Depends On The Meaning Of “Really Good” Posted by William A. Jacobson Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 07:00am 6 Comments Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Pinterest Digg Print Buffer Pocket Blogger Yahoo Mail Flipboard Viber Skype Facebook Messenger Copy Link More Sharing Options Pinterest Digg Print Buffer Pocket Blogger Yahoo Mail Flipboard Viber Skype Facebook Messenger Copy Link We can agree on the one-term thing; the “really good” part we’ll have to talk about. ——————————————Follow me on Twitter and Facebook Facebook Twitter Telegram LinkedIn WhatsApp Reddit Email Pinterest Digg Print Buffer Pocket Blogger Yahoo Mail Flipboard Viber Skype Facebook Messenger Copy Link More Sharing Options Pinterest Digg Print Buffer Pocket Blogger Yahoo Mail Flipboard Viber Skype Facebook Messenger Copy Link DONATE Donations tax deductible to the full extent allowed by law. 6 6 Comments 2012 Election, Obama campaign Tags: 2012 Election, Obama campaign
Comments
He should quit nine months ago, while he's still ahead.
Nothing but spin. Obama does not want to be a "good, one term, president." If he did, he would have accomplished something by now.
This whole "one term wonder" thing is his way of equivocating his failure to lead. Nothing more.
Does the man think we were born yesterday?
I think it's a Jimmy Carter reference…things got "really good" after we dumped him for Reagan
At least he is on board with the one-term presidency. And then Bob McDonnell can get started with fixing Obama's mess.
Is there really such a thing as a "good, one-term president?" Wouldn't a president who is "really good" always be elected to a second term?
Obama will be neither a "really good, one-term" nor a "mediocre, two-term" president.
Yes. We would rather he be a one term President, as well!