Keystone XL Rebranded as “Keystone Light” in Trump’s Push for North American Energy Security
This project is a leaner, faster, and more litigation-resistant project that reuses idle pipe, threads existing corridors, avoids reservation land, and is racing the clock to lock in steel-in-the-ground before the next Democratic administration can once again sacrifice North American energy security to green ideology.
It’s been quite some time since we covered the Keystone XL Pipeline, a proposed extension of the existing Keystone Pipeline System designed to transport crude oil from Alberta, Canada, to Nebraska.
The project’s goal was to expand the pipeline system’s capacity by allowing the transport of up to 830,000 barrels of oil per day over a distance of approximately 1,210 miles. The aim was to provide a more direct route for Canadian oil, and provisions were included for adding American-produced oil from the Bakken formation in Montana and North Dakota.
The last time we reported on this Keystone XL, President Donald Trump was promising to revive the project “on day one.”
Last fall, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney raised the prospect of reviving the pipeline project during his recent White House visit with Trump.
The project has now moved another step toward starting. Trump recently signed an order granting a cross-border permit to revive parts of the Keystone XL pipeline to transport Canadian oil to Guernsey, Wyoming.
The pipeline, proposed by Canadian pipeline company South Bow (SOBO.TO), opens new tab and its U.S. partner Bridger Pipeline, could increase Canada’s crude exports to the U.S. by more than 12% if it goes ahead. A presidential permit was required for the project to proceed.
The new proposal involves a different route through the U.S. than the previous Keystone XL project, which was canceled by former President Joe Biden in 2021 after years of Indigenous and environmental opposition.
“Slightly different than the last administration,” Trump said at a White House event, referring to his administration’s attitude towards crude oil infrastructure. “They wouldn’t sign a pipeline deal, and we have pipelines going up.”
But the project will use some of the previously built pipe on the Canadian side, where Keystone XL is already fully permitted. South Bow was spun off by former Keystone XL proponent TC Energy in 2024 to take over its oil pipeline business. Approximately 150 km (93 miles) of pipe has been built in Canada and sitting idle since Keystone XL’s cancellation.
Trump has approved the Keystone Light pipeline, clearing the way for construction to start in 2027. The Canada-U.S. project could move 550,000 barrels of crude per day, with completion targeted for late 2028 or early 2029.https://t.co/sfPgNiAUcO#energy #keystone #oilandgas
— Livingston Intl. (@livingston_intl) May 8, 2026
The footprint of this pipeline is a little different than that envisioned for the Keystone XL. It appears the goal of the firms involved in this project is to complete construction before Trump’s term ends.
Sometimes called “Keystone Light,” the Bridger Pipeline Expansion would not cross any Native American reservations. More than 70% would be built within existing pipeline corridors and 80% on private land, Bridger Pipeline LLC said in a statement.
The Casper, Wyoming-based company operates more than 3,700 miles (5,950 kilometers) of gathering and transmission oil pipelines in the Williston Basin of North Dakota and Montana and the Powder River Basin of Wyoming.
A subsidiary of True Companies, Bridger Pipeline could avoid a reversal by a future administration if it’s able to complete its project before Trump leaves office. It hopes to start construction in the fall of 2027 and finish it by late 2028 or early 2029, Bridger spokesperson Bill Salvin said.
It is being reported that oil companies have committed to move at least 400,000 barrels per day (bpd), or about 72 per cent of the pipeline’s initial capacity of 550,000 bpd.
Canadian oil producers are thrilled, as their ability to move product has been stifled by capacity constraints.
Rival pipeline operators are also looking to expand capacity on existing pipelines.
Last fall, Enbridge [ENB-T ] approved expansions for its Mainline and Flanagan South pipelines, which will allow an additional 150,000 bpd of Canadian heavy oil to move to the U.S. Midwest and Gulf Coast.
That additional capacity is expected to come online in 2027, and the company is also gauging commercial interest in a second phase of its Mainline expansion, which it has said could be in service in 2028 and would add another 250,000 bpd of capacity.
The Trans Mountain pipeline, running from Alberta to Canada’s west coast for export to the U.S. West Coast and Asia, is also planning a series of enhancements that could increase its capacity by 360,000 bpd.
The bottom line: While Keystone XL’s original vision was killed off by Biden’s climate virtue-signaling, market realities, Canadian persistence, and Trump’s energy priorities have combined to resurrect its core purpose as “Keystone Light”.
Ultimately, this project is leaner, faster, and more litigation-resistant, reusing idle pipe, threading existing corridors, avoiding reservation land, and racing the clock to lock in steel-in-the-ground before the next Democratic administration can once again sacrifice North American energy security to green ideology.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.






Comments
Hopefully the tribes will understand how their knee-jerk opposition will play out over the next couple Admins
I’ve been wondering if the tribes just asked the gov for too much annual rent money for the pipelines to cross their territory
The tribe was receiving money from oil transported via rail on their reservation. IIRC, more than would be received by the pipeline.
As does Uncle Warren’s Railroad
You need to understand that tribal administrations are usually as corrupt as any white politicians.
What they favor and what they oppose has more to do with their personal wealth and power and that of their families than any particular good it will do tribal members.
Dear leftists with 🇺🇦 in your bio – this is how you defeat Putin; crash the ME market cartels with affordable North American crude oil and LNG.
We get rid of two dictator-tyrants; Putin and Zeliniskyyy.
Imagine free elections in both countries.
Win. Win. Win. Win.
Nope. Leftists with 🇺🇦 in their bios are feverishly planning how to blow the Keystone pipeline up from a private yacht.
Hate to bear bad tidings but Trump’s term ends on the first Wednesday of this coming November– if. If gas doesn’t come way down and we don’t show up at the polls en masse. They will sell off the pipeline materials at pennies on the dollar. Just like the border wall last time.
Yes. The consequences of a loss this fall are truly terrifying. Unthinkable.
Lot of ifs there fella. What IF the sky fell and hit you on the head? 🙄
Do what you got to do. Congress can preen as much as they want to the media but Democrats do not control who is and is not targeted so good luck enforcing those subpoenas Democrats 🤣
Mind you, given how much of a car crash Democrat redistricting has been they might be lucky to not [British] Labour themselves out of existence 🤔
Even if we lose both houses in the midterms, there is no way the Dems will get 2/3 of the senate, so Trump will not be removed from office. Regardless of what happens in November, so long as he remains alive and well he will remain in office until noon on Jan-20-2029. And that means the pipeline can continue to be built no matter how much the Dems screech and scream.
Let’s get it done this time.
Given the Albertan independence movement, the pipeline to the US might give the new Republic of Alberta a steady source of income.
Subotai Bahadur
The Albertan independence movement has no obvious route to achieve its goals. Assuming it wins the coming referendum, all that will mean is that the provincial government will petition Ottawa and the other provinces to pretty please with sugar on top amend the constitution to let it secede. They will have no reason to say yes, other than the goodness of their hearts.
Canuckistan will never let Alberta go.
They believe they have a path to leave. Turning in over 300k petitions says a lot. With no legal means to leave why collect signatures? Bring on the fight!
Canuckistan is pulling out all the stops to keep that referendum off the ballot. No matter what happens, if somehow it happens (doubtful), there’s no way Canada will let Alberta go. Without the tar sands, Canada collapses.
See my link in my other reply. Canada has a VERY narrow economic base. The tar sands are absolutely essential. Think of Canuckistan as the Beverly Hillbillies with an attitude, and you won’t be far off.
Analysis of Canada by province below. Canada will not let Alberta go. If they did, the country would unravel, politically and economically.
https://claude.ai/share/a4e4c880-d699-4a27-8b8a-b5defbeda4e4
Depending on how strongly Albertans feel, Canada may have no options to keep Alberta outside military intervention.
And the Canadian military is far from being in top form,. It is public information that they are having . . . difficulties with the increasing number of Muslims in their forces.
Subotai Bahadur
Ha ha! Who knew that Galt’s Gulch was there in plain sight all along?!
Galt’s Gulch V2, the original got crushed by the People’s Republic of Colorado. V2 is reported to be somewhere near Calgary.
Not sure what are Canada’s outcomes with Alberta succession soon to be on the ballot. Some possible outcomes:
a) Alberta votes – Canada stalls action, nothing happens except simmering discontent.
b) Alberta votes & actually leaves. – Crisis in Canada
c) Other Provinces also leave – something like BC, AB, SK, & Yukon in the west Quebec in the east.
d) Collapse of Canada into Provinces with a weak Federal government.
e) A full change of Canada Federal politics to emphasis of a growing economy at the expense of DEI.
If you look at that Claude chat that I linked, you will see that SK and Yukon are net recipients of federal money, and BC is a contributor only because of the Chinese capital influx. Quebec leave? They are the biggest recipient of federal money. Where would they go? To the U.S.? I don’t think so.
I think the practical reality is that the referendum will never be on the ballot. Canada will pull out all the stops to keep it off the ballot, and will almost certainly prevail. If I’m wrong about that prediction, then choice a) is most likely.
As for Alberta leaving, they’d have to be joined by B.C. to be independent, which I tend to doubt given that B.C. is loony left and, its remittances to Ottawa notwithstanding, benefits by its federal ties to — to Toronto’s banks. Alternatively Alberta joins the United States, which I really very much doubt will happen.
Thus the most likely is either the federal government drowns any referendum in legal crapola (native treaty rights) or, if that doesn’t fly and AB votes to request secession, Ottawa smothers the whole thing anyway. Look, folks, Canada is just the Beverly Hillbillies with an attitude, and AB is the oil they found while shootin’ up some food. They’re not going to give that up.
I can just hear Dustin Hoffman as “Ratso Rizzo” whining, “Aw, you’re killing the planet, man! Hey, I’m walking here!”
Leave a Comment