Image 01 Image 03

Mamdani Blames Israel for NYPD ‘Boot on The Neck’ of New Yorkers

Mamdani Blames Israel for NYPD ‘Boot on The Neck’ of New Yorkers

He was merely parroting a talking point from the long-running, anti-Israel “Deadly Exchange” campaign, which was created by the anti-Zionist Jewish Voice for Peace.

Speaking at a New York University event in September 2023, Democratic socialist state lawmaker Zohran Mamdani made one of his most despicable, antisemitic remarks yet. He said, “We have to make clear that when the boot of the NYPD is on your neck, it is been laced by the IDF.”

Although several of Mamdani’s past statements have surfaced since he rose to prominence in July, this one stands out as especially vile. It reflects a tendency among his allies to blame nearly every societal ill on Jewish people. This narrative is frequently repeated at pro-Palestinian rallies, often by individuals who cannot identify the river or the sea they are invoking.

If we lived in a sane world, a revelation like this so close to Election Day would be a game-changer. Voters are paying attention. The stakes are high. Yet in deep blue Manhattan, it will probably be greeted with a shrug.

This indifference is even more puzzling given New York City’s enormous Jewish population. The Jewish Chronicle notes that the city is home to the largest Jewish community in the world outside Israel.

Given Mamdani’s history of anti-Jewish rhetoric, it seems remarkable that he would garner any Jewish support at all. Yet a recent Fox News poll shows him with 38% among Jewish voters, putting him nearly neck and neck with former Governor Andrew Cuomo at 42%. [Thirteen percent supported Republican Curtis Sliwa.]

Contemptible as Mamdani’s dubious connection between the NYPD and Israel is, it was not original. He was merely parroting a talking point from the long-running, anti-Israel “Deadly Exchange” campaign, which was created by the anti-Zionist, left-wing advocacy group, Jewish Voice for Peace. Legal Insurrection has covered this topic extensively.

Though the Deadly Exchange campaign had begun years earlier, “it became an important talking point among anti-Israel activists” during and after Hamas fired rockets into Israel in May 2021 initiating 11-days of fighting.

At the time, LI’s Samantha Mandeles noted that the campaign, which sought “to blame American Jews and Israelis for alleged U.S. domestic police violence against minorities,” played a large role in “bringing the Middle East conflict to the streets of Los Angeles, New York, and elsewhere.”

She explained:

The conflict provided a new opportunity for ‘intersectional’ anti-Israel agitators to portray Israel as the common denominator in oppressions all over the world, including racism in the United States. This rhetoric was engaged in not only by street thugs, but also by several members of Congress.

She described the anti-Zionist agit-prop as a “variation” of the Deadly Exchange campaign.

[It was] a popular political warfare trope that seeks to turn Blacks and other ethnic minorities against Jews by blaming Israel and American Jewish groups for domestic police violence and other policing problems. Indeed, a key Deadly Exchange assertion is that educational exchanges between American and Israeli police involve Israeli forces teaching American law enforcement to single out and brutally attack people of color.

However absurd the connections were, antisemites seized on these narratives and amplified them, and as with anything repeated often enough, some people eventually accept them as truth.

Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove of the Park Avenue Synagogue on the Upper East Side of Manhattan told the New York Post that up until ten days ago, he had never advocated for a political candidate from his pulpit. But, during a recent sermon, he told congregants, “I believe Zohran Mamdani poses a danger to the security of the New York Jewish community.”

He urged them to support Cuomo instead. Cosgrove cited Mamdani’s repeated refusal to denounce the phrase “Globalize the Intifada,” his pledge to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should he set foot in New York City, and his “’thrice-repeated accusations of [Israel’s] genocide’ in Gaza at last week’s mayoral debate.”

Apparently, many Jewish voters in New York City do not see what the rabbi sees. Drawn to Mamdani’s smile and charismatic persona, and unwilling to back either a Republican candidate or a former governor who resigned in disgrace four years ago, they appear to have made up their minds.

Sadly, barring something truly unexpected, Mamdani will be elected New York City’s next mayor in just one week.

They will get exactly what they voted for. As H. L. Mencken warned more than a century ago, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard.”


Elizabeth writes commentary for Legal Insurrection and The Washington Examiner. She is an academy fellow at The Heritage Foundation. Please follow Elizabeth on X or LinkedIn.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

Oh? Does he really think that New York is run by crooked a holes because of israel?

    Milhouse in reply to Ironclaw. | October 29, 2025 at 1:12 am

    Follow the links provided, and read up on the “Deadly Exchange” blood libel. The left has for several years been pushing the lie that USA policemen go to Israel to be trained by the IDF in how to oppress “black and brown” people.

It’s a pity Jewish excommunication is no longer a thing. The 38% supporting pig turd would be ripe for it.

Subotai Bahadur | October 28, 2025 at 3:32 pm

It really is a pity that Dante Alighieri passed some 7 centuries ago. He would have loved to take notes on what is going to happen in NYC after Mamdani is in office there to maybe add another circle to the Inferno.

Subotai Bahadur

Such a despicable, bigoted, Islamofascsti/Muslim supremacist piece of excrement. And, this self-serving, greasy and evil hustler wasn’t even a U.S. citizen, until 2018, despite having lived in this country for decades. He is an exploitative parasite and charlatan, through-and-through.

    MarkS in reply to guyjones. | October 28, 2025 at 4:16 pm

    yes, and soon he will be NYC’s Mayor

      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to MarkS. | October 28, 2025 at 6:07 pm

      With Sliwa and Cuomo splitting the vote, yes he will.

        Reminds me of the 1992 presidential election when Perot also split the vote by running as an Independent—the same thing Cuomo is doing now. In the 92 election Perot lost, Bush lost and Clinton won with 43%.

          DaveGinOly in reply to Paula. | October 28, 2025 at 10:31 pm

          Yes, because Perot split the Republican vote. This is different. Cuomo and Mamdani will share, that is, split, the Democrat vote. Sliwa will get the Republican vote. If Sliwa dropped out, would enough Republican voters vote for the vile Cuomo? (Granted he’s less vile than Mamdani, but he’s still vile.) Expecting Sliwa voters to transfer their votes to Cuomo is like expecting Dems to vote for Sliwa if Cuomo drops out. Ain’t gonna happen. If Mamdani wins, it’s because the Dems have surrendered to their hard-core socialist wing, not because Sliwa is splitting the vote. Let’s place the blame where it belongs. The Democrats sowed the wind. Unfortunately when they reap the whirlwind, we’ll be along for the ride too.

          Personally, I’d prefer to see Mamdani win and utterly ruin NYC as an object lesson for the rest of the country. Hopefully when that happens we will have a POTUS with the backbone to deny the city a bailout. I’m pretty sick and tired of bailing out incompetent politicians and the people who vote for them.

          Milhouse in reply to Paula. | October 29, 2025 at 1:19 am

          Dave, if Mamdani wins with significantly less than half the vote, it will absolutely be because Sliwa split the anti-Mamdani vote. If he had withdrawn almost all of his voters would have gone to Cuomo.

          And if we had “ranked choice” voting for the general election, almost all of Sliwa’s voters would have put Cuomo as their number two choice, thus giving him the win (again assuming Mamdani doesn’t get an outright majority). But unfortunately we don’t, so vote-splitting is a thing, and Sliwa is doing it.

          I speculate that someone on Mamdani’s side is paying Sliwa to stay in the race, or has promised him something if he helps Mamdani win.

      guyjones in reply to MarkS. | October 28, 2025 at 6:54 pm

      It’s galling as hell. But, from the vile Dhimmi-crats’ warped perspective, if a radical, subversive, America-hating hustler such as narcissist-incompetent-dunce, Obama, can become U.S. president, why shouldn’t a similarly lazy, entitled, coddled, private sector-avoiding, subversive, communist and Islamofascist/Muslims supremacist hustler-demagogue become mayor of NYC?

      Concise in reply to MarkS. | October 28, 2025 at 8:10 pm

      Are New Yorkers really this dumb, and lacking in self respect, to vote this smarmy conman into office? Yeah, it has been my experience that they are. And then some.

“Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove … during a recent sermon, he told congregants, “I believe Zohran Mamdani poses a danger to the security of the New York Jewish community.” He urged them to support Cuomo instead.”

Cue meme: “Our Democrat politicians have ruined this city! Next time I’m voting for a different Democrat!”

His Muslime is oozing out of him

He can’t contain it anymore, yet….

He will win…

Of course, his dead aunt would approve of his antisemitism, and his greater concern for Muslims than the 9-11 victims.

Will he snatch defeat from the jaws of victory?

I’m going out on a limb here but I believe those who are going to vote for this man were either a) not alive on 9/11/01, or b) sympathetic to the Islamic pathology.

Because no one who lived through that nightmare would ever vote for someone more in line with Osama Bin Laden than Rudi Giuliani.

If he does manage to hang in there and win, those of us outside of NYC should boycott anything/everything coming from there.

The voters deserve what’s going to happen to them good and hard.

He’s winning, and he’s going to win, because stupid New York AWFL wine moms want to brag to other AWFLs about how not-racist they are.

And when NYC is absolutely destroyed by his ‘leadership’, they’ll whine that it wasn’t their fault, they had good intentions.

This is bigger than zohran. NY electorate embrace 3rd world extremist ideologies is ominous for the future. There will be no ‘course correction’. Leftists don’t admit mistakes and double down on stupid.

Mamdani’s entire playbook will be to stay cutting-edge cool in the eyes of Progressives/socialists/Democrats everywhere and normalize Jew hatred whenever possible, which is his highest actual priority.

He will open the gates for the muzzies to take over nyc
They will build mosques non stop
As unsafe as nyc is today

It will be so much more tomorrow

If we lived in a sane world, a revelation like this so close to Election Day would be a game-changer. Voters are paying attention. The stakes are high. Yet in deep blue Manhattan, it will probably be greeted with a shrug.

In Manhattan, maybe. Less so in Brooklyn or Queens.

Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove of the Park Avenue Synagogue on the Upper East Side of Manhattan told the New York Post that up until ten days ago, he had never advocated for a political candidate from his pulpit. But, during a recent sermon, he told congregants, “I believe Zohran Mamdani poses a danger to the security of the New York Jewish community.

This is big, because Park Avenue Synagogue is a “progressive” institution, and if its rabbi has never before endorsed a candidate it was because he never had to. It would be obvious to every member of his congregation that voting Democrat is the core principle of their religion, replacing the 13 principles of faith and the 613 commandments, both of which the “progressive” movements have thrown in the garbage. Hearing from the pulpit that they should vote for someone other than a Democrat (although, thank the Almighty, not a Republican, may the Merciful One protect us) would have come as a shock, and it is to be hoped that at least some of the listeners took his words seriously and will vote accordingly.

DW pointed out to me an article claiming that early vote returns are not looking good for Mamdami, I’m wondering in what kind of system early vote returns are public information.

    Milhouse in reply to henrybowman. | October 29, 2025 at 5:16 am

    Surely in every system they report who’s voting early. I have been seeing such reports regularly in every national election.

    If you mean are they counting the early votes, and reporting them, then no, they are not! All talk of early voting is about the turnout, not the votes themselves. And the turnout so far is not good for Mamdani.

    rebelgirl in reply to henrybowman. | October 29, 2025 at 7:09 am

    Exit polling?

      CommoChief in reply to rebelgirl. | October 29, 2025 at 8:55 am

      Maybe some of that. I suspect more like looking at indicators at precinct level. How many ballots returned by X date in comparison to past elections and the demographics + historical voting record by party affiliation of the precinct. Not 100% accurate prediction off those but collectively it does give a very good approximation of what the final result might be. If a candidate needs a certain % of Y demographic to win and the precincts where that demo are clustered show lower than expected early voting then the inference is bad news for that candidate. Not an exact science more like by guess and by golly but an educated guess.

Dean Robinson | October 29, 2025 at 9:31 am

Some Jewish supporters of Mamdani appear to be suffering from Stockholm syndrome, whereas others are simply clinging to denial, much like many of the European Jews did in the early stages of Nazism. Of course the leftist media also glamorizes this self proclaimed “Champion of the People”, so that snares the young and feckless vote, along with the trendy but doddering ancient revolutionaries. Their only salvation may come from the fatalistic apathy of the jaded mesmerized masses who assume this is a done deal.