Shutuppery Liberals Level ‘Incitement’ Allegations to Silence Conservatives
Accusing Republicans of trying to incite violence is once again all the rage in Democratic party circles
Democrats desperately want people to believe that Republicans are criticizing them in order to deliberately put them in harm’s way. If they can get enough people to believe this, they can simply silence all dissenting opinion as “incitement.”
When asked about the New York Post‘s cover slamming Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) “some people did something” remarks about the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) got straight to the point:
“We are getting to the level where this is an incitement of violence against progressive women of color and if they can’t figure out how to get it back to policy, we need to call it out for what it is because this is not normal,” she continued.
Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-MI) was on the same page. “They do this all the time to us, especially women of color. They do that. They take our words out of context because they are afraid because we speak truth, we speak truth to power.”
Omar expressed similar sentiments earlier that same week:
This is dangerous incitement, given the death threats I face. I hope leaders of both parties will join me in condemning it.
My love and commitment to our country and that of my colleagues should never be in question. We are ALL Americans! pic.twitter.com/foTZMpiZKv
— Ilhan Omar (@IlhanMN) April 10, 2019
In early March, after Omar was called out and criticized by Republicans and Jewish Democrats about her repeated use of anti-Semitic tropes, 2020 Democratic presidential candidates made dramatic statements expressing their concern for Omar’s safety.
Sen. Kamala Harris (CA) said “But like some of my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus, I am concerned that the spotlight being put on Congresswoman Omar may put her at risk.” Sen. Elizabeth Warren (MA) joined the echo chamber, too. “Threats of violence — like those made against Rep. Omar — are never acceptable,” she said.
First things first: No one in their right mind wants anyone’s safety endangered over things that they say. There has been an unspoken rule in politics about being willing to fight for the right for someone to say something with which you may not agree.
This is a rule that Democrats typically only observe in theory, not in practice, however.
Ocasio-Cortez, Tlaib, Warren, Harris, Omar, Rep. Ayanna Pressley (MA) and all the rest are classic examples of this. They’re reviving a despicable tactic from a long list of shutuppery tactics Democrats employ to try and shame their political opposition into shutting up. They believe that by accusing Republicans of wanting Democrats to be targets of violence, that they’ll succeed in silencing them.
Shutuppery in and of itself isn’t new for Democrats, of course. After the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, President Clinton blamed talk radio. Rush Limbaugh rose to national prominence during the Clinton presidency, so it was believed that Clinton was referring to Limbaugh. Clinton, by the way, wasn’t the only Democrat to suggest Republicans were to blame.
And for the eight years of Barack Obama’s presidency—and even before that when he was a candidate, Democrats played the race card with wild abandon any time a Republican criticized Obama. When Republicans weren’t being accused of being racists, they were accused by radical leftists of promoting “rape culture” and being “anti-woman.”
As I wrote at the time—and is still true today, feminists and their ilk have become the modern-day thought police, using a combination of shame tactics, obedient group-think, and mindless mob-rule to shut down dissent.
We see this frequently with the “Three Amigas” (AOC, Omar, and Tlaib), all three of who want Americans to believe Republicans disagree with them because they’re “progressive women of color” and Republicans can’t handle minority women speaking out or something. Never mind that some of the most vocal critics of these women—and other Democratic women like Harris and Warren—are Republican women who have no use for their juvenile word games and dangerous thought policing.
When these Democratic women in particular become especially agitated with their critics, they’ll add on accusations of incitement to try and guilt them into backing down. Their fellow Democrats obediently fall in line, saying Republicans are deliberately putting targets on the backs of these “progressive women of color.”
What they conveniently ignore—and their media allies are happy to overlook as well—are the many, many instances where Democrats have used what could be considered inciteful rhetoric against their political opposition: Republicans are Nazis/racists/white supremacists for supporting and/or defending President Trump. Republicans are child killers and terrorists for supporting gun rights. The list goes on and on.
Shouldn’t their over-the-top rhetoric be considered incitement and called out, too?
Furthermore, should we blame Democrats for all the attacks on MAGA hat wearers that have happened since Alyssa Milano called the hat the “new white hood,” a statement with which Democrats agreed? Should we blame AOC for a liberal columnist’s call for waiters to pee and bleed on food they served to Trump administration officials? Remember, AOC herself joined in on the calls for Trump administration officials to be ostracized in the private sector.
And shouldn’t Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) be called to account for her unhinged rant where she actually encouraged—incited—supporters to confront their political opposition where they slept, ate, traveled, basically everywhere? What about 2020 presidential candidate Sen. Cory Booker’s (NJ) call for people to “get up in the face of some Congresspeople”?
Democrats are used to having a playing field that is heavily weighted in their favor. Because of that, they make it a point to throw out the most inflammatory rhetoric about Republicans and have actually gone on record urging liberals to harass conservatives in their public and private lives.
But no matter how much the media eagerly aids them in their shutuppery endeavors, the best answer to left’s attempts at silencing speech is . . . more speech.
Andrew Klavan did an excellent video in 2009 on the left’s “shut up” strategy, and it very much relates to how Democrats are still operating today. Click below to watch:
— Stacey Matthews has also written under the pseudonym “Sister Toldjah” and can be reached via Twitter. —
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Miss Piggy in blackface, April Ryan, called for Sarah Huckabee Sanders head to be “lopped off”.
Papa Huck took her to task on Twitter calling for her Press Pass to be revoked and she immediately went into Victim Mode, saying
“I have a warning for you! If anything happens to me or mine or anyone connected to me, you and your daughter and this administration will be held accountable! So you better stop now!”
When leftists accuse conservatives of hate speech or inciting violence you can be sure of one thing. They’re doing it themselves.
If leftists had a “national” sport it would be projection. And if they didn’t have double standards they’d have no standards at all.
Miss Piggy is insulted.
Shouldn’t they remain quiet under the niqab? 😉
For the good of humanity, these four should be sterilized. That opinion is based on the crap they spew.
Because these women can’t handle the truth, they spread their “white” lies.
And that is how white privilege works.
The left doesn’t have a problem when the media incites violence against Trump and other Republicans. CNN likely played a role in the murder of five Dallas officers a few years back with its highly-biased non-stop Michael Brown coverage.
Speaking of mittens romney:
Mitt Romney is “sickened” by the Trump administration’s “dishonesty” after reading Mueller report:
https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2019/4/20/18508795/mitt-romney-is-sickened-by-the-trump-administrations-dishonesty-after-reading-mueller-report
Rabid diversity, sexism, genderism, etc, complemented with a liberal dose of conflating logical domains in post-normal “scientific” prophecies. Political Correctness (PC) is notoriously a Progressive Process (PP). Hopefully, people aren’t so green.
I now understand why some guys believe Cortez is good looking. It’s the company she’s been keeping, as above.
Making genetic deposits in stupid vessels is not smart, and I would be willing that allowing such deposits is how she got her degree.
Old saying: The prettiest girl in town becomes average the day that the train arrives. Ironic that AOC wants to build the railroad to her own demise.
Take a look at an image of AOC with her mouth open. Most horses would gladly give up a week of oats for her teeth.
8-year-old imidates Alexandra Cortez. Hilarious:
https://twitter.com/SICKENLAW/status/1118873752031285248
I’ve watched that 3 times today.
her little voice is SO perfect.
and the counting on her fingers had me rolling!
We should now lower the voting age to eight.
Wait until liberals finally see this video. Poor little girl will be doxxed by them.
SickenTirade
@SICKENLAW
This sweet, adorable, 8yo actress is not only much cuter than the real #AlexandriaOcasioCortez but she’s also already much smarter too. I asked her to do this video because when #AOC is talking this is what we’re all thinking. We’re better off with this sweetheart in Congress.
https://twitter.com/SICKENLAW/status/1118873752031285248
It’s not like cortez is bad-looking. However good she looks, she’s an obnoxious ass, and an insult to our freedom. Kind of like obama.
she thinks it’s 1AM and all of the guys at the bar are actually listening to and care about everything she says and aren’t just there to stare at her bewbs
At closing time, she looked good to the drunks. Then she started talking, and the vomiting began.
These lunatic radically-Leftist Dems don’t NEED help from the Right to make people hate them! LOL!
I think most of them hate themselves.
Atheism will do that to a person.
“Shouldn’t their over-the-top rhetoric be considered incitement and called out, too?”
Now you’re being silly. Everybody knows they are the Party which is just chock full of people who have only the best interests of we hoi polloi at heart. If that weren’t such a silly idea I’d have to seriously contemplate labeling it hate speech.
How’s this work, now? They’re joining the republican softball team?
How’s this work, now? They’re joining the republican softball team?
Comes with the territory of “public service” (cough).
“If you can’t stand the heat, get out of the kitchen”
Sexist! Or something. /sarc
Pretty sure that by the left’s own definition, they are inciting violence against POTUS which is at least treason, and at most, punishable by you-know-what.
Can we get on with the punishment?
Except that the left’s rules only apply to their opponents. Never themselves. They are always morally justified in all of their actions.
Um, no. Inciting violence against the president — even actual incitement, which this was not — is not treason.
Once again, our worthless media focuses on republican reaction to Dem malfeasance, instead of the Dem malfeasance itself. It’s the ‘Republicans Pounce’ story, in this case, Dems reacting with hostility to Republicans Pouncing.
Oh, it’s more than worthless, leftist “journalists” are “inciting violence” and as such, should be obliterated.
It’s not ‘worthless’ if you’re a leftist. Then, the corrpution of the media is priceless.
Four Mares Of the Apocalypse.
The hate, bigotry, racism, anti-Americanism, and pure ignorance represented by that rogues gallery is….NOT WHO WE ARE
Mysterious straw men(women?) show up a lot with these Leftist lovelies: Some people(?) did something(?) They(?) do this(?). We know who the some people were and exactly what they did but who are “they” and what exactly did they do? The specifics will be left to the media to fill in the blanks.
Reminds me of a Tom Petty lyric: “who knows, maybe you were kidnapped, tied up, taken away and held for rannnnnnnnsom” (very sarcastic exphasis). That man saw lefties 30 years ahead of time. I am waiting for when we get “victim mockery” s a national sport.
Karma’s a bitch. (While cortez is complicit with these three bigoted maggots, she hasn’t stated any bigotry. Nonetheless: lie down with maggoted, bigoted dogs, and you wake up a maggoted, bigoted dog by association.)
If any of these four think we enjoyed McCain’s funeral, wait till we see theirs.
1) Leftists are shown to be able to commit violence against anyone they do not like with absolute impunity; especially in Democrat-Socialist controlled polities.
2) Anyone who disagrees with a Leftist is accused and deemed to have committed violence against the Left, regardless if there is any violence involved.
3) Since obeying the law, and rational discourse gets you tarred with the penalties of being violent, what reason is there to restrict your expressions of opinion to the law and rational discourse?
Subotai Bahadur
“…what reason is there to restrict your expressions of opinion to the law and rational discourse? ”
Very soon now there will be none. That will be the legacy the dead leftists will leave.
For people who talk a lot of trash talk, you’d think they could take criticism but apparently not.