Hazmat Crews Fight Electric Truck Battery Fire That Closes California’s I-80
Due to the toxic fumes and intense heat, the evacuation perimeter was one-half mile and firefighters dumped 40,000 gallons on the fire…that was still burning over 8 hours later.
There is an interesting new entry for my series on electric vehicle realities.
As I have noted, many challenges are associated with fighting lithium/lithium-ion battery fires. The lithium is water reactive, yet water is often the only fire-fighting option in large enough quantities to fight the blaze. The materials burn at very high temperatures and are prone to re-igniting, which is why it took the firefighters in Texas 30,000 gallons of water and four hours to extinguish one blaze.
In my most recent report on the issue, a San Diego area warehouse collection of batteries burned for nearly a week before firefighters began to control the fire. Even then, the fire continued to smolder for weeks.
Now, an electric big-rig truck fire forced hazmat crews to shut down both directions of Interstate 80 in Northern California’s Sierra Nevada as authorities battled the intense heat and toxicity from the vehicle’s batteries.
The crash occurred around 3:15 a.m. near Emigrant Gap where an electric vehicle traveling eastbound at the Laing Road offramp crashed onto the right shoulder and into trees, according to the California Highway Patrol’s incident log.
Officer Jason Lyman, a spokesman for the CHP’s Gold Run office, said that only one vehicle was involved and that the driver was not injured. Lyman said the white Tesla Semi truck was without a trailer when it was headed uphill west of Yuba Gap. Investigators were still trying to piece together what led the Tesla to leave the roadway, he said.
But authorities’ immediate concern was the fire, sparked by the batteries of the roughly 13-ton vehicle, after the vehicle was seen “smoking.” Lyman said that the fire produced “quite the plume of smoke” early on as firefighters rushed in to fight the flames with chemicals. By 9 a.m. the fire was still smoldering, Lyman said.
Keep in mind that electric trucks are being mandated under California regulations.
As of January 1, 2024, any new big rigs registered in California have to be powered by hydrogen or electricity. California’s Advanced Clean Fleets Regulation, which the California Air Resources Board approved on April 28, mandates that companies rapidly phase out diesel semi-trucks, starting with older models, and replace them with zero-emission trucks.
Given this incident, I suspect California truckers who own diesel rigs will bitterly cling to their machines for as long as possible.
The incident report adds additional perspective on the challenges of dealing with this type of fire. The evacuation perimeter was one-half mile. The firefighters had to use helicopters, as they would do when battling a wildfire.
Even after battling the blaze for 8 hours, one lane of traffic was still not open.
“The battery itself, you can’t just spray water on it to put it out. It takes either some sort of dry chemical or very huge amount of water, I’ve heard as much as 40,000 gallons,” said Ofc. Jason Lyman with CHP Gold Run.
It’s unknown what the semi was hauling.
CHP initially said they expected the roadway to reopen around 8 a.m. Monday, but the freeway remained fully closed through the late afternoon. As of 4:30 p.m., the westbound lanes had been reopened but there was still no clear indicator for when the eastbound side would reopen.
Cal Fire aircraft dropped fire retardant on the semi, like during a wildfire fight, to keep the flames under control.
The eastbound lanes are closed at Nyack. CHP says all big rigs are being turned around eastbound at Applegate.
The incident started as a crash when the big rig went off the roadway and into the trees.
Due to the fumes, they won't allow anyone near the fire. pic.twitter.com/aGAdFjlTI5
— KylieRose (@KylieRoseMM) August 19, 2024
Tens of thousands of gallons of water, toxic fumes, and cars idling during the closure—all of this environmental goodness is brought to you by green energy.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
This is NOT my comment; it’s a comment left on another site discussing this Tesla fire. So, I ask you to make your own conclusions as to its potential validity. Having said that -I- found it rather interesting.
“…EV Trucks using a 1-MW charger would take over one-hour to charge. There are an estimated 2.9 million semi-trucks registered in the United Stated. I retired as a nuclear reactor operator. My last shift, we were generating 1,270 MW when I left. That would charge only 1270 trucks per hour. If we could keep that up for 24-hrs, a total of 30,480 trucks could be charged in a single 24-hr day from one nuclear power plant. You would need 95 new nuclear power plants just to charge all the EV semi-trucks. Now add into that all box delivery trucks, the EV cars. The current and existing power plants are already supply business and homes…
A wind turbine might produce 3 MW when the wind blows. That would mean you would need one wind turbine for every 72 trucks or 40,277 new wind turbines, If the wind blows 24-hrs a day at just the right speed.
Facts tend to get in the way of environmental virtue-signaling.
Don’t tell this to Elon Musk. He is giving Trump 45 million dollars every month to get him elected. If Trump is elected, we will all be driving electrric vehicles, whether we like it or not. Money talks.
You’re full of sh!t.
Oh JR, the world has passed you by
Genetics passed him by.
How much to treat you for the Trump virus?
Half a doses of the first COVID vaccine should do the trick.
It is incurable
You continue to impress me as the site’s dumbest f**king poster.
Who’s the dumbest celebate one?
Yep. He also wants to be a dictator, said there’s good people on both sides, got elected b/c of Russian collusion, and is a racist. Biden said it so it must be true.
I doubt that very much. Even if Musk were inclined to ask for that, and even if Trump were inclined to agree to it (both of which I doubt), Congress would never go along. Unless it was a Dem congress, of course.
If it was a damn Congress they’d refused to do it to spite him.
Trump said this $45 million was not true.
Just out of curiosity, is this you?
https://x.com/amuse/status/1826343806188310541?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1826343806188310541%7Ctwgr%5Eae3d1c563995426f9a2867e38c76f1befa920cfe%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frantingly.com%2F
Elon Musk has already recognized this reality and advised we need more fossilized fuels, not less.
Also, you haven’t listened to Trump lately. Elon Musk is supporting despite Trump constantly bashing the nonsense of EVs.
I think that with the current state if the art that only hybrid electric should be considered. I have many diesel engines, I vastly prefer them rather than gas.
“The lithium is water reactive, yet water is often the only fire-fighting option in large enough quantities to” fight the blaze.”
It is stupid to put water on lithium, also sodium metal. A lot of this problem is the battery chemistry they are using.
Fire departments should have one or more dedicated trucks loaded with tri-class ABC powder and a suitable spray dispensing system. That would also be useful with flammable liquids.
“As of January 1, 2024, any new big rigs registered in California have to be powered by hydrogen or electricity..”
If a hydrogen-powered truck (using either a metal hydride or compressed hydrogen) caught fire, it would be even more hazardous, with a high probability of an explosion. Firefighters would be well advised just to let it burn itself out (or go boom).
There was a big yacht fire in Northern Alabama (Tennessee River) a couple weeks ago that started in a bank of lithium-Ion batteries on one yacht and quickly spread to the neighboring yacht leaving both yachts – both 60’+ – totally destroyed and a couple others damaged. All things considered, it could have been way worse. It’s very en vogue to put Li-Ion batteries on yachts right now. I guess it’s fine for coastal cruisers. But, I’d hate to be on a long passage trying to fight a Li-Ion fire. That’s likely not a winnable fight.
TNSTASFL.
It’s too bad that we don’t have a power source for big rigs that uses a plentiful, transportable fuel source, one that will only combust under extremely high pressure.
Oh, wait…
Imagine when some discovers the formula that will put out Li fires
There are fire extinguisher balls. They have a small explosive charge in them that a fire sets off. They come in different sizes and are Tri class.
Those EVs sure weigh a lot, too.
They need to stop wasting water on these fires. Water doesn’t put out this kind of fire, they’re chemical reaction fires, they will burn as long as it has material fueling it.
They were tying to prevent eruption of wildfires.
Since the electrolyte releases oxygen when it decays under heat, the battery is literally feeding all three sides of the fire triangle at once from itself. The only thing the firefighters can do at that point is try to remove the Heat which is why they keep spraying water on it.
Look at what just one of those giant electro-toys has done and now imagine thousands of those toxic deathtraps roaming our roads. Wonderful.
Oh the humanity!! Imagine how many solar farms could be watered with 30K gallons of water!!
Can we get a pic of AOC crying by the side of a solar farm?
“Keep in mind that electric trucks are being mandated under California regulations.
As of January 1, 2024, any new big rigs registered in California have to be powered by hydrogen or electricity.”
I can’t wait to see how they handle it When Hydrogen Attacks…!
I can’t wait to see how store shelves get stocked
I live near the AZ/CA border. Mais fica, baby.
Emigrant Gap. A route that leads out of California. How fitting.
Should park a dozen or so in the basement of the governor’s residence.
Note that an EV catching fire in your attached garage could mean that your whole house is a “goner”. If such fires start happening, I think the market for EVs will have a problem.
They have happened, the news doesn’t want to report on it
Given this incident, I suspect California truckers who own diesel rigs will bitterly cling to their machines for as long as possible.
You bet there are but those trucks still need to meet even stricter emissions standards pushed by the Cali Legislature. But notice something else, the “registered in California” part. This law was pushed by the large trucking companies who are based in other states but have terminals in California. Their trucks and trailers are registered in states like OK, TN etc. The law is designed to push out the smaller companies and owner operators based in California to give the larger companies a monopoly in the ports to haul containers.
FTA: “Lyman said the white Tesla Semi truck was without a trailer when it was headed uphill west of Yuba Gap.”
Also FTA: “It’s unknown what the semi was hauling.”
Read your own article, idiot! If there was no semi-trailer, then it was an unloaded tractor (you know, tractor-trailer). In which case, it was not hauling anything. Duh!
One was a SacBee article, and the other was CBS. Not the same article.
But the source in the one was available to the other, for sure.
Lyman said the white Tesla Semi truck was without a trailer when it was headed uphill west of Yuba Gap.
It’s unknown what the semi was hauling.
So… someone wasn’t using all their sources when they wrote that second article. Oy.