Image 01 Image 03

Trump Moves to Rebuild America’s Naval Shipbuilding Base

Trump Moves to Rebuild America’s Naval Shipbuilding Base

Strategy draws on a “Finland model,” allowing carefully conditioned initial construction at allied foreign yards while requiring technology transfer, U.S. investment, workforce training, and eventual domestic production.

President Donald Trump has launched a new push to rebuild America’s hollowed-out naval shipbuilding base, with an eye toward countering China’s vast maritime capacity.

The presidential strategy draws on a “Finland model,” allowing carefully conditioned initial construction at allied foreign yards while requiring technology transfer, U.S. investment, workforce training, and eventual domestic production.

The new National Security Presidential Memorandum urges the expansion of the so-called “Finland model” currently employed to build the Coast Guard’s Arctic Security Cutters where initial vessels are built in Finland by foreign yards and subsequent vessels are constructed domestically. The memo says that as long as foreign shipbuilders agree to some stringent conditions on-shoring future work to the US, they would be allowed to build up to two ships in three different ship classes at their parent docks, which would then be transferred to the US.

These ship classes include surface combatants with “sufficient inherent capabilities to perform anti‑submarine warfare, surface warfare, and convoy escort duties,” as well as those that meet “the requirements for Consolidated Cargo Replenishment at Sea (CONSOL) Tankers and — separately — Roll-On, Roll-Off Vessels,” according to the memo.

If executed successfully, the plan could turn short-term reliance on trusted partners into a long-term revival of American shipyards, repair capacity, and sea power.

Additionally, the order also instructs Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, working with Acting Navy Secretary Hung Cao, to deliver a plan within 120 days to improve the readiness of nuclear-powered submarines and aircraft carriers. The proposal is expected to draw on private-sector capacity and establish a fifth government-operated Navy Yard.

This new yard is to possess the “sufficient drydock capacity” needed to assist with the upkeep and maintenance of the nation’s growing submarine fleet. The plan is to assess potential locations near the U.S. Pacific Fleet, including those in the continental United States, Alaska, Hawaii, and existing U.S. territories.

The memo’s final major prong directs Hegseth, in consultation with Cao, to submit a plan within 60 days that requires “measures to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System and Advanced Weapons Elevators with steam and hydraulic systems for the construction” of the future USS Doris Miller (CVN-81), an upcoming Ford-class aircraft carrier. As noted by gCaptain, “The move would represent a major departure from the technologies introduced aboard the Ford class and potentially require significant redesign work on a carrier already under construction.”

The edict builds upon the president’s April 2025 executive order and subsequent “Maritime Action Plan” aimed at reversing America’s shipbuilding decline.

In addition to the shipbuilding measures, the presidential memorandum also directs a significant change to the design of future Ford-class aircraft carriers by returning steam catapults to those vessels.

Within 60 days, the Secretary of War, in consultation with the Secretary of the Navy, must submit a plan detailing how to replace the Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System (EMALS) and advanced weapons elevators (AWE) with steam and hydraulic systems on CVN-81, the fourth Ford-class carrier.

The directive would mark a reversal from the technology adopted for the Ford class. EMALS uses stored kinetic energy and electrical power conversion to launch aircraft, replacing the steam catapults used aboard the Navy’s Nimitz-class carriers.

According to the navy, the system was designed to provide greater control and efficiency, reduced manpower and maintenance requirements, and the ability to launch a wider range of aircraft, including unmanned platforms.

Clearly, our nation cannot deter a rising naval China and its maritime antics with policy papers, delayed hulls, and shipyards operating far below the capacity needed to meet our military needs.

The Finland model offers a pragmatic approach that leverages trusted allies immediately while insisting that the jobs, expertise, and actual shipbuilding eventually return to American soil.

If the administration follows through, this could become the beginning of a long-overdue revival of America’s maritime capacity…and that is a good thing.

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 1
ztakddot | August 18, 2026 at 4:35 pm

Great idea to use foreign shipyards, Several suitable countries come to mind. Have them build most everything but sensitive electronics and weapons. Bring them back and do final finishing in US.

As for the new AC launch system Trump has a bee up his bonnet for some reason. Yes it has had bugs but its new tech. Its physical plant is smaller than steam and it has a faster launch tempo. Not sure they should abandon it.

Not that it matter but china is using it too.

    EMALS has a faster launch tempo *when it works* (which has been rather iffy). I’m suspecting this is a behind the scenes arm-twisting of the EMALS contractor and subcontractors who are using breakdowns to leverage emergency contracts for fixing the various issues rather than give up their expensive cash-rich payments to allow Navy personnel the authority/training to work on the widgets. (The electric elevators used to transfer munitions have similar hair-pulling issues) After all, a system that breaks down a lot and puts a lump of cash in the contractor’s pockets when it does, makes them a lot more money than a bulletproof reliable system.


       
       0 
       
       3
      Ruby Red in reply to georgfelis. | August 18, 2026 at 8:26 pm

      The Gerald Ford has been out there for seven years and the EMALS system still doesn’t work. Our newest carrier and it’s not certified for the F-35. Sometimes old and proven is both cheaper and dependable.

Love this. After way too much hemming and hawing over military expenditures with substandard results, this is good news. The best way to avoid war is to be prepared. The USA has been dragging its feet to keep up our military. Perhaps cleaning of the multi-billions in social welfare payments can decrease our debt AND upgrade our military.

Biggest holdup, politicians on grift; dumb enough so they don’t see the big picture.

LI doesn’t appear to have any way to change ones password.


     
     0 
     
     1
    gibbie in reply to gibbie. | August 18, 2026 at 7:25 pm

    Silly me. It’s simple. Just ask Perplexity.ai.

    If you are already logged in, visit the WordPress profile page—typically legalinsurrection.com/wp-admin/profile.php—and look for Account Management → Set New Password, then save the profile.


 
 0 
 
 1
CommoChief | August 19, 2026 at 8:38 am

Rebuilding our shipyards and the # of trained workers to do the work of increasing our US flagged merchant fleet and building out our Navy is very much needed and long overdue.


 
 0 
 
 0
Whitewall | August 19, 2026 at 1:01 pm

Democracies tend to under-build and under prepare for war during peace time-meaning war on a lesser scale. Then we get caught flat footed and everyone in DC wants to know why and how could this happen?

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.