There is another difference that the “Five” didn’t mention. Sandra Fluke went on her own free will in front of Congress and demanded that Taxpayers pay for her contraceptives (which makes her what Rush Limbaugh says she is even though we are not allowed to say it) while Rachel was minding her own business until that knucklehead Smith decided to Assault her.
Sandra Fluke is my new girlfriend. I am thinking after I get back from cashing my fat check from OFA, we will have some guilt-free sex and use as many tax payer provided contraceptives as we want! HAHA
Worse than that, amigo. Little known fact: Fluke never appeared before Congress. What we all saw on the tube was a staged press conference designed to look like a Congressional hearing.
Isn’t there an illogical disconnect to desiring to be free to do whatever one wishes while expecting “someone else” to pay? That’s dependency, not freedom. Oh, I forgot. We don’t need no stinkin’ logic.
That is an exchange of liberty for submission with benefits. We do this implicitly when we are young and vulnerable. We do this explicitly — because we reject equal rights — when we become adults.
Obama and Fluke represent progressive involuntary exploitation, denigration of individual dignity, and devaluation of human life. In short, they appeal to people with dreams of instant gratification without perceived consequences. That’s why they promote normalization of dysfunctional behaviors (most notable elective abortion, homosexual behavior), from which follows reduced productivity (economic and natural), and a million illegal aliens to displace Americans while maintaining an illusion of a viable society.
Professor, I don’t know if anyone else is having this problem but when I visited the site on my tablet or phone, that fox news segment auto plays and causes my shit to leave the site. Is it me?
I watched this segment last night and the contrast was very powerful … I actually thought of mentioning it on LI today, so I’m really happy you posted this, Professor!
Greg Gutfeld is Bill Maher … only a million times funnier and a billion times a nicer person. He’s Jon Stewart … only he’s much funnier off the cuff.
I’m so glad people who don’t usually watch TV at 3:00 a.m. can now see him on “The Five.”
At the end of the show last night, Beckel apologized for “something” he had said the day before and which lit Twitter up.
He wouldn’t say just what it was he was apologizing for saying, but it was for saying Romney had a fundraiser in Israel with a bunch of “diamond merchants.”
Gutfeld is the conservatives’ way to reaching young voters.
Beckel and Sharpton have now shown that it is acceptable to use the slur “diamond merchants” against Jews … and still have a career in TV. That’s quite unbelievable.
That shows you the extent of the corruption of the American news media: when Jews in high positions in the news media sell out (and sell out their families and friends) to the likes of Al Sharpton. we’re beyond the tipping point. It’s time to write-off the mainstream news and broadcast media in America, and simply accept them as corrupt, and look to other sources for your news and entertainment.
Remember, Sharpton is the agitator who caused three days of riots in NYC, pitting blacks against orthodox Jews, resulting in Sharpton’s rioters killing of a Jew dead in the street. This malignant clown is very closely tied to Barack Obama. You can count on their being on ‘standby’ for the November election.
Yeah, but in truth Buchanan had a long career on TV playing the token conservative on MSNBC… or a parody of a conservative, really. Granted, there are real liberals on Fox like Kirsten Powers and Juan Williams.
Beckel is on the Five to contrast the difference between Conservatives and knuckleheads. His purpose is to show that the knuckleheads are knuckleheads.
“As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 year old long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students’ birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.
“However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance.
QUOTE IS FROM: //mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance
Point: YOU DON’T KNOW SANDRA, and this is not a “fluke”. Her background; parentage; wealth; GLBT goals, etc. are HIDDEN by O’Bastard’s camp. SEARCH OUT THE FACTS FROM RELIABLE SOURCES AND YOU WILL SEE SHE HAS A DOUBLE AGENDA: 1) ALL ABORTION RIGHTS + 2) GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER ADVOCACY–all at GOVERNMENT (i.e. OUR) EXPENSE.
She’s in career mode. In her mind if Obobo wins she’s set for life. If not, she’ll use all this to pad her resume. Good luck to whichever firm eventually pays her health insurance. From what I’ve seen she’ll get them lots of unwanted attention but not much in the way of billables.
She was a seasoned hack before she even applied to Georgetown. Seriously: she was a “reproductive rights activist” who deliberately chose Georgetown in order to sue them into providing free contraceptives (and abortions?) in their health insurance plan. Even though contraceptives are incredibly cheap (a 90-day script for birth control pills is $11 at Walmart).
Honestly though, I really don’t think Sandra Fluke needs to worry about contraceptives anyway (if you know what I mean, and I think you do).
My only fear is that we are reaching the tipping point where the “feeders” out number the “builders.” Once that occurs, we’re finished as a world influence and our standard of living will descend into an ever tightening spiral.
That’s why is is critical to ensure that the anointed one is evicted along with the democrat controlled Senate in November.
According to the latest Rasmussen poll, victory just might be possible..
I’m sorry, but whoever you are, lay off Mrs. Joe Soptic.
She’s dead, you know.
And it’s not very sporting to make fun of the dead.
Pick another nym and make your point about the current post without going after dead people. Mrs. Soptic had cancer, she didn’t choose to have it and doubtless both she and her husband would have preferred a different outcome.
Mind you, I think the ad filmed by Mr. Soptic is despicable, and it’s especially galling to see the Obama campaign lie about how they knew Mr. Soptic. The whole situation stinks like yesterday’s diapers.
But you don’t have to mock a dead woman to make that point.
The only problem I see is if anyone asked Rachel if she wanted to be a part of the political debate beyond her involuntary induction via Adam Smith. It might be that she is pretty much what she is and does not want to be drawn into the cultural wars and certainly does not want to become a Palin like target of the left.
They should write a script for Rachel, and have her do a fake “testimony before Congress”, with the phony setting and all. That’s what they did to push the Fluke “testimony”.
Sandra was rejected when they tried to have her testify in committee, due to her lack of qualification. So Democrats staged the event and called it a testimony before Congress, when it was really just Sandra spreading her propaganda on C-Span, made to look like official testimony. What a bunch of liars.
Most of us had already made that connection and thought it so obvious we left it unspoken, but you are correct. A few folks finding their way to this blog might not understand that particular dynamic. It does take all kinds.
Best comments and argument in the discussion is the fact that Fluke was a created propaganda situation. Rachael was attacked again as another propaganda attempt but it backfired. One a shill in a con, the other reality of the left.
I have a question. Was Sandra in NYC today to get her free Vibrator? And if not ,did Obama give her a special deal on a tingle to replace the loss she suffered by not getting one?
[…] Rachels built America. The Sandras just feed off it. Just like the […]
Announcement
ATTORNEY - EQUAL PROTECTION PROJECT - Legal Insurrection Foundation is seeking an Attorney for the Equal Protection Project (EqualProtect.org). For information on the job opening contact Talent Market.
Comments
And that, to those who have never seen Red Eye, is the new and improved version of the Greg-a-logue.
Classic, priceless. And oh, so sweetly true!
Thanks for posting!!
The right has Joe the Plumber. The left has Joe the Septic Tank.
The left has Sandra Fluke. The Right has Rachel.
ENOUGH SAID.
And I’m not even a real plumber!
We have our heros and they have their sluts.
There is another difference that the “Five” didn’t mention. Sandra Fluke went on her own free will in front of Congress and demanded that Taxpayers pay for her contraceptives (which makes her what Rush Limbaugh says she is even though we are not allowed to say it) while Rachel was minding her own business until that knucklehead Smith decided to Assault her.
Sandra Fluke is my new girlfriend. I am thinking after I get back from cashing my fat check from OFA, we will have some guilt-free sex and use as many tax payer provided contraceptives as we want! HAHA
Worse than that, amigo. Little known fact: Fluke never appeared before Congress. What we all saw on the tube was a staged press conference designed to look like a Congressional hearing.
Yeah, I know; you’re shocked, no? 🙂
Sandra is looking kinda fluffy. And she always seems to be sweaty.
Rachel should be invited to stand with Romney at a campaign event.
And I actually agree with Obama; woman’s choices belong to them…along with the cost and consequences of those choices.
Reality is, you don’t keep one without paying the other.
Isn’t there an illogical disconnect to desiring to be free to do whatever one wishes while expecting “someone else” to pay? That’s dependency, not freedom. Oh, I forgot. We don’t need no stinkin’ logic.
That is an exchange of liberty for submission with benefits. We do this implicitly when we are young and vulnerable. We do this explicitly — because we reject equal rights — when we become adults.
Obama and Fluke represent progressive involuntary exploitation, denigration of individual dignity, and devaluation of human life. In short, they appeal to people with dreams of instant gratification without perceived consequences. That’s why they promote normalization of dysfunctional behaviors (most notable elective abortion, homosexual behavior), from which follows reduced productivity (economic and natural), and a million illegal aliens to displace Americans while maintaining an illusion of a viable society.
Best comment ever on any blog in the history of the internet. You should also mention that this is how civilizations destroy themselves.
Professor, I don’t know if anyone else is having this problem but when I visited the site on my tablet or phone, that fox news segment auto plays and causes my shit to leave the site. Is it me?
“Rachel didn’t get a call from the President”
Lucky Rachel.
The Left takes care of its own. Period.
Perhaps if she’d been an illegal alien working that drive thru window she would have gotten a call….
Essentially my thought, too – she’s the wrong skin color and/or wrong work ethic (i.e., she actually has one) for Zero to exploit.
Rachel, on behalf of the United States of America, I deeply apologize for our president.
How can anyone give a dislike to Cassandra’s comment?
Please identify yourselves.
I don’t care if you give me a dislike. But I’m not going to sit here while you badmouth Cassandra Lite and the United States of America!
Touché.
But come to think of it…
I watched this segment last night and the contrast was very powerful … I actually thought of mentioning it on LI today, so I’m really happy you posted this, Professor!
Greg Gutfeld is Bill Maher … only a million times funnier and a billion times a nicer person. He’s Jon Stewart … only he’s much funnier off the cuff.
I’m so glad people who don’t usually watch TV at 3:00 a.m. can now see him on “The Five.”
Bob Beckel? Can’t stand him!
P.S.
At the end of the show last night, Beckel apologized for “something” he had said the day before and which lit Twitter up.
He wouldn’t say just what it was he was apologizing for saying, but it was for saying Romney had a fundraiser in Israel with a bunch of “diamond merchants.”
Channeling his inner Al Sharpton.
Beckel is horrible. I don’t understand why everyone (Mark Levin, some others, can’t recall right now) always say that he’s a nice guy.
I love Gutfeld.
Gutfeld is the conservatives’ way to reaching young voters.
Beckel and Sharpton have now shown that it is acceptable to use the slur “diamond merchants” against Jews … and still have a career in TV. That’s quite unbelievable.
That shows you the extent of the corruption of the American news media: when Jews in high positions in the news media sell out (and sell out their families and friends) to the likes of Al Sharpton. we’re beyond the tipping point. It’s time to write-off the mainstream news and broadcast media in America, and simply accept them as corrupt, and look to other sources for your news and entertainment.
Remember, Sharpton is the agitator who caused three days of riots in NYC, pitting blacks against orthodox Jews, resulting in Sharpton’s rioters killing of a Jew dead in the street. This malignant clown is very closely tied to Barack Obama. You can count on their being on ‘standby’ for the November election.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Heights_riot
Video of Beckel’s “diamond merchants” comment via the rightscoop:
http://www.therightscoop.com/bob-beckel-romney-had-a-fundraiser-in-israel-with-a-bunch-of-diamond-merchants/
Maybe Beckel used the term thinking that it would get him his own show, as it apparently did for Sharpton.
Yeah, but in truth Buchanan had a long career on TV playing the token conservative on MSNBC… or a parody of a conservative, really. Granted, there are real liberals on Fox like Kirsten Powers and Juan Williams.
I think today is the first anniversary of…
“Resist we much!”
I saw this video yesterday of him intentionally calling the RNC chairman a “pussy”, while pretending it was an inadvertant slip of the tongue.
http://www.therightscoop.com/bob-beckel-calls-rnc-chairman-reince-priebus-a-pussy-on-air/
There seems to be an organized bunch leaving “dislikes” on all the treads to day.
Notice that?
A cluck and a fluk. (Sober or not, I’m taking the cluck.)
The sooner they ditch that pile of crap Bob Beckel, the sooner I will actually watch The Five.
Beckel is on the Five to contrast the difference between Conservatives and knuckleheads. His purpose is to show that the knuckleheads are knuckleheads.
Test: How well do you know Sandra F?
“As many have already uncovered Sandra Fluke she is, in reality, a 30 year old long time liberal activist who enrolled at Georgetown with the express purpose of fighting for the school to pay for students’ birth control. She has been pushing for mandated coverage of contraceptives at Georgetown for at least three years according to the Washington Post.
“However, as I discovered today, birth control is not all that Ms. Fluke believes private health insurance must cover. She also, apparently, believes that it is discrimination deserving of legal action if “gender reassignment” surgeries are not covered by employer provided health insurance.
QUOTE IS FROM: //mrctv.org/blog/sandra-fluke-gender-reassignment-and-health-insurance
Point: YOU DON’T KNOW SANDRA, and this is not a “fluke”. Her background; parentage; wealth; GLBT goals, etc. are HIDDEN by O’Bastard’s camp. SEARCH OUT THE FACTS FROM RELIABLE SOURCES AND YOU WILL SEE SHE HAS A DOUBLE AGENDA: 1) ALL ABORTION RIGHTS + 2) GAY, LESBIAN, BISEXUAL, TRANSGENDER ADVOCACY–all at GOVERNMENT (i.e. OUR) EXPENSE.
Ahem. You may be right but you were shouting. Dial it back a notch next time and be taken seriously. Point made.
Why isn’t Sandra’s 15 minutes up yet?
She’s in career mode. In her mind if Obobo wins she’s set for life. If not, she’ll use all this to pad her resume. Good luck to whichever firm eventually pays her health insurance. From what I’ve seen she’ll get them lots of unwanted attention but not much in the way of billables.
So young and she already looks like such a seasoned hack.
LHC,
She was a seasoned hack before she even applied to Georgetown. Seriously: she was a “reproductive rights activist” who deliberately chose Georgetown in order to sue them into providing free contraceptives (and abortions?) in their health insurance plan. Even though contraceptives are incredibly cheap (a 90-day script for birth control pills is $11 at Walmart).
Honestly though, I really don’t think Sandra Fluke needs to worry about contraceptives anyway (if you know what I mean, and I think you do).
Spiny,
You mean you’d rather take home Rachel to meet your mother than Sandra?
I know what you mean. I can’t think of a more unappealing “lady” than Sandra Fluke.
Just looking at her gives me a dull ache behind my eyes. Make her go away.
My only fear is that we are reaching the tipping point where the “feeders” out number the “builders.” Once that occurs, we’re finished as a world influence and our standard of living will descend into an ever tightening spiral.
That’s why is is critical to ensure that the anointed one is evicted along with the democrat controlled Senate in November.
According to the latest Rasmussen poll, victory just might be possible..
Looks like three of those “feeders” rated your comment.
Romney killed my wife and all I got was my 15 minutes. Oh, I did get a grey polo shirt so, there’s that.
Da bottom line is dis: my wife needed Mitt Romney to figure out she had cancer, then tell us so’s we could get to a doctor in time to save her life.
He didn’t do dat. But Barack Obama will.
If Obama is so great, let him bring her back to life.
I’m sorry, but whoever you are, lay off Mrs. Joe Soptic.
She’s dead, you know.
And it’s not very sporting to make fun of the dead.
Pick another nym and make your point about the current post without going after dead people. Mrs. Soptic had cancer, she didn’t choose to have it and doubtless both she and her husband would have preferred a different outcome.
Mind you, I think the ad filmed by Mr. Soptic is despicable, and it’s especially galling to see the Obama campaign lie about how they knew Mr. Soptic. The whole situation stinks like yesterday’s diapers.
But you don’t have to mock a dead woman to make that point.
So, very kindly, knock it off. Thank you.
An excellent juxtaposition to illustrate the two sides…two irreconcilable sides…in the American debate today.
It occurs to me that two other women are excellent representatives illustrating the two sides…
Sarah Palin and Lizzy Warren.
Compare and contrast.
I like me some 1/32 native American women !!!
The only problem I see is if anyone asked Rachel if she wanted to be a part of the political debate beyond her involuntary induction via Adam Smith. It might be that she is pretty much what she is and does not want to be drawn into the cultural wars and certainly does not want to become a Palin like target of the left.
It seems to me that Rachel already received a higher priority call from someone upstairs – the Good Shepherd.
Anyone else notice Obama’s and Fluke’s wardrobe coordination? His tie and her dress were exactly the same shade of gray. Just sayin’…
They should write a script for Rachel, and have her do a fake “testimony before Congress”, with the phony setting and all. That’s what they did to push the Fluke “testimony”.
Sandra was rejected when they tried to have her testify in committee, due to her lack of qualification. So Democrats staged the event and called it a testimony before Congress, when it was really just Sandra spreading her propaganda on C-Span, made to look like official testimony. What a bunch of liars.
http://reason.com/archives/2012/03/12/a-pox-on-both-houses-in-the-contraceptio
Rachel is not a slut.
Make the connection.
Most of us had already made that connection and thought it so obvious we left it unspoken, but you are correct. A few folks finding their way to this blog might not understand that particular dynamic. It does take all kinds.
Best comments and argument in the discussion is the fact that Fluke was a created propaganda situation. Rachael was attacked again as another propaganda attempt but it backfired. One a shill in a con, the other reality of the left.
Astro vs grass
OBAMA – 5-STAR GENERAL IN THE WAR ON WOMEN.
I have a question. Was Sandra in NYC today to get her free Vibrator? And if not ,did Obama give her a special deal on a tingle to replace the loss she suffered by not getting one?
[…] HT: Legal Insurrection […]
Rachel is probably supporting Obama more that Sandra is. She is supporting Obamacare, Solyndra and higher energy costs by paying more in taxes.
[…] AGAIN SPEWING her morally bankrupt ignorance to the four winds. Now, she claims to have a “right to […]
[…] Rachels built America. The Sandras just feed off it. Just like the […]