Sarah Lawrence College Anti-Israel Protesters Publish Strategy Guide Saying They Answered the Call of Hamas
“fighters in the Student Intifada”
We covered the recent building takeover at Sarah Lawrence. This school needs an intervention.
NEW: Students at Sarah Lawrence College have published a strategy guide in which they say they were ANSWERING THE CALL OF HAMAS when they recently occupied a building and set up an encampment on campus.
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 8, 2024
They call themselves “fighters in the Student Intifada” and declare that “the third stage of the Student Intifada at SLC has just begun.” pic.twitter.com/W452DB0BdX
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 8, 2024
They say “to escalate requires education” and report that encampment participants were educated “on the Palestinian resistance, the Student Intifada here at home, and the tactics used by other militant student movements.” pic.twitter.com/vM8e7N55lx
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 8, 2024
They’re big fans of Mao and structure their strategy based on his thought.
The third stage of their student intifada, which they say has just begun, is a “period of our strategic counteroffensive and the enemy's strategic retreat.” pic.twitter.com/JS387Dw8q8
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 8, 2024
Instead of disciplining these terrorist sympathizers for breaking campus rules, the @SarahLawrence administration negotiated with and made concessions to them.https://t.co/4pvxlT1J4b
— Steve McGuire (@sfmcguire79) December 8, 2024
DONATE
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
How many times must someone “answer the call” of a terrorist institution before it counts as material aid?
It’s not the number of times, it’s establishing a link between them. Hamas put out a general call to the whole world, and they acted independently on that call without informing anyone at Hamas of what they were doing. That’s probably not enough, but it’s very close.
I assume there is indeed some international cabal behind this. The US protests appear well financed. I’ve seen Qatar mentioned burt cannot verify that.
Assistance from Hamas to the protesters, even if it could be proven, would not be a crime. The crime would be assistance from the protesters to Hamas.
Sarah Lawrence used to be an expensive girls’ finishing school. Now, it’s an expensive finishing school for girls and effeminate left-wing boys.
Admitting that in acting they were “answering Hamas’s call” skates very close to giving material assistance. It probably stays on the right side of the law, but only just. A material assistance charge would probably require some level of coordination or direct communication with Hamas itself.
I would think a good case to be made that spending money to hold rallies and demonstrations to “answer Hamas’ call” could be construed as material assistance.
It would be, if they actually spoke to someone at Hamas who asked them to do it. But “answering” a general call made to the void probably stays on this side of the law.
Oh girls! Supporting Hamas is, like, soooo last year. You should be, like, out buying new outfits to wear at the Trump inauguration protests!
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/women-knit-pink-pussyhats-for-rally-after-trump-inauguration-idUSKBN14Y0RJ/
When they support Hamas, they support mass murder. They support gang rape. They support torture. They support kidnapping. They support terrorism and war crimes.
OTOH, I didn’t see the word “genocide” in there. When Palestinians and their supporters use that word, they are NOT against genocide, just upset that the targets of the alleged genocide are different than Hitler’s.
These protesters remind me of the Nazi Brownshirts at the start of WW2. I fear that the next progressive fascist presidential candidate will use them to win their election.