Image 01 Image 03

Was This July Really the “Hottest Month in History”?

Was This July Really the “Hottest Month in History”?

No, but the “claim sounds scary until you read the fine print.” So, go out and enjoy your summer!

The annual “hottest month in history” headline has arrived again, complete with demands that the public accept it as proof of an imminent climate apocalypse.

Cue the red ink and hyperbole.

July was “a wild weather month,” setting a record as the warmest month ever for the contiguous United States, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said Monday.

Temperatures last month averaged 76.9 degrees Fahrenheit as above-average warmth blanketed the U.S., and several locations in Idaho, Utah, Wyoming and Montana saw all-time high temperature records since NOAA started keeping track in 1895.

Last month was 0.1 to 0.2 degrees warmer than July 1936 and July 2012, according to the agency. July also broke the record for the average low temperature, at 64.2 degrees, surpassing July 2022 by 0.7 degrees.

heat wave that began in early July placed more than 185 million people under heat alerts, including residents of multiple major metropolitan areas, like BostonNew York CityPhiladelphia and Washington, D.C. The Independence Day parade in the nation’s capital was among several events that had to be canceled or postponed due to the extreme heat.

Meteorologist Chris Martz says this claim is misleading.

“That claim is misleading for two reasons:

1️⃣ This is due to minimum temperatures only, which skew the “average.”

2️⃣ The real, measured thermometer data (area-weighted) don’t support this claim.”

I would like to explore the rest of his explanation for a few moments.

The reported warming trend appears to be driven mainly by rising nighttime low temperatures. Because climate “averages” combine daytime highs and nighttime lows, warmer nights can make the overall average look higher even when daytime high temperatures do not show the same increase.

Martz argues that raw thermometer readings, which are adjusted to account for the area each station represents, do not show as much recent warming as the adjusted records suggest.

To elaborate, temperature stations measure temperatures at specific locations. If we are trying to estimate the average temperature over a wide area like the U.S. or the Globe, it is advisable to use gridding or some more complicated form of spatial interpolation to assure that our results are representative of the underlying temperature field. For example, about a third of the available global temperature stations are in U.S. If we calculated global temperatures without spatial weighting, we’d be treating the U.S. as 33% of the world’s land area rather than ~5%, and end up with a rather biased estimate of global temperatures.

NOAA adjusts older weather-station records to account for non-climate changes, such as stations moving, equipment changing, or observers recording temperatures at different times of day. Its Pairwise Homogenization Algorithm (PHA) compares a station with nearby stations to identify and correct apparent breaks in the record.

Critics argue that this process can make early temperature records look too cool and recent warming look larger than it really was. One concern is that if an urban station affected by the urban heat-island effect is used as a comparison station, some of that artificial urban warming could influence adjustments applied to nearby rural stations. A peer-reviewed study found that this type of “urban blending” can occur in homogenized data sets.

Most weather station–based global land temperature datasets currently use a process called “statistical homogenization” to reduce the amount of nonclimatic biases. However, using temperature data from two countries (Japan and the United States), we show that the homogenization process unintentionally introduces new nonclimatic biases into the data as a result of an “urban blending” problem. Urban blending arises when the homogenization process inadvertently mixes the urbanization (warming) bias of the neighboring stations into the adjustments applied to each station record. As a result, the urbanization biases of the unhomogenized temperature records are spread throughout all of the homogenized data. The net effect tends to artificially add warming to rural stations and subtract warming from urban stations until all stations have about the same amount of urbanization bias.

Martz notes that rural stations, weighted so that densely monitored areas do not dominate the results, show more pronounced warm periods in the early and middle 1900s and a less steep warming trend in recent decades. The claim is that careful time-of-observation corrections do not automatically double-count hot days; instead, their main possible effect during a warm spell may occur near its end, when a cold front rapidly lowers temperatures.

Furthermore, the actual precision of the temperature determination for this claim is questionable.

In fact, the data show that if only daytime temperatures were taken into account, this would be only the 6th-hottest July. And it turns out Alaska, omitted by considering only the “contiguous U.S.,” was in the “coolest third” over the past century.

As former climate activist Lucy Biggers notes, the “claim sounds scary until you read the fine print.” So go out and enjoy your summer.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments

They’ve been screwing around ‘adjusting’ the temperature record for decades.

At this point there’s no way to actually know for sure.

As usual the Communist media got the headlines they wanted. And no one ever lost their job for promoting Communist propaganda.

Not where I live. Also according to my electric bills for air conditioning this summer has not been as hot as other ones.

Besides the claim is stupid since weather varies all over the US. What could be the hottest in one location could even be considered mild in another,

    MajorWood in reply to ztakddot. | August 17, 2026 at 10:47 am

    Oregon has been lovely this summer, except for a week of wildfire smoke. Mid August and most of us are wearing a jacket to the mochahut at 7AM.

Anthony Watts at Watts Up With That has shown that many of those reporting stations are located in areas that promote anomalous readings – the middle of a parking lot, for example.

https://wattsupwiththat.com/
https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/surfacestations-org-2/

    JackinSilverSpring in reply to Rusty Bill. | August 17, 2026 at 1:36 pm

    Many readings are airports which have large amounts of concrete absorbing heat and hot jet engines.

      Yep. Back when SurfaceStations.org was active, Tony would routinely post pictures of egregious locations – a station literally six inches from the shell of an industrial air conditioner, stations on airports and parking lots, one in the permanent sun-shadow of a six-story building…

It’s called “Narrative Science”. Adjust the experimental model, data collection and/or data analysis to support the narrative conclusion.

LI Swimsuit Edition?

Leslie, is that you in the pool? No wonder the temperature’s up!

Heh, heh.
.

You know what was really hot this July?

The BOSTON REDSOX!!

I love the photo and I agree with the article, but gee what’s with this trend of duplicate quotes immediately following each other?

Meteorologist Chris Martz says this claim is misleading.
Hottest month ever?

That claim is misleading for two reasons:

1️⃣ This is due to minimum temperatures only, which skew the “average.”

2️⃣ The real, measured thermometer data (area-weighted) don’t support this claim.

NOAA’s “pairwise homogenization algorithm” (PHA)… https://t.co/xxULNXReP4 pic.twitter.com/PdOSwQKWUl

— Chris Martz (@ChrisMartzWX) August 12, 2026
“That claim is misleading for two reasons:

1️⃣ This is due to minimum temperatures only, which skew the “average.”

2️⃣ The real, measured thermometer data (area-weighted) don’t support this claim.”

    henrybowman in reply to Hodge. | August 17, 2026 at 4:09 pm

    You will see this if you have your cookies set to deny cross-site cookies. Instead of Tweets appearing verbatim, they collapse and duplicate themselves.

MoeHowardwasright | August 17, 2026 at 8:40 am

In other news, the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. Summer is hot. Winter is cold. The North Pole was a temperate zone 80 million years ago. That’s why there is oil there. Closet still, 50,000 years ago North America was covered under a mile high glacial ice sheet along the northern littorals from the Pacific to the Atlantic coasts. Temperature fluctuations follow fluctuations in the earths orbit related to wobbles as we spin through space. The alarmism is just out of control.

It’s hot in the summer.
It’s cold in the winter.

The End.

We can settle this issue finally by asking the expert: Al Gore.

Simply put, the historic, static locations of U.S. temp measuring points were mostly in non-urban areas. Now, many of those locations are in urban and/or industrialized areas and subject to “heat island” effects, and it’s not a small percentage. “Homogenize” the modern data across the board and guess what you get, relative to the earlier data?

I wouldn’t know. I have air conditioning.

The fun part is, I could have told you a decade ago that it would be hot around this year. There is a roughly 30 year cycle in temps, especially in the northern hemisphere, it’s driven by oceanic thermal cycles, largely the Pacific Decadal Oscillation.

The last peak was around the mid 1990s, with previous ones in the 1960s and the mid 1930s. We still haven’t surpassed that peak in the ’30s, if you look at the all-time high records for US states, most were set in 1934 or 1936, with a few in 1994, then a scattering of random, other dates.

My first summer of retirement. I’ve enjoyed every second of it, including the weather.

MartelCharlie3 | August 23, 2026 at 9:56 am

Climate scammers get your hockey stick graphs out. Normalization is Climate Speak for adjusting the data to fit your ideology.