Palisades Fire Report Exposes Failures Before Homes Burned
A new Palisades fire report exposes delayed evacuation alerts, ignored warnings and Los Angeles failures during the deadly 2025 wildfires.
By the time some Pacific Palisades residents got an evacuation alert, homes had been burning for 40 to 90 minutes. The city had managed to notify them after the fire had already been burning through their neighborhood.
That delay appears in the Palisades fire report released October 2 by UL Research Institute’s Fire Safety Research Institute. Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-CA) requested the review of the January 2025 Southern California wildfires. It took 724 pages to document what happened. Thirty-one people died in the Palisades and Eaton fires; more than 16,000 structures were destroyed.
The trouble began before January 7. The Lachman fire, which later rekindled into the Palisades fire, had been contained on New Year’s Day. On January 2, a captain objected to taking away the hose crews might still need. He later saw a wisp of smoke. Another firefighter found a hot spot, though others said they had found none.
Crews removed the hose anyway. On January 3, firefighters checked another report of smoke but did not see any when they arrived. Investigators found no evidence of subsequent patrols for hot spots as dangerous fire weather approached.
There had been reason to go back and check. The winds were forecast.
At 10:46 a.m. on January 7, a helicopter radioed that homes would likely be hit within minutes. At 11:29, an assistant chief called for evacuations down to Pacific Coast Highway. The city’s first evacuation order went out at 12:09.
City staff were still drawing the evacuation zones from street names read over the radio:
“As a result, LA Metro and EMD personnel were constructing evacuation zones manually based on spoken street names transmitted over radio traffic. When the first evacuation was ordered, more information was required between the field and LA Metro to determine the exact spelling of street names and define the geographic boundaries.”
Los Angeles County kept the previous shift at work that morning, giving it nearly 3,000 firefighters instead of about 1,500. Over at LAFD, the previous shift went home. City officials would soon be trying to undo that decision.
TV and radio carried the recall, inviting anyone with firefighting experience to call the department’s staffing number. LAFD needed its own employees and got a worldwide response. Thousands of calls from around the world clogged its staffing lines for more than 48 hours. The report says the city’s predeployment and recall processes departed from its written procedures and appeared largely driven by budget constraints.
Commanders initially set up at Fire Station 23, in the fire’s path and along a major evacuation route. They hesitated over requests for outside help while questioning who would pay. Fire and police personnel operated with different evacuation maps, a discrepancy they discovered late that day. Up to 26 units deployed without incident command knowing.
The breakdown wasn’t limited to Pacific Palisades. Eighteen of the 19 people killed in the Eaton fire died in west Altadena. Most of that area did not get its evacuation order until 3:25 a.m. on January 8. The first 911 call west of Lake Avenue had come more than four hours earlier.
A paramedic squad was out there seeing houses burn, with embers coming down like snow. You would think that would reach the people deciding whether to evacuate the neighborhood. The squad was working independently of the fire incident, though, and its account never reached command.
The investigation describes several failures coming together under extreme fire conditions. It does not single out one official or one decision as the cause. Jeremy Padawer, a toymaker who lost his Palisades home, had heard enough explanations about the weather. He told the California Post:
“What made me angry wasn’t the fact that a fire burned my house down. That made me sad. They said it was climate change. They said it was human impact. They said that it was hurricane force winds.”
Mayor Karen Bass says the findings confirm much of what officials already knew. She says 92 percent of recommendations from LAFD’s separate internal review have been implemented.
Ninety-two percent of the department’s own recommendations, to be clear. The independent review includes advice to revisit recently controlled fires before dangerous weather and settle concerns about hot spots before crews leave. A captain had raised concerns about removing the hose five days before the Palisades fire. Now there’s a recommendation.
The next evacuation order needs to beat the fire to the house. Eighteen people in West Altadena never got that chance. Los Angeles has had nearly 21 months to act.
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.





Comments
Now I don’t want to get off on a rant, here, but my tinfoil hat(*) won’t shut up about swaths of owner-occupied housing somehow wiped out by unforseeable disasters(**), when there happens to be another use for that land waiting in the wings, if only those inconvenient owners would get out of the way. Hey, moving them out can be cheaper than buying them out. Just sayin.
Did Oprah get her resort in Hawaii?
What they gonna build in the Smokeys — mines, power plants, data centers, or something else?
The CA “solution” is building subsidized, multi-story multiple occupancy “housing” where people used to have their own homes on their own land. Because everything n9t compulsory is forbidden, ye Digits of The Commensal.(***) (Doubtless, shortly a light station on a line to nowhere.)
(*) I see a tinfoil version of The Sorting Hat, scowling and scrunching to finally proclaim: “It was done in a sound stage…” This could get me to make a clip with AI.
(**) “Unforseeable disasters” is doing a lot of heavy lifting there. Because wildfires don’t happen, nobody knew about the wind, and just wait til we find out how those reservoirs got emptied.
(***) Phrase from The Left Hand of Darkness, in context should be understood literally and ironically: callback to the party proclamations in 1984 for example. Interestingly, took three rounds of old-school search, search to turn up the reference and link after the search and AI results declared there was no such thing. No, I don’t want a more adept skewing of the inputs you’re feeding me, double-plus-not when you get payoffs depending on what I do.
It ain’t what they show you, it’s what they don’t.
https://www.litcharts.com/lit/the-left-hand-of-darkness/terms/commensal
Oh, downvotes… it’s cheap and it’s easy.
Come on, join the fray. What’s the objection? Don’t like the take — let’s hear yours? Badly written — do better and show us.
Maybe it’s the potential Harry Potter abuse. You don’t mess with the sorting hat.
“TV and radio carried the recall, inviting anyone with firefighting experience to call the department’s staffing number. LAFD needed its own employees and got a worldwide response. Thousands of calls from around the world clogged its staffing lines for more than 48 hours.”
:facepalm:
10-4, Good Buddy!
The only thing longer than the reaction time by the mayor of LA and the rest of the fire fighting infrastructure is the time it is taking to put the victims back in their homes.
Naturally, as noted above, the Cali communists have a Soviet plan to build ugly, Øbama library style concrete multifamily dwellings on their land, likely appropriated by eminent domain seizures. Not to fear; it is for the children (of illegals).
The state of Weirdafornia is Dysfunction Junction in action. These fires were predicted to happen years ago. The lack of fuel management is a tribute to the corrupt politicians and environmentalist movements.
Windblown fires like this have a footprint. You just about can’t stop the downwind side, but you can attack the sides and narrow the footprint, as well as the relatively easy task of putting it out on the upwind side. The California fire response did neither of these, and the fire spread to *both* sides, *and* upwind. Spencer Pratt details the failures quite well.
“Mistakes were made, but no one entity is to blame with the multitude of a fog of dots that needed to be connected to prevent this sudden, unexpected and totally unforeseeable, unprecedented wild fire incident.
But, in the final analysis, we may never know the motive of the wildfire.”