Announcement
Shop Amazon Outlet - Clearance, Markdowns and Overstock Deals -- A small percentage of your purchase goes to Legal Insurrection at no extra cost to you.
Your purchases from Amazon.com help support
this blog at no extra cost to you.
Other Contributors
Post of the Day
Blog of the Day
Video of the Day
Rate this video
Support this Blog
One Time Donation |
Monthly Donation |
blog advertising is good for you
The Latest from College Insurrection
Blogs I Read
Blogs to Note
Linking Policy
I like to link to people who link to me. Being linked by me is like getting an Instalanche, only smaller.
blog advertising is good for you
Blog Store
Your purchases from Amazon.com help support this blog at no extra cost to you.
What They Are Saying About Me
- "Someone with credibility is saying these things and trying to do something. Thank you."
- "'Obtuse' is just about the nicest thing I could say about Jacobson. The problem with being too steeped in any profession is that you run the risk of no longer understanding the difference between reality and your profession's most obscure minutiae."
- "I just wanted to thank you for writing such a great article on your reasons why you voted for John McCain. I wish everyone would have read that article."
- "Jacobson is doing only what other McCain supporters are starting to do, produce these worthless pieces from some narrow perch in order to cover up their own racist bigotry"
- "Cornell and the country need more educators like yourself to keep the flag of reason flying."
- “I take it Jacobson teaches at the cow college part of Cornell, and not the elite section where Coulter attended.”
- "Thank you for speaking out... and I hope you avoid repercussions in 'The People's Republic of Ithaca.'"
- "My Favorite Law Professor"
- "I love Professor Jacobson at Legal Insurrection on any given day, but today I love him like I love Christmas."
- Bill Jacobson is the smartest, best looking and most loved law professor at all of Cornell and his blog is one of the finest out there.





Comments
It’s weird that you keep mocking Romney for saying he’s going to be the nominee, but you don’t mock Newt for saying the exact same thing.
The tweet nails it. Romney might get 23% of the Iowa vote. The paul bots will deliver 20%. That leaves 57% going to the conservative candidates.
While you’re at it, do you have tonight’s winning lottery numbers?
What intrigues me is that this seems to be pre-emptive spin. Is he conceding that Romney will get 23%? If so, unless there is some dramatic shift in these last hours, that will likely be enough to win the caucus (albeit narrowly).
But the main point is this: No, Romney is no stronger in Iowa than he was four years ago. What makes his nomination highly likely (not quite inevitable) should he win Iowa is that the opposition remains completely fractured. The opposition to Romney has had AMPLE time to unite behind a candidate and a plethora of options to choose from. They have failed to do so and are highly unlikely to do so before New Hampshire; possibly not even before South Carolina.
Yes, yes, this is partly because the GOP “Establishment” (to the extent that it exists) strongly prefers Romney and consistently attacked the not-Romneys as each one rose to the top. And yes, it’s partly because Romney completely bulldozed Gingrich in Iowa.
However, a strong candidate with broad appeal would have been able to withstand all of this onslaught, particularly if the anti-Romney voters passionately united behind him. But, none of the other candidates are strong, as we have seen demonstrated time and time again and the opposition has failed to unite behind any one of them.
And that is why Romney has a clear path to the nomination if he wins today.