Image 01 Image 03

Former Olympic Athlete Indicted for Allegedly Vandalizing Reflecting Pool

Former Olympic Athlete Indicted for Allegedly Vandalizing Reflecting Pool

David Hearn faces a charge of felony destruction of property and could receive 10 years in prison.

U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Jeanine Ferris Pirro announced a grand jury has indicted a former Olympic athlete on charges related to vandalizing the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool.

Authorities arrested former Olympic canoeist David Hearn, 67, on June 19.

The grand jury “returned an indictment against Hearn for one count of felony destruction of property in violation of DC Code § 22–303.”

Pirro said at a press conference:

So today, a grand jury has returned a felony indictment against a defendant, David Hearn, for felony destruction of property, for which he faces ten years in prison.

The indictment is in response to an incident that occurred on June 19 of 2026, in which the defendant, Hearn, ripped a piece of recently installed sealant on the bottom of the Reflecting Pool at the Lincoln Memorial. The evidence shows, and we will prove beyond a reasonable doubt, that Hurn willfully destroyed property at the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. This was a deliberate act to damage the reflecting pool at the National Mall that members of the National Park Service actually have worked hard to restore and have witnessed.

By Hearn’s own admission, on June 19th, he reached down into the pool. Our evidence further shows that the National Park Service employees observed Hearn actually forcefully and violently pulling up and removing the bottom liner with both hands.

According to witnesses, Hearn damaged approximately two square feet of sealant from the bottom of the pool. A Parks employee actually told Hearn to stop, to stop his behavior and stop what he was doing. Hearn reacted by shouting at that Parks employee, saying that she cared too much about the Reflecting Pool, and why did she even care, since it wasn’t her pool?

Now, Mr. Hearn’s behavior was characterized by witnesses as belligerent, rude and disrespectful, according to National Park Service employees that witnessed the event.

Pirro confirmed her office has six other cases from six arrests in connection with the vandalism.

Unlike Hearn, Pirro said those cases could result in misdemeanors or just a violation.

I cannot find the indictment, and Pirro told the press she would “get into the evidence” when asked how Hearn allegedly damaged the pool:

Pirro: “You know, I’m not going to get into the evidence, but what I told you is what our witnesses saw and experienced. There was an effort, a violent effort, to rip up the sealant from the bottom of the pool. And irrespective of whether or not, you know, we think that, you know, there — there is some situation that preceded it, we can state and prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he caused damage, and that damage is over $1,000.”

Reporter: “Keying in on that, how do you prove that $1,000 —”

Pirro: “With an expert!”

Reporter: [Inaudible].

Pirro: “Come to the trial!”

Reporter: “It has to be drained? Like, that — because it has to be

Pirro: “You can — we — we’ll hear all that at the trial.”

Despite her assertion, Pirro admitted that her office believes Hearn damaged the pool with “his bare hands – both hands.”

Pirro grew a bit testy when the reporter confronted her about the videos of the incident:

Reporter: “Did he have any tools or was it just his bare hands?”

Pirro: “Right now, we believe it’s his bare hands — both hands.”

Reporter: “Does that indicate, in your belief, that it was probably damaged before? or do you believe that he —”

Pirro: “Oh, he damaged it.”

Reporter: “further? But do you believe it had already been damaged before he —”

Pirro: “He damaged the pool!”

Reporter: “— before he touched the pool?”

Pirro: “He damaged this pool.”

Reporter: “But there have been, you know, all these videos —”

Pirro: “Well, good. I’m glad you’ve got that evidence. Come on in the grand jury. You can testify.”

DONATE

Donations tax deductible
to the full extent allowed by law.

Comments


 
 0 
 
 16
Treguard | July 2, 2026 at 8:05 pm

There is no cure for TDS.

(Nor that silly back to the top button).


     
     0 
     
     4
    OwenKellogg-Engineer in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 7:30 am

    It does get in the way doesn’t it?


       
       0 
       
       0
      henrybowman in reply to OwenKellogg-Engineer. | July 3, 2026 at 1:40 pm

      In current releases of iOS, tapping the upper left hand corner of the screen performs this function (and better/faster). Is the same true of Android? If so, we should request its removal. It continuously intercepts clicks meant for the Submit button.


     
     0 
     
     4
    guyjones in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 9:04 am

    And, watch what happens, when #47 departs the presidency — the next GOP president, be it Vance, Rubio, or someone else, will predictably be subjected to the same dehumanizing vilification, venom, spite, insults and hatred; as sure as the day is long.

    Thus demonstrating that the rabid vitriol and hatreds displayed and expressed by the vile, stupid and evil nazi/communist/Islamofascist/Muslim supremacist Dhimmi-crat subversives, pukes and fifth columnists have nothing to do with President Trump, specifically, but are part and parcel of their wretched party’s intrinsic and immutable hatred for Jews, Christians, conservatives and anyone else who possesses the temerity to reject their Satanic and destructive orthodoxies and policies.


 
 0 
 
 3
tiger66 | July 2, 2026 at 8:18 pm

I dindt do nuffin, man!


 
 0 
 
 2
REDACTED | July 2, 2026 at 8:34 pm

they had a lot more evidence against Michael Sussman and he walked

in DC


 
 0 
 
 17
ztakddot | July 2, 2026 at 9:00 pm

These people are insane. Why would you damage the pool? It’s not Trump’s pool. It’s the US’s pool. Unbelievable.


 
 0 
 
 7
Frank G | July 2, 2026 at 9:08 pm

Name the reporter! They should be proud, right? Not object to being named


 
 0 
 
 3
DaveGinOly | July 2, 2026 at 9:12 pm

Hearns likely grabbed a flap and then tore it from its connection to the rest of the liner. Claiming that he didn’t damage or tear the piece himself is like throwing a rock through an already broken window and claiming you didn’t break the window.


     
     8 
     
     1
    Milhouse in reply to DaveGinOly. | July 2, 2026 at 10:21 pm

    What he claimed at the time was that the piece was already fully detached and he merely fished it out. If Pirro is to be believed, she can prove that’s not true. We’ll see that evidence at trial.


       
       0 
       
       3
      MarkS in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 7:44 am

      according to the law, that is irrelevant! Removing a lose piece of granite from a monument, or even picking up a dropped cheery blossom will get you arrested


         
         3 
         
         0
        Milhouse in reply to MarkS. | July 3, 2026 at 8:31 am

        For what? If you did no damage, then what is the charge?


           
           0 
           
           0
          DB523 in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 10:12 am

          Hi Milhouse, help me please,

          isn’t there a thing about removing ANYTHING from National Park land… like taking rocks, plants, baby animals etc. out of the Park?

          This is a National Park?


           
           4 
           
           0
          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 11:08 am

          Yes, the mall is technically a national park, and you can’t dig things up or damage them, but the law clearly doesn’t apply to picking something up off the floor that you happen to see there, like a fallen flower petal, or something that someone dropped, or anything like that. If you’re not harming the place, you can’t be committing a crime and it would be asinine to charge you for it. If all he did was remove some debris that is not there naturally, and is of no use to anyone, then he didn’t do anything wrong.


           
           0 
           
           2
          Hodge in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 1:25 pm

          “It crawled into my hand honest! There I was, innocently reaching in the pool for no particular reason and suddenly:

          “A Parks employee actually told Hearn to stop, to stop his behavior and stop what he was doing. Hearn reacted by shouting at that Parks employee, saying that she cared too much about the Reflecting Pool, and why did she even care, since it wasn’t her pool?

          As, of course, one does…


           
           0 
           
           2
          henrybowman in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 1:45 pm

          Ask people who pick raptor feathers off the ground.


           
           0 
           
           2
          DaveGinOly in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 4:49 pm

          Milhouse, as someone who has been in at least five national parks in the last three years, along with numerous national wildlife refuges, national forests, and so on, I can tell you for certain that in national parks you absolutely cannot remove or alter anything. You can’t take a small rock, a mushroom, a feather, nothing. It is illegal. You also cannot mark, destroy, or alter the environment nor any buildings/facilities in these places. You seem to forget, we live in ham sandwich nation – there’s a law making most activities in federal areas illegal in one way or another. You need to pay for permits to do many things (like camp overnight, light campfires or use fire pits, or even to enter some areas), without which you can be fined or imprisoned (if you take or break something). There are warnings at the entrances and visitor centers, as well as on most brochures and at trailheads.


           
           2 
           
           1
          Milhouse in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 5:40 pm

          Ask people who pick raptor feathers off the ground.

          On the mall?! I doubt that the usual rules apply in the same way to the mall, or to Independence Mall in Philadelphia, Federal Hall in Manhattan, etc., places that are far away from nature.


           
           0 
           
           1
          stella dallas in reply to Milhouse. | July 5, 2026 at 10:44 pm

          It’s federal land. Try picking a Lady Slipper or even picking up a rock as a souvenir. at a national park.


       
       0 
       
       4
      Concise in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 12:27 pm

      He’s lying. Based on witness statements, he didn’t give a rat’s ____ about the pool. Why extract this piece? He did something, the material wasn’t floating on the surface. What kind of moron would reach into an area off limits to the public? So what we have is an idiot liar, aka a democrat voter.


         
         4 
         
         0
        Milhouse in reply to Concise. | July 3, 2026 at 5:41 pm

        Well, I assume Pirro has convincing evidence that he’s lying, or she wouldn’t have had the grand jury indict him. But we shall see when he comes to trial.


 
 0 
 
 7
schmuul | July 2, 2026 at 10:12 pm

So he could get a longer sentence than the man who killed the elderly Jewish man in California?


 
 0 
 
 7
Ghostrider | July 2, 2026 at 11:28 pm

David Hearn’s lawyers are Norm Eisen and Mary Dohrmann. They released a statement following his indictment, asserting his innocence and criticizing the charges as politically motivated. This trial is interesting in many ways. First, how did Hearn know to hire Eisen so quickly? Eisen is the leading anti-Trump lawfare lawyer for the DNC, known for being a crooked and unethical lawyer and a distasteful person. The guy is evil. I hope he loses.


 
 9 
 
 0
Milhouse | July 3, 2026 at 1:04 am

Completely off topic, I have a question for people here.

I just watched a lefty video poking fun at the MAGA world for allegedly freaking out about Mamdani supposedly ordering NY schools to teach kids Arabic numerals. He showed clips from two alleged MAGA content creators — neither of whom I’d heard of — making a fuss about this, and claimed that this represented “MAGA” at large.

Now when lefty personalities make idiots of themselves like this we have great fun with it and tell each other about it to show how dumb they are, and project this onto the left in general. So if this is a genuine example of the same thing happening on our side, then it’s fair enough them poking fun back for it.

But is it? This is the first I’ve heard of it. So is this becoming a significant thing on the right-wing media, or is it just two idiots and the lefty is just milking it because it’s all he has?


     
     0 
     
     4
    Treguard in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 2:29 am

    You’ve been Onioned, sir.


       
       4 
       
       0
      Milhouse in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 2:46 am

      I’m not sure I understand you. The only association I have for “Onion” is a publication that used to be funny until it went woke. Kind of like SNL but in writing.


         
         0 
         
         3
        Coolpapa in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 7:39 am

        Having that “association”, it shouldn’t be that difficult to “understand”.


         
         0 
         
         3
        Treguard in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 8:30 am

        You’ve read a piece of satire and reacted as if it were actual news. By proxy, at any rate.

        This particular satire has been floating around at least a year, I think.

        It happened more often when the Onion was funny, in early Internet days.


           
           2 
           
           0
          Milhouse in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 8:47 am

          Yeah, what I’m asking is whether it’s true that this particular stupidity has achieved any kind of traction on the right-wing media, at the level that we routinely poke fun at when it happens on the left; or whether these two idiots who fell for it were just completely obscure idiots that no one on the right has ever heard of, and this lefty was just milking it because he had nothing else.


           
           0 
           
           1
          healthguyfsu in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 12:36 pm

          I haven’t heard of it but you are also being pretty vague. Maybe you are trying to avoid drawing traffic?


           
           1 
           
           0
          Milhouse in reply to Treguard. | July 3, 2026 at 5:55 pm

          No, it’s just something that came up on youtube, and the title piqued my curiosity.

          OK, I went through my watched history on youtube and found it. The narrator seems like a typical smug lefty. I’ve never heard of either of the two allegedly right-wing people whose videos he exploits. All I want to know is whether he’s actually got a point this time, and is justly making fun, or is he just pretending these two clowns represent some significant section of the MAGA movement because he has no other material,


     
     0 
     
     0
    E Howard Hunt in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 6:42 am

    This is just one of innumerable such instances.


     
     0 
     
     0
    patchman2076 in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 9:36 am

    I think it depends on the content creators, who they are?


     
     0 
     
     1
    alaskabob in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 1:03 pm

    Well… we do know the Roman numerals are giving Representatives of Congress fits. Just proves that the US is a land of opportunity …. in this case to show the shortcomings of learing.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Hodge in reply to Milhouse. | July 3, 2026 at 1:33 pm

    Milhouse – I am going to try to ignore all the flack and distractors zinging about here ,and give my opinion on what I -think- is your underlying question.

    Yes, it is perfectly fine for the Left to have fun with stupid things someone on the Right might do. Unlike the situation when Obama was President, and nothing he did could ever be considered funny, I think it is perfectly fine for the Left to make fun of Trump. He’s neither God nor perfect.

    Of course, their problem is that they are generally just not very good at it, and they ran out of subtle humor somewhere about 2015. Still, they’re perfectly free to try, and when they DO find something funny, I laugh.


       
       0 
       
       0
      henrybowman in reply to Hodge. | July 3, 2026 at 1:48 pm

      But he haz sMalL haNdZ!!1!


       
       0 
       
       1
      DaveGinOly in reply to Hodge. | July 3, 2026 at 4:56 pm

      They’re not good at it because they don’t understand that humor relies on at least a kernel of truth. Making a joke based on falsehoods is only funny to those who believe the falsehoods, which are legion when it comes to Trump. Every time I’ve heard a Kimmel monologue, I’ve found it unfunny for precisely this reason – every punch line a quip is based on an untruth, a lie, or a distortion of reality. Humor, especially the most acidic, is funny because it’s true.


       
       0 
       
       0
      Milhouse in reply to Hodge. | July 3, 2026 at 5:59 pm

      Yes, Dave, exactly. My question is whether there really is a kernel of truth here, which the guy is justly entitled to exploit to make fun of us, or is he cooking something up out of absolutely nothing, because these two alleged MAGA creators are completely obscure and no one in MAGA has heard of them?


 
 0 
 
 1
E Howard Hunt | July 3, 2026 at 6:44 am

Now all depends on the jury pool.


 
 0 
 
 4
Ironclaw | July 3, 2026 at 6:52 am

Unfortunately there’s no reason to believe that this guy, even if he’s guilty as sin, will receive any punishment worth mentioning. Not in DC where the jury will be full of libtards.


     
     0 
     
     1
    Hodge in reply to Ironclaw. | July 3, 2026 at 1:37 pm

    I have a friend who spent some years of his 20’s as a Policeman until life offered him a better opportunity. He taught me something that I think might be appropriate here.

    “Yeah, sometimes you know you’re not gonna get a conviction but at least you can take the guy downtown in cuffs in the back of the car, and make him think about whether what he did was a good idea.”


 
 1 
 
 2
2smartforlibs | July 3, 2026 at 9:49 am

If you hate America why are you still here? You know where the border is.


 
 0 
 
 2
isfoss | July 3, 2026 at 10:14 am

I like Jeanine Pirro. If anyone can nail this snake, she can.


 
 0 
 
 5
nordic prince | July 3, 2026 at 10:45 am

At age 67 he should be old enough to know better.

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.