Image 01 Image 03

WNBA Player Ejected for Clotheslining Sophie Cunningham Issues Ominous Warning

WNBA Player Ejected for Clotheslining Sophie Cunningham Issues Ominous Warning

“The WNBA is what the entire country would be like if run by white liberal women.” Except for leaving out the word “affluent,” he’s not wrong.

By now, the world has heard what happened during Saturday’s WNBA game between the Chicago Sky and the Indiana Fever. But just to recap: Late in the first quarter, as the Fever’s Sophie Cunningham drove toward the basket for a layup, the Sky’s DiJonai Carrington struck her across the head and neck, clotheslining her and sending her crashing to the floor. It was a deliberate move from an aggressive player.

Officials ruled the hit a Flagrant 2 foul — a serious foul “involving excessive or unnecessary contact” — and immediately ejected Carrington from the game.

[Indiana went on to win 90–86.]

Incredibly, after committing a hard foul on Cunningham, Carrington blamed her ejection from the game on white privilege. She posted the following message on her Threads account: “WHITE PRIVILEGE @indianafever”

Below, Cunningham responds angrily to Carrington: “You dumba** b*tch! Why the f*** would you do that?”

This was not unusual behavior for Carrington. Fox News reminded readers that during the 2024 WNBA Playoffs, “Carrington delivered a brutal blow directly to the eye of then-rookie sensation Caitlin Clark.”

Let’s not forget Carrington poking Caitlin’s eye out and no call made. https://t.co/IyOVYiinkG

— Greg Bryan (@HardHatNation) August 9, 2026

Following the game, Cunningham stated the obvious: Carrington’s flagrant foul was intentional. She said, “Clearly, I think it was like unnecessary. I’ve never really spoken to her and have no beef with her, but I guess she has some pent up stuff. So get your s— off. That’s fine. I can take it … Yeah, it’s intentional.”

Cunningham’s “enlightened” coach, Stephanie White, saw things differently. She told reporters, “Yeah, I mean, look, it was a hard foul. I don’t think that DiJonai [Carrington] intentionally came out to get her across the neck like she did. But it did happen and I thought it was the right call.”

But she didn’t stop there.

“You know, one of the things about Nay [nickname for Carrington] is that she’s gonna play her butt off, man. She’s gonna compete. Nobody’s gonna go walking in for a layup. And so, I don’t oppose the hard foul. But I also don’t think that she intentionally went for the neck.”

This is the same coach who defended Phoenix Mercury forward Alyssa Thomas after she punched Caitlin Clark in the throat in June.

She also refused to rule out allowing biological men to play in women’s sports, saying recently, “I just don’t feel like exclusion is an answer, and I think that we need to have deeper, more layered conversations.”

White was either gaslighting or else she is so deeply committed to her woke ideology that such responses have become almost reflexive. Unfortunately, she is hardly alone.

One X user made an astute observation: “The WNBA is what the entire country would be like if run by white liberal women.” Except for leaving out the word “affluent,” he’s not wrong.

Another called for the insanity to stop. He attached a meme that read: “The WNBA wouldn’t even allow Rosa Parks on the bus today if a white man identified as a black trans woman and took her seat.”

Like White, Carrington is steeped in the woke ideology that swept through American culture in the aftermath of George Floyd’s death. That she would invoke “white privilege” after committing a deliberate violation speaks volumes.

More accurately, Carrington’s attack on Cunningham was a case of “black privilege” — aptly defined by the X user below as “the ability to break any law in society and still remain the victim.”

Nevertheless, not only did Carrington rationalize her willful misconduct, but she doubled down, issuing an ominous warning to Cunningham about what awaits her the next time their teams meet: She posted the date of the game along with an emoji depicting a beaming face with smiling eyes.

Classy lady.

And here she is in all her blonde glory:

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 3 
 
 29
dawgfan | August 10, 2026 at 8:09 am

Anyone who watches this trash league is enabling this behavior at this point.

Dawgfan,

Women’s Basketball above the HS level is lousy basketball. Sadly, it used to be that women were more fundamentally sound than men were, because they had to be to play well. Now it seems like higher levels of women’s BK tries to play run and gun NBA style ball without the physical capability to do it. That’s one thing that Catlin Clark does that makes her such a joy to watch, she knows the game and plays it the right way.

But just like the NBA these days (and the NFL) the problem is not the game itself, it is the people playing it, and the owners who care only about profit, and not necessarily winning anymore. When the WNBA and NBA turn into a street ball game of throwing 3’s, f-bombs, almost open combat at the rim, and almost brawls in half the games, its unwatchable.

It’s a terrible thing to see happen to a great, great sport.


 
 0 
 
 14
rickcheese | August 10, 2026 at 8:40 am

You can take the bleep out the hood but


 
 0 
 
 19
Peter Moss | August 10, 2026 at 8:46 am

“Carrington blamed her ejection from the game on white privilege.”

She’s correct, but not in the manner intended.

Ghetto culture is inferior in every aspect to what this dribbling idiot decries.

Personally (probably because I have a three digit IQ) I would be very cautious about threatening a black belt who can easily put me in a wheelchair or a coffin absent her restraint.


 
 1 
 
 14
Whitewall | August 10, 2026 at 8:56 am

Carrington can’t compete so she goes street ball.


     
     0 
     
     8
    The Gentle Grizzly in reply to Whitewall. | August 10, 2026 at 10:18 am

    Or, it is just her lack of impulse control so common among her kind.


     
     0 
     
     10
    gonzotx in reply to Whitewall. | August 10, 2026 at 10:36 am

    She’s actually pretty good player and was balling in this game.
    Somehow I missed the foul and was wondering why she wasn’t in the second half and found it online.

    This ain’t going to end well and it’s all the WNBA’ s fault, they have handled the ghetto culture poorly and barley acknowledged their super star, allowing her to be attacked repeatedly, imagine the NBA allowing that with Curry.
    Their woke gay trans loving coach’s, there just isn’t a word for Coach White, maybe traitor, and Administration
    They truly are the gang that killed the golden calf
    Sorry, America just will not support a ghetto league of gay thug women.

    Clark and Cunningham need to play in Europe apparently, oh wait, they actually have a real live trans on a team there.

    Women, their own worst enemies


 
 0 
 
 8
gonzotx | August 10, 2026 at 8:59 am

You’re wrong, it’s “affluent “ liberal women , it’s all those , white, black, brown, blue, pink, green haired baristas, minimum wage Non working fat jealous females Would do


 
 0 
 
 16
Concise | August 10, 2026 at 9:10 am

Here’s what really bothers me. I suspect that she’s been so indoctrinated by a corrupt progressive/liberal education and culture that she honestly believes this “white privilege” garbage. And how many others has the progressive education establishment thoroughly corrupted? It’s as bad as the old Soviet brainwashing,


     
     0 
     
     7
    Andy in reply to Concise. | August 10, 2026 at 9:22 am

    The soviets weren’t nearly this successful. We’ve got generations of suicide bombers salivating to be weaponized.


     
     1 
     
     12
    Olinser in reply to Concise. | August 10, 2026 at 10:11 am

    Stupid black people believe in magic dirt.

    White areas that white people live in aren’t nice, clean, and without gang shootouts because white people worked and made them nice. They’re nice because of the magic dirt. And white people are evil and greedy because they won’t share their magic dirt.

    That’s how black people think.


 
 0 
 
 13
Suburban Farm Guy | August 10, 2026 at 9:19 am

Thanks Obama


 
 0 
 
 17
guyjones | August 10, 2026 at 9:31 am

The only supremacism I see in the WNBA is black supremacism, and the only racism is obnoxious racism and resentment by infantile and spiteful black players.

White was either gaslighting or else she is so deeply committed to her woke ideology that such responses have become almost reflexive.

Or White knows that she must parrot certain political positions in order to keep drawing a paycheck.

Quite seriously – this cultural and racial tension is all the WNBA has to sell.

It’s really the 21st century remake of tv wrestling with heroines and villainesses and dirty tactics for the crowd to boo.


 
 0 
 
 10
MoeHowardwasright | August 10, 2026 at 9:55 am

Cunnigham and Clark should just resign from the Fever. The league will sink without them. The NBA subsidizes this crap. Let them sue the NBA owners for tolerating this kind of vicious behavior. These black lesbians are conspiring to injure these two white women. Wheee the hell is the DOJ? Why aren’t they investigating the league for civil rights violations?


     
     0 
     
     1
    DaveGinOly in reply to MoeHowardwasright. | August 10, 2026 at 11:08 pm

    The league has created a “hostile work environment.”

    I used those words in a work environment once and they worked like a miracle. Stopped my supervisor cold from entertaining petty complaints about my emails (my direct nature offended my co-workers, most native to the PNW and very laid-back and indirect). They should try it.


 
 0 
 
 10
CommoChief | August 10, 2026 at 9:56 am

A coach openly praising the deliberate ‘hard foul’ as an acceptable part of the game should be reminded that she’s endorsed on court conduct not only beyond the rules a ‘foul’ but one which exceeds normal level of intensity ‘hard’. She also made the case for ‘deliberate foul’ by praising Carrington ‘…nobody’s gonna go walking in for a layup’. In sum she made the case for someone to intentionally make hard and deliberate contact with another in this case leaping and grabbing the neck/head of the victim with sufficient force to throw them down.

Referees police conduct on the court/field of play within the rules of the game. That’s what the players signed up for. When incidents like a hard deliberate foul occur that’s not ‘part of the game’. If it happened on the sidewalk outside the arena that would be a crime, why would the court be any different? It is past time to end the deliberate hard foul in basketball. Alternatively the league can simply up their insurance, let the players play, and be willing to ignore retaliation. Since the WNBA doesn’t want to exclude such conduct, no whining when a player deliberately takes revenge by yanking out the hair/extensions of their target, to bring them to the ground and kicking their teeth in until they get tired. No running over to interfere, no sending security or police to intervene, detain or arrest b/c deliberate/intentional forceful striking/contact on the court is ‘part of the game’.

    The irony is that White is slowly oozing and squishing herself out of a job. Even the violent black lesbian gangbangers who despise Clark and Cunningham cannot help but notice that White won’t defend her own player in an obvious foul situation. Why play for a coach like that?


       
       0 
       
       3
      CommoChief in reply to Recovering Lutheran. | August 10, 2026 at 4:02 pm

      Yep. Basketball isn’t supposed to be a contact sport much less a collision sport. If they wanna go so hard to show their toughness then they can sign up for women’s rugby. A bunch of largely butch women hacking and fouling each other b/c most lack the ability to offer much else in the way of entertainment value in terms of basketball skill is why attendance and fan interest didn’t arrive until Clark and a few other skilled players arrived.

        Basketball isn’t supposed to be a contact sport much less a collision sport.

        Basketball from it’s inception has been a contact sport.


           
           0 
           
           2
          CommoChief in reply to gitarcarver. | August 10, 2026 at 8:55 pm

          Not when the plain rules of basketball are adhered to. Totally unlike rugby or American Football both of which are designed as contact/collision sports.

          Not when the plain rules of basketball are adhered to.

          Changing the goal posts as it were for basketball?

          You said “basketball is not a contact sport….”

          It is a contact sport. By rule it is a contact sport. The rules deal with “advantageous contact,” which can be a foul. But absent an advantage, contact is allowed.


           
           0 
           
           1
          CommoChief in reply to gitarcarver. | August 11, 2026 at 9:55 am

          No goalposts changes. I continue to maintain that basketball is not a contact sport. Not by design, not by the rules. The significant difference between allowable contact within the rules of both rugby and American Football v basketball is plain to see for any fair minded observer.

          You contend basketball is a contact sport by design, from inception and I wholeheartedly disagree. Now we could look at different eras of how the rules of basketball were or were not strictly enforced. Elsewhere you made mention of Detroit Pistons ‘bully ball’. I don’t discount that history but the difference is we’re discussing the rules of the game and strict enforcement ..which in that era the strict enforcement of fouls and especially hard/deliberate fouls was very obviously NOT closely adhered to. The rules didn’t really change much from then to now so much as the willingness to enforce the existing rules become the norm.

          In sum in contrast to basketball both American football and rugby were designed to be and remain contact/collision sports.

          I continue to maintain that basketball is not a contact sport. Not by design, not by the rules.

          What’s the old saying?

          “You are entitled to your own opinion. You are not entitled to your own facts.”

          Naismith’s rules for the sport allowed for contact. What was outlawed was excessive contact. As I said, the game, rules and casebook continues that basic principle and does not allow contact that gains an advantage.

          Secondly, if you want to claim some misguided and factually incorrect position, you would have to believe that no dribbling would be allowed today as dribbling is banned in the original rules. You would have to agree to allow goaltending, as that was allowed in the original rules. Obviously the three point shot would be gone as well. (And of course, no open woven nets, but instead baskets with a closed bottom,)

          You are simply wrong on the facts and at the very least, being hypocritical in not allowing contact as given in the original rules and not banning other things that were explicitly banned in the original rules.

          Your choice, goalpost mover.


 
 0 
 
 11
Paddy M | August 10, 2026 at 10:06 am

In a normal league, Carrington would be in fear of the rematch on 8/23 because Cunningham’s teammates would be going headhunting.


 
 1 
 
 5
nordic prince | August 10, 2026 at 10:24 am

Isn’t it ethnic appropriation if the black player (or any black, for that matter) has bleached blond hair?

They hate white/Europeans so much, why are they trying to look like them? In the 70s they were pushing “black is beautiful,” but when they straighten their hair and bleach it, it seems like they’re denying their genetics.


 
 0 
 
 4
Treguard | August 10, 2026 at 10:26 am

Forget the Refs, this is a second case of battery.

Where’s the police?


 
 0 
 
 8
The Gentle Grizzly | August 10, 2026 at 10:34 am

All the WNBA is now is 21st century Roller Derby.

Old Angelenos will get this reference: let Dick Lane narrate the games and run them on KTLA, channel 5.


 
 1 
 
 3
alaskabob | August 10, 2026 at 11:10 am

The official name is The Womyns Negro and Lesbian Basketball Association. Cunningham has been called out for last year’s flagrant foul. Except…Cunningham was playing enforcer after multiple fouls against Clark that the WNLBA let happen. Cunningham is a fighter and now the REAL threat to the league. As Thomas Sowell writes, when special privileges are removed it looks like discrimination. “White Privilege” is really a level playing field. Clark, and now Cunningham, have given legit players air time that they wouldn’t have had…but that air time also shows the likes of Angel Reece and others. Bad but real optics.


 
 1 
 
 0
ztakddot | August 10, 2026 at 11:34 am

Angry Black Thuggish Lesbians and AWFULs – a match made in hell.

Dumb and Dumber.


 
 0 
 
 4
texansamurai | August 10, 2026 at 11:58 am

typical hoodrat behavior–sucker punch / attack from behind / blindsiding–definitive acts of an ignorant coward

a coach who will not support / defend their own player deserves neither the title nor the job


 
 0 
 
 1
henrybowman | August 10, 2026 at 12:04 pm

“Except for leaving out the word “affluent,” he’s not wrong.”
Describes the league tyrants perhaps, but definitely not the league itself.


 
 0 
 
 0
gonzotx | August 10, 2026 at 12:11 pm

Sophie must be eyeing an end to her BB career because she’s smart and knows this is blowing up

So, let’s write a tell all book and burn down the house!!!!

https://redstate.com/terichristoph/2026/08/10/sophie-cunninghams-next-career-move-n2205419


     
     0 
     
     2
    pablo panadero in reply to gonzotx. | August 10, 2026 at 2:03 pm

    Understand that the NBA underwrites this league financially, so leadership, coaching and players are under no financial obligation to make a good watchable product. Because of 30 years of this, the league has lost those that were grateful for the opportunity and instead dominated by those who feel victimized. Caitlin and Sophie have exposed this, and must be punished.

      Understand that the NBA underwrites this league financially, so leadership, coaching and players are under no financial obligation to make a good watchable product.

      The NBA gives only $15 million a year to the WNBA.

      That is less than 1% of the salary cap for an entire, individual NBA TEAM. When you factor in the fact that NBA owners also own 60% of the WNBA teams, it is no wonder why the NBA Board of Governors give the WNBA the $15 million.

      Clark exposed the fact that the league is fundamentally unsound on the court, and has played the “victim” just as much as anyone.


       
       1 
       
       0
      The Gentle Grizzly in reply to pablo panadero. | August 10, 2026 at 7:43 pm

      Understand that the NBA underwrites this league financially…

      Oh! You mean, Affirmative Action?

        Oh! You mean, Affirmative Action?

        Actually, it was more of a case of supporting women’s sports in general.

        The women’s soccer team, softball teams, etc. brought attention to women and to women’s sports. The NBA sought to get in the ground floor of women’s basketball to support and grow the sport.

        In Europe and the Soviet Union, women’s teams were initially started by and supported by the men’s team and leagues. For some reason that model worked well in the rest of the world and not here.

        “Affirmative action” has nothing to do with it.


 
 1 
 
 1
Jeroboam | August 10, 2026 at 1:58 pm

DiJonai ? Is that even a real name?


 
 1 
 
 2
schmuul | August 10, 2026 at 2:09 pm

The whole league is an embarrassment to women everywhere. It makes no money, has limited viewership and operates completely unprofessionally. The women conform to the lowest stereotypes of female behavior acting catty, jealous and aggressive towards one another. I honestly wish Caitlyn Clarke would just leave to play in Europe because then the whole league would fold and end this dumpster fire.


 
 0 
 
 1
starlightnite50yrsago | August 10, 2026 at 2:13 pm

The sad part is that Carrington’s use of the race card. It is the only talent she has. She needs to be removed from women’s basketball and put in the NFL.


 
 1 
 
 0
MarkSmith | August 10, 2026 at 2:53 pm

Her fgp sucks. She could never be a Rodman. It would be one thing if she was good.

    Carrington’s FG% is 48.4% according to ESPN.

    Caitlin Clark’s FG% is 44.2% according to the same source.

    If Carrington’s FG% “sucks,” then surely you believe that Clark’s FG% “sucks” even more.


 
 0 
 
 0
ChrisPeters | August 10, 2026 at 3:04 pm

Congratulations to the WNBA!!!

The league has FINALLY found an “angle” in its desire for viewership.


 
 0 
 
 1
Ironclaw | August 10, 2026 at 3:06 pm

I think they can’t bring on the Nashville Balls quickly enough. NBA trannies for the win


     
     0 
     
     1
    rangercatfish in reply to Ironclaw. | August 11, 2026 at 9:18 am

    Long time lurker because of the intelligent level of commentary, and the clever humor. Seldom comment. Respectfully disagree basketball is contact sport. It was always designed to be a sport of skill and grace. Hope to see more discussion of when or if a hostile work environment lawsuit would be appropriate or successful.


 
 0 
 
 4
henrybowman | August 10, 2026 at 3:21 pm

“I don’t think that DiJonai [Carrington] intentionally came out to get her across the neck like she did.”

B, she didn’t just contact Cunningham, she hooked her arm all the way around her neck.


     
     0 
     
     4
    CommoChief in reply to henrybowman. | August 10, 2026 at 4:12 pm

    Yep whatever else she clearly did mean to initiate a deliberate hard foul from behind and definitely decided to make contact high at head/neck area then when contact made she secured a grip/hold and used momentum/force to drive Cunningham to the floor. If she was surprised why did she hold onto Cunningham? She.wasn’t surprised she did it deliberately.


 
 0 
 
 0
alaskabob | August 10, 2026 at 4:37 pm

Hoping the two former NBA players make it….. this will boost ticket sales with the aura of the Colosseum back in Roman days… Saw a replay of a rebound and coast to coast run… leaving a little inside the 3 point line with a gentle slam dunk on the way down. Show Time 2.0

As to the foul, many will remember the days of the Pistons, Celtics, Spurs, etc., where this type of foul was common. The NBA, college, and NFHSAA has worked to eliminate this type of foul where there is a good possibility of injury, while still allowing a “hard foul” as legitimate basketball play.

The WNBA has multiple problems. First is the level of play. It is horrible. I am not sure there is a way to clean up the play while allowing the horrible play to continue.

The referees are in a horrible place where the public sees them as not being able to do anything right. There is a perception of bias no matter what is called. Good referees have quit the WNBA because of a lack of support from the league and a lack of understanding of officiating from the fans. The problem is that the pool from which to draw referees is dwindling. There is not a league (in any sport) at the entry level (high school and low college) that is not screaming for sports officials.

It used to be that referees would spend an “apprenticeship” of sorts before being called to do “big” (high level) games. Now, there are not enough officials to fill the open spots, so less qualified and less seasoned officials are being called up.

Finally, the WNBA is embroiled in a civil war of “wokeness.” It is killing the league. Players claim discrimination on the basis of race. (And it doesn’t matter the race ……it is everywhere.) The trans / LGBTQ+ discussion crosses the line from a “discussion” to accusations of “hatred” and “ignorance” unless you agree with other people. There is no discussion to be found – just lines drawn in the sand.

Sue Bird and Cheryl Miller (both basketball HOF’ers) said of this incident that it is indicative of the “outside interests” who are trying to destroy the WNBA, When the so called “experts” refuse to acknowledge that it was Carrington who introduced race and “privilege” into this play.

It was a hard foul. Period. People should just accept the play, and the punishment and move on, but players won’t. The league won’t.

The WNBA is killing itself.


     
     0 
     
     2
    rangercatfish in reply to gitarcarver. | August 11, 2026 at 9:21 am

    IMHO, it wasn’t a hard foul. It was a deliberate assault with intent to injure.

      IMHO, it wasn’t a hard foul.

      You are certainly entitled to that opinion.

      The rules and common nomenclature of the sport disagree with you. It was a hard foul with elements that made it a flagrant foul worthy of ejection.

      I go back to the days of the Pistons, the Celtics, the Spurs, and even the Lakers where such a foul was common and even expected. In fact, it was ruled a “common foul.”

      I totally agree with the eventual call as the offside referee was blocked by Cunningham’s arm and body.

      It’s a hard foul.

Heh. Carrington’s fake blond tresses are a tell, just like Joy Reid’s bleached blond nappy. LOL


 
 0 
 
 0
Chitragupta | August 11, 2026 at 2:38 pm

Says the woman who has dye her hair so she looks like she plays for the Swedish Bikini Team during the off season.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.