Fauci Discussed Possible Miscarriage Risks Linked to COVID Vaccine in Texts
Fauci never mentioned his concerns to the public.
Dr. Anthony Fauci expressed concerns about miscarriage risks linked to the COVID vaccine in text messages, but assured pregnant women their babies would be fine.
Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and Rand Paul (R-KY) released four pages of text messages related to the vaccine and pregnancy.
Fauci shared his thoughts with then-Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky and Dr. Vivek Murthy, who became President Joe Biden’s surgeon general.
On January 25, 2021, Dr. Murthy asked for guidance regarding pregnant women and potential risks.
At first, Fauci told Murthy, “There are no data or theoretical reason to believe that vaccinating early versus later in pregnancy would be preferred.”
A few hours later, Fauci wrote:
I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.
Dr. Walensky agreed: “Definitely a good point, esp after dose two.”
Murthy acknowledged the risk, too.
Our amazing Leslie Eastman has detailed cytokine storms before in her posts about COVID.
I learned that a cytokine storm occurs when the immune system releases too many cytokines into the bloodstream too quickly.
During a flu infection, a cytokine storm usually occurs in the lungs.
According to the BRI Reproductive Immunology & Endometriosis Surgical Center, abnormal levels of cytokines cause the majority of miscarriages.
So, yes, I can understand why Fauci would be concerned.
However, a day later, Murthy alerted Walensky and Fauci that the WHO was advising pregnant women not to receive the Moderna vaccine due to insufficient data.
Pregnant women could not participate in the vaccine trials, but over 10,000 received it after the Emergency Use Authorization was granted.
Fauci told Murthy that “[N]o issues have arisen.”
“The FDA and the ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] and the ACOG [American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] are all permissive for pregnant women tov [sp] have a choice,” answered Fauci. “Animal tox studies did not raise any red flags.”
Did…did I miss something?
January 25: “Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”
January 26:”[N]o issues have arisen.”
A week later, Fauci said to the public, “[FDA] have found thus far and we have to be careful but thus far no red flags about that, about pregnant women.”
Here’s the thing. Say at that time no data showed a pregnant woman did not experience any risks after taking the vaccine.
Why didn’t Fauci detail the possible risks even if the data didn’t show it?
Personal stories have emerged.
My daughter took the 1st 2 shots to keep her job. She had 2 miscarriages in the 1st trimester. 1 in 2023, and another in 2024. Fortunately she had my granddaughter in 2025.
— Trish (@DeplorableTris2) August 10, 2026
Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.
Comments
Disgusting. How low will Fauci go? No conscience, no morals, no truth.
A health care administrator I know can testify to such issues that her organization had, particularly when requiring “vaccination” for continued employment. Fortunately, I wound up with a specialty exemption from the same overarching organization that control hers also. Lucky me… really…. lucky.
I got an exemption too
Lucky me
I would have quit
I wasn’t required to do it, but I did the two-shot Pfizer series. I sincerely regret ever having done so.
My late brother bought into this fraud hook, line, and sinker with boosters all the time. I am convinced this caused his death via a complete breakdown of his ability to produce new blood cells.
So sorry
There are “remedies” out there to mitigate the effects of the vax. Also, i have seen rather promising use of IVM and the “bendizoles” for all types of cancers. Taking IVM and such have very high safety indexes. I was a Maxwell Smart “that close” to taking the vax until that physician in Florida bled out like a sieve… and that put my doc and myself into a holding pattern. She wound up catching covid from a med student … so has immunity. I think I already had been clobbered in early 2020… safely passing through rather than passing away in Seattle during the tsunami. Sorry for your loss… i know that you know that you aren’t alone with that close a loss.
It would be great if a few of the states would hang this creep by the balls. After they get through with Fauci, they can go after his wife and then Birx.
I’m sure there are a few more that need to be dealt with, but the first three would be a good start.
“[N]o issues have arisen” because there was no data: pregnant women were not in the trials. If there is no data, there are no issues! Hear no evil, see no evil.
In fairness though, pregnant women these days are told not to eat or drink anything either because it might have bacteria, or alcohol, or mercury, or whatever. One wonders how we all survived our parents smoking and drinking through pregnancy.
HUGE difference
HUGE🤬
take two folic acid supplements and call me in the morning.
That only underscores their hypocrisy.
“Don’t take OTC meds, don’t eat raw fish, don’t drink, don’t smoke” etc because of the risk to the developing fetus….
vs
Experimental vaxx for a highly publicized cold? A-OK.
So much for “an abundance of caution”….
I wonder how many of the affected women didn’t get pregnant until well AFTER the jabs, but got stricken anyway?
Yeah, true – compare that to most pharmaceutical ads:
“Don’t take XXX if you’re pregnant or planning to become pregnant….”
Government officials hypocritical and inept? You dont say!
Seriously: The sciency part of my brain is frustrated, but the libertarian side is equally frustrated. Sure, there is a “theoretical” risk. California Prop 64 comes to mind- everything causes cancer! Do we warn pregant women about the theoretical risk of getting stoned by a meteor, too?
I think adult women these days know to take new medicine or get jabbed at their own risk. “Children of Thalidomide” has not vanished from cultural memory.
I think our parents were a tougher lot, and gave birth to kids with plenty of immunities already in place.
My late mother not only smoked during her child-bearing years, but smoked Camels. A pack every three or four days, but still smoked.
Didn’t the camels object to being lit on fire?
.
Say it ain’t so Joe.
dwb:
You stated, “[N]o issues have arisen” because there was no data: pregnant women were not in the trials.”
This turns out NOT to be the case. The Pfizer data from their initial human trial included pregnant women (I forget where I found the documentation of the actual Pfizer-written data). What no one mentioned is that something like 95% of them miscarried.
On top of that the initial trials included a large number of people with previously-existing auto-immune problems. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM experienced massive flare-ups of their particular problem, whether rheumatoid arthritis or uveitis.
All of this was thoroughly documented and known, and yet they continued to insist that everything was safe. But the Chinese-purchased US Democrat/Socialist/Communist party will never allow anyone to be prosecuted for this fraud that killed millions.
Just as a bye-the-bye, we must stop referring to mRNA jabs as “vaccines”. They aren’t vaccines, they’re a gene mutation injection designed to make human cells produce spike proteins like little invasive factories loaded into your body.
How far down does the rot go? A Grok query said no increased risk. Was this conclusion based on manipulated data or is the opposite conclusion due to, what is common today, “narrative” research.
Grok:
“No. Multiple large studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have found no increased risk of first-trimester (or early) miscarriage associated with COVID-19 vaccination.”
https://x.com/i/grok?conversation=2086919563141394539
Mr self declared ‘the science’ along with his acolytes, apologists and enablers have routinely sidestepped, ignored, pretend not to know all sorts of information that ran counter to their preferred narrative. Many still do it as of the rest of us didn’t witness it and can’t access the videos and transcripts of them doing so both then and now. No amnesty.
The first vax was released with the comment that it had been accorded less than normal (normal is years) testing. The pandemic was the tradeoff. It was more important to kill that off than to worry about oddball problems that hadn’t come up in testing to that point.
Every vaccine kills people. The law that protects vaccine manufacturers from lawsuits for damages is there to get vaccine manufacturers to produce the vaccine, which otherwise would wipe them out with punitive damages from lawsuits. More lives saved than lost, is the public policy decision. Lives lost dominate the finances after punitive damages even when rare.
Frankly, we would be better off if the vaxx makers were put out of business due to lawsuits arising from their “unavoidably unsafe” products.
I won’t shed a single tear.
Bruh,
The ‘jab’ doesn’t qualify under the definition of traditional vaccines so your attempt to compare apples to oranges is very disingenuous. Production/use of ‘jab’ was authorized under emergency use procedures not standard protocols which is another important distinction from traditional vaccines. They purposefully nuked the ‘jab’ control group as soon the production and distribution was approved. So not even short term results could be observed, recorded and taken into planning consideration for the ongoing ’emergency’.
The same anti science goon.squad disregarded all prior guidance about efficacy of masks and made up out of whole cloth their social distancing requirements. They disregarded the overwhelming evidence that young healthy people were at practically ZERO risk and not much more in the working age population 18-64 …but instead of calming folks down they locked down the schools, closed small Mom /Pop businesses, locked parishioners out of Churches, canceled in person gatherings for funerals, weddings, worship …even disallowed visiting a dying family member ….but gave a pass to BLM mobs.
These folks completely ignored the role of natural immunity in this process and let’s be clear by end of ’20 practically everyone had been exposed to Covid 1.0 and the herd immunity was already building due to natural immunity before the first ‘jab’ inoculation occurred. They routinely and consistently refused to address the fact the only folks at risk of death or serious issues was either very elderly or already in bad health with serious health issues.
This wasn’t a case of ‘hard decision’ to save lives. It was about power, control and narcissism aka Fauci Fascism. Many believe it was used to influence the 2020 elections and/or a ginned up social experiment. Others seem to be true believing useful idiots or self serving apologists seeking to avoid a richly deserved and overdue reckoning.
“Every vaccine kills people”….. rather a gross overstatement when it comes to Covid mRNA “vaccines” versus the older real ones. Can’t remember older vaccines playing roulette with genetics. This was one huge experiment with safety limiters off line. There was no such comment in the box… it was branded as completely safe and every (now known _ reported complication was beaten down…. every one of them. Myocarditis, pericarditis pushed aside. Bells’ Palsy… pushed aside. By the way,… myocarditis is a one way street one can’t back out of. Pericarditis…. a good friend needed pericardectomy to survive. Name any of the old vaccines having these complications… please.
Worse, they claim they were safe for pregnant and nursing women. They knew better, they lied
Why lie when you don’t even have to?
Take Tylenol. They have specifically avoided making ANY statement about whether or not it is safe during pregnancy. It doesn’t matter — pregnant women pop it anyway, and pregnant women with TDS will pop it purely out of spite.
I remember quite a few women who lost their jobs because they refused to risk their unborn child on an untested vaccine.
They murdered peoples baby’s in the womb
Pardons don’t protect from civil liability.
Every single woman who suffered a miscarriage should sue Fauci personally in a class action lawsuit.
They should find him and beat him
Nürnberg 2.0.
“Trust the science!,” the media crooned in unison. “Trust this a$$hole” is what it really was.
Well GP1 cases sudden blindness and you barle hear about it, there is no treatment and no forewarnings
And it’s not a few, 4 in 10,000 people have had this happen
Think of the hundred of thousands that take this crap
They hid a lot of known or suspected risks.
I have Factor V Leiden (heterozygous) so the only shot I would have considered, the J&J was ruled out.
When I looked for info on the mRNA for folks like me, the only info I could find anywhere (and as a former med librarian, I do know how to search the lit) was that Factor V folks who had never had a blood clot would be fine. Nothing about those of us who have thrown clots. Not to mention that a lot of folks with Factor V might have thrown tiny clots and not known. So I didn’t get the shots, took C, D, and zinc daily, and my one known case of covid was less severe than many regular colds.
I’m late 60s with “comorbidities, and I’m married to a lady that worked at the hospital on the same street as the CDC, so we both had the first two Pfizer shots and one booster. I’ve only recently gotten over whatever those heart attack symptoms were. I also caught it twice and gifted it to my wife the second time. I was prescribed Paxlovid both times, but my wife’s pre-conditions prevented her from taking Paxlovid, so she roughed it out for over a week. We’re both over 65, so we were “first in line” at CVS when the “if you get the vaccine-you won’t catch covid-vaccine” became available. My mother-in-law caught it twice and survived, and she is a WWII veteran (will be 104 in October).
Here’s something. Apparently, our 46th U.S. president may have cured the flu. For the week ending 12/25/21, the U.S. had 6 recorded deaths from influenza. This number (6) is compared to the Wuhan China plague which reportedly killed 1,058 Americans during the same week. Don’t believe me without verifying these easily found statistics (The CDC.gov website is my source.).
So, according to the CDC, the U.S. averaged 33,400 influenza deaths annually from 2010-2019. Deaths attributed to influenza in 2020 and 2021 averaged 4,792 deaths annually. The Biden Whitehouse should have declared victory over common influenza. The goons at CNN would have greeted this wonderful news with parties, more “peaceful” political protests, and nationwide “no-money-down” smash-and-grab-shopping sprees.
https://x.com/i/status/2081901217467232464
I think the only statistic that is truly valid is total deaths from all causes, available on the CDC website.
If you plot this data from 2015-present, you can see that total deaths have a regular seasonal pattern from 2015-2019 (minimum in August, maximum in Dec-Feb), then things went totally haywire from 2020-2021, with each major C-19 surge clearly visible, and went back to the regular seasonal pattern by the 2022-2023 winter. However, if you draw a straight line through the pre-pandemic minima, it doesn’t intersect the total deaths minima until this year – 2026. That means we are finally back to baseline.
Speaking of miscarriages, isn’t that what Dr. Death is?
Leave a Comment