease the anti-Israel faction because they didn’t have the cojones to tell them to bugger-off.
Absolutely gutless, but that’s our leftists.
They pay some lip service, and chicken out to save themselves.
But without the heightened scrutiny brought on by Professor Jacobson and others, you know they would have happily joined the boycott with no fear of reprisal – or even much attention outside the circles of the anti-semitic left – and their support would be cited in later years as evidence of how “mainstream” those views are.
[…] Jacobson at Legal Insurrection has up this terrific post today on “Modern Language Assn split verdict: Adopts watered-down Israel visa resolution, rejects […]